Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Walker J. Donat v. United States of America, Walker J. Donat v. United States, 904 F.2d 699, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on appeals brought by Walker J. Donat regarding the denial of his motion to set bond pending immigration or remove an immigration detainer. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeals lacked merit. It denied the United States' motion to dismiss the appeal. The court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Walker J. Donat v. United States of America, Walker J. Donat v. United States, 904 F.2d 699, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The document is a court case ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on appeals brought by Walker J. Donat regarding the denial of his motion to set bond pending immigration or remove an immigration detainer. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeals lacked merit. It denied the United States' motion to dismiss the appeal. The court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-05-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 904 F.2d 699 Docket: 90-6276

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a court case ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on appeals brought by Walker J. Donat regarding the denial of his motion to set bond pending immigration or remove an immigration detainer. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeals lacked merit. It denied the United States' motion to dismiss the appeal. The court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Walker J. Donat v. United States of America, Walker J. Donat v. United States, 904 F.2d 699, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on appeals brought by Walker J. Donat regarding the denial of his motion to set bond pending immigration or remove an immigration detainer. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeals lacked merit. It denied the United States' motion to dismiss the appeal. The court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    904 F.

    2d 699
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Walker J. DONAT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
    Walker J. DONAT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
    Nos. 90-6276, 90-6771.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 7, 1990.
    Decided: May 25, 1990.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge. (C/A
    No. 90-47-A).
    Walker J. Donat, appellant pro se.
    Alison Ruth Drucker, United States Department of Justice, Washington,
    D.C., for appellee.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Walker J. Donat appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to
    set bond pending immigration or to remove the immigration detainer. Our
    review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals
    are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Donat v. United States, C/A No. 90-47-A (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 1990). We also
    deny the United States's motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like