Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 63 views

    Gregory Leonard Fletcher v. George M. Hinkle, Warden, 107 F.3d 865, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from February 27, 1997. It involves an appeal by Gregory Leonard Fletcher of a district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit denied Fletcher a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning in Fletcher v. Hinkle, No. CA95-392 (E.D.Va. Oct. 24, 1996).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Gregory Leonard Fletcher v. George M. Hinkle, Warden, 107 F.3d 865, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    63 views2 pages
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from February 27, 1997. It involves an appeal by Gregory Leonard Fletcher of a district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit denied Fletcher a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning in Fletcher v. Hinkle, No. CA95-392 (E.D.Va. Oct. 24, 1996).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-02-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 107 F.3d 865 Docket: 96-7745

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from February 27, 1997. It involves an appeal by Gregory Leonard Fletcher of a district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit denied Fletcher a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning in Fletcher v. Hinkle, No. CA95-392 (E.D.Va. Oct. 24, 1996).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    63 views2 pages

    Gregory Leonard Fletcher v. George M. Hinkle, Warden, 107 F.3d 865, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from February 27, 1997. It involves an appeal by Gregory Leonard Fletcher of a district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit denied Fletcher a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning in Fletcher v. Hinkle, No. CA95-392 (E.D.Va. Oct. 24, 1996).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    107 F.

    3d 865

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Gregory Leonard FLETCHER, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    George M. HINKLE, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-7745.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 13, 1997.
    Decided Feb. 27, 1997.

    Gregory Leonard Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se.


    Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond,
    VA, for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition
    filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective
    Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
    the reasoning of the district court. Fletcher v. Hinkle, No. CA95-392 (E.D.Va.
    Oct. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like