George L. Schweitzer v. Daniel S. Schweitzer Hazel E. Wundrow Hanneman Schweitzer, 124 F.3d 217, 10th Cir. (1997)
George L. Schweitzer v. Daniel S. Schweitzer Hazel E. Wundrow Hanneman Schweitzer, 124 F.3d 217, 10th Cir. (1997)
George L. Schweitzer v. Daniel S. Schweitzer Hazel E. Wundrow Hanneman Schweitzer, 124 F.3d 217, 10th Cir. (1997)
3d 217
97 CJ C.A.R. 1782
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored,
unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a
material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral
argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of
November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or
further order.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination
of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is
therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff and appellant George L. Schweitzer, appearing pro se, appeals the
dismissal of his First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, for
failure to show entitlement to relief, and for failure to plead facts necessary to
permit defendant and appellee Daniel S. Schweitzer to respond. We conclude
that, for substantially the reasons set forth in the district court's order, entered
on March 28, 1997, the district court correctly dismissed this action.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally
disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and
judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3