Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 27 views

    David James Fratus v. Philip G. Jones, Cary L. Krog, Wayne A. Freestone, David J. Angeshofer, Danny Quintana, and Mr. Esparza, 992 F.2d 1222, 10th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of David James Fratus' civil rights complaint against various attorneys and individuals providing legal assistance at the Utah State Prison. The complaint alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, § 1985(3), and § 1986 related to civil rights. The appellate court determined, after reviewing the record, that the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint or denying Fratus' motion to have counsel appointed to represent him.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    David James Fratus v. Philip G. Jones, Cary L. Krog, Wayne A. Freestone, David J. Angeshofer, Danny Quintana, and Mr. Esparza, 992 F.2d 1222, 10th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    27 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of David James Fratus' civil rights complaint against various attorneys and individuals providing legal assistance at the Utah State Prison. The complaint alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, § 1985(3), and § 1986 related to civil rights. The appellate court determined, after reviewing the record, that the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint or denying Fratus' motion to have counsel appointed to represent him.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-04-26 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 992 F.2d 1222 Docket: 92-4220

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of David James Fratus' civil rights complaint against various attorneys and individuals providing legal assistance at the Utah State Prison. The complaint alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, § 1985(3), and § 1986 related to civil rights. The appellate court determined, after reviewing the record, that the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint or denying Fratus' motion to have counsel appointed to represent him.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    27 views2 pages

    David James Fratus v. Philip G. Jones, Cary L. Krog, Wayne A. Freestone, David J. Angeshofer, Danny Quintana, and Mr. Esparza, 992 F.2d 1222, 10th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of David James Fratus' civil rights complaint against various attorneys and individuals providing legal assistance at the Utah State Prison. The complaint alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, § 1985(3), and § 1986 related to civil rights. The appellate court determined, after reviewing the record, that the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint or denying Fratus' motion to have counsel appointed to represent him.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    992 F.

    2d 1222
    NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored,
    unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a
    material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral
    argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of
    November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or
    further order.

    David James FRATUS, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Philip G. JONES, Cary L. Krog, Wayne A. Freestone, David J.
    Angeshofer, Danny Quintana, and Mr. Esparza,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 92-4220.

    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.


    April 26, 1993.

    ORDER AND JUDGMENT*


    Before SEYMOUR, ANDERSON and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
    STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination
    of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is
    therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

    David James Fratus appeals the dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), of


    his civil rights complaint against various attorneys and individuals providing
    legal assistance to inmates at the Utah State Prison. The complaint alleged
    violations of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983, 1985(3), and 1986. 1 Mr.
    Fratus also appeals the district court's denial of his motion to have counsel
    appointed to represent him.

    We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and conclude that the

    district court did not err in dismissing Mr. Fratus' complaint and in denying the
    motion to appoint counsel.

    Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The mandate


    shall issue forthwith.

    This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or
    used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing
    the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th
    Cir.R. 36.3

    Although the district court referred only to 42 U.S.C. 1983 in its order of
    dismissal dated November 19, 1992, that order adopts the report and
    recommendation of the magistrate judge which dealt with all aspects of Mr.
    Fratus' complaint. R. Vol. I at Tabs 4, 5

    You might also like