Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kenneth Warrix appealed three district court orders: one denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis, one denying his motion to enjoin his transfer to another prison, and one granting the government's motion to destroy evidence from his trial. The appeals court affirmed all three district court orders, finding the appeals to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court. The appeals court also denied Warrix's motion to expedite the appeals but granted his request to incorporate records from a related prior appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Kenneth Warrix appealed three district court orders: one denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis, one denying his motion to enjoin his transfer to another prison, and one granting the government's motion to destroy evidence from his trial. The appeals court affirmed all three district court orders, finding the appeals to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court. The appeals court also denied Warrix's motion to expedite the appeals but granted his request to incorporate records from a related prior appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-02-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 986 F.2d 1417 Docket: 92-7079

    Original Title

    United States v. Kenneth Warrix, United States of America v. Kenneth Warrix, United States of America v. Kenneth Warrix, 986 F.2d 1417, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Kenneth Warrix appealed three district court orders: one denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis, one denying his motion to enjoin his transfer to another prison, and one granting the government's motion to destroy evidence from his trial. The appeals court affirmed all three district court orders, finding the appeals to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court. The appeals court also denied Warrix's motion to expedite the appeals but granted his request to incorporate records from a related prior appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kenneth Warrix appealed three district court orders: one denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis, one denying his motion to enjoin his transfer to another prison, and one granting the government's motion to destroy evidence from his trial. The appeals court affirmed all three district court orders, finding the appeals to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court. The appeals court also denied Warrix's motion to expedite the appeals but granted his request to incorporate records from a related prior appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    986 F.

    2d 1417

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Kenneth WARRIX, Defendant-Appellant.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Kenneth WARRIX, Defendant-Appellant.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Kenneth WARRIX, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 92-7079, 92-7114, 92-7115.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: December 18, 1992
    Decided: February 22, 1993

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of
    West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, District Judge. (CR-88191-3)
    Kenneth Warrix, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Francis Savage, Jr., Assistant
    United States Attorney, Sanford Benjamin Bryant, Assistant United States
    Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    S.D.W.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior
    Circuit Judge.

    PER CURIAM:

    Kenneth Warrix appeals from the district court's orders that denied his petition
    for a writ of coram nobis and his motion to enjoin his transfer to another federal
    correctional institution, and granted the government's motion for the destruction
    of evidence used at Warrix's trial. Our review of the record and the district
    court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit.* Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Warrix, No. CR88-191-3 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 24, 1992; Apr. 29, 1992; May 27, 1992). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    Since Warrix's appeals have been promptly considered in the normal course of
    the appellate process, we deny his motion to expedite. Because we have
    adopted the record of United States v. Warrix, Nos. 92-6306/6533 (4th Cir. Oct.
    2, 1992) (unpublished) in consideration of these appeals, we grant Warrix's
    motion to "incorporate" that record

    You might also like