Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 19 views

    United States v. Boatwright, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Darris Darnell Boatwright of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Therefore, the appeals court denied Boatwright a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Boatwright, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    19 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Darris Darnell Boatwright of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Therefore, the appeals court denied Boatwright a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-05-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6132

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Darris Darnell Boatwright of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Therefore, the appeals court denied Boatwright a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    19 views2 pages

    United States v. Boatwright, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Darris Darnell Boatwright of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Therefore, the appeals court denied Boatwright a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6132

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DARRIS DARNELL BOATWRIGHT,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-92-9, CA-97-165-R)
    Submitted:

    April 29, 1998

    Decided:

    May 18, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Darris Darnell Boatwright, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge
    Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Boatwright, Nos. CR-92-9; CA-97-165-R (W.D.
    Va. Nov. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like