Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Dontay Carter v. James v. Peguese, Captain Thomas Stewart Ken Fenton, Officer H. Grant, Lieutenant, 36 F.3d 1091, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Dontay Carter filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials that was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Carter's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Carter's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Dontay Carter v. James v. Peguese, Captain Thomas Stewart Ken Fenton, Officer H. Grant, Lieutenant, 36 F.3d 1091, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Dontay Carter filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials that was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Carter's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Carter's complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-09-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 36 F.3d 1091 Docket: 94-6360

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Dontay Carter filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials that was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Carter's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Carter's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Dontay Carter v. James v. Peguese, Captain Thomas Stewart Ken Fenton, Officer H. Grant, Lieutenant, 36 F.3d 1091, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Dontay Carter filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials that was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Carter's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Carter's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    36 F.

    3d 1091

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Dontay CARTER, Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    James V. PEGUESE, Captain; Thomas Stewart; Ken Fenton,
    Officer; H. Grant, Lieutenant, Defendants Appellees.
    No. 94-6360.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
    Decided Sept. 27, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-93-1024-WN)
    Dontay Carter, appellant pro se.
    John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Audrey J.S. Carrion, Office of the
    Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
    Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that
    this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Carter v. Peguese, No. CA-93-1024-WN (D. Md. Mar. 14, 1994).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not

    aid the decisional process.


    2

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like