Decay Detection Manual
Decay Detection Manual
Decay Detection Manual
P. Blank
Copyright 2006
Disc 1
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Copyright 2006
No part of the content of this manual is to be used
without permission of the author.
This manual is based on research and experience on
decay detection.
This manual must be applied on the basics of the users
own judgement and knowledge.
The author disclaims any liability from damage which
might arise from the application of the information in this
manual, especially injury to persons, damage to property
& pecuniary damage.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Foreword
Decay in trees is one of the most common causes of tree failure and not that much had
been written about it in Australia.
Peter Blank has compiled more than six years of research on decay detection into an
easy to understand manual called Basic Decay Detection Manual for Trees & Timber
Structures. Arguably it is the most comprehensive manual written on this subject,
particularly for Australian conditions. There are some 460 pages that include many color
photos and easy to understand graphics that show and explain where and why a tree can
fail due to decay .Topics range from the use of the Resistograph (mechanical decay
detection) to basic hazard assessment, tree mechanics and basic pruning to prevent
future failures. This very well explained and easy to understand manual is a handy tool
for the Consulting Arborist. It is also a good reference for the local government, for their
staff and when employing contractors.
This manual is fully key word searchable. It is also a great tool of reference when
writing tree reports.
The manual also contains an assessment section with multiple choice questions for
certification. The certification will ensure that a high standard is achieved and
maintained for Resistograph operators and Consulting Arborists around Australia and
World Wide.
Please Note: Some of the content in this manual might appear to be repetitious,
Index
Click on Headings
PART 1.
The IML Resistograph
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
General Information
How to operate the Resistograph
Interpreting graphs
Applications
Trouble shooting
Other IML Products
AUSTRALIA
ABN: 37071465832
P.O. Box 82
Northlands QLD 4350
Ph: 0418 709 846
[email protected]
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Sound
Decay
Sound
F-Tools
F-Tools Pro includes: Cavity Detection, Growth Ring Analysing,
Average Curve & Export/Import Software.
The IML Electronic Unit Software is Microsoft Windows
compatible.
Please refer to the IML Electronic Unit User Manual.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
The object data box on the top left side of the Resistograph
report contains all the necessary information.
Resistograph Kit
Shut cover
Spindle / Gearing
There are 0.5 mm, 0.75mm, 1.35mm, 1.5mm &
2.5mm Spindles
Most Resistograph's that work with Hardwood
would be fitted with a 0.75 Spindle
However for extreme Hardwood testing use a
0.5 as with that setting the needle travels slower
but has more torque
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Soft/Hardwood Setting
on the same spot (hollow log)
Note the Amplitude is higher on Softwood setting
Hardwood Setting
Softwood Setting
(c) 2006
Sensitivity
settings
Setting Wheel
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Bolt caught
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Setting on 1 or 2
Battery Life
Dependant on size of battery
Dependant on distance drilled
Dependant on temperature
8 to 12 x 500 mm drills out of a
2.4ah battery
Ensure that there is always a spare
battery on hand as the power is
lost without much warning !
Standard charge time is approx. 60
minutes
Operating Tips
Always ensure that the Resistograph is NOT driven
in full speed right back to the end
When reversing out of an object, gently pull needle
all the way out
When out of the object, hold the needle between
fingers while reversing back into Resistograph
When reversing out of extreme hard wood, free the
drill bit by a half a second slower speed before
going full speed out
Listen to the sound of the drill, when the drill hits a
cavity the sound pitch is noticeably different
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Grub screw
needle
Grub screw
needle
weak
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Drill Bits
(c) 2006
IML
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Drill Speed
It is recommended to conduct most measurements
with the drill speed setting 2 (fast)
However for extra torque on extreme hard wood
the operator can find it easier on drill speed 1 (slow)
It is advisable to stick to one setting as the change
of drill speeds will give a slightly different graph
Also for detecting Growth Rings it pays to try both
speeds for the clearest graph
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Relative Measurement
The Resistograph will provide us with a
Relative measurement. It measures the
resistance in all types of timber.
A tree of the same species can have a different
reading in different localities. It depends on soil,
rainfall and position of the tree.
However it is possible to build up a manual or
database for a specific area.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Reference Drill
Always conduct a Reference
Drill on the most likely place
where sound wood is
suspected.
This is usually in the tension
side or in ridges on the trunk.
A reference measurement
should give a reading of
comparative sound wood.
Ref. Drill
Decay
(c) 2006
Free Downloads
Go to:
www.wooddecaydetectionmanual.com
www.imlaustralia.com
for all downloads of manuals, research and
movie clips.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Before Drilling
(c) 2006
Resistograph testing
Try to watch the graph as you drill.
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Resistograph in Operation
Note the operator is watching the graph while testing.
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Graph Examples
(c) 2006
Sound
Decay
Sound
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Sound
Decay
Copyright Peter Sound/Wall
Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Sound
Decay
Sound
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
If the species & age of the poles are the same or simular, a threshold can
be created and the cavity detection parameter (in software) set accordingly
i.e. everything below 50% amplitude is not sound and over 50% is sound.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Needle Exit
Decay
(c) 2006
Decay
Sound
Sound
Cracks
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Sound
Decay/Hollow
Sound/Cracks
(c) 2006
Graph Examples in
Trees
Graph Example
Drill Direction
Reaction Zone
Sapwood
IML
Included Bark
itude [%]
10
12
14
16
Bohrtiefe [cm]
Drill Direction
18
20
22
SOUND
HEARTWOOD
DECAY
(c) 2006
Sound Amplitude
Reference Drill
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Reference Drill
Sound Amplitude
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Heartwood
Sapwood
(c) 2006
Inner Bark
Cambium
Sapwood
Heartwood
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
IML
Heartwood
Bark
Sapwood
(c) 2006
Sapwood
Sound
Decay
Sound
Decay
Sound
(c) 2006
DECAY
SOUND
HEARTWOOD
SOUND
SAPWOOD
(c) 2006
Bark
Some trees i.e. Poplar, Iron Bark,
Pine etc. have sometimes up to 5 cm
of bark. The operator has to take this
fact into consideration when
interpreting the measurement.
The graph can show a low resistance
and false decay .
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Sound
Decay/Soft
Sound/ very hard
Sound
Needle entry
- Bark
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Sound
Bark
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Heartwood
Sapwood
(c) 2006
Heartwood
Bark
Decay/Crack
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Decay
Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Sound Heartwood
Crack
Sound Sapwood
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Drill
(c) 2006
Sound Heartwood
Decay
Sound Sapwood
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Heartwood
Sapwood
(c) 2006
Sapwood
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Crack
Sound Heartwood
Sound Sapwood
Bark
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Sound
(c) 2006
Appears to be Sound
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Bark from 0 20 mm
Sapwood from 20 140 mm
Heartwood from 140 mm
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
HEARTWOOD
SAPWOOD
(c) 2006
Clear Readings
Please Note: Only by drilling in a 90 degree
angle the Sapwood, Heartwood & Growth
Rings are clearly visible. However it is still
species dependant.
Sound
Sound
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Decay/Hollow
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Decay
Sound Sapwood
(Holding Wood)
(c) 2006
Start of Decay
(c) 2006
Sound
Decay
(c) 2006
Sound
Sound
Decay
Needle Entry
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Soft Decay
Sound
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Test
This narrow Leaf Iron Bark Tree locked perfectly healthy except for the small wound & little swelling
The graph shows that The tree has only some 7 cm wall thickness on the western side of the trunk.
Sound
with cracks
Decay
Possible Termites
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
SOUND
DECAY
BARK
(c) 2006
Decay
Sound
Bark
Sapwood Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Decay from 0 36 cm !
The small bit of sound wood at 12 cm (Arrow)
is insignificant as it is free floating and not
attached to a wall.
See chapter on free floating wood .
(c) 2006
Soft Tissue
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Sapwood
Heartwood
Average Line
(c) 2006
Decay
Die Average Curve (blue line) can also be used to create a threshold
database of sound trees of a cretin species in a cretin area.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Example Only !
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Decay
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Less Weight
More Weight
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Decay
Decay
Even the Amplitude is over the decay threshold due to the drag of the
needle the slight drop in the graph indicates decay (lower resistance).
Irregularities should be noted.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
0 1 Needle entry
1 12 Sound
12 28 Decay - (in very hard wood there can be a lot of drag
on the needle so the graph does not always fall right down.)
(c) 2006
Measurement
Measuring Result
(c) 2006
Measurement
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
p. s.
Drill has to be exact at 90 Degrees
at the trunk !
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
5x
10 x
Tip:
Try both drill speeds in order to
find the best resolution of growth
rings on your graph.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Saved Printout
Age
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
For Trees
For Timber Bridges
For Play Ground Equipment
For Power Poles
For Building Inspection
For Termite Inspection
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Building Inspections
(c) 2006
Bridge Testing
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Resistograph
Trouble Shooting
Trouble Shooting 1.
The drilling needle does not rotate, the slide does not
move, and a rattling noise is to be heard during
operation of the drill !
- the drill holder of the drill has opened
- the gearbox of the IML-RESI is damaged, please contact
your dealer!
TROUBLE SHOOTING 2,
The drilling needle rotates, but the slide does not move
forward from the rear position!
- Switch on the drill several times in forward running and see
whether the slide moves!
- Remove clutch cap in the front plate and turn the central
spindle clockwise a little by means of a screw driver.
- If the problem occurs frequently, the clutch will have to be readjusted, Clutch overload.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Trouble Shooting 3,
The drilling needle rotates, but the slide does not
move forward nor backward from any position!
- Re-adjust the clutch as described in the section
Overload Clutch in User Manual!
Trouble Shooting 4,
The drilling needle does not rotate, and the slide
does not move at all!
- the drill has not been set to any transmission stage!
- the safety pin has sheared off owing to overload,
- cf. Section Replacing the Safety Pin in User Manual
A few
Testimonials
Testimonial
My Testimonial
by John Atkins
Testimonial
Urban Tree Management has been using the Resistograph (Resi-500) for
more than 5 years which has now formed an intricate part of many
reports. It has enabled us as consultants to provide to our clients a
professional and clear understanding of the internal structure of a tree by
utilising a non-destructive method.
A Visual Tree Assessment is the initial stage for tree inspection and
examination but is limited to the external signs only. The Resistograph has
taken us to the next step by presenting the results of the concealed internal
structure of a tree which would generally go undetected without the
assistance of this technology.
The computer upgrade has taken us to a higher step again by enabling first
class presentation of the data with the ability to present it concisely in a
clear and easily understood format.
Feedback from our clients has only been positive and of high quality.
As professional Arboricultural consultants, we are legally accountable to
carry out tree hazard assessments with the most up to date and scientific
technologies. As a team of consultants we pride ourselves on quality and a
high standard, the Resistograph has enabled us to achieve that goal.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Testimonial
We at Bellarine Tree Services were looking for a way
to give absolute conclusive evidence to our clients of
the condition under the bark of their treesAfter
looking around at what the market had to offer we
purchased our Resistograph. (18 months ago.)
Since this time it has proven to be a valuable tool to our
consulting Airbursts and customers alike.
The Resistograph is simple to use but technical in
nature, so the information it details and records is state
of the art.
With the electronics kit included it is an all round tool
proving its worth job after job.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Testimonial
Resistograph Technology Eliminating the Guess Work
by Scott McKenzie BSc. (UNSW), Adv. Cert. Hort. (Ryd/Pad)
Botanist
All Suburbs Tree Services (NSW) P/L
As a botanist, it has always concerned me the degree to which a
Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) can accurately predict the internal
state of primary and secondary tissue development, or the lack there
of. The Resistograph allows me to accurately assess the state of
growth and/or decay within the tree (with respect to tree ring
analysis), eliminating the guess work for unnecessary tree removals.
A masterful piece of machinery that is fast, accurate and has no
significant impact on the health of trees. At All Suburbs Tree
Services (NSW) pty ltd, we have saved more trees, using the
Resistograph, than we have ever done in the past.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
IML Hammer
Wood Quality Focus (a private wood quality consultancy company in NZ) has used
the IML Hammer for a wide range of forest based projects over the last two years. It is
one of a small number of tools that can be used to obtain a reliable indication of
timber stiffness in standing trees and therefore has application across the age range
with younger trees sampled in conjunction with tree breeding programs and older
stands to assist harvest planning, log allocation and pricing. Timber stiffness is an
important property with regard to structural applications.
Initially I hired an IML Hammer from Ensis (formerly Forest Research located in
Rotorua N.Z.). Ensis staff have modified the probes for large scale in-forest use and
continue to make modifications in this area to enhance the ease of use allowing more
trees to be sampled in a given timeframe. More recently I have purchased my own
IML Hammer to allow me to continue to pursue both research and consultancies with
individual forest and breeding companies.
Don McConchie
Wood Quality Focus
New Zealand
IML Fractometer II
PART 2.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
In the Field
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Remember:
Resistograph Drilling is only ONE
PART of the Tree Assessment !
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
What is Decay ?
Decay Formula ?
It is impossible to have a standard formula regarding the
It depends on:
(c) 2006
Examples
A single, thin & tall tree with no decay could be
more of a concern than a compact, thick tree
with some decay.
A tree with little decay next to a children's play
ground is more of a concern than a tree with
more decay in a park, surrounded by other trees
in a non target area.
(c) 2006
Wind
(c) 2006
in a Park
(c) 2006
. In a Forest
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Wind
Compression
Anchor Root
Tension
(c) 2006
Height/Diameter Ratio
The H/D ( Height/Diameter) Ratio is
very important when assessing a tree.
Height/Diameter Ratio !
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
WIND
WIND
WIND
Large
WIND
Sail
Small Sail
(c) 2006
Cracks
In order to identify the size of the crack, the
drilling process continues until satisfied.
(c) 2006
A
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
.
Min
e
c kn
i
h
lT
Wa l
ss
Decay
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Wall
Wall
(c) 2006
X
X
X
X
Note:
It might take more than 3 or 4 drills
to establish a picture like this.
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Sound
Decay
Decay
Bark
free floating
sound wood
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Sound
Not Sound
(c) 2006
Drill
(c) 2006
Decay start/soft
Wall
(c) 2006
C
B
(c) 2006
Wounds in Trees
Large Wound,
Suspect Decay in most of the lower Trunk and Roots
Fail here
(c) 2006
Decay Zone
Drill Here
Drill Here
(c) 2006
Various Wounds
Arrows show where to suspect decay & drill.
Decay Zone
(c) 2006
Drill Here
Drill Here
e
H
l
l
ri
re
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Traffic/Machinery Wound in an
Elm Tree
Decay Zone
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Various Wounds
Arrows show where to suspect decay & drill.
(c) 2006
Drill Here
Drill Here
Drill Here
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Drill Here
Suspected Decay
Area
Drill Here
(c) 2006
Drill Here
Ref. Drill
Drill Here
(c) 2006
Drill Here
(c) 2006
Swelling
Swelling is often associated
with decay as the tree
compensates with extra
tissue.
The most likely place to find
decay is : see Arrow
(c) 2006
Swelling in Trunk
Drill Here
(c) 2006
Drill Here
(c) 2006
Swelling in Trunk
Tension
Compression
l in g
Swel
Drill Here
Drill Here
He
l
l
i
r
D
re
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Perfect Reference
Drill Point
Tension Side
h
nc
oo
R
r
Suspected Decay
Area
Drill here
(c) 2006
Multi - Trunk
Ref. Drill
Drill Here
Drill here
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Compression
TENSION
REF.DRILL
DRILL HERE
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
DRILL HERE
(c) 2006
REF. DRILL
DRILL HERE
(c) 2006
REF. DRILL
DRILL HERE
(c) 2006
Drill here
Drill here
Drill here
he
D r il l
re
(c) 2006
Ref. Drill
Drill here
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
DRILL HERE
Suspected Decay
Area
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Ref. Drill
Conduct Reference Drills to
determine the extent of decay
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Various Wounds
Traffic Wound on an Elm Tree
Open wound
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Decay
Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Fruiting Bodies
(c) 2006
Wound
Suspect Decay in
Root Crown and
In Wound
Fruiting Body
Suspected Decay
Area
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Fungi
Suspect Decay
here first
Crack
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
L
DRI
E RE
H
L
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Included Bark
Included bark
(c) 2006
Included Bark
Drill Here
Drill Here
Drill Here
(c) 2006
Included Bark
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Co Dominant Trees
Ref. Drill
Included bark
Drill Here
Drill Here
(c) 2006
Co-Dominant Trunk
Trunk
Trunk
Included Bark
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Decay
Included Bark
(c) 2006
Resistograph Measurement
Decay-Hollow
Heartwood
Sapwood
Bark
(c) 2006
Crack
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Crack
(c) 2006
Pointy Ears
Pointy Ears on a co-dominant tree
is always a sign of a problem.
Pointy Ears
(c) 2006
Co - Dominant Tree
Swelling
Swelling
Snub Nose more stable then Pointy Nose Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
V
Potentially Unstable
More Stable
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Co Dominant Tree
Force
Included Bark
DRILL HERE
(c) 2006
Co Dominant Tree
- next to a building -
(c) 2006
Co - Dominant
Force
Force
Included Bark
DRILL HERE
(c) 2006
Included Bark
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Decay Zone
(c) 2006
Swelling
Broken out stem
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Swelling in fork
Arrows show where to drill.
(c) 2006
Decay Zone
Fail
(c) 2006
Fo
r ce
o
F
e
H
l
l
i
Dr
re
rce
Decay Zone
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Cracks
(c) 2006
Suspect Decay In
most of the trunk
Crack continuos on
into the root crown
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Ref. Drill
Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Decay
Drill 45 degrees
Ground Level
(c) 2006
Trunk
Flare
Ground Level
Root
(c) 2006
Trunk
Drill 45 degrees
Ground Level
Decay
Flare
Root
(c) 2006
No Trunk Flare
(c) 2006
Land Fill
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Decay Zone
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Anchor Roots
WIND
Tension
Compression
Anchor Roots
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Anchor Roots
Anchor Root
Wind
Soil
Stones
(c) 2006
For
ce
Stress on Roots
Fail
(c) 2006
Wind
An
ch
or
Wound
s
ot
Ro
(c) 2006
Drill Here
(c) 2006
Root Decay
(Decay in Anchor Root)
Drill H
ere
An
ch
or
ou
vi
Ob
Ro
ot
Drill here
y
ca
De
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Anchor Roots
Arrows show where to test Anchor Roots for Decay.
Wind
Compression
(c) 2006
Wind
Anchor Root
Note:
This Iron Bark Tree is
completely hollow in the
Lower trunk !
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Eroded Roots
can also cause Tree Failure
Decay Zone
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Ref. Drill
Drill Here
Drill Here
Ground Level
Decay in Root
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Weight
Drill Here
Fibre Buckling
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Weight
Possible Failure
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Weight
(c) 2006
Wind
Weight
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Tension
Amplitude on Graph
Can be slightly higher
On the ridge - Tension
Compression
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Needle Entry
Needle Exit
Decay in Centre
Compression Side
Tension Side
Note: the graph amplitude
Is higher on the
Tension side
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Compression Side
Tension Side
on
i
s
n
Te
Weakest Point
io
ss
re
p
m
Co
Compression
Drill Here
Drill Here
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
Tension
Not compressed
but higher strength
Compression
(c) 2006
Bend in Trunk
see Arrow where tree could fail.
Weight
Possible Failure
(c) 2006
Multi Stem
Arrows show where the tree could fail.
Weight
Bark Buckling
(c) 2006
Weight
Co
m
pr
es
si
o
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Shell buckling
(c) 2006
Fungi
Like a kinked hose, a hollow (decayed) tree is
giving way to the weight of the tree.
Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Darren Williams
Epicormic Growth
Epicormic growth is shoots arising from
activated buds situated at the base of the tree and
on the main trunk.
Epicormic growth often occurs after heavy
pruning or lopping of trunks and fires.
Epicormic growth is not very strong and will fail
regularly as it is not supported by a trunk collar.
Epicormic Groth
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
PART 3.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Double Leader
Older Tree
Younger Tree
(c) 2006
Fa
il
Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Double Leaders
Double leaders will lead to Co-Dominant stems and therefore not
desired. It is advisable to prune the young tree.
Prune Here
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
What is Compartmentalization ?
When trees come under attack from microorganisms, the primary line of defence is a
mechanism called compartmentalization.
In the case of a pruning cut or wound the tree
then builds cells around it and tries to seal it.
Some species of trees compartmentalize better
than others.
For more on compartmentalization please refer
to the works of Alex Shigo.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Compartmentalization
(c) 2006
Compartmentalization
This branch is starting to
compartmentalize
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Compartmentalization
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Lightning Strike
Fusion of Branch
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Branch Collar
Incorrect previous
Pruning cut
(c) 2006
Totally Compartmentalised
Detained Decay
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Dead Branch
Branch collar
Dead branch
Dead branch
Branch collar
Branch collar
(c) 2006
Dead Branch
Open Wound
Decay
(c) 2006
Dead Branch
Branch Collar
Branch Collar
Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Alex
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Shigo
Correct Pruning
Flush Cut versus Correct Cut.
Alex Shigo
Correct Pruning
Alex Shigo
Perfect compartmentalisation
(c) 2006
Previous
Pruning Cut
(c) 2006
Dead-Wood
Dead-wood, or dead branches, are a normal part
of a trees growth pattern but will eventually fall.
Branches over five centimetres in diameter can
cause serious damage when they fall. Removal of
dead-wood should always be a priority.
Dead-Wood
(c) 2006
PART 4.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Further Reading
www.wooddecaydetectionmanual.com
Drill
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
(c) 2006
Seminar Course
This Manual is also available as a
Seminar Course
Please contact us for details.
C. Mattheck
A. Shigo
Darren Williams
IML Germany