United States v. Gaskins, 4th Cir. (1997)
United States v. Gaskins, 4th Cir. (1997)
United States v. Gaskins, 4th Cir. (1997)
No. 96-6844
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Alexander Harvey II, Senior District
Judge. (CR-90-283-H, CA-95-3930-H)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994) (current version at 28
U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Gaskins, Nos. CR-90-283-H, CA-95-3930-H (D.
Md. Apr. 30, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL
338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We deny the motion for
oral argument and dispense with argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The
motion for bail is denied.
AFFIRMED