03 - FRM 15. Robert McDonald, Derivatives Markets, 2nd Edition (Ch. 6 Commodity Forwards and Futures)

Forwards and Futures
observed that all happy families are all alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in
its own way. An analogous idea in financial markets might be: Financial forwards are
all alike; each commodity forward, however, has some unique economic characteristic
that must be understood in order to appreciate forward pricing in that market. In this
chapter we will see how commodity forwards and futures differ from, and are similar
to, financial forwards and futures.
In our discussion of forward pricing for financial assets we relied heavily on the
fact that for financial assets, the price of the asset today is the present value of the asset
at time T, less the value of dividends to be received between now and time T. We will
explore the extent to which this relationship also is true for commodities.
6.1 INTRODUCTION TO
COMMODITY FORWARDS
Chapter 5 introduced the formula for a forward price on a financial asset:
FO. T
Soe(r-8)T
(6.1)
where So is the spot price of the asset, r is the continuously compounded interest rate,
and i.s the continuous dividend yield on the asset. The difference between the forward'
price and spot price reflects the cost and benefits of delaying payment for, and receipt of,
the asset. In Chapter 5 we treated forward and futures prices as the same; we continue
to ignore the pricing differences in this chapter.
On any given day, for many commodities there are futures contracts available that
expire in a number of different months. The set of prices for different expiration dates for
a given commodity is called the forward curve or the forward strip for that date. Table
6.1 displays futures prices with up to 6 months to maturity for several commodities.
Let's consider these prices and try to interpret them using equation (6.1). To provide a
reference interest rate, 3-month LIBOR on May 5, 2004, was 1.22%, or about 0.3% for
3 months. From May to July, the forward price of corn rose from 314.25 to 319.75. This
is a 2-month increase of 319.75/314.25 - 1 = 1.75%, an annual rate of approximately
11 %, far in excess of the 1.22% annual interest rate. In the context of the formula
for pricing financial forwards, equation (6.1), we would need to have a continuous
dividend yield, of -9.19% in order to explain this rise in the forward price over time.
169
170
COMMODITY FORWARDS AND FUTURES
EQUILIBRIUM PRICING OF COMMODITY FORWARDS
Futures prices for various commodities, May 5, 2004. Corn and

soybeans are from the CBOT and unleaded gasoline, oil, and
gold from NYMEX.
May
314.25
1034.50
June
July
319.75
39.57
393.80
1020.00
127.15
39.36
394.30
959.00
122.32
38.79
394.80
845.50
116.57
38.13
109.64
37.56
105.49
37.04
August
September
393.40
131.25
316.75
October
November
786.50
395.90
SOl/Tee: Futures data from Datastream.
In that case, we would have

FJu1y
= 319.75
How do we interpret a negative dividend yield?

Perhaps even more puzzling, given our discussion of financial futures, is the
quent drop in the corn futures price from July to September, and the behavior of soybean,
gasoline, and crude oil prices, which all decline with time to expiration. It is possible to
tell plausible stories about this behavior. Corn and soybeans are harvested over the
mer, so perhaps the expected increase in supply accounts for the reduction over time in
the futures price. In May 2004, the war in Iraq had driven crude oil prices to high levels.
guess that producers would respond by increasing supply and consumers by
We
reducing demand, resulting in lower expected oil prices in subsequent months. Gasoline
is distilled from oil, so gasoline prices might behave similarly. Finally, in contrast to the
behavior of the other commodities, gold prices rise steadily over time at a rate close to
the interest rate.
It seems that we can tell stories about the behavior offorward prices over time. But
how do we reconcile these explanations with our understanding of financial forwards, in
which forward prices depend on the interest rate and dividends, and explicit expectations
of future prices do not enter the forward price formula?
The behavior of forward prices can vary over time. Two terms often used by
commodity traders are contango and backwardation. If on a given date the forward
curve is upward-sloping-i.e., forward prices more distant in time are higher-then
we say the market is in contango. We observe this pattern with corn in Table 6.1.
171
If the forward curve is downward sloping, as with gasoline, we say the market is in
backwardation. Forward curves can have portions in backwardation and portions in
contango, as does that for crude oil.
It would take an entire book to cover commodities in depth. Our goal here is to
understand the logic of forward pricing for commodities and where it differs from the
logic of financial forward pricing. What is the forward curve telling us about the market
for the commodity?
6.2 EQUILIBRIUM PRICING OF COMMODITY

FORWARDS
As with forward prices on financial assets, commodity forward prices are the result
of a present value calculation. To understand this, it is helpful to consider synthetic
commodities.
Just as we could create a synthetic stock with a stock forward contract and a
coupon bond, we can also create a synthetic commodity by combining a forward contract
with a zero-coupon bond. Consider the following investment strategy: Enter into a long
commodity forward contract at the price Fo,T and buy a zero-coupon bond that pays Fo,T
at time T. Since the forward contract is costless, the cost of this investment strategy at
time 0 is just the cost of the bond, or
Time 0 cash flow = _e- rT Fo T
(6.2)
At time T, the strategy pays
ST - Fo,T
Forward contract payoff
FOT
= ST
Bond payoff
where ST is the time T price of the commodity. This investment strategy creates a
synthetic commodity, in that it has the same value as a unit of the commodity at time
T. Note that, from equation (6.2), the cost of the synthetic commodity is the prepaid,
price, e- rT FO,T.
Valuing a synthetic commodity is easy if we can see the forward price. Suppose,
however, that we do not know the forward price. Computing the time 0 value of a unit
of the commodity received at time T is a standard problem: You discount the expected
commodity price to determine its value today. Let EO(ST) denote the expected
price as of time 0, and let denote the appropriate discount rate for a
T cash flow
of ST. Then the present value is
(6.3)
The important point is that expressions (6.2) and (6.3) represent the same value. Both
reflect what you would pay today to receive one unit of the commodity at time T.
Equating the two expressions, we have
e -rT
= E 0 (ST ) e
(6.4)
172
this equation, we can write the forward price as

FO.T =e rT EO(ST
NONSTORABllITY: ELECTRICITY
Day-ahead price, by hour, for 1 megawatt-hour of

electricity in New York City, September 7, 2004.
(6.5)
=EO(ST
Equation (6.5) demonstrates the link between the expected commodity price,
and the forward price. As with financial forwards (see Chapter 5), the forward pnce IS a
biased estimate of the expected spot price, EO(ST), with the bias due to the risk premium
on the commodity, - r. 1
Equation 6.4 deserves emphasis: The time- T forward price discounted at the riskfree rate back to time 0 is the present value of a unit of commodity received at time T.
This calculation is useful when performing NPV calculations involving commodities for
which forward prices are available. Thus, for example, an industrial producer who buys
oil can calculate the present value of future oil costs by discounting oil forward prices at
the risk-free rate. The present value of future oil costs is not dependent upon whether or
not the producer hedges. We will see an example of this calculation later in the chapter.
.
If a commodity cannot be physically stored, the no-arbitrage pricing principles
discussed in Section 5.2 cannot be used to obtain a forward price. Without storage,
to
this
equation (6.5) determines the forward price. However, it is
formula, which requires forecasting the expected future spot pnce and estlmatmg
Moreover, even when physically possible, storage may be costly. Given the difficulties
of pricing commodity forwards, our goal will be to .interpret forward prices and to
understand the economics of different commodity markets.
In the rest of the chapter, we will further explore similarities and differences
between forward prices for commodities and financial assets. Some of the most important
differences have to do with storage: whether the commodity can be stored and, if so,
how costly it is to store. The next section provides an example of forward prices when
a commodity cannot be stored.
6.3 NONSTORABILITY: ELECTRICITY

The forward market for electricity illustrates forward pricing when storage is not possible.
Electricity is produced in different ways: from fuels such as coal and natural gas, or from
nuclear power, hydroelectric power, wind power, or solar power. Once it is produced,
electricity is transmitted over the power grid to end-users. Electricity has characteristics
I Historical commodity and futures data, necessary to estimate expected commodity returns, are rel(1980) examine quarterly futures returns from 1950 to
atively hard to obtain. Bodie and
1976. while Gorton and Rouwenhorst (2004) examine monthly futures returns from 1959 to 2004.
Both studies construct portfolios of synthetic commodities-T-bills plus commodity futures-and find
that these portfolios earn the same average return as stocks, are on average negatively correlated with
stocks, and are positively correlated with inflation. These findings imply that a portfolio of stocks
and synthetic commodities would have the same expected return and less risk than a diversified stock
portfolio alone.
173
0000
Price
Time
Price
Time
Price
$35.68
0600
$40.03
1200
$61.46
Price
1800
$57.81
$62.18
0100
$31.59
0700
$49.64
1300
$61.47
1900
0200
$29.85
0800
$53.48
1400
$61.74
2000
$60.12
0300
$28.37
0900
$57.15
1500
$62.71
2100
$54.25
0400
$28.75
1000
$59.04
1600
$62.68
2200
$52.89
0500
$33.57
1100
$61.45
1700
$60.28
2300
$45.56
Source: Bloomberg.
that distinguish it not only from financial assets, but from other commodities as well.
What is special about electricity?
First, electricity is difficult to store, hence it must be consumed when it is produced
or else it is wasted. 2 Second, at any point in time the maximum supply of electricity
is fixed. You can produce less but not more. Third, demand for electricity varies
substantially by season, by day of week, and by time of day.
To illustrate the effects of nonstorability, Table 6.2 displays I-day ahead hourly
prices for 1 megawatt-hour of electricity in New York City. The I-day ahead forward
price is $28.37 at 3 A.M., and $62.71 at 3 P.M. Since you have learned about arbitrage,
you are possibly thinking that you would like to buy electricity at the 3 A.M. price and
sell it at the 3 P.M. price. However, there is no way to do so. Because electricity cannot
be stored, its price is set by demand and supply at a point in time. There is also no way to
buy winter electricity and sell it in the summer, so there are seasonal variations as well
as intraday variations. Because of peak-load plants that operate only when prices are
high, power suppliers are able to temporarily increase the supply of electricity. However,
expectations about supply are already reflected in the forward price.
Given these characteristics of electricity, what does the electricity forward price
represent? The prices in Table 6.2 are best interpreted using equation (6.5). The large
price swings over the day primarily reflect changes in the expected spot price, which in
tum reflects changes in demand over the day.
Notice two things. First, the swings in Table 6.2 could not occur with financial
assets, which are stored. (It is so obvious that financial assets are stored that we usually
don't mention it.) As a
the 3 A.M. and 3 P.M. forward prices for a stock
2There are ways to store electricity. For example, it is possible to use excess electricity to pump water
uphill and then, at a later time, release it to generate electricity. Storage is uncommon, expensive, and
entails losses, however.
174
will be almost identical. If they were not, it would be possible to engage in arbitrage,
buying low at 3 A.M. and selling high at 3 P.M. Second, whereas the forward price for
a stock is largely redundant in the sense that it reflects information about the current
stock price, interest, and the dividend yield, the forward prices in Table 6.2 provide
not otherwise obtain, revealing information about the future price
information we
of the commodity. This illustrates the forward market providing price discovery, with
forward prices revealing information, not otherwise obtainable, about the future price of
the commodity.
6.4 PRICING COMMODITY FORWARDS

BY ARBITRAGE: AN EXAMPLE
Electricity repre,sents the extreme of nonstorability. However, many commodities are
storable. To see the effects of storage, we now consider the very simple, hypothetical
ex'ample of a forward contract for pencils. We use pencils as an example because they
are familiar and you will have no preconceptions about how such a forward should work,
because it does not exist.
Suppose that pencils cost $0.20 today and for certain will cost $0.20 in 1 year. The
economics of this assumption are simple. Pencil manufacturers produce pencils from
wood and other inputs. If the price of a pencil is greater than the cost of production, more
pencils are produced, driving down the market price. If the price falls, fewer pencils
are produced and the price rises. The market price of pencils thus reflects the cost of
production. An economist would say that the supply of pencils is pelfectly elastic.
There is nothing inherently inconsistent about assuming that the pencil price is
expected to stay the same. However, before we proceed, note that a constant price
would not be a reasonable assumption about the price of a nondividend-paying stock.
A nondividend-paying stock must be expected to appreciate, or else no one would own
it. At the outset, there is an obvious difference between this commodity and a financial
PRICING COMMODITY FORWARDS BY ARBITRAGE: AN EXAMPLE
Now suppose that the continuously compounded interest rate is 10%. What is the
forward price for a pencil to be delivered in 1 year? Before reading any further, you
should stop and decide what you think the answer is. (Really. Please stop and think
about it!)
One obvious possible answer to this question, drawing on our discussion of financial forwards, is that the forward price should be the future value of the pencil price:
eO. 1 x $0.20 = $0.2210. However, common
suggests that this cannot be the correct answer. You hlOW that the pencil price in one year will be $0.20. If you entered
into a forward agreement to buy a pencil for $0.221, you would feel foolish in a year
when the price was only $0.20.
Common sense also rules out the forward price being less than -$0.20. Consider
the forward seller. No one would agree to sell a pencil for a forward price of less than
$0.20, knowing that the price will be $0.20.
Thus, it seems as if both the buyer and seller perspective lead us to the conclusion
that the forward price must be $0.20.
An Apparent Arbitrage and Resolution

If the forward price is $0.20, is there an arbitrage opportunity? Suppose you believe that
the $0.20 forward price is too low. Following the logic in Chapter 5, you would want
to buy the pencil forward and short-sell a pencil. Table 6.3 depicts the cash flows in
this reverse cash-and-carry arbitrage. The result seems to show that there is an arbitracre
opportunity.
'
We seem to have reached an impasse. Common sense suggests a forward price of
$0.20, but the application in Table 6.3 of our formulas suggests that any forward price
less than $0.221 leads to an arbitrage opportunity, where we would make $0.221 - Fo,1
per pencil.
asset.
One way to describe this difference between the pencil and the stock is to say that,
in equilibrium, stocks and other financial assets must be held by investors, or stored. This
is why the stock price appreciates on average; appreciation is necessary for investors to
willingly store the stock.
The pencil, by contrast, need not be stored. The equilibrium condition for pencils
requires that price equals marginal production cost. This distinction between a storage
3
and production equilibrium is a central concept in our discussion of commrnodities.
Apparent reverse cash-and-carry arbitrage for a pencil.

These calculations appear to demonstrate that there is
an arbitrage opportunity if the pencil forward price is
below $0.221. However, there is a logical error in the
table.
Long forward @ $0.20

3you may be thinking that you have pencils in your desk and therefore you do, in fact, store pencils.
However, you are storing them to save yourself the inconvenience of going to the store each time you
need a new one, not because you expect pencils to be a good financial investment akin to stock. When
storing pencils for convenience, you will store only a few at a time. Thus, for the moment, suppose
that no one stores pencils. We return to the concept of storing for convenience in Section 6.6.
175
Short-sell pencil
+$0.20
Lend short-sale proceeds @ 10%
-$0.20
Total
$0.20 -
FO,I
-$0.20
$0.221
$0.221 -
FO,I
176
Once again it is time to stop and think before proceeding. Examine Table 6.3
closely; there is a problem.
The arbitrage assumes that you can short-sell a pencil by borrowing it today and
returning it in a year. However, recall that pencils cost $0.20 today and will cost $0.20
in a year. Borrowing one pencil and returning one pencil in a year is an interest-free
loan of $0.20. No one will lend you the pencil without charging you an additionalfee.
If you are to short-sell, there must be someone who is both holding the asset and
willing to give up physical possession for the period of the short-sale. Unlike stock,
nobody holds pencils in a brokerage account. It is straightforward to borrow a financial
asset and return it later, in the interim paying dividends to the owner. However, if you
borrow an unused pencil and return an unused pencil at some later date, the owner of
the pencil loses interest for the duration of the pencil loan since the pencil price does not
change.
Thus, the apparent arbitrage in the above table has nothing at all to do with
forward contracts on pencils. If you find someone willing to lend you pencils for a year,
you should borrow as many as you can and invest the proceeds in T-bills. You will earn
the interest rate and pay nothing to borrow the money.
You might object that pencils do provide a flow of services-namely, making
marks on paper. However, this service flow requires having physical possession of the
pencil and it also uses up the pencil. A stock loaned to a short-seller continues to earn its
return; the pencil loaned to the short-seller earns no retum for the lender. Consequently,
the pencil borrower must make a payment to the lender to compensate the lender for lost
time value of money.
Pencils Have a Positive Lease Rate

How do we correct the arbitrage analysis in Table 6.3? We have to recognize that the
lender of the pencil has invested $0.20 in the pencil. In order to be kept financially
whole, the lender of a pencil will require us to pay interest. The pencil therefore has a
lease rate of 10%, since that is the interest rate. With this change, the corrected reverse
cash-and-carry arbitrage is in Table 6.4.
When we correctly account for the lease payment, this transaction no longer earns
profits when the forward price is $0.20 or greater. If we turn the arbitrage around, buying
the pencil and shorting the forward, the cash-and-carry arbitrage is depicted in Table 6.5.
These calculations show that any forward price greater than $0.221 generates arbitrage
profits.
Using no-arbitrage arguments, we have ruled out arbitrage for forward prices less
than $0.20 (go long the forward and short-sell the pencil) and greater than $0.221 (go
short the forward and long the pencil). However, what if the forward price is between
$0.20 and $0.22l?
If there is an active lending market for pencils, we can narrow the no-arbitrage
price even further: We can demonstrate that the forward price must be $0.20. The lease
rate of a pencil is 10%. Therefore a pencil lender can earn 10% by buying the pencil and
lending it. The lease payment for a short seller is a dividend for the lender. Imagine that
PRICING COMMODITY FORWARDS BY ARBITRAGE: AN EXAMPLE
177
Reverse cash-and-carry arbitrage for a pencil. This table

demonstrates that there is an arbitrage opportunity if
the pencil forward price is below $0.20. It differs from
Table 6.3 in properly accounting for lease payments.
Long forward @ $.20
$0.20
Short-sell pencil @ lease rate of 10%
+$0.20
Lend short-sale proceeds @ 10%
-$0.20
$0.221
$0.20
Total
FO,1
Fa, I
Cash-and-carry arbitrage for a pencil, showing that

there is an arbitrage opportunity if the forward pencil
price exceeds $0.221.
Short forward @ $.20
FO,1
$0.20
Buy pencil @ $.20
-$0.20
+$0.20
Borrow @ 10%
+$0.20
-$0.221
Total
FO,1
$0.221
the forward price is $0.21. We would buy a pencil and sell it forward, and simultaneously
lend the pencil. To see that this strategy is profitable, examine Table 6.6.
Income from lending the pencil provides the missing piece: Any forward price
greater than $0.20 now results in arbitrage profits. Since we also have seen that any
forward price less than $0.20 results in arbitrage profits, we have pinned down the
forward price as $0.20.
Finally, what about equation (6.5), which we claimed holds for all commodities
and assets? To apply this equation to the pencil, recognize that the appropriate discount
rate, for a risk-free pencil is r, the risk-free rate. Hence, we have
FO,T
= EO(ST )e(r-a)T = 0.20 x
Thus, equation (6.5) gives us the correct answer.
e(O,lO-O.lO)
= 0.20
178
THE COMMODITY LEASE RATE
179
Then from equation (6.6), the NPV of the commodity loan, without payments, is
Cash and carry arbitrage with pencil lending. When the
pencil is loaned, interest is earned and the no-arbitrage
price is $0.20.
Short forward @ $0.20

Buy pencil @ $0.20
-$0.20
Lend pencil @ 10%
Borrow @ 10%
FO,1
Total
Soe(g-a)T
So
(6.7)
$0.20
+$0.20
(6.8)
-$0.221
FO,1
If g <
the commodity loan has a negative NPY. However, suppose the lender demands
that the borrower return e(a-g)T units of the commodity for each unit borrowed. If one
unit is loaned, e(a-g)T units will be returned. This is like a continuous proportional
rate is the difference between the
lease payment of - g to the lender. Thus, the
commodity discount rate and the expected growth rate of the commodity price, or
0.021
+$0.20
NPV
$0.20
The pencil is obviously a special example, but this discussion establishes the important point that in order to understand arbitrage relationships for commodity forwards,
we have to think about the cost of borrowing and income from lending an asset. Borrowing and leasing costs also determine the pricing of financial forwards, but the cash
flow associated with borrowing and lending financial assets is the dividend yield, which
is readily observable. The commodity analogue to dividend income is lease income,
which may not be directly observable. We now discuss leasing more generally.
6.5 THE COMMODITY LEASE RATE

The discussion of pencil forwards raises the issue of a lease market. How would such a
lease market work in general?
The Lease Market for a Commodity

Consider again the perspective of a commodity lender, who in the previous discussion
required that we pay interest to borrow the pencil. More generally, here is how a lender
will think about a commodity loan: "If I lend the commodity, I am giving up possession
of a unit worth So. At time T, I will receive a unit worth ST. I am effectively making an
investment of So in order to receive the random amount ST."
How would you analyze this investment? Suppose that is the expected return on
a stock that has the same risk as the commodity; is therefore the appropriate discount
rate for the cash flow ST. The NPV of the investment is
(6.6)
NPV = EO(ST )e-aT - So
Suppose that we expect the commodity price to increase at the rate g, so that
gT
EO(ST) = Soe
With this payment, the NPV of a commodity loan is

NPV = Soe(a-g)T e(g-a)T
So = 0
(6.9)
Now the commodity loan is a fair deal for the lender. The commodity lender must be
compensated by the borrower for the opportunity cost associated with lending. When
the future pencil price was certain to be $0.20, the opportunity cost was the risk-free
interest rate, 10%.
Note that if ST were the price of a nondividend-paying stock, its expected rate
of appreciation would equal its expected return, so g =
and no payment would be
for the stock loan to be a fair dea1. 4 Commodities, however, are produced; as
with the pencil, their expected price appreciation need not equal
Forward Prices and the Lease Rate

Suppose we have a commodity where there is an active lease market, with the lease rate
given by equation (6.8). What is the forward price?
The key insight, as in the pencil example, is that the lease payment is a dividend.
If we borrow the asset, we have to pay the lease rate to the lender, just as with a dividendpaying stock. If we buy the asset and lend it out, we receive the lease payment. Thus,
for the forward price with a lease market is
the
Fo,T = Soe(r-8 r)T
(6.10)
Tables 6.7 and 6.8 verify that this formula is the no-arbitrage price by performing the
cash-and-carry and reverse cash-and-carry arbitrages. In both tables we tail the position
in order to offset the lease income.
The striking thing about Tables 6.7 and 6.8 is that on the surface they are exactly
like Tables 5.6 and 5.7, which depict arbitrage transactions for a dividend-paying stock.
In an important sense, however, the two sets of tables are quite different. With the stock,
is an observable characteristic of the stock, reflecting payment
the dividend yield,
received by the owner of the stock whether or not the stock is loaned.
4As we saw in Chapter 5, for a nondividend-paying stock, the present value of the future stock price is
the current stock price.
180
CARRY MARKETS
In some markets, consistent and reliable quotes for the spot price are not available,
or are not comparable to forward prices. In such cases, the near-term forward price can
be used as a proxy for the spot price, S.
By definition, contango-an upward-sloping forward curve-occurs when the
lease rate is less than the risk-free rate. Backwardation-a downward-sloping forward
curve-occurs when the lease rate exceeds the risk-free rate.
Cash-and-carry arbitrage with a commodity for which the lease

rate is
The implied no-arbitrage restriction is Fa,T Sae(r-li/lT.
Fo,T - ST
Short forward @ Fo,T

Buy
commodity units and lend @
-Soe- a/T
Borrow @ r
+Soe- a/T
6.6
+ST
Reverse cash-and-carry arbitrage with a commodity for which

the lease rate is
The implied no-arbitrage restriction is
a,T >
_
5a e(r-li/lT.
Long forward @ Fo,T

.
Short
commodity units with lease rate
Lend @ r
o
+Soe-a/T
-Soe-a/T
Storage Costs and Forward Prices
ST - Fo,T
-ST
+Soe(r-a/lT
Total
With pencils, by contrast, the lease rate, = - g, is income earned only if the
pencil is loaned. In fact,. notice in Tables 6.7 and 6.8 that the
never stores
the commodity! Thus, equation (6.10) holds whether or not the commodIty can be, or
is, stored.
One of the implications of Tables 6.7 and 6.8 is that the lease
has to be
consistent with the forward price. Thus, when we observe the forward pnce, we can
infer what the lease rate would have to be if a lease market existed. Specifically, if the
forward price is Fo,T, the annualized lease rate is
1
= r - y:ln(Fo,T/S)
(6.11)
If instead we use an effective annual interest rate, r, the effective annual lease rate is
_
(1+r)
-1
(FO,T/S)ljT
The denominator in this expression annualizes the forward premium.
MARKETS
Sometimes it makes sense for a commodity to be stored, at least temporarily. Storage is
market.
also called carry, and a commodity that is stored is said to be in a
One reason for storage is seasonal variation in either supply or demand, which
causes a mismatch between the time at which a commodity is produced and the time at
which it is consumed. With some agricultural products, for example, supply is seasonal
(there is a harvest season) but demand is constant over the year. In this case, storage
permits consumption to occur throughout the year.
With natural gas, by contrast, there is high demand in the winter and low demand
the summer, but relatively constant production over the year. This pattern of use and
production suggests that there will be times when natural gas is stored.
Total
181
(6.12)
Storage is not always feasible (for example, fresh strawberries are perishable) and when
technically feasible, storage is almost always costly. When storage is feasible, how
do storage costs affect forward pricing? Put yourself in the position of a commodity
merchant who owns one unit of the commodity and ask whether you would be willing
to store this unit until time T. You face the choice of selling it today, receiving So, or
selling it at time T. If you elect to sell at time T, you can sell forward (to guarantee the
price you will receive), and you will receive FO,T. This is a cash-and-carry.
The cash-and-carry logic with storage costs suggests that you will store only if the
present value ofselling at time T is at least as great as that ofselling today. Denote the
T).
future value of storage costs for one unit of the commodity from time 0 to T as
Indifference between selling today and at time T requires
= e- rT JFo,T Revenue from selling today
Net revenue from selling at time T
This relationship in tum implies that if storage is to occur, the forward price is at least
Fo,T
Soe rT +
T)
(6.13)
In the special case where storage costs are paid continuously and are proportional to the
value of the commodity, storage cost is like a continuous negative dividend of and we
can write the forward price as
Fo,T =
(6.14)
182
CARRY MARKETS
When there are no storage costs

= 0), equations (6.13) and (6.14) reduce to our
familiar forward pricing formula from Chapter 5.
When there are storage costs, the forward price is higher. Why? The selling price
must compensate the commodity merchant for both the financial cost of storage (interest)
and the physical cost of storage. With storage costs, the forward curve can rise faster
than the interest rate. We can view storage costs as a negative dividend in that, instead
of receiving cash flow for holding the asset, you have to pay to hold the asset.
Example 6.1
Suppose that the November price of corn is $2.50/bushel, the effective

interest rate is 1%, and storage costs per bushel are $0.05/month. Assuming that
corn is stored from November to February, the February forward price must compensate
owners for interest and storage. The future value of storage costs is
$0.05
+ ($0.05
x 1.01)
+ ($0.05
= ($0.05/.01) x
= $0.1515
[(l + 0.01)3 -
1]
Thus, the February forward price will be

2.50 x (1.01)3
+ 0.1515 =
corn, you can sell the excess. However, if you hold too little and run out of corn, you
must stop producing, idling workers and machines. Your physical inventory of corn in
this case has value-it provides insurance that you can keep producing in case there is
a disruption in the supply of corn.
In this situation, corn holdings provide an extra nonmonetary return that is sometimes referred to as the convenience yield.S You will be willing to store corn with a lower
rate of return than if you did not earn the convenience yield. What are the implications
of the convenience yield for the forward price?
Suppose that someone approached you to borrow a commodity from which you
derived a convenience yield. You would think as follows: "If I lend the commodity, I
am bearing interest cost, saving storage cost, and losing the value I
from having
a physical inventory. I was willing to bear the interest cost already; thus, I will pay a
commodity borrower storage cost less the convenience yield."
Suppose the continuously compounded convenience yield is c, proportional to the
value of the commodity. The commodity lender saves - c by not physically storing the
compensating the lender
commodity; hence, the commodity borrower pays = c for convenience yield less storage cost. Using an argument identical to that in Table 6.8,
conclude that the forward price must be no less than
2.7273
Problem 6.9 asks you to verify that this is a no-arbitrage price.

Keep in mind that just
a commodity can be stored does not mean that it
should (or will) be stored. Pencils were not stored because storage was not economically
necessary: A constant new supply of pencils was available to meet pencil demand. Thus,
equation (6.13) describes the forward price when storage occurs. Whether and when a
commodity is stored are peculiar to each commodity.
Storage Costs and the Lease Rate
Fo,T
Soe(r-8)T
This is the restriction imposed by a reverse cash-and-carry, in which the arbitrageur

borrows the commodity and goes long the forward.
Now consider what happens if you perform a cash-and-carry, buying the commodity and selling it forward. If you are an average investor, you will not earn the convenience yield (it is earned only by those with a business reason to hold the commodity).
You could try to lend the commodity, reasoning that the borrower could be a commercial
user to whom you would pay storage cost less the convenience yield. But those who earn
the convenience yield likely already hold the optimal amount of the commodity. There
may be no wayfor you to eam the convenience yield when pelforming a cash-and-carry.
Those
do not earn the convenience yield will not own the commodity.
Thus,for all average investor, the cash-and-carry has the cash flows 6
Suppose that there is a carry market for a commodity, so that its forward price is given
by equation (6.13). What is the lease rate in this case?
Again put yourself in the shoes of the commodity lender. If you lend the commodity, you are saved from having to pay storage cost. Thus, the lease rate should equal the
negative of the storage cost. In other words, the lender will pay the borrower! In effect,
the commodity borrower is providing "virtual storage" for the commodity lender, who
receives back the commodity at a point in the future. The lender making a payment to
the borrower generates a negative dividend.
This expression implies that the forward price must be below

no cash-and-carry arbitrage.
The Convenience Yield
5The term convenience yield is defined differently by different authors. Convenience yield generally
means a return to physical ownership of the commodity. In practice it is sometimes used to mean the
lease rate. In this book, the lease rate of a commodity can be inferred from the forward price using
equation (6.1 I).
The discussion of commodities to this point has ignored business reasons for holding
commodities. For example, suppose you are a food manufacturer for whom corn is an
essential input. You will hold an inventory of corn. If you end up holding too much
183
Fo,T -
ST
+ ST
Fo,T
6In this expression, we assume we tail the holding of the commodity by buying
and selling off units of the commodity over time to pay storage costs.
if there is to be
e)T
units at time 0,
184
In summary, from the perspective of an arbitrageur, the price range within which
there is no arbitrage is
Soe(r+/.-clT
FO.T
(6.15)
The convenience yield produces a no-arbitrage region rather than a no-arbitrage price.
The observed lease rate will depend upon both storage costs and convenience. Also,
as in Section 5.3, bid-ask spreads and trading costs will further expand the no-arbitrage
region in equation (6.15).
As another illustration of convenience yield, consider again the pencil example
Section 6.4. In reality, everyone stores a few pencils in order to be sure to have one
available. You can think of this benefit from storage as the convenience yield of a pencil.
However, because the supply of pencils is perfectly elastic, the price of pencils is fixed
at $0.20. Convenience yield in this case does not affect the forward price, but it does
explain the decision to store pencils.
The difficulty with the convenience yield in practice is that convenience is hard to
observe. The concept of the convenience yield serves two purposes. First, it explains
patterns in storage-for example, why a commercial user might store a commodity
when the average investor will not. Second, it provides an additional parameter to better
explain the forward curve. You might object that we can invoke the convenience yield to
explain any forward curve, and therefore the concept of the convenience yield is vacuous.
While convenience yield can be tautological, it is a meaningful economic concept and
it would be just as arbitrary to assume that there is never convenience. Moreover, the
upper bound in equation (6.15) depends on storage costs but not the convenience yield.
Thus, the convenience yield only explains anomalously low forward prices, and only
when there is storage.
We will now examine particular commodities to illustrate the concepts from the
previous sections.
6.7 GOLD
FUTURES
Gold is durable, relatively inexpensive to store (compared to its value), widely held,
and actively produced through gold mining. Because of transportation costs and purity
concerns, gold often trades in certificate form, as a claim to physical gold at a specific
location. There are exchange-traded gold futures, specifications for which are in Figure
6.1. 7
Figure 6.2 is a newspaper listing for the NYMEX gold futures contract. Figure 6.3
graphs the futures prices for all available gold futures contracts-the forward curvefor the first Wednesday in June, from 2001 to 2004. (Newspaper listings for most
futures contracts do not show the full set of available expiration dates, so Figure 6.3
Specifications for the

NYMEX gold futures
contract.
is usually denominated in troy ounces (480 grains), which are approximately 9.7% heavier than
the more familiar avoirdupois ounce (437.5 grains). Twelve troy ounces make I troy pound, which
weighs approximately 0.37 kg.
Refined gold bearing approved refiner stamp

New York Mercantile Exchange
100 troy ounces
Feb, Apr, Aug, Oct, out two years. Jun, Dec,
out 5 years
Third-to-Iast business day of maturity month
Any business day of the delivery month
Underlying
Where traded
Size
Months
Trading ends
Delivery
HIGH
Listing for the NYMEX

gold futures contract
from the Wall Street
journal, July 21, 2004.
July
AU9
o,t
AU9
406.00
40850
4lLOO
420.00
Est vol 5Z,000;
The forward curve for

gold on four dates,
from NYMEX gold
futures prices.
CHG
LIFETIME
HIGH
OPEN
INT
40L90 -3JO
399.70 402.10 -3.70
40L20 403.40 -3.70
402.00
-3.70
405.00 406.40 -3.70
4lLOO 4lL80 -3.70
420.00 415.90 -3.70
31,225; open int 262,052.
40010 38050
433.00 324.70
432.00 332.00
290.00
435.00 33L50
379.00
298.40
4
139,287
U310
62,036
LOW SETTLE
GoId CCMX)100
407.10
408.00
409.90
40350
4lLOO
2,290
6,387
06-jun-2001
05-jun-2002
04-]un-2003
02-]un-2004
460
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
300
280
260
7 Gold
185
GOLD FUTURES
__
10
__
20
30
40
Months to Maturity
50
60
Source: Futures data from Datastream.
186
GOLD FUTURES
is constructed using more expiration dates than are in Figure 6.2.) What is interesting
about the gold forward curve is how relatively uninteresting it is, with the forward price
steadily increasing with time to maturity.
From our previous discussion, the forward price implies a lease rate. Short-sales
and loans of gold are common in the gold market, and gold borrowers in fact have to pay
the lease rate. On the lending side, large gold holders (including some central banks) put
gold on deposit with brokers, in order that it may be loaned to short-sellers. The gold
lenders earn the lease rate.
The lease rate for gold, silver, and other commodities is computed in practice using
equation (6.12) and is reported routinely by financial reporting services. Table 6.9 shows
the 6-month and I-year lease rates for the four gold forward curves depicted in Figure
6.3, computed using equation (6.12);
Example 6.2 Here are the details of computing the 6-month lease rate for June
6, 2001. Gold futures prices are in Table 6.9. The June and September
futures prices on this date were 96.09 and 96.13. Thus, 3-month LIBOR from June
to September was (100 - 96.09)/400 x 91/90 = 0.988%, and from September to
December was (100 - 94.56)/400 x 91/90 = 0.978%. The June to December interest
rate was therefore (1.00988) x (1.00978) - 1 = 1.9763%, or 1.0197362 annualized.
Using equation (6.12), the annualized 6-month lease rate is therefore
1.0197632
)
6-month lease rate = ( (269/265.7)(1/0.5) - 1 = 1.456%
Six-month and 12-month gold lease rates for four

dates, computed using equation (6.12). Interest rates
are computed from Eurodollar futures prices.
187
Gold Investments
If you wish to hold gold as part of an investment portfolio, you can do so by holding
physical gold or synthetic gold-i.e., holding T-bills and going long gold futures. Which
should you do? If you hold physical gold without lending it, and if the lease rate is
positive, you forgo the lease rate. You also bear storage costs. With synthetic gold,
on the other hand, you have a counterparty who may fail to pay so there is credit risk.
Ignoring credit risk, however, synthetic gold is generally the preferable way to obtain
gold price exposure.
Table 6.9 shows that the 6-month annualized gold lease rate is 1.46% in June
2001. Thus, by
physical gold instead of synthetic gold, an investor would lose
this 1.46% return. In June 2003 and 2004, however, the lease rate was about -0.10%. If
storage costs are about 0.10%, an investor would be indifferent between holding physical
and synthetic gold. The futures market on those dates was compensating investors for
storing physical gold.
Some nonfinancial holders of gold will obtain a convenience yield from gold.
Consider an electronics manufacturer who uses gold in producing components. Suppose
that running out of gold would halt production. It would be natural in this case to hold
a buffer stock of gold in order to avoid a stock-out of gold, i.e., running out of gold.
For this manufacturer, there is a return to holding gold-namely, a lower probability of
stocking out and halting production. Stocking out would have a real financial cost, and
the manufacturer is willing to pay a price-the lease rate-to avoid that cost.
Evaluation of Gold Production

Suppose we have an operating gold mine and we wish to compute the present value
of future production. As discussed in Section 6.2, the present value of the commodity
received in the future is simply the present value-eomputed at the risk-free rate-of
the forward price. We can use the forward curve for gold to compute the value of an
operating gold mine.
Suppose that at times t;, i = 1, ... ,11, we expect to extract
ounces of gold
by paying an extraction cost x(t;). We have a set of 11 forward prices, Fo I.' If the
value of
continuously compounded annual risk-free rate from time 0 to t; is reO, t;),
the gold mine is
II
PV gold production
[Fo,li -
x(t;)] e-r(O,li)li
(6.16)
;=1
June 6, 2001
265.7
269.0
271.7
1.46%
1.90%
June 5, 2002
321.2
323.9
326.9
0.44%
0.88%
June 4,2003
362.6
364.9
366.4
-0.14%
0.09%
June 2,2004
391.6
395.2
400.2
-0.10%
0.07%
This equation assumes that the gold mine is certain to operate the entire time and that
the quantity of production is known. Only price is uncertain. (We will see in Chapter 17
8The cost of I ounce of physical gold is So. However, from equation (6.10), the cost of I ounce of gold
bought as a prepaid forward is Soe- oIT Synthetic gold is proportionally cheaper by the lease rate,
188
Gold forward and prepaid forward prices on 1 day for

gold delivered at 1-year intervals, out to 6 years. The
continuously compounded interest rate is 6% and the
lease rate is assumed to be a constant 1.5%.
Expiration Year
For,va.rdPrice ($)
Prepaid Forward Price ($)
1
2
313.81
295.53
328.25
291.13
3
4
5
6
343.36
286.80
359.17
282.53
375.70
278.32
392.99
274.18
how the possibility of mine closings due to low prices affects valuation.) Note that in
equation (6.16), by computing the present value of the forward price, we compute the
prepaid forward price.
Example 6.3 Suppose we hav.e a mining project that will produce 1 ounce of gold
every year for 6 years. The cost of this project is $1,100 today, the marginal cost per
ounce at the time of extraction is $100, and the continuously compounded interest rate
is 6%.
We observe the gold forward prices in the second column of Table 6.10, with
implied prepaid forward prices in the third column. Using equation (6.16), we can use
these prices to perform the necessary present value calculations.
[Fo,i - 100] e-O.06xi
HIGH
Listing for the CBOT

corn futures contract
from the Wall Street
Journal, July 21, 2004.
$1100 = $119.56
(6.17)
i=l
LIFETIME
LOW SETTLE CHG HIGH
Corn (CBD-5,000 hu.;

bu.
Sept 236.50 23750 232.75 234.00
244.75 246.00 240.75 242.00
Mr05
254.00 24B.75 250.25
May 25B.OO 259.75
256.00
July 262.00
260.00
Sept 262.75 263.00 260.00'
262.75 260.00 260.50
Est vol 74,710; vol Man 71,B92; open Int
-3.00
-3.00
-2.50
-3.00
-2.50
-2.75
-2.75
34100 1.29.75
341.50 232.50
342.00 239.00
243.50
342.00 246.50
299.00 260.00
288.50 235.00
+1,4BB.
162,000
307,442
52,447
16,60B
13,717
10,707
As discussed in Section 6.6, storage is an economic decision in which there is a

trade-off between selling today and selling tomorrow. If we can sell corn today for $2/bu
and in 2 months for $2.25/bu, the storage decision entails comparing the price we can get
today with the present value of the price we can get in 2 months. In addition to interest,
we need to include storage costs in our analysis.
An equilibrium with some current selling and some storage requires that corn
prices be expected to rise at the interest rate plus storage costs, which implies that there
will be an upward trend in the price between harvests. While corn is being stored, the
forward price should behave as in equation (6.14), rising at interest plus storage costs.
Once the harvest begins, storage is no longer necessary; if supply and demand
remain constant from year to year, the harvest price will be the same every year. The
corn price will fall to that level at harvest, only to begin rising again after the harvest.
The market conditions we have described are graphed in Figure 6.5, which depicts
a hypothetical forward curve as seen from time O. Between harvests, the forward price
Forward Price ($/bu)

A hypothetical
Net present
189
SEASONALITY: THE CORN FORWARD MARKET
curve for corn,

assuming the harvest
occurs at years 0, 1, 2,
etc.
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
6.8 SEASONALITY: THE CORN

FORWARD MARKET
Corn in the United States is harvested primarily in the fall, from September through
November. The United States is a leading corn producer, generally exporting rather than
importing corn. Figure 6.4 shows a newspaper listing for corn futures.
Given seasonality in production, what should the forward curve for corn look like?
Corn is produced at one time of the year, but consumed throughout the year. In order to
be consumed when it is not being produced, corn must be stored. Thus, to understand
the forward curve for corn we need to recall our discussion of storage and carry markets.
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
__
0.5
1.0
__
__
1.5
Year
2.0
2.5
3.0
190
of com rises to reward storage, and it falls at each harvest. Let's see how this graph was
constructed.
The com price is $2.50 initially, the continuously compounded interest rate is 6%,
and storage cost is 1.5%/month. The forward price after n months (where n < 12) is
F
01l
= $2.50 x
e(O.005 +O.015)x1I
Thus, the 12-month forward price is $2.50eo.o6+o.ls = $3.18. After 1 year, the process
starts over.
Farmers will plant in anticipation of receiving the harvest price, which means that
it is the harvest price that reflects the cost of producing com. The price during the rest of
the year equals the harvest price plus storage. In general we would expect those storing
corn to plan to deplete inventory as harvest approaches and to replenish inventory from
the new harvest.
This is a simplified version of reality. Perhaps most important, the supply of com
varies from year to year. When there is a large crop, producers will expect corn to be
'stored not just over the current year, but into the next year as well. If there is a large
harvest, therefore, we might see the forward curve rise continuously until year 2. To
better understand the possible behavior of com, let's look at real com prices.
Table 6.11 shows the June forward curves for com over a lO-year period. Some
clear patterns are evident. First, notice that from December to March to May (columns
3-5), the futures price rises every year. We would expect there to be storage of com
during this period, with the futures price compensating for storage. A low current price
suggests a large supply. Thus, when the near-July price is low, we might also expect
storage across the coming harvest. Particularly in the years with the lowest July prices
(1999-2002), there is a pronounced rise in price from July to December. When the
price is unusually high (1996 and 2004), there is a drop in price from July to December.
Behavior is mixed in the other years. 9 We can also examine the July-December price
relationship in the following year. In 6 of the 10 years, the distant-December price
(column 8) is below the distant July price (column 6). The exceptions occur in years
with relatively low current prices (1998-2001). These patterns are generally consistent
with storage of corn between harvests, and storage across harvests only occasionally.
Finally, compare prices for the near-July contract (the first column) with those for
the distant-December contract (the last column). Near-term prices are quite variable,
ranging from 216.75 to 435.00 cents per bushel. In December of the following year,
however, prices range only from 239 to 286.50. In fact, in 7 of the 10 years, the price
is between 251 and 268. The lower variability of distant prices is not surprising: It is
difficult to forecast a harvest more than a year into the future. Thus, the forward price is
reflecting the market's expectation of a normal harvest 1 year hence.
If we assume that storage costs are approximately $0.03/month/bushel, the forward
price in Table 6.11 never violates the no-arbitrage condition
FO,T+s
< FO,Te
rs
which says that the forward price from T to T

storage costs.
Futures prices for corn (from the Chicago Board of Trade) for
the first Wednesday in June, 1995-2004. The last column is the
18-month forward price. Prices are in cents per bushel.
265.50
272.25
277.75
282.75
285.25
286.00
269.50
253.50
05-Jun-1996
435.00
373.25
340.75
346.75
350.50
348.00
298.00
286.50
04-Jun-1997
271.25
256.50
254.75
261.00
265.50
269.00
257.00
255.00
245.75
253.75
259.00
264.00
261.00
268.00
244.50
248.25
248.00
251.50
07-Jun-1995
03-Jun-1998
238.00
242.25
191
NATURAL GAS
02-Jun-1999
216.75
222.00
230.75
07-Jun-2000
219.75
228.50
234.50
239.25
242.50
248.50
254.50
259.00
06-Jun-2001
198.50
206.00
217.25
228.25
234.50
241.75
245.00
251.25
05-Jun-2002
210.25
217.25
226.75
234.50
237.25
240.75
235.00
239.00
04-Jun-2003
237.50
236.25
237.75
244.00
248.00
250.00
242.25
242.50
02-Jun-2004
321.75
319.75
319.25
322.50
325.50 324.50
296.50
279.00
+ s)
(6.18)
+ s cannot rise faster than interest plus
6.9 NATURAL GAS

Natural gas is another market in which seasonality and storage costs are important. The
natural gas futures contract, introduced in 1990, has become one of the most heavily
traded futures contracts in the United States. The asset underlying one contract is 1
month;s worth of gas, delivered at a specific location (different gas contracts call for
delivery at different locations). Figure 6.6 shows a newspaper listing for natural gas
futures, and Figure 6.7 details the specifications for the Henry Hub contract.
Natural gas has several interesting characteristics. First, gas is costly to transport
once a given well
internationally, so prices and forward curves vary regionally.
has begun production, gas is costly to store. Third, demand for gas in the United States is
highly seasonal, with peak demand arising from heating in winter months. Thus, there is
a relatively steady stream of production with variable demand, which leads to large and
predictable price swings. Whereas com has seasonal production and relatively constant
demand, gas has relatively constant supply and seasonal demand.
9It is possible to have low current storage and a large expected harvest, which would cause the December
price to be lower than the July price, or high current storage and a poor expected harvest, which would
cause the July price to be below the December price.
192
NATURAL GAS
OPEN

natural gas futures
contract from the Wall
Street Journal, july 21,
2004.
HIGH
LOW SETILE CHG
Naturai Gas
AU9
Sept
Oct
Nov
5.815
5.865
5.910
6.560
Feb
6.705
Mar
June
July
Aug
Oct
Nov
JI06
Ap07
Oct
5.980
5.890
5.900
5.960
5.990
6.150
6350
5.520
5.109
5.111
5.090
5.960
5.990
6360
6.660
6.835
6.800
6.650
6.010
5.900
5.910
5.960
5.960
5.990
6.160
6350
5.520
UFETIME
HIGH
OPEN
INT
$
5.837
5.797
5.835
5.898
5.8n
6.584
6.730
6.705
6.560
5.870
5.890
5.935
5.950
5.990
6.150
6350
6.722
6.592
5.987
5.890
5.927
5.937
5.952
6302
5.189
5.109
5.109
5.111
5.Ill
5.090
5.090
vol
61.746;
.019
.Oll
.015
.016
.016
.016
.017
.018
.Oll
.017
.017
.017
.008
.008
6.780
6.800
6.940
7.110
7.230
6.970
6.200
6.020
6.030
6.070
6.080
6.080
6.240
6.400
5.520
5.ll0
5.111
5.090
int 380,824. +3,187.
5.039
3.110
3.100
3.100
3170
3.520
3.400
3.500
3.530
3.560
3.230
3.790
3.960
3.580
4.711
4.000
4.891
60,098
40,028
15,510
17,636
1l,388
Forward curves for

natural gas for the first
Wednesday in june
from 2001 to 2004.
Prices are dollars per
MMBtu, from NYMEX.
06-Jun-2001
05-Jun-2002
04-Jun-2003
===
7.5
,\
7
6.5
02-Jun-2004
....
'\
8,340
5.5
8,036
6,627
6,nO
3,074
3,187
767
376
I
i
Underlying
Where traded
Size
Months
Trading ends
Delivery
Natural gas delivered at Sabine Pipe Lines

CO.'s Henry Hub, Louisiana
10,000 million British thermal units (MMBtu)
72 consecutive months
Third-to-last business day of month prior to
maturity month
As uniformly as possible over the delivery
month
Figure 6.8 displays 3-year (2001) and 6-year (2002-2004) strips of gas futures
prices for the first Wednesday in June from 1997 to 2000. Seasonality is evident, with
high winter prices and low summer prices. The 2003 and 2004 strip shows seasonal
cycles combined with a downward trend in prices, suggesting that the market considered
prices in that year as anomalously high. For the other years, the average price for each
coming year is about the same.
Gas storage is costly and demand for gas is highest in the winter. The steady rise
of the forward curve during the fall months suggests that storage occurs just before the
heaviest demand. Table 6.12 shows prices for October through December. The monthly
increase in gas prices over these months ranges from $0.13 to $0.23. Assuming that the
interest rate is about 0.15% per month and that you use equation (6.13), storage cost in
November 2004, would satisfy
6.947 = 6.75geo.OOI5
'..
4.5
I
\
!.
.....
......:
1\
4
3.5
10

NYMEX Henry Hub
natural gas contract.
193
20
30 40 50 60 70
Months to Maturity
80
june natural gas futures prices for October, November,

and December in the same year, for 2001 to 2004.
06-Jun-2001
2.173
2.305
2.435
05-Jun-2002
3.352
3.617
3.850
04-Jun-2003
6.428
6.528
6.658
02-Jun-2004
6.581
6.759
6.947
implying an estimated storage cost of = $0.178 in November 2004. You will find
different imputed marginal storage costs in each year, but this is to be expected if marginal
storage costs vary with the quantity stored.
Because of the expense in transporting gas internationally, the seasonal behavior
of the forward curve can vary in different parts of the world. In tropical areas where gas
is used for cooking and electricity generation, the forward curve is relatively flat'because
demand is relatively flat. In the Southern hemisphere, where seasons are reversed from
the Northern hemisphere, the forward curve will peak in June and July rather than
December and January.
194
Recent developments in energy markets could alter the behavior of the natural gas
forward curve in the United States. Power producers have made greater use of gas-fired
peak-load electricity plants. These plants have increased summer demand for natural
gas and may permanently alter seasonality.
6.10 OIL
Both oil and natural gas produce energy and are extracted from wells, but the different
physical characteristics and uses of oil lead to a very different forward curve than that
for gas. Oil is easier to transport than gas. Transportation of oil takes time, but oil has
a global market. Oil is also easier to store than gas. Thus, seasonals in the price of
crude oil are relatively unimportant. Specifications for the NYMEX light oil contract
are shown in Figure 6.9. Figure 6.10 shows a newspaper listing for oil futures. The
NYMEX forward curve on four dates is plotted in Figure 6.11.
Seven-year strip of
NYMEX crude oil
futures prices, $/barrel,
for four different dates.
06 lun 2001
05-]un-2002
..... 04-]un-2003
02-]un-2004
===
40
\
38
36
34
-- --
32
22
20
Underlying
NYMEX light, sweet
crude oil contract.
Where traded
Size
Months
Trading ends
Delivery

crude oil futures
contract from the Wall
Street Journal, July 21,
2004.
Specific domestic crudes delivered at Cushing, Oklahoma

1000 U.S. barrels (42,000 gallons)
30 consecutive months plus long-dated futures out 7 years
Third-to-Iast business day preceding the 25th
calendar day of month prior to maturity month
As uniformly as possible over the delivery
month
OPEN HIGH lOW SETTLE CHG

Crude Oii, Light
UFETlCvlE
OPEN
HIGH
INT
bbls.; per bbl.
AU9
4230
4L90
Oct
flov
Ja05
Feb
Apr
June
Sept
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
oelO
vol
41.63
4L41
40.B5
4038
39.85
3889
38.05
36.65
36.00
195
COMMODITY SPREADS
4230
4L05
40.45
40.10
39.50
39.05
38.20
37.45
36.65
36.05
34.15
32.75
32.75
3L75
3L20
3L20
30.85
30.95
204,514, vol
40.51
4031
39.80
3952
39.00
39.20
3865
38.20
37.85
36.60
36.65
35.90
34.15
32.75
3L70
40.B6 -0.78
- LOO
39.88 -LOO
39.45 -0.93
39.04 -0.B9
38.55 -0.86
-0.83
37.74
3737 -0.78
36.68 -0.73
35.96
35.44 -0.61
3358 -058
32.19 -0.55
-0.55
30.48
30.63 30.18 -055
24B,39B;
Int
40.70
4030
39.50
39.15
38.65
38.50
3755
36.85
36.30
20.84
20.82
B.75
24.75
16.35
B.85
B.05
B6,034
68,764
35,763
60,672
B,149
13,656
10,589
22.40
24.00
17.00
19.10
19.50
19.75
32.75
32.00
3L20
3LOO 27.15
-1,567.
8,357
47,774
34,365
10,916
15,928
..
=
....=.=.=
.====...
__
10
20
30
40
50
60
Months to Maturity
70
80
On the four dates in the figure, near-term oil prices range from $25 to $40, while'
the 7-year forward price in each case is between $22 and $30. The long-run forward
price is less volatile than the short-run forward price, which makes economic sense. In
the short run, an increase in demand will cause a price increase since supply is fixed. A
supply shock (such as production restrictions by the Organization ofPetroleum Exporting
Countries [OPEC]) will cause the price to increase. In the long run, however, both supply
and demand have time to adjust to price changes with the result that price movements
are
The forward curve suggests that market participants in June 2004 did not
expect the price to remain at $40lbarrel.
6.11 COMMODITY SPREADS

Some commodities are inputs in the creation of other commodities,
gives rise to
commodity spreads. Soybeans, for example, can be crushed to produce soybean meal
and soybean oil (and a small amount of waste). A trader with a position in soybeans
and an opposite position in equivalent quantities of soybean meal and soybean oil has a
crush spread and is said to be "trading the crush."
Similarly, crude oil is refined to make petroleum products, in particular heating
oil and gasoline. The refining process entails distillation, which separates crude oil into
different components, including gasoline, kerosene, and heating oil. The split of oil into
these different components can be complemented by a process known as "cracking";
196
HEDGING STRATEGIES
hence, the difference in price between crude oil and equivalent amounts of heating oil
and gasoline is called the crack spread.
Oil can be processed in different ways, producing different mixes of outputs. The
spread terminology identifies the number of gallons of oil as input, and the number of
gallons of gasoline and heating oil as outputs. Traders will speak of "5-3-2," "3-2-1,"
and "2-1-1" crack spreads. The 5-3-2 spread, for example, reflects the profit from taking
5 gallons of oil as input, and producing 3 gallons of gasoline and 2 gallons of heating oil.
A petroleum refiner producing gasoline and heating oil could use a futures crack spread
to lock in both the cost of oil and output prices. This strategy would entail going long
oil futures and short the appropriate quantities of gasoline and heating oil futures. Of
course there are other inputs to production and it is possible to produce other outputs,
such as jet fuel, so the crack spread is not a perfect hedge.
Example 6.4 Suppose we consider buying oil in July and selling gasoline and heating oil in August. On June 2, 2004, the July futures price for oil was $39.96/barrel,
or $0.95l4/gallon (there are 42 gallons per barrel). The August futures prices for unleaded gasoline and heating oil were $1.2427/gallon and $1.0171/gallon. The 3-2-1
crack spread tells us the gross margin we can lock in by buying 3 gallons of oil and
producing 2 gallons of gasoline and 1 of heating oil. Using these prices, the spread is
(2 x $1.2427)
+ $1.0171 -
(3 x $0.9514) = $0.6482
or $0.6482/3 = $0.2161/gallon. In this calculation we made no interest adjustment for

the different expiration months of the futures contract.
There are crack spread options trading on NYMEX. Two of these options pay
based on the difference between the price of heating oil and crude oil, and the price of
gasoline and heating oil, both in a 1: 1 ratio.
6.12 HEDGING STRATEGIES

In this section we discuss some of the complications that can arise when using commodity
futures and forwards to hedge commodity price exposure. In Section 3.3 we discussed
one such complication: the problem of quantity uncertainty, where, for example, a
farmer growing com does not know the ultimate yield at the time of planting. Other
issues can arise. Since commodities are heterogeneous and often costly to transport
and store, it is common to hedge a risk with a commodity contract that is imperfectly
correlated with the risk being hedged. This gives rise to basis risk: The price of the
commodity underlying the futures contract may move differently than the price of the
commodity you are hedging. For example, because of transportation cost and time,
the price of natural gas in California may differ from that in Louisiana, which is the
197
location underlying the principal natural gas futures contract (see again Figure 6.7). In
some cases, one commodity may be used to hedge another. As an example of this we
discuss the use of crude oil to hedge jet fuel. Finally, weather derivatives provide another
example of an instrument that can be used to cross-hedge. We discuss degree-day index
contracts as an example of such derivatives.
Basis Risk
Exchange-traded commodity futures contracts call for delivery of the underlying commodity at specific locations and specific dates. The actual commodity to be bought or
sold may reside at a different location and the desired delivery date may
match that of
the futures contract. Additionally, the grade of the deliverable under the futures contract
may not match the grade that is being delivered.
This general problem of the futures or forward contract not representing exactly
what is being hedged is called basis risk. Basis risk is a generic problem with commodities because of storage and transportation costs and quality differences. Basis risk
can also arise with financial futures, as for example when a company hedges its own
borrowing cost with the Eurodollar contract.
Section 5.5 demonstrated how an individual stock could be hedged with an index
futures contract. We saw that if we regressed the individual stock return on the index
return, the resulting regression coefficient provided a hedge ratio that minimized the
variance of the hedged position.
In the same way, suppose we wish to hedge oil delivered on the East Coast with
the NYMEX oil contract, which calls for delivery of oil in Cushing, Oklahoma. The
variance-minimizing hedge ratio would be the regression coefficient obtained by regressing the East Coast price on the Cushing price. Problems with this regression are
that the relationship may not be stable over time or may be estimated imprecisely.
Another example of basis risk occurs when hedgers decide to hedge distant obligations with near-term futures. For example, an oil producer might have an obligation
to deliv.er 100,000 barrels per month at a fixed price for a year. The natural way to hedge '
this obligation would be to buy 100,000 barrels per month, locking in the price and
supply on a month-by-month basis. This is called a strip hedge. We engage in a strip
hedge when we hedge a stream of obligations by offsetting each individual obligation
with a futures contract matching the maturity and quantity of the obligation. For the
oil producer obligated to deliver every month at a fixed price, the hedge would entail
buying the appropriate quantity each month, in effect taking a long position in the strip.
An alternative to a strip hedge is a stack hedge. With a stack hedge, we enter into
futures contracts with a single maturity, with the number of contracts selected so that
changes in the pres.ent vallie of the future obligations are offset by changes in the value
of this "stack" of futures contracts. In the context of the oil producer with a monthly
delivery obligation, a stack hedge would entail going long 1.2 million barrels using the
near-term contract. (Actually, we would want to tail the position and short less than
1.2 million barrels, but we will ignore this.) When the near-term contract matures, we
198
HEDGING STRATEGIES
199
Hedging Jet Fuel with Crude Oil

a U.S. subsidiary of the German
industrial firm Metallgesellschaft A. (MG)
had offered customers fixed prices on over
150 million barrels of petroleum products,
including gasoline, heating oil, and diesel
fuel, over periods as long as 10 years. To
hedge the resulting short exposure, MG
entered into futures and swaps.
Much of MG's hedging was done using
short-dated NYMEX crude oil and heating
futures. Thus, MG was using stack hedging,
rolling over the hedge each month.
much of 1993, the near-term oil
market was in contango (the forward curve
was upward sloping). As a result of the market
.remaining in contango, MG systematically
lost money when rolling its hedges and had to
meet substantial margin calls. In December
1993, the supervisory board ofMG decided to
liquidate both its supply contracts and
futures positions used to hedge
those contracts. In the end, MG sustained

losses estimated at between $200 million and
$1.3 billion.
The MG case was extremely complicated
and has been the subject of pointed exchanges
among academics-see in particular Culp and
Miller (1995), Edwards and Canter (1995),
and Mello and Parsons (1995). While the case
is complicated, several issues stand out. First,
was the stack-and-roll a reasonable strategy
for MG to have undertaken? Second, should
the position have been liquidated when it was
and in the manner it was liquidated (as it
turned out, oil prices increased-which would
have worked in MG's favor-following the
liquidation). Third, did MG encounter
liquidity problems from having to finance
losses on its hedging strategy? While the MG
case has receded into history, hedgers still
confront the issues raised by this case.
Jet fuel futures do not exist in the United States, but firms sometimes hedge jet fuel
with crude oil futures along with futures for related petroleum products. 1O In order to
perform this hedge, it is necessary to understand the relationship between crude oil and
jet fuel prices. If we own a quantity ofjet fuel and hedge by holding H crude oil futures
contracts, our mark-to-market profit depends on the change in the jet fuel price and the
change in the futures price:
(6.19)
where PI is the price of jet fuel and FI the crude oil futures price. We
estimate H
by regressing the change in the jet fuel price (denominated in cents per gallon) on the
change in the crude futures price (denominated in dollar per barrel). Doing so using
daily data for January 2000-June 2004 gives (standard errors are in parentheses)
PI -
PI_I
= 0.009
+ 2.037(F
I
(0.069)
(0.094)
FI _ I )
R2
= 0.287
(6.20)
The futures price used in this regression is the price of the current near-term contract.
The coefficient on the futures price change tells us that, on average, when the crude
futures price increases by $1, a gallon of jet fuel increases by $0.02. Suppose that as
part of a particular crack spread, 1 gallon of crude oil is used to produce I gallon of jet
fuel. Then, other things equal, since there are 42 gallons in a barrel, a $1 increase in the
price of a barrel of oil will generate a $1I42 = $0.0238 increase in the price of jet fuel.
This is approximately the regression coefficient. II
The R 2 in equation (6.19) is 0.287, which implies a correlation coefficient of about
0.50. The hedge would therefore have considerable residual risk.
Weather Derivatives
reestablish the stack hedge by going long contracts in the new near month. This process
of stacking futures contracts in the near-term contract and rolling over into the new
near-term contract is called a stack and roll. If the new near-term futures price is below
the expiring near-term price (i.e., there is backwardation), rolling is profitable.
Why would anyone use a stack hedge? There are at least two reasons. First, there is
often more trading volume and liquidity in near-term contracts. With many commodities,
bid-ask spreads widen with maturity. Thus, a stack hedge may have lower transaction
costs than a strip hedge. Second, the manager may wish to speculate on the shape of
the forward curve. You might decide that the forward curve looks unusually steep in the
early months. If you undertake a stack hedge and the forward curve then flattens, you
will have locked in all your oil at the relatively cheap near-term price, and implicitly
made gains from not having locked in the relatively high strip prices. However, if the
curve becomes steeper, it is possible to lose.
The box above recounts the story of MetallgesellschaftA. (MG), in which MG's
large losses on a hedged position might have been caused, atleast in part, by the use of
a stock hedge.
Weather derivatives provide another illustration of cross-hedging. Weather as a business

risk
be difficult to hedge. For example, weather can affect both the prices of energy
products and the amount of energy consumed. If a winter is colder than average, homeowners and businesses will consume extra electricity, heating oil, and natural gas, and the
prices of these products will tend to be high as well. Conversely, during a warm winter,
energy prices and quantities will be low. While it is possible to use futures markets to
hedge prices of commodities such as natural gas, hedging the quantity is more difficult.
IOFor example, Southwest Airlines reportedly used a combination of crude oil and heating oil futures
to hedge jet fuel. See Melanie Trottman, "Southwest Airline's Big Fuel-Hedging Call Is Paying Off,"
Wall Street JOlll71al, January 16,2004, p. B4.
11 Recall that in Section 5.5 we estimated a hedge ratio for stocks using a regression based on percentage
changes. In that case, we had an economic reason (an asset pricing model) to believe that there was
a stable relationship based upon rates of return. With crude and jet fuel, crude is used to produce jet
fuel, so it makes sense that dollar changes in the price of crude would be related to dollar changes in
the price of jet fuel.
200
PROBLEMS
There are many other examples of weather risk: ski resorts are harmed by warm
winters, soft drink manufacturers are harmed by a cold spring, summer, or fall, and
makers of lawn sprinklers are harmed by wet summers. In all of these cases, firms could
hedge their risk using weather derivatives-contracts that make payments based upon
realized characteristics of weather-to cross-hedge their specific risk.
The payoffs for weather derivatives are based on weather-related measurements.
An example of a weather contract is the degree-day index futures contract traded at the
Chicago Mercantile Exchange. A heating degree-day is the maximum of zero and the
difference between the average daily temperature and 65 degrees Fahrenheit. A cooling
is the maximum of the difference between the average daily temperature and
65 degrees Fahrenheit, and zero. Sixty-five degrees is a moderate temperature. At higher
temperatures, air conditioners may be used, while at lower temperatures, heating may be
used. A monthly degree-day index is constructed by adding the daily degree-days over
the month. The futures contract then settles based on the cumulative heating or cooling
degree-days (the two are separate contracts) over the course of a month. The size of the
contract is $100 times the degree-day index. As of September 2004, degree-day index
contracts were available for over 20 cities in the United States, Europe, and Japan. There
are also puts and calls on these futures.
With city-specific degree-day index contracts, it is possible to create and hedge
payoffs based on average temperatures, or using options, based on ranges of average
temperatures. If Minneapolis is unusually cold but the rest of the country is normal,
the cooling degree-day contract for Minneapolis will make a large payment that will
compensate the holder for the increased consumption of energy. Notice that in this
scenario a natural gas price contract (for example) would not provide a sufficient hedge,
since unusual cold in Minneapolis alone would not have much effect on national energy
prices.
CHAPTER SUMMARY
At a general level, commodity forward prices can be described by the same formula as
financial forward prices:
FO.T
(6.21)
For financial assets, is the dividend yield. For commodities, is the commodity lease
rate-the return that makes an investor willing to buy and then lend a commodity. Thus,
for the commodity owner who lends the commodity, it is like a dividend. From the
commodity borrower's perspective, it is the cost of borrowing the commodity. As with
financial forwards, commodity forward prices are biased predictors of the future spot
price when the commodity return contains a risk premium.
While the dividend yield for a financial asset can typically be observed directly,
the lease rate for a commodity can typically be estimated only by obseJ11ing the forward
price. The forward curve provides important information
the commodity.
Commodities are complex because every commodity market differs in the details.
Forward curves for different commodities reflect different properties of storability, stor-
201
age costs, production, and demand. Electricity, gold, corn, natural gas, and oil all have
distinct forward curves, reflecting the different characteristics of their physical markets.
These idiosyncracies will be reflected in the commodity lease rate. When there are
seasonalities in either the demand or supply of a commodity, the commodity will be
stored (assuming this is physically feasible), and the forward curve for the commodity
will reflect storage costs. Some holders of a commodity receive benefits from physical
ownership. This benefit is called the commodity's
yield. The convenience
yield creates different returns to ownership for different investors, and mayor may not
be reflected in the forward price. The convenience yield can lead to no-arbitrage regions
rather than a no-arbitrage price. It can also be costly to short-sell commodities with a
significant convenience yield.
FURTHER READING
We will see in later chapters that the concept of a lease rate-which is a generalization
of a dividend yield-helps to unify the pricing of swaps (Chapter 8), options (Chapter
10), and commodity-linked notes (Chapter 15). One particularly interesting application
of the lease rate arises in the discussion of real options in Chapter 17. We will see
there that if an extractable commodity (such as oil or gold) has a zero lease rate, it will
never be extracted. Thus, the lease rate is linked in an important way with production
decisions.
A useful resource for learning more about commodities is the Chicago Board of
Trade (1998). The Web sites of the various exchanges (e.g., NYMEX and the CBOT)
are also useful resources, with information about particular commodities and trading and
hedging strategies.
Siegel and Siegel (1990) provide a detailed discussion of many commodity futures. There are numerous papers on commodities. Bodie and Rosansky (1980) and
Gorton and Rouwenhorst (2004) examine the risk and return of commodities as an inBrennan (1991), Pindyck (1993b), and Pindyck (1994) examine the behavior'
of commodity prices. Schwartz (1997) compares the performance of different models
of commodity price behavior. Jarrow and Oldfield (1981) discuss the effect of storage
costs on pricing, and Routledge et al. (2000) present a theoretical model of commodity
forward curves.
Finally, Metallgesellschaft engendered a spirited debate. Papers written about that
episode include Culp and Miller (1995), Edwards and Canter (1995), and Mello and
Parsons (1995).
PROBLEMS
6.1. The spot price of a widget is $70.00 per unit. Forward prices for 3,6,9, and 12
months are $70.70, $71.41, $72.13, and $72.86. Assuming a 5% continuously
compounded annual risk-free rate, what are the annualized lease rates for each
maturity? Is this an example of contango or backwardation?
202
PROBLEMS
6.2. The current price of oil is $32.00 per barrel. Forward prices for 3, 6, 9, and 12
months are $31.37, $30.75, $30.14, and $29.54. Assuming a 2% continuously
compounded annual risk-free rate, what is the annualized lease rate for each maturity? Is this an example of contango or backwardation?
6.3. Given a continuously compounded risk-free rate of 3% annually, at what lease
rate will forward prices equal the current commodity price? (Recall the pencil
example in Section 6.4.) If the lease rate were 3.5%, would there be contango or
backwardation?
6.4. Suppose that pencils cost $0.20 today and the continuously compounded lease
rate for pencils is 5%. The continuously compounded interest rate is 10%. The
pencil price in 1 year is uncertain and pencils can be stored costlessly.
a. If you short-sell a pencil for 1 year, what payment do you have to make
to the pencil lender? Would it make sense for a financial investor to store
pencils in equilibrium?
b. Show that the equilibrium forward price is $0.2103.
c. Explain what ranges of forward prices are ruled out by arbitrage in the
four cases where pencils can and cannot be short-sold and can and cannot
be loaned.
6.5. Suppose the gold spot price is $300/oz., the I-year forward price is 310.686, and
the continuously compounded-risk-free rate is 5%.
a. What is the lease rate?
b. What is the return on a cash-and-carry in which gold is not loaned?
c. What is the return on a cash-and-carry in which gold is loaned, earning

the lease rate?
For the next three problems, assume that the continuously compounded interest rate is
6% and the storage cost of widgets is $0.03 quarterly (payable at the end of the quarter).
for widgets:
Here is the forward price
2004
Dec
3.000
6.6.
Mar
3.075
Jun
3.152
2005
Sep
2.750
2006
Dec
2.822
Mar
2.894
Jun
2.968
a. What are some possible explanations for the shape of this forward curve?
b. What annualized rate of return do you earn on a cash-and-carry entered

into in December 2004 and closed in March 2005? Is your answer sen-
sible?
c. What annualized rate of return do you earn on a cash-and-carry entered
into in December 2004 and closed in September 2005? Is your answer
sensible?
6.7.
203
a. Suppose that you want to borrow a widget beginning in December 2004

and ending in March 2005. What payment will be required to make the
transaction fair to both parties?
b. Suppose that you want to borrow a widget beginning in December 2004
and ending in September 2005. What payment will be required to make
the transaction fair to both parties?
6.8.
a. Suppose the March 2005 forward price were $3.10. Describe two different transactions you could use to undertake arbitrage.
b. Suppose the September 2005 forward price fell to $2.70 and subsequent
forward prices fell in such a way that there is no arbitrage from September
2005 and going forward. Is there an arbitrage you could undertake using
forward contracts from June 2005 and earlier? Why or why not?
6.9. Consider Example 6.1. Suppose the February forward price had been $2.80. What
would the arbitrage be? Suppose it had been $2.65. What would the arbitrage be?
In each case, specify the transactions and resulting cash flows in both November
and February. What are you assuming about the convenience yield?
6.10. Using Table 6.10, what is your best guess about the current price of gold per
ounce?
6.11. Suppose you know nothing about widgets. You are going to approach a widget
merchant to borrow one in order to short-sell it. (That is, you will take physical
possession of the widget, sell it, and return a widget at time T.) Before you ring
the doorbell, you want to make a judgment about what you think is a reasonable
lease rate for the widget. Think about the following possible scenarios.
a. Suppose that widgets do not deteriorate over time, are costless to store,
and are always produced, although production quantity can be varied.
Demand is constant over time. Knowing nothing else, what lease rate
might you face?
b. Suppose everything is the same as in (a) except that demand for widgets
varies seasonally.
c. Suppose everything is the same as in (a) except that demand for widgets
varies seasonally and the rate of production cannot be adjusted. Consider
how seasonality and the horizon of your short-sale interact with the lease
rate.
d. Suppose everything is the same as in (a) except that demand is constant
over time and production is seasonal. Consider how production seasonality and the horizon of your short-sale interact with the lease rate.
e. Suppose that widgets cannot be stored. How does this affect your answers
to the previous questions?

03 - FRM 15. Robert McDonald, Derivatives Markets, 2nd Edition (Ch. 6 Commodity Forwards and Futures)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

03 - FRM 15. Robert McDonald, Derivatives Markets, 2nd Edition (Ch. 6 Commodity Forwards and Futures)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

03 - FRM 15. Robert McDonald, Derivatives Markets, 2nd Edition (Ch. 6 Commodity Forwards and Futures)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Forwards and Futures

COMMODITY FORWARDS AND FUTURES

EQUILIBRIUM PRICING OF COMMODITY FORWARDS

Futures prices for various commodities, May 5, 2004. Corn and

SOl/Tee: Futures data from Datastream.

In that case, we would have

How do we interpret a negative dividend yield?

6.2 EQUILIBRIUM PRICING OF COMMODITY

At time T, the strategy pays

COMMODITY FORWARDS AND FUTURES

this equation, we can write the forward price as

Day-ahead price, by hour, for 1 megawatt-hour of

6.3 NONSTORABILITY: ELECTRICITY

COMMODITY FORWARDS AND FUTURES

6.4 PRICING COMMODITY FORWARDS

PRICING COMMODITY FORWARDS BY ARBITRAGE: AN EXAMPLE

An Apparent Arbitrage and Resolution

Apparent reverse cash-and-carry arbitrage for a pencil.

Long forward @ $0.20

Lend short-sale proceeds @ 10%

COMMODITY FORWARDS AND FUTURES

Pencils Have a Positive Lease Rate

PRICING COMMODITY FORWARDS BY ARBITRAGE: AN EXAMPLE

Reverse cash-and-carry arbitrage for a pencil. This table

Long forward @ $.20

Short-sell pencil @ lease rate of 10%

Lend short-sale proceeds @ 10%

Cash-and-carry arbitrage for a pencil, showing that

Short forward @ $.20

Buy pencil @ $.20

= EO(ST )e(r-a)T = 0.20 x

Thus, equation (6.5) gives us the correct answer.

THE COMMODITY LEASE RATE

COMMODITY FORWARDS AND FUTURES

Short forward @ $0.20

Lend pencil @ 10%

6.5 THE COMMODITY LEASE RATE

The Lease Market for a Commodity

With this payment, the NPV of a commodity loan is

Forward Prices and the Lease Rate

Fo,T = Soe(r-8 r)T

COMMODITY FORWARDS AND FUTURES

Cash-and-carry arbitrage with a commodity for which the lease

Short forward @ Fo,T

Reverse cash-and-carry arbitrage with a commodity for which

Long forward @ Fo,T

Storage Costs and Forward Prices

The denominator in this expression annualizes the forward premium.

Net revenue from selling at time T

COMMODITY FORWARDS AND FUTURES

When there are no storage costs

Suppose that the November price of corn is $2.50/bushel, the effective

Thus, the February forward price will be

Problem 6.9 asks you to verify that this is a no-arbitrage price.

Storage Costs and the Lease Rate

This is the restriction imposed by a reverse cash-and-carry, in which the arbitrageur

This expression implies that the forward price must be below

The Convenience Yield

Specifications for the