Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. David W. Oles AKA David Lane, 60 F.3d 837, 10th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an order and judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding an appeal by David Oles (aka David Lane) of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate or amend his sentence and the judge's refusal to recuse himself. The Tenth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not assist in determining the appeal. The court found no error in the district court's rulings and deemed the appeal frivolous, denying all requested relief. The mandate was ordered to issue forthwith.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. David W. Oles AKA David Lane, 60 F.3d 837, 10th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an order and judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding an appeal by David Oles (aka David Lane) of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate or amend his sentence and the judge's refusal to recuse himself. The Tenth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not assist in determining the appeal. The court found no error in the district court's rulings and deemed the appeal frivolous, denying all requested relief. The mandate was ordered to issue forthwith.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-07-07 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 60 F.3d 837 Docket: 94-3015

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an order and judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding an appeal by David Oles (aka David Lane) of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate or amend his sentence and the judge's refusal to recuse himself. The Tenth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not assist in determining the appeal. The court found no error in the district court's rulings and deemed the appeal frivolous, denying all requested relief. The mandate was ordered to issue forthwith.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. David W. Oles AKA David Lane, 60 F.3d 837, 10th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an order and judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding an appeal by David Oles (aka David Lane) of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate or amend his sentence and the judge's refusal to recuse himself. The Tenth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not assist in determining the appeal. The court found no error in the district court's rulings and deemed the appeal frivolous, denying all requested relief. The mandate was ordered to issue forthwith.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    60 F.

    3d 837
    NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored,
    unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a
    material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral
    argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of
    November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or
    further order.

    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,


    v.
    David W. OLES aka David Lane, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 94-3015.

    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.


    July 7, 1995.

    Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

    ORDER AND JUDGMENT1


    1

    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination
    of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is
    therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

    Appellant, David Oles, appeals the district court's denial of his motion to vacate
    or amend his sentence and the district court judge's refusal to recuse himself
    from this case. We find no error in the district court's rulings and find this
    appeal to be utterly frivolous. Accordingly, all requested relief is denied.

    AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
    law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally
    disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and

    judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General
    Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

    You might also like