Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    United States v. Rembert, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eddie Rembert filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of relief on his petition and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Rembert's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in its October 25 and November 27, 1996 opinions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Rembert, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Eddie Rembert filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of relief on his petition and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Rembert's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in its October 25 and November 27, 1996 opinions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-06-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6115

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Eddie Rembert filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of relief on his petition and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Rembert's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in its October 25 and November 27, 1996 opinions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Rembert, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eddie Rembert filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of relief on his petition and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Rembert's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in its October 25 and November 27, 1996 opinions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 97-6115

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EDDIE REMBERT, a/k/a Rem,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (CR-92-180, CA-94-4-5)
    Submitted:

    June 19, 1997

    Decided:

    June 30, 1997

    Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Eddie Rembert, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
    recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
    dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United
    States v. Rembert, Nos. CR-92-180, CA-94-4-5 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 25
    and Nov. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like