United States v. Hayes, 4th Cir. (1998)

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6065

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KEITH GREGORY HAYES,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CR-93-12, CA-97-364-3)

Submitted:

September 10, 1998

Decided:

September 23, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Theodore Roosevelt Dues, Jr., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district courts orders denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997),
and declining to reconsider that judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Hayes, Nos. CR-93-12; CA-97-364-3 (S.D.W. Va. Nov.
3, 1997; Nov. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED

You might also like