On The Formation of A Short Prose Pratityasamutpada Sutra - Aramaki
On The Formation of A Short Prose Pratityasamutpada Sutra - Aramaki
On The Formation of A Short Prose Pratityasamutpada Sutra - Aramaki
PRAT]TYASAMUTPADA SUTRA
Noritoshi ARAM AKI
While engaged in undertaking the reconstruction of the formative process
of the pratityasamutpada formula in Early Buddhism, I realized the necessity to
establish the text-strata of the verse and prose sutras relevant to my subject
One of the fundamental theses I am trying to put forward is that the development of the constituent fundamental concepts such as l($7:z.ii, namarapa, vijnana
etc. in verse sutras must precede the formative process of the pratityasamut-
pada formula itself, starting with the simple three- or five-membered up to the
complete twelve-membered in prose sutras. Therefore my study on the pratityasamutpada formula will consist of two parts: the first part proposes to
trace how the constituent fundamental concepts originate and develop through
the strata of verse siitras, while the second part is concerned with how they
are combined finally to formulate the twelve-membered formula in prose
sutras. Obviously the first undertaking is more ambitious, if not hazardous,
than the second, since so far verse sutras have scarcely been investigated with
respect to the development of philosophical or doctrinal concepts traceable
therein. My contention here is that exactly this neglect of verse sutras in
philosophical or doctrinal studies has hindered the penetrating understanding of
early Buddhist philosophy to such an extent that almost all the fundamental
concepts of Early Buddhism must have been accepted as nothing more than
the dogmatic concepts which had long been fixed and are as such prevalent
in prose siitras.
Having started to trace the occurrences of the constituent fundamental
concepts in verse sutras, I am becoming more and more confident that their
origin and development must indeed be interpreted from the contexts of their
occurrences in verse sutras, but here has emerged a serious difficulty : how to
88
N. ARAMAKI
stratify verse sutras so that I may trace the origin and development of the
89
constituent concepts on a solid philological basis and at the same time how to
that I may stratify them around the well-established lines of their development
therein traceable. Here is a vicious circle and I must be able to break it
somehow. I am of the opinion that prior to establishing a general stratification of the entire verse siitras and a general developing line of Buddhist
philosophical concepts therein, I can only accumulate piecemeal evidence,
philological, philosophical or otherwise, which may establish, however partially,
the textual relationships among the relevant verse siitras and at the same
time the conceptual development of certain concepts occurring therein. In
this paper I propose to concentrate my attention upon those concepts which
are constituent of the pratityasamutpiida theory in the early prose pratitya-
samutpada siitras and to find out their developing line from one of the oldest
verse siitras- possibly one of the Buddha's words if ever such could exist!'
through the strata of the relevant verse siitras up to the prose pratityasamutpiida siitras. The starting-point of my present attempt reveresly to pursue
the earlier development of the constituent concepts of the pratityasamutpiida
theory is a short prose pratityasamutpiida sutra, SN 12. 38 (ii, 65): SA-A 14.
19 (no. 359) which has so far scarcely attracted the attention of scholars,
but nevertheless which, together with the other related siitras, contains the
most fundamental concepts, niimarupa and vijniina. The following study into
the precedent development of the constituent concepts of the pratltyasamut
Although these two parts are arranged in the reverse order, the discussion
within each part cannot but be in the progressive. Accordingly what I am
attempting here in this paper is first to identify the constituent concepts of the
samutpiida formula has its starting-points in the two short prose pratityasamutpiida sutras, one on the concept l!$~Zii (SN 12. 66: SA-A 12. 9, no. 291 :
Nidanasarpyukta 9) and the other on the concepts vijfziina and niimarupa, the
latter of which will be discussed here in this paper in some detail, the former
being reserved for another paper. This short prose pratityasa1nutpiida sutra on
the concepts vijniina and niimarupa develops in two directions : firstly in
the direction of analyzing how the vijtiiina conditions the namancpa to be
reborn in the next life incurring the universal conglomeration of sufferings ;
and secondly in the direction of analyzing how the niimarupa conditions the
vijniina to experience the fruits of previous karmans in this life. The development in the first direction results in the caturiihiira- and the caturvijJiiinasthiti- theories , and that in the second results in the pratityasamutpiida theory
Part 1 Th e formatiOn
of the pratityasamutpada theory defined by the
-pa and vz]niina
.. _
interdependence of 12amaru
in the early prose
of SN
N. ARAMAK I
90
91
bbatti" by the " niimarupassa avakkanti" and thus expounds the augmented
Theories
In the shortest and probably original version (as represented in the Chinese
version) the short prose pratityasamutpiida sutra, SN 12. 38: SA-A 14. 19 (no.
359) runs as follows :
ymi ca ... ceteti ymi ca pakappeti ymi ciinuseti iiramma~zam etarrz hoti
viihiii~wssa tlzitiyii armnnza~1e sati patit!hii vithiii~wssa hoti 1 tasmit.n
to, here becomes the object, upon which depending the vijtiiina- continues
to exist (in the augha-); if there is such an object, the vijl'iiina- has
the stand (to stay in the augha-); if the vijfiiina- has the stand (to
stay in the augha-) and continues to grow, there arises a new reborn
existence in the next life; if there arises a new reborn existence in the
next life, there accumulate old age, death, griefs, lamentations, sufferings, dejectednesses and desperations. Thus there arises the universal
~onglomeration
iiramma~wm eta~n
hoti
vi1i'iiii~zassa
thitiyii I iiramma~e sati pati!thii viihiii~wssa hoti 1 tasmirrt patitfhite viiiiiii~ze virufhe niimarupassa avakkanti hoti 1 *niimarupassa avakkantiyii sati iiyatirrz, jatijariimara~zarrz, sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupiiyiisii sambhavanti I ... * I
.. .If there is anything considered, conceived and unconsciously attached
to, here becomes the object, upon which depending the vij1'iiina- continues
to exist (in the augha-); if there is such an object, the vijl'iiina- has
the stand (to stay in the augha-); if the vij1'iiina- has the stand (to stay
in the augha-) and continues to grow, the niimarupa- enters upon (the
womb of a mother in the next life); if the niirnarupa- enters upon (the
womb of a mother in the next life), there accumulate (re-) birth, old age,
death, griefs, lamentations, sufferings and desperations ....
When these two very simple pratityasamutpiida- sutras are really one of the
two starting points of the development of the pratityasamutpiida- formula, as
I am now arguing, there is no doubt that they presuppose some fundamental
concepts in currency which must have been inherited from the preceding
traditions either of Buddhist (verse) sutras or of ascetic verses commonly
shared by ]ainism, etc. : 1) the iiramma~w- and patitthii- consisting of anything
cetita-, pakappita- and anusayita- upon which depending the viftiiina- continues
to exist, 2) the vijiiiina- which continues to exist even after death and brings
forth the new saqtsaric existence to be reborn, 3) the niimariipa- which
appears in the earliest stage of rebirth perhaps as the deepest underlying layer
of the new saqtsaric existence, and 4) the anxiety toward the jariimara~w- etc.
Where have they come from? Before I undertake to answer this question, it
is, I think, advisable to confirm that these two seemingly negligible pratitya-
92
N. ARAMAKI
interdependence. Let me try to suggest that these two pratityasamutpiidasiitras develop into the catu riihiira- and the caturvij;liinasthiti- theories by
further analyzing how the vijJiiina- in its dependence upon the aramma~ta- and
patittllii- conditions the nanwriipa- to be reborn and that they develop into the
pratityasamutpiida- theory by further analyzing how the niimarupa- thus reborn
to be the $aqiiyatanas conditions the $atjvijiianakayas.
It is easy to recognize the close relationship and the probable precedence
caturiilziira- siitras, SN 12. 64 (ii, 101) : SA-A 15. 12 (no. 374) (cf. also E. Waldschmidt, Ein Fragment des Saq1yuktagama aus den Turfan-Funden, M 476, in
Von Ceylon bis Turfan, S. 280 f.) due to their common vocabulary and phraseology. The caturiihiira- siitra runs as follows :
... cattiiro me ... iihiirii bhutiinii7Jl vii sattaniirJ't thitiya sambhavesinaytt vii
anuggahiiya I katame cattiiro 1 kabalirrtkiiro iihiiro otjariko va sukkhumo vii
pJzasso dutiyo manosa11cetanii tatiyii viii1lii~WJ?'l catuttharrt I . . . . ..
kabali1rzkiire ce ... iihiire atthi riigo atthi nandi atthi ta~thii patif!hitm!l
_,__,
.
mara~arrt
93
*sokaparidevadukkhadomanassuPii)liisii* ...
ce ... ahiire .. .
......... There are four kinds of aliment which enable sentient beings
either continuously to live on when they have been reborn or ( newly) to
nourish (the embryos of themselves) when they are desiring to be
reborn. What are the four kinds of aliment? (They are) 1) edible food,
coarse or refined, 2) experience (, unpleasant or pleasant) , 3) (volitional)
conception in mind and 4) vijiitina-. ... If there is greed for , pleasure in
and desire for edible food, then the vij;iiina- has the stand (to stay in
the augha-) and continues to grow. When the vijiiiina- has the stand
(to stay in the augha-) and continues to grow, then the niiman~pa
enters upon (the womb of a mother) . When the niimarupa enters upon
(the womb of a mother), then the sarrzskiiras or the karmans accumulated
in latency are activated. When the S01JlSkiiras accumulated in latency
are activated, then there is reborn the saq1saric existence in the next
life. When there is reborn the saq1saric existence in the next life, then
there are rebirth, old age, death, griefs, lamentations, sufferings,
dejectednesses and desperations in the next life.
If ( there is greed for, pleasure in and desire for) experience (,
unpleasant or pleasant) , then ...
If ( there is greed for, pleasure m and desire for volitional) con-
kabalimkiire
ce iiha-re natth z rago
- natthz. nandt. natthi tanha appatttJ!E:_
.
. ~01Jl
. avir
lh
..
. vifiiiiinam
. . avtru
. a,n ......
- yattha natthi iiyatim
desire for edible food, then the vij1iiina- has no stand ( to stay in the
94
N. ARAMAKI
Textually there is no doubt that the two short pratityasamutpada- sutras have
developed into this perhaps earliest caturahiira sutra, as the common expressions underlined above clearly indicate. What, then, is the motive for the
new development of the oldest pratityasanu-ttpada- siitras in this direction?
These sutras, the pratityasamutpi'ida- as well as the caturahara- sutras, are all
concerned with the problem how the vijiiana has the stand and continues
to grow so that the niirnarz~Pa enters upon the womb of a mother in the next
life and there old age, death etc. incur. The vij1iana- in its dependence on
the arammalla or anything considered, conceived and unconsciously attached
to in the former corresponds to the vijJiana with greed for, pleasure in and
desire for the four ahiiras, edible food, experience, consideration in mind and
vzjfuina- in the latter. I think that if the vij1-iana- in its dependence on the
arammm_w- is analyzed with respect to the aramma~w- of the desire being at
work in the vij1iiina- and driving it onward or, in other words, if the aram
ma~w- of the vijJiiina- is identified with that of the desire being at work in the
vzjfuina- and driving it onward, then there results the vij1iana- with greed for,
pleasure in and desire for the four ahiiras, edible food, experience, considera
tion in mind and vij1iiina- ; the vij1iana- in its dependence on the armnma~w- is
here interpreted as continually growing by the driving force of the desire for
the four iihiiras. In some caturahiira- sutras (SN 12. 64: SA-A 15. 14, no. 376,
SN 12. 64 : SA-A 15. 16, no. 378 etc.) the vijiitina- with desire for the four
tlhiiras is illustrated by the sunshine entering from the eastern window and
reflecting on the western wall of a building or by a painter drawing on a wall;
if there is no wall, the sutras say, then there cannot be any reflection or a
na- should thus be interpreted as being driven by the trsnti or desire for the
wtzmlllaras and espec'all
1 Y f or t h e
_ a- in the next ..
vz;.. nan
life? I think I can.
95
The development of the two short pratuyasamutpada- sutras into the catur-
N.
96
\ R \M A K 1
fin~' (The~ are) 1) the root in the function of seed, 2) the trunk in
the function of ~eed. 3) the shoot in the function of seed, 4) the fruit
in the fundion ot seed and 5) the seed in the function of seed.......
" ater (to moist "n them ). then do these five kinds of seed continue to
exist, gro\\, and become bif!gcr? \" es (. they do so). Just as the earthelement. o are the four zij1ianastllitis to be considered. just as the
water-element, so are the pleasure and the greed to be considered. Just
as the fi, e kinds of eed, o
1-
(in the nipa-), the vij1imza- continues to exist, gro'' and become bigger.
Or in so far a being engaged in the vedana-.
Or in so far as being engaged in the 'aJ!Ijiza- ..
Once a
bhik~us
97
aramma~za- continues to exist, grow and become bigger: the vij1itina- in its
dependence on the aramma~w- is, more exactly to analyze, the vij1iana- accompanied by the ahara- or the tidtina- which is nourished in the state of being
engaged in the rii.pa-, the vedana-, the sarr1j1i.ti- or the sa'!7sktira- and is moistened by the pleasure and the greed for these, just as the five kinds of seed
which are, in so far as they are living, nourished in the earth and are moistened by water; only the vij1iana- which is engaged in these deepest underlying
layers of a saq1saric existence and has the pleasure and the greed for them
continues to exist, grow and become bigger : accordingly once the vij11tinais liberated from the pleasure and the greed for them and ceases to be
driven by the pleasure and the greed for them, it loses its
pati!tha- and ultimately realizes the
nirva~za-
aramma~za-
and
If anyone should say, "l propound that the vijiiiina- comes, goes, passes
exist in the saq1saric augha-, in so far as it is driven by the pleasure and the
of the rlipa-. the zedanii-. the smJljliti and the sc mskara-," there is no
greed for the other deepest underlying layers, but on the other hand it realizes
the perfect
1~
relinquished, the
ItS patiffhii
LcontlnU
ally to e. i.;t .
Once a bhiksu' greed f or the vedana- element i relinquished, .. .
Once a bhik~u greed for tht. samj1iii- element is relinquished, .. .
nirva~w-
iiramma~za-
should
thus be interpreted as the vij1ilina- with the pleasure and the greed for the
N. ARAMAKI
98
other four deepest underlying layers (which are termed " skandhas" or
'trunks") and is thus illustrated by the vegetable seed? I think it does.
99
for this problem is the discovery of the desire trsna. . . for the caturaharas or '
that is the same thing in substance, the greed raga- for the other four deepest
underlying layers which is hidden deep in the vijiiana- and drives the vijiiana-
and brings forth the namariipa- as the new body in the rebirth on the con-
daurmanasyopayasebhya~z na parimucyate du~zkhiid iti vadarni tat kasmad dheto~z 1 naciir$id bala~z purve brahmacarye$a~ztirrt samyagdu~zkJzak$a
yaya dul:z.khasyiintakriyayai 1 tasnziit sa kayasya bhedat para,.,unara~zat
dition that one is not liberated or, in other words, is enveloped by the ignorance avidya- and is driven by the desire l($1:ta-, then how is this reborn
namarupa- related to the avidya- and especially to the trsna- within this life
and how can one being endowed with one's namariipa- ~~.liberated from the
tr$~la-, so that one may no more be endowed with the namarupa- in the next
life? ..This problem inevitably leads to the problem of how the namarupacondltlons
- 1s
. h1dden
.
. the vz;nana.. _
.
. . the vijiiana-, because th e t!$1Jadeep m
and
dnvmg the latter on and on. 1 recogmze
.
the first step of the endeavour
. the cardmal
.
toward answering this new pro bl em m
pratityasamutpadasiitra SN
12. 19 (iii, 23) :. SA-A 12 12 ( no. 294) . N1danasaq1yukta
. _
12. To quote the text
IS
avidyaya nivrtasya
biilasYa t!$~zaya- sarrzyuktasyazvam
.
UNIVERSITAT ~A M BU RG
100
N. ARAMAKI
101
unlearned, is endowed with his body here (experiencing) with the rsix)
an ordinary man, dull and unlearned, is thus endowed with his body
vijiiiinas; (here in this life) his ignorance has not yet been relinquished
here (experiencing) with the (six) vijiiiinas C. five perceptual and one
and his desire has not yet been annihilated ; because his ignorance has
conceptual); therefore the JZiimarupa- for him is this body here (expe-
not yet been relinquished and because his desire has not yet been
riencing) with the (six) vij1iiinas and the external (objects being expe-
annihilated, he receives his (new) body after (the time of) his death
when his body has been destroyed. Receiving his (new) body, he is not
~_experiential bases) that there arises the experience. For the experience
there are six kinds of experiential bases here and now which or
sufferings. Thus I declare. What is the reason for this? Because the
(ordinary) man, dull (and unlearned), has not, ever since the past,
pleasant as well as unpleasant. What are the six kinds (of experiential
bases)? They are the eye (and the colour-and-shape) as the experiential
base, the ear (and the sound) , the nose (and the smell), the tongue
therefore he receives his (new) body after (the time of) his death when
his body has been destroyed.
(and the taste) , the body (and the touch) and the conceptual mind (and
Now, (on the contrary,) having been enveloped by ignorance and
desire, an intelligent man is (as well) thus endowed with his body here
body (here experiencing) with the (six) vijiiiinas; (here in this life) his
(experiencingJ with the (six) vijiianas; therefore the niimarupa- for him
ignorance has ( now) already been relinquished and his desire has ( now)
is this body here experiencing) with the (six) vijiziinas and the external
already been annihilated. Because his ignorance has (now) already been
relinquished and because his desire has (now) already been annihilated,
he does not receive his (new) body after (the time of) his death when
his body has been destroyed. Not receiving his (new) body, he is
liberated from birth, old age, disease, death, griefs, lamentations,
Such being the case, what shall be the distinction what shall be the
'
intelligent man has, ever since the past, practiced the pursuit of the
h"l t th sufferings
pure brahman-wise practices in order nghtly to anm I a e e
and in order to exterminate the sufferings; therefore he does not
.
h. b0 d has
Y
receive his ( new) body after (the time of) h1s death when IS
been destroyed.
102
N. ARAMAKI
103
Frankly I admit that the textual relationship between the earliest two short
asks the question how an intelligent man, being endowed with the niimarupa-
this life and answers that he annihilates the desire by practicing the pure
the first direction, but nevertheless I think that a closer examination of the
brahman-wise practices.
content of this pratityasamutpiida- sutra and its cardinal position among the
sutras.
question how an intelligent man being endowed with the niimarupa- annihilates
of this sutra. This sutra declares that an ordinary man, dull and unlearned,
the desire in this life-the fundamental question, since it is only here and now
and an intelligent man are all the same, in so far as they both had not yet
in this life that a man can be liberated, if ever he can be-and yet its answer,
relinquished the ignorance and had not yet annihilated the desire in the past
the pure brahman-wise practice, is not sufficiently well-defined, there follow the
life and therefore they both are endowed with the niimarupa- in this life. This
them, because this niimarupa- as the twofold experiential bases is indeed the
1ziimarz1pa- in the next life. T here is no doubt that this sutra analyzes the
1uimarz1pa- into the twofold experiential bases with the intention to explain
the relationship of the niimarupa- to the desire within this life and thus the
sutra says that an ordinary man and an intelligent man are disting uished with
regard to whether or not they practice the pure brahman-wise practices in
order to relinquish the ignorance and annihilate the desire in this life, while,
of course being endowed w1th th e namarupa
and expene ncmg
pleasant and
unpleasant
feelings An ordmary man w h o has not practiced the pure brah.
man-wise practices and has not yet annihilated the desire will rece ive his new
niimarupa- in the next life and W Iu no t b e 11-b erated from the s ufferings and,
.
on the. contrary, an intelligent man w ho h as practiced
the pure brahman-wise
practtces and
has
annihilated
the
d
.
.
. new ntimarupa- m
.
.
estre, w1 11 not recetve hts
the next h fe and will be l'b
1 era t e d f rom the s ufferings. If I am right in thus
. .
summanzmg the content of the - t - I h.
. .
su ra, t mk that 1t 1s only in the frame of
h
reference of the earliest t
wo s ort Pralityasamutpiida- s utras with their
development in the first direct'
h
.
.
ton t at thts cardmal pratityasamutptida- s utra
Now that this cardinal sutra has started to ask the fundamental
introduce in its place either the complete detachment from any object of the
Buddha's immediate inner realization) or the contemplation on the pratitya-
samutpiida- (which has been newly established as the Buddhist practice by the
saT!Igha-): the former process results in the formation of the pratityasamutpiidaformula starting w ith the desire, tr$~1ii-, and the latter process in that of the
fundamental theory of the pratltyasamutpiida- itself. Reserving an attempt to
trace the former process for another paper on the concept f[$~Zii-, I will here
confine myself to an attempt to show the first stage of the second process in
the following lines.
pada- sutra which I have tried to express by designating it as 'cardinal ' can
only be accounted for by the fact that the earliest two short pratltyasamutpiidasiitras have developed into this pratftyasamutpiida- sutra and thereby the
formative process of the pratityasamutpiida- formula has started.
If so then can I indeed recognize any tendencies in the preceding tradition of v;rse-sutras that will explain the necessity that the mimanipa- received
as the new body in the r ebirth should be interpreted as the twofold experiential bases and further that the relationship of the niimariipa- to the f!$Wiin this life should be asked? I think I can.
12 12
:
Now with this cardinal pratityasamutpiida- sutra SN 12. 19: SA-A
N. ARAMAKI
104
105
Nidanasarpyukta 12 discussed so far , the decis ive step toward the formation of
the pratityasamutpiida- formula has been taken and here follows the fundamen-
4hapraptaJ:z, saik$e1Ja jiianena saik$e1:za dar5anena lokasyodayastmrtgaminyii praj'l'iayii samanvagata aryaya nairya7Jikaya nairvedhikayii niryati
tatkaraJ:z, samyagduJ:z,khak$ayaya duJ:zkhasyantakriyayai 1 tat kasmad dheto~z 1 tatha hi srutavataryasravake~ta lokasamudayas ca lokanirodhas ca
tries further to define the pure brahman-wise practice and introduces in its
place the contemplation on the pratftyasamutpada- or, in other words, on how
the niimarzjpa- as the twofold experiential bases conditions the six vijJiana-
kayas or, in short, on how the namarupa- conditions the vijJ1iina-. Note that
in the Pali version this sutra SN 12. 37 precedes the two earliest short
pratltyasamutpada- sutras SN 12. 38 and SN 12. 39 a nd in the Chinese and the
Sanskrit versions this sutra SA-A 12. 13 : Nidanasarpyukta 13 follows the
'vagacjhaprapta~z
paryavagii-
same self), but I declare that (this body consisting of) the six ex-
above. Such canonical status of this s utra may also bespeak its fundamental
periential bases here and now must be known to be what has been
importance. Let me quote the text in the Sanskrit version which again seems
s tored by r epeated actions and by repeated volitions ever since the past
and (thus nothing but) the (stored) karman- since the past. What are
the s ix (experiential bases)? (They are) (1) the eye as the experiential
basis, (2) the ear , (3) the nose, (4) the tongue, (5) the touch and (6)
yatas ca srutavat-aryasrava
' - ke~za lok asamudayas ca lokanirodhas ca yathabhutam
. .
. .
samyakprajnay-a sudT$.to bhavatt. suvzdztaJ:z,
suju$!al:z, supratwtd-
the mind as the experiential bases. With regard to this (body consisting
of the six experiential bases) a well-learnt noble disciple contemplates to
himself rightly ( in accordance with his stage) the pratityasamutpada- or
the (continued) origination (of the six experiencing vijfzanas) on the
condition (of the six experiential bases as the stored karman) purposively a nd pertinently (as follows) : on the condition that there exists
this (body consisting of the six experiential bases as the stored karman),
there orig inate the six (experiencing) vij11anas in their continuities and
there originate the six experiences in their continuities, the six feelings
t he1r
contmmttes,
concep t ualt' zatt'ons t'n their continuities and
m
t h e s1x
the s ix volitions in their continuities. (He further contemplates to
.
_
f
) th s on the condition that
htmself the pratityasamutpada- as o11ows u
there exis ts this (body consis ting of the six experiential bases as. the
.
. h ld
disease death, gnefs,
stored karman.J , ther e origmate btrt , o age,
'
.
.
d
desperations
in
the
future
;
lamenta tions, s ufferings, melancho11es an
.
lomeration of suftenngs
. fi .
thus ther e arises the universal and m mte cong
N. ARAMAKI
here and now. For (all) the saJ11saric existence thus arises on the
condition of the causes and the conditions. For the arising of (all) the
saq1saric existence is thus on the condition of the causes and the
conditions.
(A well-learnt noble disciple agam contemplates to himself the
pratityasamutpada- as follows): on the condition that there does not
exist this (body consisting of the six experiential bases as the stored
karman-), there do not originate the six ( experiencing) vij1iiinas in their
107
edged and has completely penetrated into the arising and the perishing
of (all) the saJ11Saric existence as it is in reality with his true wisdom.
In an effort to solve the fundamental problem how the niimarupa- is related to
the tr?~la- and how one being endowed with the niimarupa- is liberated from
the f!$W1- here in this life, the cardinal pratityasamutpada- siitra discussed
above has analyzed the namarupa- into the twofold experiential bases experiencing with the six vij1Mnas and experiencing the pleasant and unpleasant
feelings and has proposed the pure brahman-wise practice as the practice to
relinquish the avidya- and to annihilate the f!$~la- but the relationship between
the niimarilpa- and the f!$~U1- has been merely implicitly suggested and the
pure brahman-wise practice has not yet been sufficiently well-defined. I think
that this fundamental pratityasamutpada- siitra pursues the same fundamental
problem to the ultimate Buddhist solution and thereby proposes the fundamental theory pratityasamutpiida-. What, then, is the true meaning of the
fundamental theory pratityasamutpada- here proposed? It is indubious that
this fundamental pratityasarnutpada- siitra is designed to be the declaration of
the new Buddhist practice toward the liberation, the contemplation and the
complete knowledge of the arising and the perishing of all the saq1saric
Because a well-learnt noble disciple has completely seen, has completely known, has completely acknowledged and has completely penetrated into the arising and the perishing of (all) the saJ1lsaric existence
as it is in reality with his true wisdom, therefore this ( disciple) is called
a noble disciple and is praised, "he has attained our true Buddhist truth,
has achieved our true Buddhist truth and comprehends the true truth,"
"he has arrived at the profundity and he has arrived at the complete
profundity through his soteriological practices with respect to knowledge
as. ~ell as to intuition," "he has realized the wisdom to contemplate the
ansmg and the perishing of (all) the saJ11saric existence," "he transcends
with his noble tr anscen d enta1 and comprehensive wisdom " "he is
. order to truly annihilate the
' sufferdevoted
rto the true pr ac t'tees) m
.
d w1'th
mgs
th and to exterminate the sufferings"
Wh Y ts h e pratse
ese words)? It is (nothing but) because the well-learnt noble disciple
has completely seen, has completely known, has completely acknowl-
existence which are here expounded as the positive and the negative aspects of
the pratityasamutpiida-, but how does this fundamental pratityasamutpiidasiitra come to declare the contemplation of the pratityasamutpada- as the new
Buddhist practice? I think that this fundamental pratityasamutpiida- siitra
firstly re-interprets the older concept, the body or the twofold experiential
bases experiencing with the six vijiianas and experiencing the pleasant and
the unpleasant feelings as the self-less body or the stored karman- or the
six experiential bases conditioning the six vijJiiinas, the six experiences, the
six feelings, the six conceptualizations and the six volitions in their continuities. Note that in some other siitras the latter list is further extended to
include the $G!f!$1Jiikiiyas, the six desires in their continuities. Thus the first
problem how the namarupa- is related to the
f!$~lii-
is answered by saying
that the niimarupa- (which is here interpreted as the stored karman- or the
six experiential bases) conditions the vij1iiina- (which represents the six
109
N. ARAM AKI
but rather here I will attempt to review the earliest stages d.1scussed a bove
vijfzanas, the six experiences, the six feelings, the six conceptualizations, the
and try to trace backwards the constituent concepts of the theory pra tztyasa-
six volitions and even the six desires in their continuities). This is, I think,
an extension and a re-interpretation of the older twofold experiential bases
experiencing with the six vij1ianas and experiencing the two feelings through
each presuppose some fundamental concepts which must have been there for
introducing some new concepts, such as the self-less body, the pratityasamut-
piida- (which originally means the conditioning of the kannan- on its fruit
vipaka-) and the pmicopadanaskandhas. Where have these new concepts come
from?
Secondly this fundamental pratityasamutpada- slitra replaces the pure
to exist.
2) the vijfzana- which continues to exist even after death and brings
brahman-wise practice by the new Buddhist practice toward liberation ' that is,
the contemplation and the complete knowledge of the arising and the perishing
of all the sarpsaric existence which is here expounded as the positive and the
negative aspects of the newly revised concept pratityasamutpada- : positively
the namarapa- conditions the vij1iana- and negatively the perishing of the
former conditions the perishing of the latter. Thus the second problem how
one being endowed with the namarupa- is liberated from the trsna- is ultimately aswered by introducing the new Buddhist practice: a
the nandi- and the raga- for the other deepest underlying layers
penshmg; hence he contemplates the arising and the perishing of the pratityasamutpada- together Where, how ever, has th1s
. new Buddhist practice come
. of verse-sutras? I think I can.
from ? Can we trace it to th e preced.mg trad1t1on
10) the niimarupa- analyzed into this body here experiencing with the six
vijfianas and the external objects being experienced or the twofold
experiential bases.
11) the pure brahman-wise practice.
12) the body possessed of neither by your self nor by others' self.
on the vipaka-.
14) the theory of the pa,icopiidanaskandhas: the $afsparsayatanas, the
N. AR AM AKI
110
notes concerning how those fifteen constituent concepts forming the pratit-
yasamutpiida formula can be traced back to the strata of verse sutras. Now
knowledge of the arising and the perishing of all the saq1saric existence.
These fifteen concepts enumerated are the constituent concepts of the theory
prior to undertaking the proposed task in this section, it is, assuredly, advisable
and overlappings among them. I consider that the fifteen concepts enumerated in accordance with the development of the early prose pratityasamutpa-
da- sutras can further be synthesized into the following seven fundamental
concepts:
1) the iirammana- and the pati!!hti- consisting of anything cetita-,
such is analysed into the twofold experiential bases or more fully into
the pmicoptidiinaskandhas : the $afsparsayatanas, the $a</.vzjfuznakiiyas,
underlying layers in the next life and are active togather with the
pancoptidtinaskandhas.
the tr$~Zii- or the nandl- and the raga- which desire especially for
the vijiitina- in the next life and also for the other four deepest
verse siitras can be stratified, in the broadest outline into three strata each
0
111
5)
6)
on the vipaka-.
7) the new Buddhist practice or the contemplation and the complete
knowledge of the arising and the perishing of all the sarpsaric existence.
Therefore the entire truth of the theory pratityasamutpada- can be defined by
d.
oble Buddhist disciple
these seven fundamental concepts thus synt hes1ze a n
N. ARAMAKI
contemplates the arising and the perishing aspects of the self-less pratitya-
samutptida- - the uijjitina- being dependent on the aramma~w- and the patitthaand being driven by the f($~1rl for the uij1iana- and for the other four deepest
underlying layers in the next life, conditions the niimarupa- perhaps as the
deepest underlying layers of the newly reborn sa111saric existence and this
latter ntimanipa- principally consisting of the six experiential bases and being
re-interpreted as the stored previous karman-, conditions the vijliiina- representing the $acfuijliiinakayas, the $acfuedanakayas, the $O{SaJ!ljtiiikayas and the
$Ofcetanakayas and actualizing the tr$~lii- together with them or, in short, the
uijiiana- with the f($~Za- conditions the namarupa- and the namaru,pa- conditions
the uij1iana- togather with the tr$~Z a- or, in the shortest, the vijl'iiina- conditions
the ntimarzipa- and the namariipa- conditions the vij1iiina-. What I am now
asking is how these seven fundamental concepts have consistently developed
through the strata of verse sutras and how their development through the
strata of verse sutras dictates the formative process of the theory pratitya-
113
this sa111saric world) , what kind of person on the earth should that one
be? If one who has abandoned any stable stand (to continue to exist in
the sa111saric flood and especially in the higher meditative stages) and
who has given up to take hold of any floating object (either to be driven
on the sa111saric flood or to be liberated from the higher meditative
stages), does not sink down in the (bottomlessly) profound (saf!lsaric
flood), what kind of person on the earth should that one be?
Suffice it for the moment to recognize that the two concepts alamba (i. e.
1) The iiramma~a and the pati~~ha. In the oldest stratum the Attadar:tQasutta, the fundamental sutta which I consider one of the Buddha's
words, declares that there is the aramma?Ja floating on the augha (the
Saf!lsaric flood) of the subconscious desire, Sn 945 :
aramma~za m. c.) and prati${ha are juxtaposed here as the basic conditions by
which one sinks down in the sa111saric flood and which abandoning one is
liberated, while the answers to these two questions are important in many
other respects. In the following strata of verse sutras this same sutta is
commented upon in the supplementary sutta (SN 1. 1. 1 in the present Pali
SN) added to this original sutta *SN 1. 1. 1, the latter being replaced by the
former in the present Pali SN, and is quoted twice in the verse sutras, once
mcessant drive the torrent and the (obj ect) conceptualized (in the
subconscious intention) the (floating) object to be grasped. Difficult to
on the basis of which the prose suttas begin to develop by the hand of the
(Sn 173-175) . The latter sutta belongs to the latest stratum of verse suttas,
N. ARAMAKI
lU
uijJiiina, then there results the short prose pratityasamutpada siitra discussed in
the present paper which explains how the vijiiiina continues to exist after the
death toward the rebirth, pursuing the iiramma~za and the pati!!hti and further
how the vij;iiina develops into the JU"imarzipa after the rebirth. But what is
the namanipa in concrete? Here again in the fundamentally important series
of the verse siitras of the Devatasa111yutta (to which the fundamental verse
sutra for the development of the pratityasamutpiida theory above also belongs),
there is one ver se sUtra which, for the first time, analyzes the ntimariipa into
the new Buddhist theory of the six cognitive faculties, SN 1. 3. 7 : SA-A 22. 26
(no. 601): SA-B 9. 16 (no. 176): K. 466 of the Sanskrithandschriften des
on that stage the existence here and now [consisting of the subjective
and the bodily existen ces J 1s ex t'mglllshed
Turfanfunden :
n k
f L'b
1 Arts Kyoto Universitv. 1982).
rancas andhas, jmbun, The College o 1 era
N. ARAMAKI
116
117
to extirpate any f!$~lti toward any object cognized in any directions and being
thereby liberated even from the vijJiiina or the deepest underlying subconscious
tion raised in the fundamental verse for the development of the pratitya-
samutpada theory above quoted, it is again answered that the raga, the
sarrzyojana and the nandi must be extirpated through Buddhist practices, sN
1. 1. 1: SA-A 49. 23 (no. 1269): SA-B 15. 18 (no. 178) ,
3)
The namarupa.
nandlbhavaparikkhi~zo
so gambhire na sidati I I
sutras starts with the fundamental concept tr$~lii, which I will discuss in a
been conceiving the desired object as existing and transcending from [all)
separate paper to elucidate its cardinal importance not only in the history of
the ropes which have been binding one to (the meditative stages where)
Buddhism but also of Indian philosophy as a whole. Here I will confine myself
to quoting the two verses which attest how tr$~Zii, nandi or raga are together
higher stages) - such a one does not sink down in the (bottomlessly)
Bhagavat declares his new and true dharma in an answer to the question, how
stand (appatittha) and given up to take hold of any floating object (aniilamba)
one may cross over the f!$~lii termed the visattika (a pan between the Sanskrit
and does not sink down in the bottomlessly profound sa111saric flood and this
question has, in the prose pratityasamutpada sutras, been developed into the
search for the true liberation from the deepest underlying subconscious
layers of the samsaric existence, the vijFzana and the niimarzipa. The answer
here answers t~at it is he who has stopped the raga conceptualizing the
b. d"
one to the nipa and
.
.
obJects of desires, overcome the sarrzyo]mza m mg
.
- .
t
ltimately and this answer
extirpated the nandi in the sa111sanc ex1s ence u
is replaced by to the contemplation on the essential structure of the pratifya-
samutpiida, the interdependence of the vijJiiina and the niimanipa, in t~e ~ro~e
th Buddhist techmcal
after all, the raga, the smrzyojana and the nan dI or m e
N. ARAM AKI
118
119
fundamental concept pratityasamutpada occurs for the first time in the context
of defining the conditioning of the karman on the vipaka, Sn 653:
evm!z etarrt yathiibhutm.n kamma~.n passanti pa~ufitii 1
paficcasamuppadadasii kammavipakakovidii 11
5)
of the conditioning of) the karman (on the ripened sa111saric existence)
as it really is. They comprehend the pratityasamutpada or the dependent
development (of the ripened sa111saric existence on the condition of the
karman ) and thus they are conversant of (the truth of the conditioning
As has been discussed, all the other concepts constituent of the fundamental
This malignant body here and now neither grows out of the (same)
self, nor grows out of the other (unrelated self) , but it develops in
dependence on the causal (continuity) and the conditions and it is
extinguished through eradicating the causal (continuity).
Thus in the way expounded so far the wise contemplate on (the truth
Just as the
seed in the other (worldly) sense is sow n on the field and then grows
in dependence on the two (conditions) , earthly nutrients and moisture,
tion of the interdependent vijjiana and niimariipa or of the f!$~Zii etc. and how
they are extinguished through eradicating the f!'$~lii etc. The concept pratityasamutpiida, on the other hand, defines how the ripened sa111saric existence
It is reasonable
that the whole truth comprised in those concepts is represented by the concept prafityasamutpada.
It lS taught in the sutra that the bhikkhuni Sela has r epudiated the seduction
of Mara the Death by co n t emp1a f mg m
. med1tat1on
. . this truth of the dependent
development
neither fr om th e same self nor from the other u nrelated self.
.
Th1s contemplation WI,11 be mcorporated
6)
d.t ton
Their fundamen1
su bconsc10us layers of the sa111sanc extstence lD me I a
tal discovery is the truth that to contemplate the deepest underlying sub-
121
N. ARAM AKI
Sketchy as it is, the above exposition may be sufficient to show that all
the seven constituent concepts of the fundamental truth pratityasamutpiida
can be traced back to the preceding tradition of verse sutras and that the
fundamental truth pratityasamutpada has been formulated by synthesizing
these essential structures of the Buddhist philosophy which have developed
through the strata of verse sutras ever since Sakyamuni's teachings, interpreting and reinterpreting it. The next project I must undertake, is to explain
the formation and the development of these and other fundamental Buddhist
concepts through the strata of verse sutras in the progressive order, starting
Here are those who (are awakened with the wisdom to) realize the
sufferings and then the causal (activities) of the sufferings and the
(nirvai_la) where the sufferings are eradicated completely without
remainder and the practical path guiding to the extinction of the
sufferings and thus who have accomplished the liberation in meditation
as well as that in wisdom. They are able to exterminate ( the sufferings)
and no longer experience the rebirth and the old age.
The following portion of this Dvayatanupassanasutta consists of a series of the
quotations of one or two or several essential verses from each of the most
important verse sutras previously formed, although some of them may be the
imitations by the sarpgha on the model of the original verses quoted. In his
book of 1912, L. de La Vallee Poussin already r ecognized that this Dvayatanupassanasutta especially in the form as transmitted in Pali is the immediately
The line
.
_ of the developmen t of th e t heory startmg
with the concepts vijiiana
and namarupa discussed in this paper must be interpreted as an effort to
apply . the dvayatanup asyana
'
- contemplation
. on the deepest underlying subconscious layers of the sarpsanc
- . existence,
.
.. _
Vl)niina
and namarupa which have
now been analyzed into the paiicaskandhas and the $acf.ayatanas.'
(1. The abbreviations here are those used in my previous paper mentioned on p. 115.
2.
* suggests