Wilking Fundamentalintro To Biofilms 2016 v3

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 48

Center for Biofilm Engineering

Fundamentals of
Microbial Biofilms
Center for Biofilm Engineering at
Montana State University

James N. Wilking
Assistant Professor, ChBE
Center for Biofilm Engineering
Montana State University
wilkinglab.com
2011, CLSM biofilm: K Hunt, MSU-CBE PhD student

CFP Biennial Meeting | 2016

Center for Biofilm Engineering


Bozeman, Montana

Free-swimming microbes vs. biofilms

Biofilms are all around us

Photos by CBE staff and students


unless otherwise noted.

Extracellular matrix:
a hallmark of microbial biofilms

JW Costerton

Extracellular matrix:
a hallmark of microbial biofilms

Extracellular matrix:
a hallmark of microbial biofilms

The extracellular matrix provides the


biofilm with mechanical integrity

Biofilms undergo a life-cycle

Biofilms undergo a life-cycle

Biofilm growth and spreading

Biofilms form complex structures

Biofilms undergo a life-cycle

Biofilm detachment

Planktonic bacteria ready to be released!

Biofilms impact industry, environment & health

Center for Biofilm Engineering


Industrial Associates
Consumer Products
Church & Dwight
Colgate-Palmolive
Johnson & Johnson
Kimberly-Clark
Masco
Procter & Gamble
Reckitt Benckiser
Sherwin Williams
Testing Laboratories
WuXi AppTec*
Energy
ExxonMobil
BP

Specialty Chemicals
BASF
BCG Solutions *
Clorox
Dow Corning
Dow Microbial Control
Ecolab/Nalco
NCH Corp.
Novozymes A/S
Sani-Marc
Sample6 Technologies*
Sealed-Air
US Govt Programs/Labs
NASA

Health Care/Biomedical
3M
Bard Access Systems
Bausch & Lomb
Baxter Healthcare
Bend Research*
Covidien
ICU Medical
Kane Biotech*
KCI
Next Science*
Semprus Biosciences*
Steris
W.L. Gore

Biofilm in oilfield pipeline system

Cooling tower biofilms

Health-related biofilms

Chronic wounds

Ellen Swogger, Garth James et al., MSU-CBE, 2005. Cover image on Wound Repair and Regeneration
16(1), January-February 2008, ISSN 1067-1927, Blackwell Publishing

Elbow prosthesis biofilm

Urinary catheter encrustation

Morris, N.S. and Stickler, D.J. (2001) BJU Int 88:192

Dental caries

Where ever moisture and nutrients are


present, there will be biofilms!

Biofilm in a water distribution system

Biofilm in a water distribution system

Why not just eradicate them with


antimicrobial agents?

Biofilms are more tolerant of


antimicrobial agents than are free bugs
Glutaraldehyde (50 mg/l)
against P. aeruginosa

Log Reduction

Biofilm

Planktonic
3

200

400

Time (min)

600

800

Biofilms are more tolerant of


antimicrobial agents than are free bugs
2

control

biofilm

Log (X/Xo)

0
-1
-2

Tobramycin
against P. aeruginosa

-3
-4

planktonic

-5
-6
0

25

50
Time (h)

75

100

Biofilm Tolerance
of Antimicrobial
Antimicrobial
tolerance
can be Agents
understood in light of three concepts

1. Slow penetration

Measure penetration with


microelectrodes

Hydrogen
Peroxide
Hydrogen
PeroxideConcentration
Concentration (mM)(mM)

H2O2 fails to penetrate the biofilm


60

chloride

bulkfluid
fluid
Bulk

50
40
30

H2O2

20

catalase

hypochlorite

10
0

H2O + 1/2O2

base
biofilm
Base
ofofbiofilm
0

600

1200

1800

2400

Time (sec)
Time
(seconds)

3000

3600

Chloride ions penetrate readily but


hypochlorite ions do not
Relative Penetration

1.0

Cl-

0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0

OCl0

200

400
600
Time (sec)

800

Hypochlorite penetrates biofilm slowly


1200
1000
800

600

5460 s

400
200
0

1511 s
47 s

200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Depth (microns)

2. Altered Microenvironment

Oxygen in P. aeruginosa Biofilm


Oxygen Concentration (mg/l)

7
sterile control

6
5
4
3
2
1
0
-50

untreated

50

100

Depth ( mm)

150

200

GFP Expression in P. aeruginosa Biofilm

DNA Replication Pattern Biofilm

3. Stress Response

Catalase Induction in P. aeruginosa


Biofilm
65

biofilm + H2O2

60

katB-lacZ

55
50
45
40

planktonic + H2O2

35
30

biofilm - untreated

25
0

10

20

30

Time (min)

40

50

60

Imaging antimicrobial action

S. epidermidis
biofilm staining
with Calcein AM
green (CAM)
Time: 1 hr
Vel = 6 cm/sec

Imaging antimicrobial action

CAM-stained
S. epidermidis
biofilm treated
with 10 mg/L
sodium
hypochlorite
Time: 1 hr
Vel = 6 cm/sec
W. Davison

Imaging antimicrobial action

CAM-stained
S. epidermidis
biofilm treated
with 50 mg/L
sodium
hypochlorite
Time: 1 hr
Vel = 6 cm/sec
W. Davison

Options for Microbial Control

Biofilm control in industrial systems


Regular cleaning and antimicrobial dosing
Antimicrobial access to the biofilm

Contact time
Materials Compatibility
Measuring successful treatment

Contents of these slides


were provided by faculty,
staff, and students in the
Center for Biofilm
Engineering at Montana
State University
www.biofilm.montana.edu
Thank you for your
attention!

You might also like