Ism's of Ethics

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Moral realism

Moral realism is based on the idea that there are real objective
moral facts or truths in the universe. Moral statements provide
factual information about those truths.
Subjectivism
Subjectivism teaches that moral judgments are nothing more
than statements of a person's feelings or attitudes, and that
ethical statements do not contain factual truths about goodness
or badness.
In more detail: subjectivists say that moral statements are
statements about the feelings, attitudes and emotions that that
particular person or group has about a particular issue.
If a person says something is good or bad they are telling us
about the positive or negative feelings that they have about
that something.
So if someone says 'murder is wrong' they are telling us that
they disapprove of murder.
These statements are true if the person does hold the
appropriate attitude or have the appropriate feelings. They are
false if the person doesn't.
Emotivism
Emotivism is the view that moral claims are no more than
expressions of approval or disapproval.
This sounds like subjectivism, but in emotivism a moral
statement doesn't provide information about the speaker's
feelings about the topic but expresses those feelings.

When an emotivist says "murder is wrong" it's like saying


"down with murder" or "murder, yecch!" or just saying
"murder" while pulling a horrified face, or making a thumbsdown gesture at the same time as saying "murder is wrong".
So when someone makes a moral judgement they show their
feelings about something. Some theorists also suggest that in
expressing a feeling the person gives an instruction to others
about how to act towards the subject matter.
Prescriptivism
Prescriptivists think that ethical statements are instructions or
recommendations.
So if I say something is good, I'm recommending you to do it,
and if I say something is bad, I'm telling you not to do it.
There is almost always a prescriptive element in any real-world
ethical statement: any ethical statement can be reworked (with
a bit of effort) into a statement with an 'ought' in it. For
example: "lying is wrong" can be rewritten as "people ought
not to tell lies".

You might also like