An Integrated Prototype of A Hotel Room Management System Towards Internal Cost Control Solutions
An Integrated Prototype of A Hotel Room Management System Towards Internal Cost Control Solutions
I. INTRODUCTION
In the hospitality industry, there are vast majority researches
on methods and techniques in order to achieve exceptional
service performance levels which symbolise higher customer
satisfactions. Each of the methods and techniques is seldom
able to work independently without other influences. The
influences include demographics, technology, market
segmentation, seasons, travel patterns, etc. Specifically, in the
hotel industry, these influences also cause variation in yields of
the industry. [1]
A hotel consists of a number of important departments
including front office (reservation and check-in services),
operations, housekeeping, accounting and finance, engineering,
foods and beverages. Each of the departments is operating on
its own tasks however there are a number of activities that
overlap. For example, the foods and beverages department
prepares foods and beverages for hotel customers. It requires
to report lists of foods and beverages sold to a cashier. Finally,
all of the sales must be reported back to the accounting and
finance department. It is possible to initially conclude that each
of departments does not work independently but there are some
interactions between departments. All of the departments are
monitored by a general manager who is in the middle-level
management of the organisational hierarchy. The general
manager performs duties on passing organisational objectives,
goals and strategies from top-level managers or committees to
operational managers. [2]
Figure 1. A traditional check-in process
2012 ACEEE
DOI: 02.ACE.2012.03. 20
89
Short Paper
Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Computer Engineering 2012
check-out procedures presented above are traditional procedures performed in most hotels. However, it can be varying
by the hotel policy. For example, some hotels may not allow
any credits for customers. [3]
90
Short Paper
Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Computer Engineering 2012
First-In-First-Out (FIFO), Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) and
Minimum Frequency Selection (MFS).
3.
if Status(Si ) = vacant
4.
if freq(Si) > freq(Ri)
5.
Si ! freq(Ri)
6.
end if
7.
i++
8.
end if
9. end for
10. return Si
The ideal checking-in style is manually selecting a room
from a floor map that will lead to inefficient cost controls. For
example, the hotel has 5 rooms occupied in the 10th floor. If there
is a guest would like to check-in, the front offices staff should
check the guest in to the 10th floor rather than other empty floor.
If it is managed properly, the hotel will only assign a housekeeper
in the 10th floor. The following figure is a pre-check-in screenshot.
It allows the front offices staff to pre-configure guests requests
(left of the screenshot) including room types, the Internet usage,
non-smoking, closed to lifts and outside views.
A. First-In-First-Out (FIFO)
Description: Select and sell the room that is most aging
checked-out, which has been cleaned.
Input
R is a set of all rooms available in the hotel.
S is a set of selected rooms
Output
Si is the best selected room with the current sales
strategy.
Methods
1. for all Ri R
2.
Out_Date(Si ) ! Current_Date
3.
if Status(Si ) = vacant
4.
if Out_Date(Si) > Out_Date(Ri)
5.
Si ! Out_Date(Ri)
6.
end if
7.
i++
8.
end if
9. end for
10. return Si
B. Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)
Description: Select and sell the room that is recently
checked-out, which has been cleaned.
Input
R is a set of all rooms available in the hotel.
S is a set of selected rooms
Output
Si is the best selected room with the current sales
strategy.
Methods
1. for all Ri R
2.
Out_Date(Si ) ! Current_Date
3.
if Status(Si ) = vacant
4.
if Out_Date(Si) < Out_Date(Ri)
5.
Si ! Out_Date(Ri)
6.
end if
7.
i++
8.
end if
9. end for
10. return Si
2012 ACEEE
DOI: 02.ACE.2012.03. 20
91
Short Paper
Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Computer Engineering 2012
According to our proposed prototype, a housekeeping
department also has similar screen as the above figure.
However, housekeepers are able to switch all of the room
status except locking (L) the room, which only allows for the
front office manager.
CONCLUSION
The integrated prototype of hotel room management
systems is only the starting focal point of the integration
between vital departments in a hotel. The proposed prototype
includes three main sales strategies, which are FIFO, LIFO
and MFS together with five main groups of users. The MFS
is the delightful sales strategy that assists to target the
efficient utilisation of facilities. The proposed prototype will
be employed into the hotel, which is our case study. Most of
the hotel requirements are included with some expansions in
the near future.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research is fully supported by the Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) Programme, Faculty of
Science, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. The authors
would like to thank valuable lecturers, staffs and students at
ICT for providing helpful supports.
REFERENCES
[1] M. J. OFallon and D. G. Rutherford. Hotel Management and
Operations, 2011.
[2] K. C. Laudon and J. P. Laudon. Management Information
Sytems: Managing the Digital Firms, 2007.
[3] J. A. Bardi. Hotel Front Office Management, 2003.
[4] W. J. Relihan, The Yield-Management Approach To HotelRoom Pricing, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration
Quarterly, vol. 1, May 1989, pp.40-45.
[5] EGENCIA [Online], Hotel Cost Control: Savings and
Opportunities, Available: http://www.egencia.co.uk
[6] M. B. Ghalia, Intelligent System to Support Judgement
Business Forecasting: The Case of Estimating Hotel Room
Demand, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no.
4, August 2000, pp.380 -397.
92