Rosario IPCR
Rosario IPCR
Rosario IPCR
Head of Office
Date: _______________
Approved By:
Date
RATING SCALE
KP
Functional Objectives
THRUST
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
Alloted
Budget
RATING
Actual Accomplishment
QTY
QLY
(1)
(2)
(3) A
Remar
ks
(4)
KP
Functional Objectives
THRUST
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
Alloted
Budget
RATING
Actual Accomplishment
QTY
QLY
(1)
(2)
(3) A
Remar
ks
(4)
RATING
Planning Office
Legend: 1- Quantity
2 -Quality
Date
PMT
3 - Timeliness
Date
4 - Average
Immediate Supervisor
Head of Office
Date: _______________
Approved By:
Date
Name of Supervisor
RATING SCALE
Functional Objectives
SUCCESS INDICATORS
(Targets +
Measure)
Alloted
Budget
RATING
Actual Accomplishment
QTY QLY T
A
(1)
(2) (3) (4)
Remarks
RATING
Total Overall Rating
Final Average Rating
Adjectival Rating
Assessed by:
Date
Planning Office
Legend: 1- Quantity
Functional Objectives
SUCCESS INDICATORS
(Targets +
Measure)
2 -Quality
3 - Timeliness
Alloted
Budget
RATING
Actual Accomplishment
Secretary of Health
4 - Average
QTY QLY T
A
(1)
(2) (3) (4)
Remarks
Date
KENNETH G. RONQUILLO, MD, MPH, CESO III
Name of Supervisor
5 Outstanding
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
1 - Poor
RATING SCALE
Functional Objectives
SUCCESS INDICATORS
(Targets + Measure)
Alloted
Budget
Section/Person
Accountable
RATING
Actual Accomplishment
QTY QLY T
A
(1)
(2) (3) (4)
Remarks
Functional Objectives
SUCCESS INDICATORS
(Targets + Measure)
Alloted
Budget
Section/Person
Accountable
RATING
Actual Accomplishment
QTY QLY T
A
(1)
(2) (3) (4)
Remarks
RATING
Total Overall Rating
Final Average Rating
Adjectival Rating
Discussed With:
Esperanza C.
Carating
Assessed by:
I certify that I discussed my assessment of the
perfomance with the employee
Kenneth
Employee
Legend: 1- Quantity
Date
2 -Quality
G. Ronquillo
Supervisor
3 - Timeliness
4 - Average
Date
Date: ____________
Approved By:
Date
Name of Supervisor
5 Outstanding
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
1 - Poor
RATING SCALE
Major Final
Output
Functional Objectives
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Alloted Section/Person
Budget
Accountable
Actual
Accomplishment
RATING
QTY QLY T
A
(1)
(2) (3) (4)
Remarks
RATING
Total Overall Rating
Final Average Rating
Adjectival Rating
Discussed With:
Assessed by:
I certify that I discussed my assessment of the
perfomance with the employee
Date
Date
Employee
Legend: 1- Quantity
Supervisor
2 -Quality
3 - Timeliness
I, Yvonne Claire S. Loberas, of the Regional Office VI - DOH assigned at KABANKALAN, Negros Occidental, commit to de
rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period Jan to June, 2016.
Output
SUCCESS INDICATOR
(Targets + Measure)
Actual Accomplishment
QTY
(1)
Reports
RAT
Reports
Output
SUCCESS INDICATOR
(Targets + Measure)
Actual Accomplishment
QTY
(1)
Availability of Masterlist
Inventory of Supplies
RAT
Output
SUCCESS INDICATOR
(Targets + Measure)
Actual Accomplishment
QTY
(1)
Profiling
CHT
FP/MNCHN Implementation
EPI Implementation
RAT
Output
SUCCESS INDICATOR
(Targets + Measure)
Actual Accomplishment
QTY
RAT
(1)
Assist in the referral of severly wasted
and stunted pre-school children within
48 hours
Nutrition Program
Implementation
HI 5
Track MNCHN defaulters such as EPI,
Prenatal and Postnatal clients of 100%
assigned barangay
Attendance in stations as
scheduled
RATING
Total Overall Rating
62
4.
Adjectival Rating
Discussed With:
Date
TERESITA G. MAGBATO, RN
Employee
Legend: 1- Quantity
2 -Quality
Supervisor
3 - Timeliness
4 - Average
(IPCR)
Date
5 Outstanding
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
1 - Poor
RATING
QLY
(2)
Remarks
A
(3)
(4)
RATING
QLY
(2)
Remarks
A
(3)
(4)
RATING
QLY
(2)
Remarks
A
(3)
(4)
RATING
QLY
(2)
(4)
62.2
4.15
VS
g by:
A, BSN-RN, MN
upervisor
Remarks
A
(3)
Date
SUCCESS INDICATORS
Major Final Outputs
Performance Measures
Performance Targets
Success Indicator
Measures + Targets
Organizational
Outcomes/Sectoral
Goals
Division A
Rating
Numerical Rating
Adjectival Rating
Division A Rating
Very Satisfactory
Employee 1
Employee 2
Employee 3
Employee 4
Employee 5
No. of Employees (excluding Div. Chief) = 5
Average ratings of staff
4
5
3
4
4
Very Satisfactory
Outstanding
Satisfactory
Very Satisfactory
Very Satisfactory
20/5 = 4
Very Satisfactory
Division B
Division B Rating
Employee 1
Employee 2
Employee 3
Employee 4
No. of Employees (excluding Div. Chief) = 4
Average ratings of staff
Division C
Division C Rating
Employee 1
Employee 2
Employee 3
Employee 4
No. of Employees = 4 (excluding Div. Chief)
Average ratings of staff
Summary:
Numerical Rating
3
Rating
Adjectival Rating
Satisfactory
3
4
2
3
Satisfactory
Very Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
12/4 = 3
Satisfactory
Numerical Rating
5
Rating
Adjectival Rating
Outstanding
5
4
5
4
Outstanding
Very Satisfactory
Outstanding
Very Satisfactory
18/4 = 4.5
Outstanding
Division A
4
Division B
3
Division C
5
Average 12/3 = 4
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Outstanding
Very Satisfactory
DOH-SPMS Form - 6
Q
u
a
r
t
e
Activity
Mechanism/s
Meeting
One-in-One
Memo
Group
Others
(Pls. Specify)
Remarks
Monitoring
Coaching
Please indicate the date in the appropriate box when the monitoring was conducted
Conducted by:
Immediate Superior
Date:
Noted by:
Date:
Head of Office
Major Final
Output
Test Item
Test Bank
Database
Exam
Calendar and
Announceme
nt
Task Status
Tasks
Exam
4.1 Constitution of
Conduct Exam Commitees
Action Plan
4.2 Determination of
Testing Centers /Test
Administrators
4.3 Preparation of
Budget Estimate
(Income and
Expenses)
NonConfidential
Examination
Documents
5.1 Preparation of
Examiner's Manual
5.2 Reproduction of
Examination
Documents
5.3 Dissemination of
Examination of
Examination
Documents
Assigned
to
Duration
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Remarks
Remarks
DOH-SPMS Form - 7
Aim
Objective
Task
Commets
Next Step
Objective
Target Date
Review Date
Achieved Date
Commets
Task
Outcome
Next Step