Decay Detection Manual

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 431

Basic Decay Detection Manual for

Trees & Timber Structures


Vol. 1
ISBN 0-646-46859-6

P. Blank
Copyright 2006

Disc 1
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Copyright 2006
No part of the content of this manual is to be used
without permission of the author.
This manual is based on research and experience on
decay detection.
This manual must be applied on the basics of the users
own judgement and knowledge.
The author disclaims any liability from damage which
might arise from the application of the information in this
manual, especially injury to persons, damage to property
& pecuniary damage.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

An Easy to Understand Manual.

Essential for the Resistograph operator.


For the Arborist & Tree Worker.
For the Environmental Engineer.
For the Parks & Garden Officer.
For anyone interested in the subject.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Foreword

Decay in trees is one of the most common causes of tree failure and not that much had
been written about it in Australia.
Peter Blank has compiled more than six years of research on decay detection into an
easy to understand manual called Basic Decay Detection Manual for Trees & Timber
Structures. Arguably it is the most comprehensive manual written on this subject,
particularly for Australian conditions. There are some 460 pages that include many color
photos and easy to understand graphics that show and explain where and why a tree can
fail due to decay .Topics range from the use of the Resistograph (mechanical decay
detection) to basic hazard assessment, tree mechanics and basic pruning to prevent
future failures. This very well explained and easy to understand manual is a handy tool
for the Consulting Arborist. It is also a good reference for the local government, for their
staff and when employing contractors.
This manual is fully key word searchable. It is also a great tool of reference when
writing tree reports.
The manual also contains an assessment section with multiple choice questions for
certification. The certification will ensure that a high standard is achieved and
maintained for Resistograph operators and Consulting Arborists around Australia and
World Wide.

Please Note: Some of the content in this manual might appear to be repetitious,

but in my opinion it is necessary to give as many examples and circumstances


as possible.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Index

Click on Headings

Part 1 - IML and the Resistograph


Tips & Tricks
Graph Examples - Interpreting graphs
Annual Growth Ring Analysis
Other Resistograph applications
Utility Pole & Bridge Testing
Testing for Termites & Building Inspections
Trouble Shooting
A few Testimonials
Other IML products
Part 2 In the Field
Where to drill
Wind & Weight
Cracks, Free Floating Wood & Wall thickness
Wounds in trees
Fruiting Bodies, Included Bark and Co Dominant Trees
Co Dominant Trees
Decay in Tree roots
Basic Tree mechanics
Part 3 Basic Pruning & deadwood
Part 4 Further Reading
Does Drilling Harm the Tree ?
Acknowledgements

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

PART 1.
The IML Resistograph
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

IML Resistograph Information

General Information
How to operate the Resistograph
Interpreting graphs
Applications
Trouble shooting
Other IML Products

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

INSTRUMENTA MECHANIK LABOR

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

IML Factory in Germany

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

IML Australia, New Zealand & Asia

AUSTRALIA
ABN: 37071465832
P.O. Box 82
Northlands QLD 4350
Ph: 0418 709 846
[email protected]
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

The IML Resistograph


The IML-Resistograph System is based on a drilling resistance
measuring method.
A drilling needle with a diameter of 1.5 mm to 3.0 mm penetrates into
the wooden structure with a regular advance speed, and the drilling
resistance is measured. The data is recorded on a wax paper strip at a
scale of 1:1. The wood will only be insignificantly injured, and the
drilling hole closes itself due to a special drilling angle that was
customized for the drill bit. A special computer program (F-TOOLS ) is
available for all instruments. If the Resistograph is equipped with the
Electronic Unit the user can download all information gathered during
the day into the computer program. Graph profiles can then be
downloaded and analysed.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

The Resistograph Principle


- it measures the resistance in wood -

Sound

Decay

Sound

Please Note: this is a very exaggerated graph model


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

IML Resistograph Models

F150 S - Termite & Building Inspection


F300 S - Power Pole, Bridge & Tree Inspection
F400 S - Tree Inspections
F500 S - Tree Inspections
F300 S Electronic - Power Pole, Bridge & Tree Inspection
F400 S Electronic - Tree Inspections
F500 S Electronic - Tree Inspections
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

The IML Electronic Unit

F-Tools
F-Tools Pro includes: Cavity Detection, Growth Ring Analysing,
Average Curve & Export/Import Software.
The IML Electronic Unit Software is Microsoft Windows
compatible.
Please refer to the IML Electronic Unit User Manual.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

The Electronic IML Resistograph

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Electronic Print Out


A perfectly presented Report

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

View of the Software

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Object Data Box

The object data box on the top left side of the Resistograph
report contains all the necessary information.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Example of the Comment Box on the


lower right of the graph print out.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Example of the Assessment Box in


the lower left side of the graph
print out.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Always insert Wax Paper


Even when engaging the Electronic Unit the Wax
Paper should be inserted for two reasons:
1. For protection of the Resistograph metal cover plate;
2. For easy identifying of graph when downloading.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Take Care of Your Resistograph


The Resistograph is a very
sophisticated and sensitive
measuring instrument therefore it
has to be handled with due care.
Depending on use the
Resistograph should be serviced at
least once a year.
Avoid overheating the drill when
used constantly.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Resistograph Kit

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Insert Graph Paper


Wax paper

Push Wax paper strip forward

Shut cover

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Inserting Wax paper


Bend wax paper strip

Place wax paper strip

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Spindle / Gearing
There are 0.5 mm, 0.75mm, 1.35mm, 1.5mm &
2.5mm Spindles
Most Resistograph's that work with Hardwood
would be fitted with a 0.75 Spindle
However for extreme Hardwood testing use a
0.5 as with that setting the needle travels slower
but has more torque

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Soft Wood Hard Wood Setting


For example: most Eucalyptus species would require a hard
wood setting ( 2 ) on the Resistograph.
For example: most Pinus species would require a soft wood
setting ( 1 ) on the Resistograph.
For example: most European species would require a soft
wood setting ( 1 ) on the Resistograph.
Remember the Resistograph readings are Relative
measurements and therefore it is a matter of experience what
species need what setting.
If unsure start with the hard wood setting (2) and if the graph
is too low, then a soft wood setting (1) is required.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Measurement Example of a Pine (soft


wood) on the Hard Wood Setting (2)
Note: the Amplitude is very low.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Soft/Hardwood Setting
on the same spot (hollow log)
Note the Amplitude is higher on Softwood setting

Hardwood Setting

Softwood Setting

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Hard Wood Soft Wood

Sensitivity
settings

Setting Wheel
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Hard Wood Soft Wood

Firmly press and turn


wheel

Bolt caught
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Hard Wood Soft Wood

Setting on 1 or 2

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Hard Wood Soft Wood


Soft wood setting

Hard wood setting


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Battery Life
Dependant on size of battery
Dependant on distance drilled
Dependant on temperature
8 to 12 x 500 mm drills out of a
2.4ah battery
Ensure that there is always a spare
battery on hand as the power is
lost without much warning !
Standard charge time is approx. 60
minutes

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Car Quick Charger

The Car Quick


Battery Charger
charges a Battery
in 12 minutes !

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Changing the Drill Bit


Please refer to User Manual
Tighten the grub screw that holds
the needle but not too tight !

Insert Drill Bit


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Tips & Tricks

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Service & Calibration


In order to make Accurate Resistograph Assessments
the unit has to be serviced and re-calibrated every 12
months
A Certificate of Currency will be issued by the
manufacturer

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Operating Tips
Always ensure that the Resistograph is NOT driven
in full speed right back to the end
When reversing out of an object, gently pull needle
all the way out
When out of the object, hold the needle between
fingers while reversing back into Resistograph
When reversing out of extreme hard wood, free the
drill bit by a half a second slower speed before
going full speed out
Listen to the sound of the drill, when the drill hits a
cavity the sound pitch is noticeably different
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Holding the retracting Drill Bit

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Do Not Over Tighten Grub Screw


Over tightening the grub screw, that holds the needle in
place, can result in weakening and breaking the needle.
Just tighten it so the handle of the tool bends slightly in
your fingers.

Grub screw

needle

Grub screw

needle
weak

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

If the Needle breaks behind the Grub Screw


Grub screw
pull
Magnet
New needle
pull
Broken bit
Should the needle break and leave a small bit behind the grub
screw, undo grub screw (not too far otherwise it falls out) and insert a magnetised
new needle and pull broken bit out gently.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Drill Bits ( Needles)


For accurate measurements it is very important
to use sharp, clean & straight drill bits
Depending on the type of wood and drilling
length, a drill bit can last between 80 and 200
drills
Check your drill bit before each use

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Blunt Drill Bit

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Drill Bits

Sharp Drill Bit

Blunt Drill Bit


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Condition of the Drill Bit (Needle)

New Drill Bit

Blunt Drill Bit

Very Blunt Drill Bit

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

IML

Dirty Drill Bit (Needle)


If the drill bit gets dirty or sticky, particularly in
a tree with much sap, this can create a drag and
the measurement can be inaccurate.
The drill resistance is getting slowly higher.
Therefore the operator must ensure that the
needle is always clean and free of sap
Clean with Pure Alcohol
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Operating the Resistograph


Ensure that a stable position is maintained
throughout the drilling process.
Moving or twisting of the Resistograph during
drilling can result in inaccurate measurements.
Ensure that the drilling process is started in full
drilling speed .
Once stoped in mid way the electronic unit
will record as a measurement.
Always refer to the IML operating manual for
further help.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Ensure a comfortable position


If the Resistograph is not held correctly,
moved or is twisted during operation, drag
occurs on the needle and the measurement
can be inaccurate.
Drill Needle

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Drill Speed
It is recommended to conduct most measurements
with the drill speed setting 2 (fast)
However for extra torque on extreme hard wood
the operator can find it easier on drill speed 1 (slow)
It is advisable to stick to one setting as the change
of drill speeds will give a slightly different graph
Also for detecting Growth Rings it pays to try both
speeds for the clearest graph
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Graph Examples on drill speed 1 & 2

Drill Speed 2 (fast)

Drill Speed 1 (slow)

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Take Notes on the Graph Paper


The more information that is written on the original graph
paper the better. The software will also ask for Species,
location, diameter, direction etc.

In order to do more than one measurement on a graph paper


Identifying information needs to be written on the end of each measurement.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

How to store the Wax Paper


Simple Paper Clips hold the Wax Paper stipes in place

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Relative Measurement
The Resistograph will provide us with a
Relative measurement. It measures the
resistance in all types of timber.
A tree of the same species can have a different
reading in different localities. It depends on soil,
rainfall and position of the tree.
However it is possible to build up a manual or
database for a specific area.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Reference Drill
Always conduct a Reference
Drill on the most likely place
where sound wood is
suspected.
This is usually in the tension
side or in ridges on the trunk.
A reference measurement
should give a reading of
comparative sound wood.

Ref. Drill

Decay

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Free Downloads
Go to:
www.wooddecaydetectionmanual.com
www.imlaustralia.com
for all downloads of manuals, research and
movie clips.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

For more info refer to the IML User Manual

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Before Drilling

Ensure that a sharp drill bit ( needle ) is used


Ensure fresh graph paper is inserted
Identify the suspect decay & drilling places
Write tree info on graph paper
Select: softwood/ hardwood setting
Ensure electronic is turned on & ID number is set
Check forward position on Drill
Take a comfortable position
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Resistograph testing
Try to watch the graph as you drill.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Resistograph Testing 10 m up the


Trunk in a cherry picker

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Resistograph used by Climber

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Resistograph Test on a large Bunya Pine


from a Crane Bucket

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Resistograph in Operation
Note the operator is watching the graph while testing.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Pressure towards the Object is


important.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Pressure towards the Object ensures accurate


measurements

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Different Ways to Hold & Operate

The Resistograph can be


Operated on its side

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Different Ways to Hold & Operate

The Resistograph can be


operated upside down.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Operating the Resistograph on a 45


degree angle

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Examples

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Interpreting the Graph


When examining a graph we look for
irregularities and a drop of the graph indicates a
lower resistance, therefore decay, hollow,
honeycomb etc.
It is always advisable to conduct a Reference
Drill on an area where sound wood is
expected.
With more experience the operator will be more
accurate in the interpreting of graphs.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph examples of Power Poles &


Timber Bridges

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Graph Example of a Hardwood


Power Pole

Sound

Decay

Sound
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of Graph from a Timber


Bridge ( extreme hard wood)

Sound
Decay
Copyright Peter Sound/Wall
Blank 2007
(c) 2006

Example of a Typical Hardwood Power Pole


Graph Decay in Centre

Sound

Decay

Sound
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Sound Power Pole

On a 30 cm diameter pole it is sometimes only necessary to drill a little


over half way to determine the soundness / wall thickness.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of a Sound Power Pole


Measurement with a set Threshold

Threshold 50% amplitude


(Example only)

If the species & age of the poles are the same or simular, a threshold can
be created and the cavity detection parameter (in software) set accordingly
i.e. everything below 50% amplitude is not sound and over 50% is sound.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of a Power Pole Graph


Cavity Detection Parameters set on 50% Amplitude

50% Amplitude Threshold

Needle Exit

Decay

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of a Timber Bridge Graph


From 0 6 Sound but some cracks
From 6 28 Decay
From 28 30 sound

Decay
Sound

Sound
Cracks

Very old, dry & cracked wood


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Cracked old Timber

An example of cracks in old timber

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of a Timber Bearer of a Bridge

Sound

Decay/Hollow

Sound/Cracks

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Examples in
Trees

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Graph Example
Drill Direction

Reaction Zone

Sapwood

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

IML

Graph Example ( Tilia sp.)


Compression Wood

Included Bark

The low amplitude here is due to


the needle going a little with
the growth rings

itude [%]

10

12

14

16

Bohrtiefe [cm]

Drill Direction

18

20

22

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Graph Example of a Totally Decayed


Trunk of a Eucalyptus
Dia. 65 cm Test Level: 120 cm Direction: North

Decay / Soft Tissue

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Example of little decay behind bark

SOUND
HEARTWOOD

DECAY

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Reference Drill


in a Eucalyptus sp.
1st drill found decay in base

Sound Amplitude
Reference Drill
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Sound and Decayed Graph of a


Cupressus Macrocarpa
This test has found decay
after 11 cm of sound wall

Reference Drill

Sound Amplitude
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Sapwood & Heartwood


The amount of Sapwood & Heartwood
depends on the species.
Sapwood is always softer than Heartwood,
therefore the amplitude in the graph is
lower in Sapwood.

Heartwood

Sapwood

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Sapwood & Heartwood


Outer Bark

Inner Bark

Cambium
Sapwood
Heartwood
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

IML

Bark, Sap & Heartwood in a


Eucalyptus sp.

Heartwood

Bark
Sapwood

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of Graph of a Cupressus


macrocarpa.

Sapwood

Sound

Decay

Sound

Decay

Sound

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of Decay in Sapwood

DECAY

SOUND
HEARTWOOD

SOUND
SAPWOOD

Free Floating Wood


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Bark
Some trees i.e. Poplar, Iron Bark,
Pine etc. have sometimes up to 5 cm
of bark. The operator has to take this
fact into consideration when
interpreting the measurement.
The graph can show a low resistance
and false decay .
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a sound Silky Oak


Dia. 90 cm

Sound

Bark ! Not Decay !


The Cavity Parameter had been set at 15%
amplitude therefore it shows up as decay.
Refer to user manual re: Setting Parameters
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Grey Box Tree

Decay/Soft
Sound/ very hard

Sound

Needle entry
- Bark
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a sound Hoop


Pine Dia. 65 cm

Sound

Bark
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Radiata Pine


Dia. 100 cm

Heartwood

Sapwood

Decay or possibly a part


of the bark
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Pinus radiata


Diameter: 120 cm
Sapwood

Heartwood

Bark
Decay/Crack
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Co Dominant Tree

Decay

Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of Crack in a Eucalyptus sp.


Dia. 40 cm

Sound Heartwood
Crack

Sound Sapwood
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of Included Bark in a Illawarra


Flame Tree ( very soft)

Drill

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of Decay in Elm Tree


Dia. 70 cm

Sound Heartwood

Decay

Sound Sapwood
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a sound Grey Box

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Measurement Example of a Sound


Cupressus Macrocarpa

Heartwood
Sapwood

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a sound


Grey Gum. Dia. 60 cm.

Sapwood
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a sound small Brush Box


on the tension side of the trunk
Dia. 30 cm

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Small amount of Oscillation


Please Note: In some species of tree with very
hard wood there is sometimes little Oscillation
in the graph due to the enormous drag on the
needle.
The Operator must take this into consideration
when interpreting the measurement.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Graph Example of a Sound large


Brush Box Dia. 150 cm

Crack

Sound Heartwood

Sound Sapwood

Bark
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a mature Moreton Bay Fig


Dia. 150 cm

Sound

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Poplar


(soft wood setting)

Appears to be Sound
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Sound Hardwood Graph Example

Bark from 0 20 mm
Sapwood from 20 140 mm
Heartwood from 140 mm
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of a sound (very hard)


Eucalyptus tree

HEARTWOOD
SAPWOOD

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Clear Readings
Please Note: Only by drilling in a 90 degree
angle the Sapwood, Heartwood & Growth
Rings are clearly visible. However it is still
species dependant.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Graph Example of a sound Mango Tree Dia. 60 cm


Compression Side

Sound

Graph Example of a sound Mango Tree Dia. 120 cm


Tension Side

Sound

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of an English Oak (A)


Dia. 180 cm

Measurement taken on southern


side of trunk

Floating sound wood


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of an English Oak (B)


Dia. 180 cm

Decay/Hollow
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Poplar sp.


Dia. 100 cm

Decay

Sound Sapwood
(Holding Wood)

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Print Out Example of a Eucalyptus sp.

Start of Decay

Free Floating Wood

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of Decay in Sapwood


Eucalyptus sp.

Sound

Decay

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Jacaranda


Dia. 70 cm

Honey Comb Decay


Free Floating Wood

Sound

Sound
Decay

Needle Entry
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Camphor Laurel


Dia. 160 cm

Free Floating Wood

Soft Decay

Sound
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

(c) 2006

Test

This narrow Leaf Iron Bark Tree locked perfectly healthy except for the small wound & little swelling
The graph shows that The tree has only some 7 cm wall thickness on the western side of the trunk.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Example of Decay in Centre


Sound
with cracks

Sound
with cracks

Decay

Possible Termites

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of Termite Activity


Note the sharp peaks and lows on the graph made by
the numerous tunnels created by termites.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of Decay in Centre after 15 cm


of Holding Wood

SOUND
DECAY

Very little resistance soft decay

BARK

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Poplar sp.

Free floating wood

Decay

Sound
Bark
Sapwood Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006

Example Graph of the same Poplar


Dia. 50 cm

(on northern side of trunk.)

Decay from 0 36 cm !
The small bit of sound wood at 12 cm (Arrow)
is insignificant as it is free floating and not
attached to a wall.
See chapter on free floating wood .

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of Decayed Heartwood


- Soft -

Soft Tissue
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Electronic Graph Example of Decayed


Wood in Centre of a Limb

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph using the Average Curve


( Blue Line )

The Average line can be set in the IML Software F-Tools


Pro and can be used to show the average trend of a graph.

Sapwood

Heartwood

Average Line

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Decay

The Average Curve Blue Line

Die Average Curve (blue line) can also be used to create a threshold
database of sound trees of a cretin species in a cretin area.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Free Standing Trees


Please Note: The graph amplitude is generally higher
in a free standing & wind exposed tree !
These trees build more muscles to compensate the
wind.
That will also apply for the compression side or a
bend in a tree.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Threshold and Database of


Measurements
Trees are a living organism and due to geographical,
soil and weather differences it is only possible to have
a rough threshold for measurements. ( graphs)
In order to obtain an objective threshold, a minimum
of 10 trees of the same species but of different size
must be tested. The average of the data collected is
then the approximate threshold for that species for a
specific area.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Threshold Example of a Sound species of


Tree in a particular area

Example Only !

Threshold: 25% Amplitude


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Find the extent of Decay by


Drilling through to the Sound Wood.
Always drill further
through the decay
into sound wood
Sound
(if possible) to determine
the extend of decay.
Decay

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Drill on 3,4 or 6 sides to know the


extent of Decay and Wall Thickness

Decay

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

With 5 drills we would have a pretty good


idea on the average of the wall thickness

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Find the extend of Decay


or Sound Wood
Always drill further up and down in trunk

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

I. Drill Example on a Log


Drill

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

II. Drill Example on a Log


Drill

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Test for Sound Wood and/or Decay


Testing can be done two ways depending on the
individual circumstances:
for decay
or for the amount of sound wood.

Often it is satisfactory to know the amount of


sound wood in a tree and therefore the actual
amount of decay is less important.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Weight of the Tree

A large tree can weigh a few


tonne more at the base as of the
way up the trunk therefore the
measurement amplitude on
the graph can be higher at the
base

Less Weight

More Weight
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Drag on the Drilling Needle


Due to sometimes
extremely hard wood
and/or sap there can be
a drag on the needle (drill
bit).
The resistance increases
when there is drag on the
needle, therefore the
graph amplitude is
abnormally higher.
See: next two pages.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of Hardwood Drag on needle in


very hard/old Timber Bridge

Decay
Decay

Even the Amplitude is over the decay threshold due to the drag of the
needle the slight drop in the graph indicates decay (lower resistance).
Irregularities should be noted.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Timber Bridge Graph

From 0 2 needle entry


From 2 17 Sound
From 17 21 Decay
From 21 24 Sound
Note: Due to the drag on the needle in very hard/old timber the graph
does not fall right down when in decay/hollow ! see Arrow.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Timber Bridge Graph

0 1 Needle entry
1 12 Sound
12 28 Decay - (in very hard wood there can be a lot of drag
on the needle so the graph does not always fall right down.)

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Measurement

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Measuring Result

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Measurement

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Testing with the 45 degree Adaptor or holding


the Resistograph in a 45 degree position

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

45 degree testing formula


When testing in a 45 degree position the needle travels further, therefore
a cavity appears to be larger than it actually is.
The formula is 1.4
i.e. If a measurement is 25 cm long on a 45 degree angle and the cavity is
12 cm, the true size of the cavity is 12 divided by 1.4 = 8.57 cm
True size of object is 17.8 cm
True size of cavity is 8.57 cm

45 degree drill = 25 cm total


and 12 cm cavity

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Annual Growth Rings

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

The Resistograph reading will pick


up Growth Rings.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Growth Ring Analysis


The IML F-Tools Pro Software is capable of
Annual Growth ring Analysis.
This Software will help identify Annual
Growth Rings and the age of the tree.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Graph Example of Growth Rings

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Easy to Identify the Growth Rings in this Photo

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Growth Rings in a Graph


Growth rings generally have a higher resistance
therefore it shows up as a slight peak in the graph.

Only the first 50 % of


the trunk is measured.

p. s.
Drill has to be exact at 90 Degrees
at the trunk !
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Magnifying Graph for Growth Ring


Analysis (part of a graph)
1:1

5x

10 x

The software allows us to


zoom in on a graph until
annual growth rings are
clearly identified .
See Arrows.

Accurate Growth Ring Analysis


depends also on knowing the
individual species.

Tip:
Try both drill speeds in order to
find the best resolution of growth
rings on your graph.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Analysing Growth Rings

The Growth Ring parameters have to


be applied manually with the software.
( Red lines )

Age of the Tree

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Analysing Growth Rings


Example

Saved Printout

Age

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

IML Growth Ring Analysing Software


For more instructions please refer to the IML Software
User Manual.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Other Applications for the


Resistograph

For Trees
For Timber Bridges
For Play Ground Equipment
For Power Poles
For Building Inspection
For Termite Inspection
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Building Inspections

House stumps can also


be tested for decay &
Termites with the
Resistograph.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Utility Pole Testing

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Power Pole Testing


The Resistograph is used for non invasive Power Pole
testing in USA, Canada, Germany, England, Italy,
Spain & France.
It replaces the old method of drilling a inch hole and
checking the sawdust.
Measurements can be stored in an electronic database.
Due to the size of the needle (1.5 mm) the pole can be
tested many times without being replaced.
Testing is done in a fraction of time (without digging)
and is recorded in a database.
This is a big advantage for the Asset Owner in terms of
cost saving and accuracy.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Power Pole Testing


Decay in timber poles is usually
around & below ground level

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Pole Testing Field Trials

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

45 degree Adaptor for use on Power


Poles & Timber Structures

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Timber Bridge Testing


The Queensland Department of Main Roads
has undertaken comprehensive studies of Non
Destructive testing, as a result this department
is now using the Resistograph technology.
All studies & papers are available for download
from this website:
www.decaydetectionmanual.com
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Bridge Testing

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Power Pole Break Testing after Testing

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Power Pole Break Testing

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Testing for Termites


& Building
Inspection

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Termite & Building Inspection


The Non Destructive
Resistograph Technology has
been proven in Termite &
Building inspection.
The F150S model is an
excellent choice due to its
compact size.
Articles on Termite inspection
with the Resistograph are
available from IML Australia
on request.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

How the Resistograph F150-S Works to Find Damage


How the Resistograph F150-S Works to Find Damage:
The Resistograph F150-S finds termite galleries by detecting voids
inside the wood. As each location is probed, a small piece of water
proof wax graph paper is generated which shows sound wood
(medium graph line), rotted wood (1/4 height on graph), or void (zero
on graph). The routine graph spikes (up and down), from termites
eating only soft wood and leaving the rings, make subterranean
termites easy to identify. Other damage such as dry wood termites,
Carpenter ants and Formosan termites can also be detected with this
new technology. The Resistograph F150-S will not accidentally show a
void that is not there. If a graph shows a zero drop, it most certainly
indicates a void in the wood. Termite damage can be distinguished
from other damage by the characteristic up and down of the graph
showing the hollowed soft wood, followed by annual rings, and then a
void again. The only way to further verify a positive graph readout is to
probe nearby areas for a second or third verification of the same
results. A second or third readout will all but eliminate any misreads by
an untrained operator.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

How the Resistograph F150-S helps to find Live


Termites
The Resistograph F150-S eliminates the need to drill
numerous holes into studs to find possible live termites.
Unlike surface bore scopes used to inspect the outside of a
stud in a wall void, the Resistograph F150-S pinpoints the
spot in the wood for direct observation with an inspection
scope and a inch drill hole. Live termites can be observed
in damaged timbers by drilling holes in the stud large
enough for magnified inspection scopes. The waterproof
wax graph paper will indicate the depth to find galleries,
making it possible to find termites quickly and easily.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

The F150-S for Termite & Building


Inspection
The Resistograph F150-S was designed for
finding termite galleries inside finished walls
without damage to the wall surface. This
exciting new technology offers an added level
of professionalism to the termite industry.
Now, you can be certain of the damage and
activity inside a wall void without costly repair
bills.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Resistograph
Trouble Shooting

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Trouble Shooting 1.
The drilling needle does not rotate, the slide does not
move, and a rattling noise is to be heard during
operation of the drill !
- the drill holder of the drill has opened
- the gearbox of the IML-RESI is damaged, please contact
your dealer!

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

TROUBLE SHOOTING 2,
The drilling needle rotates, but the slide does not move
forward from the rear position!
- Switch on the drill several times in forward running and see
whether the slide moves!
- Remove clutch cap in the front plate and turn the central
spindle clockwise a little by means of a screw driver.
- If the problem occurs frequently, the clutch will have to be readjusted, Clutch overload.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Trouble Shooting 3,
The drilling needle rotates, but the slide does not
move forward nor backward from any position!
- Re-adjust the clutch as described in the section
Overload Clutch in User Manual!

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Trouble Shooting 4,
The drilling needle does not rotate, and the slide
does not move at all!
- the drill has not been set to any transmission stage!
- the safety pin has sheared off owing to overload,
- cf. Section Replacing the Safety Pin in User Manual

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Trouble Shooting 5, (a)


The drilling needle may jam in the material to be
examined, if:
- the power of your drill is too low
- it hits hard, non-wooden materials (stone, splinter...)
- a drilling process in green wood has been stopped and
re-started more than several times
- minutes later and the needle has stuck in the wood
during this time
- the drilling instrument has been canted during the
measuring process
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Trouble Shooting 5, (b)


If you are unable to remove the needle from the drill hole
by turning it, you will have to remove it from the drill, cf.
section Exchanging the Drilling Needle!
If you do not succeed in removing the needle from the drill
holder this way, you will have to cut it off between the
wood and the drilling instrument. The part that remains in
the drill holder will be removed as you would do for usual
exchange of the drilling needle and replaced by a new
drilling needle!
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Adjusting the Clutch


Please refer to IML User Manual

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Replacing the Safety Pin


Please refer to IML User Manual

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

A few
Testimonials

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Testimonial
My Testimonial
by John Atkins

The Resistograph is one of the most accurate decay detection


devices available in Australia. The simplicity of operation,
portability of the unit and solid performance ensure the Arborist
has a reliable tool in the field. The ability to incorporate the
drilling results as a detailed graphical image into reports makes it
highly useful in presenting the facts. The Resistograph provides
the Arborist with an understanding of the inner portions of the
tree, and when combined with experience, a careful Visual Tree
Assessment and an understanding of how to interpret the results,
an Arborist can make definite judgements on tree strength and
decay. I like to call mine a 'Tree Saver', as the facts after testing
comprehensively with the Resistograph have saved many trees I
would have otherwise condemned.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Testimonial
Urban Tree Management has been using the Resistograph (Resi-500) for
more than 5 years which has now formed an intricate part of many
reports. It has enabled us as consultants to provide to our clients a
professional and clear understanding of the internal structure of a tree by
utilising a non-destructive method.
A Visual Tree Assessment is the initial stage for tree inspection and
examination but is limited to the external signs only. The Resistograph has
taken us to the next step by presenting the results of the concealed internal
structure of a tree which would generally go undetected without the
assistance of this technology.
The computer upgrade has taken us to a higher step again by enabling first
class presentation of the data with the ability to present it concisely in a
clear and easily understood format.
Feedback from our clients has only been positive and of high quality.
As professional Arboricultural consultants, we are legally accountable to
carry out tree hazard assessments with the most up to date and scientific
technologies. As a team of consultants we pride ourselves on quality and a
high standard, the Resistograph has enabled us to achieve that goal.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Testimonial
We at Bellarine Tree Services were looking for a way
to give absolute conclusive evidence to our clients of
the condition under the bark of their treesAfter
looking around at what the market had to offer we
purchased our Resistograph. (18 months ago.)
Since this time it has proven to be a valuable tool to our
consulting Airbursts and customers alike.
The Resistograph is simple to use but technical in
nature, so the information it details and records is state
of the art.
With the electronics kit included it is an all round tool
proving its worth job after job.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Testimonial
Resistograph Technology Eliminating the Guess Work
by Scott McKenzie BSc. (UNSW), Adv. Cert. Hort. (Ryd/Pad)
Botanist
All Suburbs Tree Services (NSW) P/L
As a botanist, it has always concerned me the degree to which a
Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) can accurately predict the internal
state of primary and secondary tissue development, or the lack there
of. The Resistograph allows me to accurately assess the state of
growth and/or decay within the tree (with respect to tree ring
analysis), eliminating the guess work for unnecessary tree removals.
A masterful piece of machinery that is fast, accurate and has no
significant impact on the health of trees. At All Suburbs Tree
Services (NSW) pty ltd, we have saved more trees, using the
Resistograph, than we have ever done in the past.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Testimonial for the IML Electronic


Hammer

IML Hammer
Wood Quality Focus (a private wood quality consultancy company in NZ) has used
the IML Hammer for a wide range of forest based projects over the last two years. It is
one of a small number of tools that can be used to obtain a reliable indication of
timber stiffness in standing trees and therefore has application across the age range
with younger trees sampled in conjunction with tree breeding programs and older
stands to assist harvest planning, log allocation and pricing. Timber stiffness is an
important property with regard to structural applications.
Initially I hired an IML Hammer from Ensis (formerly Forest Research located in
Rotorua N.Z.). Ensis staff have modified the probes for large scale in-forest use and
continue to make modifications in this area to enhance the ease of use allowing more
trees to be sampled in a given timeframe. More recently I have purchased my own
IML Hammer to allow me to continue to pursue both research and consultancies with
individual forest and breeding companies.
Don McConchie
Wood Quality Focus
New Zealand

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Other IML Products

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

IML Electronic Hammer


- Ultrasound -

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

IML Fractometer II

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

IML Measuring Table

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

PART 2.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

In the Field
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Remember:
Resistograph Drilling is only ONE
PART of the Tree Assessment !

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Where To Drill and Why

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Identifying Target Areas


Target areas such as park
benches, picnic areas,
playgrounds, walkways,
roads & buildings play a
very important role in tree
assessment. Tree Safety in
target areas is of highest
priority !

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Prime Target Area:


Play Ground

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

How to Read a Tree and where to


drill ?

Hazard Assessment & VTA Visual Tree Inspection ( C. Mattheck)


Walk around the tree and inspect from the roots to the top
Assess the trees general health and growing conditions
Look for obvious wounds & decay
Look for root damage, cracks, indentations, fibre buckling in trunk
Look for irregularities i.e. swelling, included bark, abnormal lean
Note the HD ( Height/Diameter) ratio
Work out the most likely spot for decay
Look out for fungi and soft tissue
Know your species

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Know your Species


Certain tree species are prone to specific types
of defects.
It is advisable to study the behaviour of species
in your particular area by:
Talking to the local Arborist or Tree Worker,
examine failed trees, test trees before felling and
dissecting after.
The more the operator knows about the behaviour
of the species in the area, the more acuate the
reports are.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

What is Decay ?

Wood decay often starts with an injury.


Bacteria & micro organisms that are getting in are
responsible for the start of decay.
Fungi are also associated with decay.
Wood decay is common among trees. Decay can affect
the roots, sapwood, or heartwood. Some trees may
appear to be healthy, yet have extensive decay within
the heartwood. These trees, although appearing healthy,
are structurally weakened and will be more likely to fail.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Decay Formula ?
It is impossible to have a standard formula regarding the

amount of decay or hollow.

It depends on:

Is the tree standing alone or in a group protected from wind?


Is the tree in or near a Target area?
Is the tree short or tall ? Hight/Diameter Ratio (HD)
Has the tree excessive weight in crown?
Has the tree a large or small sail area?
Is the tree in general good health?
The Age of the tree.
Is this particular species prone to fail easily?
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Examples
A single, thin & tall tree with no decay could be
more of a concern than a compact, thick tree
with some decay.
A tree with little decay next to a children's play
ground is more of a concern than a tree with
more decay in a park, surrounded by other trees
in a non target area.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Wind & Weight

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Protected Trees from Wind


When trees are close together
they are more protected from
wind and will not fail as a
single tree on its own.

Wind

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Trees Protect each other.

in a Park

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Trees Protect each other.

. In a Forest
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Single (slender) Tree not Protected


A single slender unprotected tree
is more likely to fail.

Wind

Compression
Anchor Root

Tension

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Height/Diameter Ratio
The H/D ( Height/Diameter) Ratio is
very important when assessing a tree.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Slender/Tall vs. Thick/Short


A slender & tall tree is more
likely to fail than a short and
thick tree.

Height/Diameter Ratio !

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

This tree is short, thick, little weight


& small sail .

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

This tree is tall, slender and free standing

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Sail Area & Weight


Sail Area is the wind resistance
of the leaves and branches.
Sail
Sail

A tree with a large sail area and


heavy weight will fail generally
easier than a tree ( same height)
with less weight and small
sail area
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

WIND
WIND
WIND
Large

WIND

Sail

Small Sail

A tree with greater


Sail Area is more
susceptible to wind
than a tree with smaller
Sail Area of the same
eight.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

For how to calculate Wind Loads


please refer to Manual of Wood
Decay by K. Weber & C. Mattheck
Page 112.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Cracks, Free Floating Wood and


Wall Thickness

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Cracks
In order to identify the size of the crack, the
drilling process continues until satisfied.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

The Needle finds a Crack


If the needle (drill bit) accidentally runs along a
crack the graph will identify it as decay. (A)
One or more reference drills will clarify. (R)
R

A
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

% of Decay in Trunk or Wall


Thickness? Depends on the
Individual Tree

.
Min

e
c kn
i
h
lT
Wa l

ss

Decay

This trunk has less


than 30% decay but
a very minimal wallthickness therefore
the tree could fail.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

% of Decay or Wall Thickness ?


Here the % of decay is not that great but the
wall thickness on over half the trunk is minimal.
Therefore the tree is unsafe.

Min. Wall Thickness

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Free Floating Wood

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

The Holding Wood between two pockets of Decay is


to an extent free floating and of not much use for
the strength of the tree.

Wall
Wall

Free floating holing wood

Free floating holding wood

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Free Floating Sound Wood


Yellow: Sound Holding Wood
Red:
Decay
Yellow: X Free Floating Sound Wood

X
X
X
X
Note:
It might take more than 3 or 4 drills
to establish a picture like this.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Free Floating Wood

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Example of Graph with free floating


sound wood .

Sound

Decay

Free Floating sound wood should be ignored


and classed as Decay as it does not serve any
role in the strength of the tree .

Decay

Bark

free floating
sound wood
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

If there are pockets of decay with free floating


sound wood in between, then the whole should be
classed as Not Sound

Arrows show free floating


sound wood

Sound

Not Sound

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

False identified Free Floating Wood


False Free Floating Wood

Drill

Free Floating Wood is NOT


attached to the sound structure
of the tree !

If there are two or more pockets of


decay and we only conduct one drill, then
we could identify the wood between these
pockets as free floating wood. Therefore
Copyright
Peter Blank
2007
more drilling is required
to be
sure.
(c) 2006

Free Floating Wood

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Different Stages of Decay


Honey Comb Decay
& Free Floating Wood

Decay start/soft

Wall

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Different Types of Decay


A
A = Wall
B = Decay start/ Soft / Free floating
C = Honey Comb Decay

C
B

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Basic Tree Mechanics


By C. Mattheck

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Basic Tree Mechanics


By C. Mattheck

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Wounds in Trees

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Wounds in Trunk & Branches


Wounds on Trees can be caused by:
Fire.
Broken off or broken out branch.
Another tree or branch falling on it.
Stock & Wild Animals.
Machinery, i.e. Bulldozer, Lawnmower, Brush Cutter, Cars
etc.
Other human interference.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Decay is common in Wounds


Therefore decay is often suspected in or around
wounds on trunk and branches.
Wounds are the obvious and first place for
decay testing.
It is important to test not only in a wound but
also around the wound in order to find the full
extent of the decay.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Suspected Decay in right hand Trunk


and Root Crown

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Large Wound,
Suspect Decay in most of the lower Trunk and Roots

If this tree is decayed and the trunk


Is below a minimal wall thickness,
failure would be very much expected.

Fail here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds

Decay Zone

Drill Here

Drill Here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Wounds
Arrows show where to suspect decay & drill.

Decay Zone

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various types of Wounds


this wound is still open and therefore decay is suspected.

Drill Here

Drill Here

e
H
l
l
ri

re
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Arrows show where to drill.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Traffic/Machinery Wound in an
Elm Tree

Decay Zone
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Various Wounds
Arrows show where to suspect decay & drill.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds


This wound is too large for the tree to compartmentalise.

Drill Here

Drill Here
Drill Here
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds


Possible machinery or traffic wound.

Drill Here

Suspected Decay
Area

Drill Here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Indentations & Bulges


Indentations & Bulges indicate
possible decay in trunk or a limb.

Drill Here

Ref. Drill

Drill Here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Swelling on Co-Dominant Tree


The tree compensates decay, weight
and stress by forming more tissue
(like muscles), therefore one has
to suspect decay there.

Drill Here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Swelling
Swelling is often associated
with decay as the tree
compensates with extra
tissue.
The most likely place to find
decay is : see Arrow

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Swelling in Trunk

Drill Here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Swelling in Base of Trunk of


Co Dominant Tree
Drill Here

Drill Here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Swelling in Trunk

Tension

Compression

l in g
Swel
Drill Here

Drill Here

He
l
l
i
r
D

re
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Ridge for Reference Drill


Ridge

Perfect Reference
Drill Point

Tension Side

h
nc

oo
R
r

Note: The Amplitude will be sightly higher


Copyright
Peter Blank 2007
on a Ridge Tension
side.
(c) 2006

Various types of Wounds


Traffic Wound
Reference

Suspected Decay
Area

Drill here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Multi - Trunk

Ref. Drill

Drill Here
Drill here
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds


Tension

Compression

TENSION

REF.DRILL

DRILL HERE

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds

Heavy Machinery Wound

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Typical Fire Wound on Trunk

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Another Typical Fire Wound in a


Eucalyptus Tree

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Various Types of Wounds


Machinery /Traffic Wound
REF. DRILL

DRILL HERE

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds


Machinery /Traffic Wound

REF. DRILL

DRILL HERE

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds


Machinery /Traffic Wound

REF. DRILL

DRILL HERE

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds

Drill here

Drill here

Drill here

he
D r il l

re

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds


Machinery /Traffic Wound

Ref. Drill

Drill here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds


On this obvious Fire Wound the operator is measuring the
remaining wall thickness and the extent of decay in the
upper trunk & root crown .

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds

DRILL HERE
Suspected Decay
Area

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds


Arrows show where to test.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds


Arrows show where to drill.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Typical Rams Horn


The tree tried to compartmentalise the wound (fire
or machinery wound)

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Wounds


Arrows show where to suspect decay & drill.
Ref. Drill

Ref. Drill
Conduct Reference Drills to
determine the extent of decay

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Decay in Cupressus Mac.


( no visible wounds or faults from the outside ! )

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Wounds
Traffic Wound on an Elm Tree

Arrows show where to


suspect decay & drill

Open wound
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Types of Decay


Crack/Included Bark

Decay
Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Various Wounds, same Species of Tree

Machinery Wound, 70% Decay / 4 cm wall


thickness in lower trunk. Also the root
crown has a large amount of decay.
This tree could potentially fail !

Machinery Wound, very little decay ,


some dead wood in lower trunk.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Fruiting Bodies, Included Bark


& Co-Dominant Trees

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Fungi or Fruiting Body

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Fungi , an Indicator of Decay

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Fungi a Tell Tail of Decay


Residual sound wood

With still a good amount of residual


sound wood left, the fruiting body
has larger increments on top and
still growing. Therefore there is still
some sound wood in the tree.

Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Fungi a Tell Tail of Decay


Residual sound wood

With very little sound wood


left, the increments on the
fruiting body are smaller and
finished growing. Therefore
there is little sound wood left.

Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Old & Young Fungi

Younger, still growing

Older, finished growing

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Fruiting Bodies

Suspect Decay here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Fruiting Body on the base of a Wound

Wound
Suspect Decay in
Root Crown and
In Wound
Fruiting Body

Suspected Decay
Area

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Very large Ganoderma Fungi on the base


of a Fig Tree

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Fruiting Body on Trunk


Note the spiral crack

Fungi

Suspect Decay
here first

Crack
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Small Fruiting Bodies Developing

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Fruiting Bodies on Base of Tree

L
DRI

E RE
H
L

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

For more in depth information on


Fungus & Fruiting Bodies please
refer to: Manual of Wood Decays
by K. Weber & C. Mattheck.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Typical example of Included Bark .

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co-Dominant & Included Bark


Arrows show where decay is suspected. (ears)

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

What is included Bark ?


Included bark can be found enclosed between
branches with narrow angles of attachment,
forming a wedge between the branch or
trunk.
Included bark increases the risk of failure of
co-dominant stems.
Included bark can start off decay.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Included Bark

Included bark

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Included Bark

Drill Here
Drill Here
Drill Here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Included Bark

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Included Bark in Eucalyptus sp.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co-Dominant & Included Bark


Arrows show where Decay is suspected.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

What is a Co Dominant Trunk ?


A co-dominant trunk are two or more trunks which
are competing in size and competing for light and
often contains included bark.
Co-dominant and multiple trunks are susceptible to
splitting.
Co-dominant stems that have included bark are
significantly weaker than those that do not have bark
included.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Co Dominant Trees

Ref. Drill
Included bark

Drill Here
Drill Here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co-Dominant Trunk

Trunk

Trunk

Included Bark

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Two Typical Examples of Included


Bark in Silky Oaks

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a Co-Dominant Tree


- 17 cm Dia -

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Included Bark on a Co-Dominant Trunk

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co-Dominant Eucalyptus nicolii


* See next two pages for details

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

The same tree sliced up.

Decay

Included Bark

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co-Dominant Tree ( Eucalyptus nic.)

Resistograph Measurement

Decay-Hollow

Heartwood

Sapwood

Bark

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Failing Co-Dominant Tree

This Tree will Fail !

Crack
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Crack

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Pointy Ears
Pointy Ears on a co-dominant tree
is always a sign of a problem.

This co-dominant tree


is potentially unstable

Pointy Ears

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co - Dominant Tree
Swelling

Swelling

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Pointy Nosed Ears & Snub Nosed Ears

Snub Nose more stable then Pointy Nose Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006

U Shape & V Shape


Co-Dominant Trunks

V
Potentially Unstable

More Stable
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co Dominant Tree
Force

Included Bark

DRILL HERE

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co Dominant Tree
- next to a building -

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co - Dominant

Force

Force

Included Bark

DRILL HERE

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co-Dominant & Included Bark


Arrows show where to suspect decay.

Included Bark

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Failed Co-Dominant Stem due to Decay

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Failed Co-Dominant Stem due to Decay


Arrows show decay.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Broken Co-Dominant Stem


due to Decay

Broken Off Stem

Decay Zone

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Broken Co-Dominant Stem

Swelling
Broken out stem

Suspected Decay Zone


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Broken Co-Dominant Stem


due to Decay

Note the Swelling

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Swelling in fork
Arrows show where to drill.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Where this Tree can Fail

Decay Zone
Fail

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Co Dominant/ Multi Stem


Weight

Fo

r ce
o
F

e
H
l
l
i
Dr

re

rce

Decay Zone
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Failed Branch due to Decay in Dead Trunk


Dead Trunk

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Cracks

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Severe Shear Crack that WILL lead to Failure

Suspect Decay In
most of the trunk
Crack continuos on
into the root crown
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Shear Crack in the Trunk of a Silky Oak


Possible decay is also suspected

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Another severe Crack in the Trunk of a Silky


Oak This tree could fail at any time !

This Crack appears to be


caused initially by a wound.
85% of decay in trunk.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Cracks in Trunk and Branches.


Like the Hazard Beam

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Decay in Tree Roots

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Often the decay is at or below ground


level, therefore drilling in a 45 degree
position is necessary.

Ref. Drill

Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Good Flare of Trunk

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Root Plate of a London Plane Tree

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Root Flare & Land Fill

Decay

Drill 45 degrees

Ground Level

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Perfect Flare of Trunk

Trunk

Flare
Ground Level
Root

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Bad Example of Land Fill


Land Fill on the trunk can develop
Decay in the lower trunk (often just
below ground level).
This condition can even cause
death of the tree.

Trunk
Drill 45 degrees

Ground Level
Decay

Flare
Root

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

No Trunk Flare

Bitumen close around the trunk will eventually lead


to Decay and decline of the tree.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Land Fill on Trunk of a Eucalyptus


This Tree is Declining within 2 Years after the Landfill

Land Fill
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Garden Beds & Mulch ( Land Fill) too close &


around the Trunk Flare are often the cause of
Decay just below ground level.

Decay Zone

Mulch Garden Bed


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Garden Beds & Mulch ( Land Fill) too close &


around the Trunk Flare are often the cause of
Decay just below ground level.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Anchor Roots (Tension Roots)


Trees develop anchor roots ( like muscles) and are one
of the most important part of the trees stability.
The anchor roots of a tree are usually on the tension
side (wind side).
If there is decay in the anchor roots the tree is likely to
fail!
Therefore it is advisable to check out anchor roots for
visible wounds or decay.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Anchor Roots
WIND

Tension

Compression

Anchor Roots
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Anchor Roots

Anchor Roots are the are the


trees Anchor to stand up to wind
and weight. Supporting rocks
also help the stability.

Anchor Root

Wind

Soil
Stones

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Severe Wind will Stress Anchor Roots


WIND

For
ce

.therefore it is important that


Anchor- Roots do not have any defects.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Extreme Lean of a Eucalyptus sp.


Weight

Stress on Roots
Fail

This tree is likely to fail due to the


extreme lean, weight and stress
on Anchor roots.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Wind

An
ch
or

Wound

s
ot
Ro

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Testing Anchor Roots


Ref. Drill
Wind

Drill Here

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Root Decay
(Decay in Anchor Root)
Drill H
ere

An
ch
or

ou
vi
Ob

Ro

ot

Drill here

y
ca
De
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Anchor Roots
Arrows show where to test Anchor Roots for Decay.
Wind

Compression

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

The Anchor Roots show that the tree is


compensating heavy winds

Wind

Anchor Root
Note:
This Iron Bark Tree is
completely hollow in the
Lower trunk !
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Eroded Roots
can also cause Tree Failure

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

45 degree Resistograph Testing


Eucalyptus Nicoli
Eucalyptus Nicholii are usually sound in
their natural environment, however in urban
areas this species is commonly known to
have decay in the root crown.
The tree CAN test sound anywhere else in
the trunk !

KNOW YOUR SPECIES !

Decay Zone
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Root Decay drill on 45 degree angle.

Ref. Drill

Drill Here

Drill Here

Ground Level

Decay in Root
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Basic Tree Mechanics


Weight
Tension & Compression
Lever Arm

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Decay in Branch Collar and Lever Arm


Leaver

Weight

If there is decay here


this branch can fail.

Drill Here

Fibre Buckling

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Branch failed due to Weight

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Long Lever Branch

Weight
Possible Failure
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

One sided Weight in a Tree

Weight

One sided weight in a tree can be caused by


natural damage, not enough space or incorrect
pruning and can lead to failure particularly in
presence of decay.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

This Eucalyptus Tree bears its weight on one side


(compression side) therefore the Anchor Roots and
main Trunk has to be free of decay.

Wind

Weight
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

What is Tension & Compression?


Tension Wood - Reaction wood forms when trees
lean. Tension wood is what forms on the upper side
of the lean. Tension wood is strengthened on the
upper side of the lean.
Compression wood forms on the lower side of the
lean in trees.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Tension & Compression


Weight

Tension
Amplitude on Graph
Can be slightly higher
On the ridge - Tension

Compression

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Tension & Compression


The tree needs more strength on the tension side, builds
muscles or higher quality wood. Therefore this wood is
usually more dense and the measurement can show a slight
higher amplitude.
The amplitude on the compression side can show a slight
lower amplitude.
The Compression side is usually on the lee side of the tree.
Note: some species of trees have more decay on the
compression side (base) i.e. Eucalyptus Nicoli
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Graph Example of a leaning tree with Decay


in centre
Drill direction

Needle Entry

Needle Exit

Decay in Centre

Compression Side

Note: the graph amplitude is


lower on the compression side

Tension Side
Note: the graph amplitude
Is higher on the
Tension side
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006

Tension & Compression in a Bend


As the tree builds muscles on the wind side (tension)
of the tree, the wood becomes stronger and therefore
the amplitude in the graph is highest where the
tree is most curved.

Compression Side
Tension Side

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Tension, Compression & Weight

on
i
s
n
Te
Weakest Point

io
ss

re
p
m
Co

If this tree has decay in the


trunk, then it would fail.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Strong Leaning Tree


Weight
Tension

Compression

Drill Here

Drill Here
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Tension & Compression


Compression

Tension
Not compressed
but higher strength

Compression

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Bend in Trunk
see Arrow where tree could fail.

Weight
Possible Failure

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Multi Stem
Arrows show where the tree could fail.

Weight

Bark Buckling

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Bark Buckling on Branch due to Weight


see Arrow

Weight
Co
m

pr

es

si
o

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Bark Buckling in lower Trunk


see Arrow

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Bark Buckling on Bend in Trunk

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Bark Buckling on Branch due to Weight


see Arrows

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Shell buckling

(c) 2006

Fungi
Like a kinked hose, a hollow (decayed) tree is
giving way to the weight of the tree.

Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Darren Williams

Epicormic Growth
Epicormic growth is shoots arising from
activated buds situated at the base of the tree and
on the main trunk.
Epicormic growth often occurs after heavy
pruning or lopping of trunks and fires.
Epicormic growth is not very strong and will fail
regularly as it is not supported by a trunk collar.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Epicormic Groth

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Epicormic Growth on an Iron Bark


- Epicormic Growth will eventually fail.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Epicormic Growth after Bush Fire

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Epicormic Growth that is likely to fail

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

PART 3.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Basic Pruning, Dead Wood


&
Compartmentalization

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Double Leader

Older Tree

Younger Tree

A young tree with a double


leader could end up Co-dominant .

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

This Branch should have been pruned


when it was young

Fa

il

Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Epicormic Growth on this young Jacaranda


should be pruned off at an early stage to
prevent future failures.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Double Leaders
Double leaders will lead to Co-Dominant stems and therefore not
desired. It is advisable to prune the young tree.

Prune Here
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

What is Compartmentalization ?
When trees come under attack from microorganisms, the primary line of defence is a
mechanism called compartmentalization.
In the case of a pruning cut or wound the tree
then builds cells around it and tries to seal it.
Some species of trees compartmentalize better
than others.
For more on compartmentalization please refer
to the works of Alex Shigo.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Compartmentalization

This branch is starting


to compartmentalize

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Compartmentalization
This branch is starting to
compartmentalize

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Full Compartmentalization of a Branch

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Compartmentalization

This branch has completely


compartmentalised

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Tree compartmentalising over a


Machinery Wound

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Broken off limbs are prone to decay and


therefore should be pruned correctly.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Some interesting Pictures

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Lightning Strike

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Fusion of Branch

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Tree growing over fence

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Correct Pruning can prevent Decay !

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Branch Collar

Incorrect previous
Pruning cut

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Totally Compartmentalised

Detained Decay

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Compartmentalised Branch Collar

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Dead Branch
Branch collar

Dead branch

Dead branch

Branch collar
Branch collar

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Dead Branch
Open Wound

Decay

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Dead Branch
Branch Collar

Branch Collar

The tree is trying to compartmentalise but


can not get tissue over the dead branch.
Notice collar is curling back. (arrow)

Decay
Copyright Peter Blank 2007
(c) 2006

Correct Pruning so tissue can grow over the


wound and compartmentalise.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Correct Pruning on the Branch


Collar

Alex
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Shigo

Correct Pruning
Flush Cut versus Correct Cut.

With a Flush Cut , it is harder


for the tree to Compartmentalize

The Branch Collar helps the tree to


Copyright Peter Blank 2007
Compartmentalize

Alex Shigo

Correct Pruning

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Alex Shigo

Correct Old Pruning

Perfect compartmentalisation

Correct old pruning cut

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Start of Compartmentalisation from a


previous pruning cut.

Starting to grow over

Previous
Pruning Cut

Starting to grow over


Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Alex Shigo writes more about correct


pruning and compartmentalisation in his
books and publications.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Dead-Wood
Dead-wood, or dead branches, are a normal part
of a trees growth pattern but will eventually fall.
Branches over five centimetres in diameter can
cause serious damage when they fall. Removal of
dead-wood should always be a priority.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Dangerous Dead-wood can fall


anytime

Dead-Wood

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

PART 4.
Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Further Reading

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

We recommend further reading

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

We recommend further reading

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

We recommend further reading:

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

We recommend further reading:

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Professor Claus Mattheck writes


more about Tree Mechanics in his
books and publications.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Does Drilling Harm the Tree ?


After an extensive scientific study by Prof. Claus
Mattheck it is now proven that even excessive drilling
does NOT harm the tree.
Please refer to the paper of The Effects of
Excessive Drilling on Wood Decay in Trees
K. Weber & C. Mattheck

Free Download at:

www.wooddecaydetectionmanual.com

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Fresh cut Trees that had been


Resistograph tested some years ago.
Reaction Zone
Drill

Drill

This Tree was Drilled 7 Years ago

This Tree was Drilled 10 Years ago

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Please read the Study on The Effects of Drilling

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Claus Mattheck Seminar Tour


Australia 2004

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Mattheck Seminar Tour 2004 Australia

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Claus Mattheck Tour 2004 Australia

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Claus Mattheck Tour 2004 Australia

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

(c) 2006

Seminar Course
This Manual is also available as a
Seminar Course
Please contact us for details.

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

Acknowledgments & Thanks

C. Mattheck
A. Shigo
Darren Williams
IML Germany

Copyright Peter Blank 2007

You might also like