Study On Digital Earthquake-Before Damage Evaluation: Min Zhu Zhongke Feng Huijie Tong Yongxia Liu Yankai Yang
Study On Digital Earthquake-Before Damage Evaluation: Min Zhu Zhongke Feng Huijie Tong Yongxia Liu Yankai Yang
Study On Digital Earthquake-Before Damage Evaluation: Min Zhu Zhongke Feng Huijie Tong Yongxia Liu Yankai Yang
Min Zhu Zhongke Feng Huijie Tong Yongxia Liu Yankai Yang
1
ABSTRACT :
Buildings digital auxiliary classification, summation of different kinds of buildings area, for earthquake-before
damage evaluation investigation, by integrated application of RS (Remote Sensing) and DPS (Digital
Photogrammetry System) and otherwise digital method are studied. Two kinds of buildings digital auxiliary
classification methods for earthquake-before damage evaluation have been used. If there are remote sensing
image stereo pairs in the evaluated area, DPS can be used. A number of DSM (digital surface models) of
three-dimensional structures and DEM can be obtained. There is another earthquake-before damage evaluation
survey method that buildings height are calculated automatically by buildings shadows in remote sensing image.
Buildings can be aided classified by height. According to formulas of aerial survey, buildings height can be
calculated by the shadows. The buildings shadows can be picked up by a series of RS image transformations.
The area summation of different kind of buildings can be obtained by GIS. Digital earthquake-before damage
evaluation, which combines digital technology with experience and statistical evaluation, is faster than
traditional methods.
KEYWORDS: Digital classification, Earthquake-before damage evaluation, DPS, RS
1. INTRODUCTION
Digital technology has been applied to prevention and reduction disaster in recent years. RS and DPS, two
kinds of digital technology have been applied to earthquake before damage evaluation and environment change
measurement.
Narpat Singh Rathore utilized RS, to study topography change earthquake bringing. Nioki Ogawa and
Hirotada Hasegawa estimated respectively earthquake damage of wood buildings by Kobe earthquake aerial
remote sensing images. Some micro vertical diastrophism of active fault was monitored and surveyed utilizing
radar images. Earthquake tectonic maps of remote sensing images interpretation in china have been compiled
by seismologists and rocksies and earthquake engineering scientists in the sevens of the twentieth century.
Aerial remote sensing images were interpreted artifically by Decheng Zhang for earthquake damage evaluation
of buildings in 1993. The aerial remote sensing images were utilized by Yang Zhe to investigation of
Lanchang-Gengma earthquake disaster. Earthquake damage evaluation of disaster area was studied by Zhang
Jingfa contrasting radar remote sensing earthquake stricken before with after.
Change of topographic and wild sight was studied by Gong Peng with DPS. Performance of concrete
girder bearing shearing force was studied by Qu Zhe with DPS.
Automatic extraction of shadows from high resolution spatial satellite images were studied by Xu
Miaozhong. The distribution information of different heights building in a city was extracted from the shadows
in an Ikonos image by Xie Junfei.
th
Earthquake before damage evaluation in china began in the sevens last century after Tangshan earthquake.
The earthquake vulnerability analysis is the primary means for earthquake before damage evaluation. The
structure will be destroyed if outside force put is over a threshold, this can be evaluated and calculated by a
number of parameters on type of buildings and building materials and so on. First of all works for earthquake
before damage evaluation, the buildings are classified according to the principles of vulnerability classification.
The principles of vulnerability categories are according to earthquake damage with similar buildings in the past
earthquakes. The field survey of the evaluation area was the basis for earthquake vulnerability calculation.
Sample buildings were surveyed detailedly for statistical calculation of vulnerability. The more sample
buildings the better the result of statistical calculation is.
In traditional field survey of earthquake before damage evaluation, a number of representative buildings
chosen from each kind of general-purpose buildings were surveyed one by one. A series of information for
earthquake before damage evaluation can be obtained by calculating with results surveyed. A lot of field survey
information can be obtained by digital technology. People on the ground of limited sight, are lack of overall
macro distribution of different type buildings. The buildings are overlooked in the air utilizing RS and DPS.
There are characteristics of overlay area extensive and evaluation fast. RS and DPS digital technology were
applied to aid classification on field survey for earthquake before damage evaluation.
More than 600 buildings were digital measured in the digital test. The information of DSM and DEM and
the types of building roof were obtained. The height of a building can be obtained by formula 2.1.
h = DSM-DEM
(2.1)
In formula 2.1, h is a building height, DSM is a value of digital surface model and DEM is a value of
th
Blue represented drop shadow of buildings in figure 3. Other kinds of color represented different kind
of buildings roof , a part of buildings , road, trees and so on. There were some confusion categories
between shadow and water, buildings and roads. It can be improved by aided information.
After unsupervised classifying, supervised classification is utilized. Trees, buildings with five color roof,
roads and drop shadow are included in supervised classification template. The possibility matrix was utilized to
estimate classification template and it is shown in table 3.1.
Table 3.1
Result Temple
Tree
East-west
Grey roof
Brown roof
Light-grey roof
White roof
Road
Shadow
Tree
11276
12
10
162
East-west
30
964
509
48
Objects
th
Grey roof
4628
61
Brown roof
528
Light-grey roof
12
17
991
White roof
30
740
36
Road
465
51
550
Shadow
445
4685
Total
11770
994
5652
528
1052
852
589
4847
The classification results are more satisfactory. There are some confused category to be improved between
roads and buildings. The results need to be improved through referring to special topic and field survey
information. Partial supervised category results are shown in figure 4.
In figure 4, green represented trees. Blue, grey, yellow, purple and white represented different color
roof of buildings. Black represented drop shadow of buildings.
According to aerial survey formulae, buildings height is calculated with buildings shadow. The length of
buildings shadow extracted automatically by RS, as shown in figure 3, was calculated automatically by GIS.
Shadow of the buildings were measured, the partial results are shown in table 3.2.
Table 3.2 Buildings shadow length calculated automatically
Number Shadow length(m) Number Shadow length (m) Number Shadow length (m)
10
20.8173
19
13.0384
28
17.366635
11
23.021729
20
8.485281
29
28.319605
12
23.64148
21
3.622154
30
19.284
13
18.508376
22
17.075128
31
8.551023
14
9.338094
23
34.567615
32
8.318654
15
8.551023
24
4.701644
33
22.951253
16
15.770859
25
4.837355
34
16.643317
17
6.003
26
7.002857
35
5.60357
18
13.0384
27
9.535198
36
22.598521
According to shadow as above, building height and floor number are calculated. The results are shown in
table 3.3.
Table 3.3 Buildings height and floor number
Number Height(m) Floor number
Opinion Number Height(m) Floor number
10
22.212
7
right
24
5.0166
1
11
24.5641
8
right
25
5.1614
1
12
25.2254
8
right
26
7.472
2
13
19.7484
6
right
27
10.174
3
14
9.9637
3
right
28
18.5302
6
15
9.1239
3
right
29
30.217
10
16
16.8275
5
right
30
20.576
6
17
6.4052
2
right
31
9.1239
3
18
13.9119
4
right
32
8.876
2
Opinion
right
right
right
right
right
right
right
right
right
th
19
20
21
22
23
13.9119
9.0538
3.8648
18.2191
36.8836
4
right
3
right
1 low value
6
right
12
right
33
34
35
36
24.4889
17.7584
5.979
24.1126
8
right
5
right
2 more low
8
right
Comparison results between digital and actual classification, the accurate rate is 80%.The accurate rate of
classification for low-rise and smaller buildings is not ideal because the buildings distribution was denser and
there were a lot of high-rise buildings in the test area.
4. CONCLUSION
The digital technology can play an important part in earthquake damage evaluation when it is more dificult
to field survey. The RS and DPS can be utilized to quantitative survey of wide scope in a short period of time by
interpreting high image. The results can covered a broad area and be more precision. To improve the efficiency
of earthquake before damage evaluation using digital technology is a very significant. It is great importance to
development of prevention and reduction earthquake disaster.
REFERENCES
Nioki Ogawa,Furmio Yamazaki.(2000),Photo-interpretation of building damage due to earthquakes using aerial
photographs,Proc of 12 WCEE,Vol 15:1906,New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Zhang Decheng.(1993), Preliminary study on visual interpretation marks of building damages caused by
earthquakes on aerophotograph. Earthquake 1, 26-30.
Zhang Jingfa, Xie Lili and Tao Xiaxin (2001).Pattern analysis of remote sensing imagery for some typical
earthquake damages. Journal of Natural Disasters 10:2, 89-95.
Gong Peng, Mei Xieliang and Gregory S. Biging (1999). Monitoring oak woodland change using digital
photogrammetry. Journal of remote sensing 3:4, 285-288.
Gong Peng (2000).Digital surface model and topographic change monitoring. Quaternary sciences 20:3,
247-251.