United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

33 F.

3d 52

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sergeant DOUGHERTY; Custodian Hinnet; Custodian Dyke;
Gary Dixon; Lynn C. Phillips; Sergeant Lassiter; James
Taylor, Manager; Doctor Baloch; Doctor Sadat; Lieutenant
Wilkinson; Lieutenant Walker; Deputy Warden French;
Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.; Correctional Officer Libon;
Correctional Officer Williams; Correctional Officer Smith;
Correctional Officer Barbour, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6609.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided Aug. 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-93-764CRT-BR)
Cornelius Tucker, Jr., appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing portions of his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument


because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

You might also like