Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 54 views

    Ledbetter v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Bobby Ledbetter filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials and medical staff alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Ledbetter v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    54 views2 pages
    Bobby Ledbetter filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials and medical staff alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-04-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7643

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Bobby Ledbetter filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials and medical staff alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    54 views2 pages

    Ledbetter v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Bobby Ledbetter filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials and medical staff alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7643

    BOBBY E. LEDBETTER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    THEODIS
    BECK,
    Secretary
    North
    Carolina
    Department
    of
    Corrections; TERRY HARVEL, Superintendent; PAMALA LOVE, Doctor;
    SAMI HASSAN, Doctor; BRENDA YUERLTON, Nurse,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (1:06-cv-00239-NCT)

    Submitted:

    March 27, 2008

    Decided:

    April 2, 2008

    Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bobby E. Ledbetter, Appellant Pro Se.


    Lisa Yvette Harper,
    Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth P.
    McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina;
    Steven Price Weaver, BROTHERTON, FORD, YEOMAN & BERRY, PLLC,
    Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Bobby E. Ledbetter appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Ledbetter v. Beck,

    No. 1:06-cv-00239-NCT (M.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2007).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like