Speaking Score Sheet
Speaking Score Sheet
T
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF CANDIDATE
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
INDEX
NUMBER
DATE :14.8.2014
ROOM :1 SESSION: 1
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
BB054K0
01
BB054K0
02
BB054K0
03
BB054K0
04
BB054K0
05
BB054K0
06
BB054K0
07
BB054K0
08
BB054K0
09
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
This form is confidential.
SULI
T
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF CANDIDATE
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
INDEX
NUMBER
DATE:14.8.2014
ROOM :2 SESSION: 1
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
BB054K0
10
BB054K0
11
BB054K0
12
BB054K0
13
BB054K0
14
BB054K0
15
BB054K0
16
BB054K0
17
BB054K0
18
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
SULI
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
T
This form is confidential.
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
BB054K0
20
BB054K0
21
BB054K0
22
BB054K0
23
BB054K0
24
BB054K0
DATE :14.8.2014
ROOM :1 SESSION: 2
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
7.
8.
9.
25
BB054K0
26
BB054K0
27
BB054K0
28
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
This form is confidential.
SULI
T
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF CANDIDATE
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
INDEX
NUMBER
DATE :14.8.2014
ROOM :2 SESSION: 2
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
BB054K0
30
BB054K0
31
BB054K0
32
BB054K0
33
BB054K0
34
BB054K0
35
BB054K0
36
BB054K0
37
BB054K0
38
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
SULI
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
T
This form is confidential.
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
This form is confidential.
SULI
T
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
SULI
T
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
This form is confidential.
SULI
T
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
SULI
T
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
This form is confidential.
SULI
T
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
SULI
T
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
This form is confidential.
SULI
T
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
SULI
T
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
This form is confidential.
SULI
T
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
SULI
T
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.
This form is confidential.
SULI
T
LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA
SPEAKING TEST SCORE
SHEET
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL CODE
N
O
NAME OF CANDIDATE
INDEX
NUMBER
MARKS
SECTION A : READING
SECTION B : SPOKEN
ALOUD
INTERACTION
(10 MARKS)
(20 MARKS)
Assesso Assess
Final Assessor Assessor Final
r1
or 2
mark
1
2
mark
s
s
TOTAL
(30
MARKS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NAME OF ASSESSOR 1
NAME OF ASSESSOR 2
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Note:
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is 2 for reading and 5 for spoken, then the assessors may
average out the marks as shown in the case of candidate 1 and 2 in the table above.
If the difference in marks given by Assessor 1 and 2 is > 2 for reading and > 5 for spoken, then the assessors will
have to discuss and come to a consensus to award the marks as shown in the case of candidate 3 in the table above.