100% found this document useful (2 votes)
232 views14 pages

A Shape Grammar Model To Generate Islamic Geometric

This document summarizes a paper that presents a shape grammar model for generating Islamic geometric patterns based on combinations of decagons. It discusses how decagons and their sub-shapes, the bowtie and elongated hexagon, can be combined to cover surfaces based on two design templates. The aim is to generate new patterns with the same genetic features as original Islamic geometric patterns. In the future, the authors want to implement this shape grammar model in a computer program to more easily and quickly generate results.

Uploaded by

Hülya Oral
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
232 views14 pages

A Shape Grammar Model To Generate Islamic Geometric

This document summarizes a paper that presents a shape grammar model for generating Islamic geometric patterns based on combinations of decagons. It discusses how decagons and their sub-shapes, the bowtie and elongated hexagon, can be combined to cover surfaces based on two design templates. The aim is to generate new patterns with the same genetic features as original Islamic geometric patterns. In the future, the authors want to implement this shape grammar model in a computer program to more easily and quickly generate results.

Uploaded by

Hülya Oral
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

A Shape Grammar Model To Generate Islamic Geometric


Pattern
Ebru ULU, MSc. Arch.
Architectural Design Computing PhD Program,
Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
e-mail: [email protected]
Assoc. Prof. Sinan Mert ENER, PhD. Arch.
Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University,
Istanbul, Turkey
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract
Geometric patterns are the important ornaments of Islamic art and architecture.
Polygons and poly-pointed star patterns, especially the 6-, 8-, 10- and 12-sided
polygons were mostly used in Islamic art and architecture. They have created
various geometrical compositions on the surfaces. The 10 sided polygon, decagon,
is a special shape in Islamic geometry. This study is evaluating the special features
of decagons in Islamic art by analysing the Penrose tiles, aiming the generation of
new patterns that have the similar characteristics of the geometric patterns in Islam
with the help of a shape grammar model. In this context, two design templates
developed are for the new generated patterns.
In this paper, the combinations of the bowtie and the elongated hexagon, which are
the sub shapes of a decagon, are mentioned and generated to make it possible to
cover a rectangular surface. Two bowtie-elongated hexagon templates help to
generate new forms. They are related to Islamic geometrical patterns and many
results of the generation from these two templates are given in the framework of this
study.
The aim of this paper is to show that different final products can be formed from the
shapes, which have the same design language and same initial shape applying the
same rule schema. It is clarified that a design can be handled at a wider perspective
in the context of shape grammars and reproduced by the new designs with the same
genetic features.
The future goal of this research is to apply this shape grammar model and the design
templates with a computer program, in order to get the results easier and faster.

1. Introduction
Since 1977, Stinys paper about generation of Chinese lattice design [10] shape
grammars have been used to understand the design language, to analyse a design
or a shape and to generate new designs from the same language. The shape
grammars are a rule-based design method, which helps to solve the rule schema of
a structure of a design. A lot of houses, shapes or compositions such as Turkish
Traditional Houses [6], Alvaro Sizas Malagueira Houses [7], Queen Ann Houses [8],
Palladian Villas [11], Mughul Gardens [12], Architect Sinans Mosques [13] and the
Meander Motifs on Greek Geometric Pottery [9] were analysed in the context of
Page 269

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

shape grammars. The analyses of Islamic geometries were also a research field in
different disciplinary [14-17].
Before the acceptance of the religion of Islam there was not a significant art style or
a dominant architectural tradition. After that, there was the belief coming from the
respect to the principle There is no God but Allah! which prohibited using the
figures as decoration elements. In Islamic art and architecture, the role played by the
non-figural style in religion caused the patterns to come in three distinct geometrical
types: the Arabic script, floral decoration called Arabesque, and geometrical patterns
[4]. First recognizable style is the Kufic patterns that are formed into rectangles and
squares to create calligraphic designs. Such patterns are used to add dignity and
solemnity onto the architectural surfaces. The second distinct pattern group is the
floral decoration, which is also called as arabesques. This type of ornaments occur
curvilinear elements symbolizing leafed and floral forms [1]. The significant ornament
type in Islamic art and architecture is the geometric patterns that include complex
polygons and poly-pointed star shapes. The patterns were applied on different types
of materials such as brick, wood, tiling, stone, plaster, stucco and paper. Islamic
compositions are usually used for wall, door, window, ceiling and mimbar
decorations.
There are numerous different geometric patterns in Islamic art and architecture. This
study focused on the geometric compositions, their sub shapes and the generation
of the new geometric patterns, which have the same characteristics with the original
ones, based on a shape grammar model.

2. Geometric Patterns
The most striking characteristic of the geometric patterns in Islamic art is the
prominent symmetric shapes, which are like stars and constellations. 6-, 8-, 10-, 12pointed star shapes are the ones that occur mostly in ornaments. Another important
characteristic is that the rectilinear forms are interlacing each other, and continuously
following the lines. The last features are the variety of the shapes, the flow and
unboundedness of the entire composition. In the composition, the context of copying
the shape is that, every cell repeats itself indefinitely with the rule of symmetry to fill
the space [1].
The most popular shapes such as 6-, 8-, 10-, 12-pointed stars are created in the
limits of the hidden circle. The circle helps to perceive the interlaced composition as
a strong unitary, which symbolizes the one and the only God, Allah [3]. The
geometries develop in two different ways such as linear-developed compositions and
centric-developed compositions. The first type of composition includes zigzags,
V-formed shapes, meanders and also poly-pointed stars. The centric-developed
compositions, also called closed geometries, contains polygons, poly-pointed stars,
medallions and mixed geometries.
Below it is seen the creation of a hexagon and a 6-pointed star; an octagon and an
8-pointed star; a decagon and a 10-pointed star; and finally a dodecagon and a 12pointed star in 3 different ways. First 3 shapes are created by centric rotation of the
same circle after starting by a point, a line and then a simple shaped circle. The

Page 270

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

figure 4 shows that the initial shape is different for the same rule schema that creates
the same final shape in different scales.

Figure 41. Creation of hexagon and 6-pointed star.

Figure 42. Creation of octagon and 8-pointed star.

Figure 43. Creation of decagon and 10-pointed star.

Page 271

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

Figure 44. Types of creation of dodecagon and 12-pointed star.


In this study, the creation of the design templates that generate new Islamic
geometries is based on the synthesis of the features and the rule schemas given
above.

3. Pentaplex Tiling and the Special Shape: Decagon

Figure 45. Rotational symmetries of basic Islamic geometries.


It is a common method to use various geometric tiles to cover a surface. The
assembling of the tiles establishes an important point which is, the tiles cannot
overlap on each other, and there cannot be a gap between them. The figure 5 shows
the most used tiles in Islamic ornaments and makes clear that equilateral triangle,
square and hexagon have a rotational symmetry, and they can cover a surface

Page 272

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

without any gaps or overlapped tiles. However, the pentagon and decagon need
support elements to close the rotational symmetry. Therefore, it is not possible to
create a periodic pattern with rotational symmetry using only pentagons or decagons.
There are seventeen periodic pattern types created by 2-, 3-, 4- and 6-fold rotational
symmetries. Most of them are also used in Islamic geometric patterns [1]. But the 5fold rotational symmetry is not used for the periodic patterns. From this point of view,
the aperiodic patterns with 5-fold rotational symmetry could be discussed.
The Pentaplex tiles are mentioned first in 1970s by Roger Penrose, a famous
physician. These tiles cover the surfaces, which contain 5-fold rotational symmetry,
aperiodically. The Pentaplex tiles in Turkish-Islamic art have been being used since
th
11 century [2]. The figure below shows one of the 3 types of Penrose tiles. This
group contains the shapes called the kite and the dart.

Figure 46. The alternative Penrose tile combinations of darts and kites.
When the entire composition created by Penrose tiles is researched, and the
assembling of the sub shapes is observed, it is realized that kites and darts create
new shapes, which will be the key points of the design templates at the end of this
research. The figure 7 clarifies the very first steps, and the source of the entire study.

Figure 7. The creation of the decagon from the tie and the bowtie.
st
1 step shows the sub shapes of the Penrose tiles, the combination of darts and
nd
kites. At the 2 level three new shapes called tie, fish and star are created. The next
level makes it clear that the tie is also the sub shape of the fish and star with a new

Page 273

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009


th

shape named bowtie, which is shown with the color light grey at the 4 step. The last
step is the most important one that represents the creation of the special form
decagon from the tie and the bowtie. In other words, the decagon comes from the
sub shapes of the Penrose tiles, and also it can be said that the sub shapes of the
Penrose tiles are also the sub shapes of the decagon.

4. Pattern Generation from Decagon


The figure below shows that the tie and the bowtie come together in many variations
to create fish, decagon and star shapes. There are 2 variations for the fish shape, 10
variations for the decagon and 5 combinations for the star shape.

Figure 8. The variations of tie and bowtie

Figure 9. 5 girih tiles: decagon, pentagon, hexagon (tie), bowtie, and rhombus [5].
In 2007, Peter Lu and Paul Steinhardt mentioned in their paper about the Decagonal
Tilings in Medieval Islamic Architecture that equilateral polygons girih tiles- created
complex periodic girih patterns with self-similar transformations to construct nearly
perfect quasi-crystalline Penrose patterns five centuries before their discovery in the
West [5]. The drawing on the left is the complete set of the 5 girih tiles: decagon,
pentagon, hexagon (in this paper it is called as tie), bowtie, and rhombus. The
th
picture on the right hand side in Figure 9 is from the outside wall of a 15 century
Timurid tomb with tie, bowtie and decagon layer on it. The overlapped layer indicates
that this pattern is developing periodically. From this point on, it can be said that it is
possible to create periodic patterns by using only decagons, which consist of three
ties and a bowtie.

Page 274

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009


st

First drawing below illustrates the generation of the 1 design template. First step
shows the initial shape of the shape grammar. The decagon, the initial shape, is
rotated on the corner 5 times intersecting each other in the context of the rule 1. The
second shape is a combination of ties and fish shapes with 5-fold rotational
symmetry. According to the rule 2, two decagons are added above the last
generated shape at the edges. Rule 3 contains the reflection of the entire shape
vertically before it is reflected horizontally in the rule 4. After the rule 4 was applied
there is a star-decagonal formed gap in the center. Last rule tells to put a decagon in
the center of the whole composition. The output shape is the first design template
that will be covered by covering tile groups afterward.

st
Figure 10. The rule schema of the 1 design templates shape grammar.
nd
Second drawing shows the generation of the 2 design template. The rule schema
is similar to the first shape grammars rules. The main point of two rule schemata is
the symmetry that is also the most important feature of Islamic patterns. Another key
point is to put the decagons at the corners and in the center of the entire design
template. The last thing to pay attention is the symmetry axes of the whole pattern
have to cross the symmetry axes of the shapes on it. Figure 12 indicates that the
edges of the rectangle and the axes of the pattern are located on the symmetry axes
of the star shape, tie and bowtie.

Page 275

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

Figure 11. The rule schema of the 2

nd

design templates shape grammar.

Figure 12. The generation constraints of the design template.


The design templates can also generate themselves in the context of the rules and
constraints. As it was mentioned before, star, fish shapes and decagons consist of
ties and bowties, so that for every decagon there are 10; for every star shape there
are 5; and for every fish shape there are 2 different combinations. There are also
combinations of every shape with each other that give numerous alternatives from
two design templates. The Figures 13 and 14 show some alternative results of the
two initial design templates. The code of the derivatives indicates the number of the
st
design template (number of the level) [number of the derivation at the 1 level
nd
rd
level number of the derivation at the 3 level]
number of the derivation at the 2
the letter code of the derivative at the 4th level.

Page 276

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

st
Figure 13. The derivatives of the 1 design template.

Figure 14 The derivatives of the 1st design template.

Page 277

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

Figure 15. 3 groups of covering tiles of decagon, tie, and bowtie.


There are three groups of covering tiles to fill the end derivatives. Figure 15 shows
the tile groups for each decagon, tie and bowtie. First group is developed from Lu
and Steinhardts researches. After they examined some ornaments of Islamic
architecture such as Darb-I Imam Shrine at Isfahan, Iran, Ottoman Green Mosque in
Bursa, Turkey, Mughal Itimad al-Daula Mausoleum in Agra, India they found many
geometric patterns combined by decagon, tie and bowtie. The first group is the
nd
rd
simplest one of all. 2 and 3 groups are created by Prof. Dr. Metin Ark and
rd
Mustafa Sancak. The 3 one is the most complex one and involves more tiles than
the other group.
nd

First column of the groups shows the covering tiles for the decagon shape, by 2
rd
column for the tie and the 3 column for the bowtie. That means where there is a
decagon in the design template it will be filled by one of the circular patterns, if it is a
tie then it will be covered by one of the vertical patterns, and a bowtie will be filled
with one of the horizontal patterns.

st
It is given in the figures 16 and 17 an end derivative from the 1 design template and
the geometric pattern results after all of the decagons, ties and bowties filled with
every group of covering tiles. Figure 18 and 19 show the same results for one of the
nd
end derivatives of the 2 design template.

Page 278

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

st
Figure 16. Derivative of the 1 design template covered by 3 groups of covering tiles.

Figure 17.Derivative of the 1st design template covered by 3 groups of covering tiles.

Page 279

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

nd

Figure 18. Derivative of the 2 design template covered by 3 groups of covering tiles.

Figure 19. Derivative of the 2nddesign template covered by 3 groups of covering tiles.

Page 280

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

5. Conclusion and Future Studies


In the context of this research the special features and the creation of decagons are
evaluated by analysing the Penrose tiles. With the help of a shape grammar model
the structure rules schemata is developed to generate new patterns that have the
similar features of the geometric patterns in Islamic art. From this point, it is given
two design templates, which are developed for the new generated patterns in the
context of the characteristics of Islamic geometries.
In this study, the shape grammar model helps to determine that it is possible to get
different final products, which have the same initial shape and design templates
created with the same rule schemata. This result indicates a design analyses could
be dealt with in a wider perspective and generate new designs with same
characteristics.
According to the analyses it is realized that the decagons are acting different than
the other shapes creating geometric patterns in Islamic art and architecture. The
decagons with a 5-fold rotational symmetry make it possible for the sub shapes, tie
and bowtie, to create countless template variations for Islamic patterns. When the
structure of the decagons is examined, it clarifies that ties and bowties have been
being used for hundreds of years in Islamic art and architecture. It must be accepted
that all of the geometric patterns in Islamic art and architecture are perfect results of
a superior intelligence. This study shows that these patterns do not have limits to be
designed, and they can be generated in the context of lots of different rule schemata.
They never could be regarded as old fashioned or unusable.
For the future studies the shape grammar model and the design templates will be
applied into the computer to get the results easier and faster. The model could be
changed by the new rule schemata, and the new design templates and the new
covering tile groups could be generated with help of the computer software. Another
goal for the future is to get digital results intended for manipulating and
manufacturing the patterns in the sense of the computer generated pattern program,
which could be used not only for the Islamic patterns but also for many existent or
new geometric patterns.

References
[1] Abas, S. J. and Salman, A. S., 1998. Symmetries of Islamic Patterns. World
Scientific, London.
[2] Ark, M. and Sancak, M., 2007. Pentapleks Kaplamalar. Tbitak Yaynlar,
Ankara.
[3] Burckhardt, T., 2005. slam Sanat: Dil ve Anlam. Klasik Yaynlar, stanbul.
[4] Rice, D. T., 1984. Islamic Art, Revised Edition. Thames and Hudson, Spain.
[5] Lu, P. J., Steinhardt, P. J. (2007). Decagonal and Quasi-Crystalline Tilings in
Medieval Islamic Architecture. Science 315, 1106-1110. Accessed
26.03.2009, http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/315/5815/1106
[6] ada, G., 1996: A Shape Grammar: The Language of Traditional Turkish

Page 281

th

12 Generative Art Conference GA2009

Houses, Environment and Planning B, 5, 443-464.


[7] Duarte, J. P., 2005: Towards the Mass Customization of Housing: The Grammar
of Siza's Houses at Malagueira. Environment and Planning B, 32,
347 380.
[8] Flemming, U., 1987: More Than The Sum of Its Parts: The Grammar of Queen
Anne Houses, Environment and Planning B, 14, 323-350.
[9] Knight, T. W., 1986: Transformations of the Meander Motif on Greek Geometric
Pottery. Design Computing 1, 29-67.
[10] Stiny, G., 1977: Ice-ray: a Note on the Generation of Chinese Lattice Designs.
Environment and Planning B, 4, 89-98.
[11] Stiny G. and Mitchell W. J., 1978: The Palladian Grammar. Environment and
Planning B, 5(1), 5 18.
[12] Stiny G. and Mitchell W. J., 1980: The Grammar of Paradise: on the Generation
of Mughul Gardens. Environment and Planning B, 7, 209-226.
[13] ener, S. M. 2009: A Shape Grammar Algorithm and Educational Software to
Analize Classic Ottoman Mosques. A|Z Journal of Faculty of
Architecture, 5-1 Spring, 12-30.
[14] Cenani, . and ada, G., 2007: A Shape Grammar Study: Form Generation
with Geometric Islamic Patterns. 10th Generative Art Conference
GA2007.
[15] olakolu, B., Yazar T. and Uysal, S. 2008: Educational Experiment on
Generative Tool Development In Architecture PatGen: Islamic Star
Pattern Generator, Architecture in Computro 26th eCAADe Conference
Proceedings, 685-691.
[16] Grnbaum, B., and Shephard G. C., 1992: Interlace patterns in Islamic and
Moorish Art, Leonardo, 25, 331339.
[17] Kaplan, C. S., 2000. Computer Generated Islamic Star Patterns, Bridges 2000
Proceedings. Accessed 10.03.2009, http://www.cgl.uwaterloo.ca/~csk/

Page 282

You might also like