Ethnography - Notes
Ethnography - Notes
Ethnography - Notes
Qualitative Research
Qualitative research differs in several aspects when compared to quantitative research, which deals
more with numbers, statistics, and 'objective' data gathering, where the gatherer of the data is not
directly involved in the gathering of the data.
• Discovery: Where you figure/learn things, allow yourself exposure to new thoughts.
• Inductive :
▪ Not deductive reasoning. Take a small example, a ground-level example, and extrapolate
to get the social conditions.
▪ Compare several different social realities if possible.
• Test 'common' ideas – Test to see if ideas that we things are commonplace and regular hold
good, or are regarded in the same way in the society being studied. Like family/religion etc.
• Social realities – Non standard. Complex, and filled with contradictions. Cannot be easily
explained, and will lose depth if simplified.
Basic Principles
• Working skepticism : Questioning what everyone takes for granted. (Like family, etc. Same as
'Testing common ideas')
• Open endedness : Start with a bare-bones skeletal framework, and fill it in with learned details,
not previous assumptions. More structure can be formed from the emerging picture, as more
fieldwork is done, and interviews/data is gathered. Let the data lead you, more than the other
way around.
Components
• Interviews
▪ Beyond 'face value' accounts. Interpret, and try for a deeper understanding.
▪ Iterative interviews
▪ Open ended, unstructured. Usually lengthy.
• Careful Recording
▪ Observant.
▪ Interview notes – Along with observations, have interview notes, as an additional way of
documenting.
Bias
• Biased Sample :
▪ Speaking only to one segment of society. (The other could be hostile, less easy to talk to,
etc.), ensuring that we don't get both sides of the story.
▪ Covering limited area, or using other shortcut methods (Like spot-interviewing, instead
of the building-rapport style of interviewing, which means the answers will have no
context, and hence will be biased)
▪ Solution : Try and minimise the bias in the sample. Try and get as representative a group
as possible.
• How direct is data : Getting second/third hand data increases the risk of the observers bias
entering into his narration of the facts.
• Location of interview :
▪ Socially : If the interviewer is socially at a very different place than the interviewee,
then there will be reluctance to be completely candid. (Account for it, and can be tried
and reduced by rapport-building)
▪ Spatial : People will probably be reluctant in discussing more private issues in public,
for example. Many other sorts of spatial bias can enter into it.