Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Willie L. Jones v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. R. Handratty, Correctional Officer, Company II John Doe, Officer, Company II, 39 F.3d 1177, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an appeals court decision from 1994 that affirms the lower district court's denial of relief to Willie L. Jones in his civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials Richard Lanham and others. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Willie L. Jones v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. R. Handratty, Correctional Officer, Company II John Doe, Officer, Company II, 39 F.3d 1177, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The document is an appeals court decision from 1994 that affirms the lower district court's denial of relief to Willie L. Jones in his civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials Richard Lanham and others. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-10-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 39 F.3d 1177 Docket: 93-7289

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is an appeals court decision from 1994 that affirms the lower district court's denial of relief to Willie L. Jones in his civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials Richard Lanham and others. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Willie L. Jones v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. R. Handratty, Correctional Officer, Company II John Doe, Officer, Company II, 39 F.3d 1177, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an appeals court decision from 1994 that affirms the lower district court's denial of relief to Willie L. Jones in his civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials Richard Lanham and others. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    39 F.

    3d 1177

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Willie L. JONES, Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    Richard A. LANHAM, Sr.; R. Handratty, Correctional Officer,
    Company II; John Doe, Officer, Company II,
    Defendants Appellees.
    No. 93-7289.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted May 17, 1994
    Decided Oct. 25, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-2863HAR)
    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    Willie L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Lanham, No. CA-93-2863-HAR (D.

    Md. Oct. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like