See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302376241

Determination of Ultimate Pile Bearing Capacity

from a Seismic Method of Shear Wave Velocity in
Comparison with Conventional Methods
Dataset May 2016

READS

10

6 authors, including:
Khairul Nayan

Mohd Raihan Taha

National University of Malaysia

National University of Malaysia

22 PUBLICATIONS 17 CITATIONS

223 PUBLICATIONS 893 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

SEE PROFILE

Noor Adila Omar

National University of Malaysia
2 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE

All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate,

letting you access and read them immediately.

Available from: Nor Faizah Bawadi

Retrieved on: 19 June 2016

Jurnal
Teknologi

Full paper

Determination of Ultimate Pile Bearing Capacity from a Seismic Method of

Shear Wave Velocity in Comparison with Conventional Methods
Khairul Anuar Mohd Nayana*, Mohd Raihan Tahaa, Noor Adila Omara, Nor Faizah Bawadia, Sung-Ho Johb, Mohamad Nor Omarc
aDepartment

of Civil and Structural Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
c
Geotechnical Division, Public Works Department of Malaysia
bDepartment

*Corresponding authors: [email protected]

Article history

Abstract

Received : 7 January 2015

Received in revised form :
7 March 2015
Accepted : 8 April 2015

The seismic method in the ultimate bearing capacity of piles based on shear wave velocity measurement
is a new technique in geotechnical engineering design. In this study, the value of shear wave velocity, Vs
is being successfully used to formulate a theory to determine the ultimate bearing capacity of piles.
This theory is adapted from the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundation proposed by Keceli.
Kecelis formula is adapted by equating the pile tip vertical resistance of the seismic formula to the end
bearing capacity of the pile tip for each layer. The sum of half the vertical resistance of each layer is then
equated to the total shaft resistance of the pile. The end tip is then added to the total shaft resistance to
give the total ultimate pile bearing capacity of the pile. This study was conducted at three sites, two sites
of residual soil located in Malaysia and one site of alluvial soil situated at Collierville, Tennessee, USA.
The results of the adapted seismic formula were compared with the static pile bearing capacities
calculated using conventional methods proposed by Meyerhof for the SPT-N values and the
Schmertmann, Bustamante and Gianeslli method for the SCPTu values. The percentage error in the
ultimate bearing capacity of the piles between the adapted seismic and the conventional methods for all
the sites were found to be -4.77%, -3.01% and -0.93% at Hulu Langat, Mutiara Damansara and
Collierville sites respectively.

Graphical abstract

Keywords: Pile bearing capacity; seismic methods; shear wave velocity

Abstrak
Kaedah seismos dalam menentukan keupayaan galas muktamad cerucuk berdasarkan pengukuran halaju
gelombang ricih adalah satu teknik baru dalam rekabentuk kejuruteraan geoteknik. Dalam kajian ini, nilai
halaju gelombang ricih, Vs telah berjaya diadaptasi dalam teori penentuan keupayaan galas muktamad
cerucuk. Teori ini diubahsuai dari teori keupayaan galas muktamad asas cetek yang telah dibangunkan
oleh Keceli. Formula Keceli disesuaikan dengan menyamakan rintangan menegak hujung cerucuk dari
formula seismos dengan keupayaan galas hujung cerucuk bagi setiap lapisan. Jumlah bagi separuh
rintangan menegak setiap lapisan ini disamakan dengan jumlah rintangan aci cerucuk. Rintangan akhir
hujung cerucuk kemudiannya dicampur dengan jumlah rintangan aci untuk memberikan jumlah
keupayaan galas muktamad cerucuk. Kajian ini telah dijalankan pada tiga lokasi tapak, dua tapak tanah
baki terletak di Malaysia dan satu tapak tanah aluvium terletak di Collierville, Tennessee, USA.
Keputusan adaptasi seismos ini telah dibandingkan dengan nilai keupayaan galas statik cerucuk
menggunakan kaedah konvensional yang dicadangkan oleh Meyerhof bagi nilai SPT-N manakala kaedah
Schmertmann, Bustamante dan Gianeslli digunakan bagi nilai SCPTu. Perbezaan peratusan pada
keupayaan galas muktamad cerucuk seismos yang telah diadaptasi dengan kaedah konvensional bagi tiga
tapak adalah -4.77%, -3.01% dan -0.93% bagi tapak Hulu Langat, Mutiara Damansara dan Collierville.
Kata kunci:Keupayaan galas cerucuk; kaedah seismos; halaju gelombang ricih
2015 Penerbit UTM Press. All rights reserved.

1.0 INTRODUCTION
There are various conventional methods in the calculation and
evaluation of geotechnical bearing capacity of piles. Applications
of conventional methods incorporate the use of basic soil
parameters like friction angles and cohesion, vane shear, SPT-N,

cone penetration and pressuremeter values. In order to determine

the soil parameters, these methods may suffer problems related to
disturbances that occurred during the sampling process,
transportations and laboratory testing of samples. All these
procedures are also time consuming. Furthermore, the final

74:3 (2015) 99102 | www.jurnalteknologi.utm.my | eISSN 21803722 |

100

Khairul Anuar Mohd Nayan et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences& Engineering) 74:3 (2015), 99102

laboratory result may not be representative of the real condition of

soil at the site.
In this paper, the seismic methods based on shear wave
velocity (1981) and correspondingly the modification of Kecelis
(2012) shallow bearing capacity formula is hereby proposed as an
alternative to the conventional method in estimating the pile
bearing capacity at three different sites. Accordingly, this seismic
field method is simpler, faster, non-destructive, more
environmental friendly and cost effective for the design of
foundation.
Comparison of the pile bearing capacities from this seismic
were then made with the normal empirical calculation using the
SPT-N and SCPTu values.

considered as the ultimate bearing capacity of the soil under a

foundation. In this case, pressure at the bottom of the soil column
with the unit cross sectional area becomes:
= = = . .

Where is the pressure of the soil column, is the ultimate

bearing capacity, is the acceleration of gravity, is the mass
density and is the depth of the soil column.
In order to evaluate ultimate bearing capacity, the value of z
in Equation (4), is substituted with the product of and T and the
equation is then transform into:
= . . .

2.0 THEORY OF THE PROPOSED METHOD

In terms of allowable bearing capacity:

Shear wave velocity is known to travel only in the matrix of soil

particles and does not travel in its liquid part. This characteristic
of shear wave velocity enables it to measure the effective soil
strength in which it travels. The travelling shear wave causes
minute strain and its measurement is known to be elastic and
hence the dynamic soil properties were obtained.1
According to Keceli (2012), seismic impedance (Z) given as
its density multiplied by its shear wave velocity is related to the
bearing capacity of soils. Also, it has been shown theoretically
that the imaginary and the real component of seismic shear wave
impedance represent cohesive resistance and internal frictional
resistance, respectively.3 As such, the bearing capacity equation
for shallow foundation based on the impedance value of soils
irrespective of its depth is given by:

= /1.5

= .

= 0.44 0.25

(1)

Where is the mass density and is the shear wave velocity.

In this situation, the weight of the ground above the base
level of the foundation is replaced by an equivalent load as shown
in Figure 1. The equivalent load or the overburden pressure at
foundation level, , is normally expressed as:
= .

(2)

Where is the unit weight of the soil and is the depth to the
bottom surface of the foundation.

(3)

(4)

(5)

From standard values of the allowable bearing capacity of the

most hard rock of = 4000m/s, = 35kN/m3 and = 10Mpa,
Equation (5) can be simplified to the following expression to
obtain the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundation, given
by:
= 0.1 . .

(6)

From Equation (6), the unit weight of soil is obtained from its
mass density using Keceli`s formula (Keceli, 2012)3 as given in
Equation (7). This equation is based on experimental shear wave
values given by:
(7)

In pile foundation, the ultimate bearing capacity of Equation

(6) is assumed to apply for the whole length of the pile. The total
pile length is divided into segmental base of shallow foundation.
Equivalent base bearing capacities for each segmental layers of
the pile were based on their corresponding normalised shear wave
velocities where the value of in Equation (6), should be
expressed as follow:
=

(8)

Where is the normalized shear wave velocity, while is the

value of atmospheric pressure (101.325 kN/m2) and is
effective overburden stress for each segment layers.
For each segment of the pile base, is multiplied by the base
area of the pile to obtain its ultimate resistance of each segment
expressed as:
= .

(9)

The shear resistance in piles for each segmental layer of soil,

() is hereby propose by the authors as in Equation (10) where
the shear resistance is considered to be half of the ultimate tip
resistance for the same segment.
() = () /2
Figure 1 The soil column to cause bearing capacity failure3

If the overburden stress of soil of depth z as shown in Figure

1 is the critical pressure to cause bearing capacity failure, it can be

(10)

The total shear resistance of the pile can then be equated to the
summation of the skin resistance for every segmental depth given
as:

101

= 1

Khairul Anuar Mohd Nayan et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences& Engineering) 74:3 (2015), 99102
()
2

(11)

Where is known as total shaft resistance and () is the pile

tip resistance of each segment.
Finally the total ultimate pile bearing capacity can be given as :
= +

(12)

The free-body diagram of these forces can be illustrated by

Figure 2 shown below.

Figure 2 Adaptation of Kecelis formula to bearing capacity of pile

3.0 METHODOLOGY
The first site was a residual soil site of meta-sedimentary origin
where a town hall is to be built at Hulu Langat, Selangor. The
second site is a proposed commercial building and basement car
park to be built at Nucleus Tower, Mutiara Damansara, Selangor
and the third site is a sewage treatment plant at Collierville,
Tennessee, USA.

Figure 4 The layout of the CAP tests (after Joh). 6

The SASW surveys of the two sites in Malaysia were carried

out using the National Instrument USB6289 data acquisition
system with the WinSASW 3.2.12 measurement and postprocessing software developed by Joh (1996)7. The geophone
sensors were of two 1-Hz geophone manufactured by Geostuff.
Several assorted hammers starting with a small geological
hammer to the sledge hammer of 8 kg in weight were employed.
For the third site, data from the seismic piezocone (SCPTu)
results at Collierville, Tennessee were obtained from the
dissertation of Alexander Namie McGallivray (2007).2
All the shear wave velocity profiles for the three sites were
then used in the Kecelis modified method as illustrated in
Figure 2 to calculate the pile bearing capacity of several circular
standard concrete piles as summerized in Table 1. Consequently
piles of similar size were used to calculate their respective pile
bearing capacities using conventional methods from SPT-N
(Meyerhof, 1976)8 field results. Meanwhile the conventional pile
bearing capacity from the SCPTu results were then calculated
using Schmertmann (1978)5, Bustamante and Gianeslli(1982)5
methods respectively. All the results were tabulated in Table 2 for
comparison and evaluation.
4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The soil profiles with their respective SPT-N values for the Hulu
Langat Town Hall site and the commercial building and basement
car park of Nucleus Tower site are given in Figure 5 and Figure 6
respectively. Correspondingly, Figure 7 shows the SCPTu values
and Vs profiles at Collierville sewage treatment plant. The soil
profiles are obtained by refering Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) chart
by Robertson et al. (1986) based on CPT cone resistance,qt on a
log scale with friction ratio, Rf on a natural scale
(Robertson, 2010).9

Figure 3 Configuration of the SASW test setup

The configuration of the SASW test has been set up as

shown in Figure 3 using the Common Array Profiling (CAP) as
suggested by Joh Sung-Ho et al. (2005) where the source to the
first geophone spacing were set to 1D, 2D, 4D, 8D and 16D as
shown in Figure 4, where D is the spacing between the two
receivers.

Figure 5 Soil profiles of SPT-N and SASW test at Hulu Langat, Selangor

102

Khairul Anuar Mohd Nayan et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences& Engineering) 74:3 (2015), 99102

offered by seismic methods and the conventional methods where

the former is three dimensional and the later is one dimensional in
terms terms of the tets coverage of the site.
Table 2 Comparison between conventional and seismic method of
ultimate pile bearing capacity
No
1
2
3

Figure 6 Soil profiles of SPT-N and SASW test at Mutiara Damansara,

Selangor

Site Location
Hulu Langat
Mutiara
Damansara
Collierville

Ultimate Bearing Capacity, Qult

Conventional (kN)
Seismic (kN)
11605.20
11051.30
12729.83
12346.74
2426.75

2404.23
Average Error

Error
(%)
-4.77
-3.01
-0.93
-2.90

5.0 CONCLUSION
The performed seismic tests have shown that the shear wave
velocity profiles are strongly related to the ultimate pile bearing
capacities. This is substantiate in this study by the small
differences obtained between the ultimate pile bearing capacities
for the three sites where the average error was found to be 2.90%
which is less than 5% of the standard acceptance in the design of
conventional civil engineering structures. Further improvement
could be attained with further studies to be carried out in order to
explore the potential of the propose seismic method mentioned
herein in this paper.
Acknowledgements

Figure 7 The SCPTu and SASW test at Collierville, Tennessee, USA2 9

Table 1 Conventional method applied for each site repectively

No
1
2

Site
Location
Hulu Langat,
Selangor
Mutiara
Damansara,
Selangor
Collierville,
Tennessee

Pile
Length
(m)

Pile
Diameter
(m)

Conventional Method

11

1.2

Modified Meyerhof
(1976)10

11

1.2

Modified Meyerhof
(1976)10

11

1.2

Schmertmann (1978),
Bustamante and
Gianeslli(1982)5

Summary of results from the calculated pile bearing

capacities using Equations (6)(10) for these three sites were
given in Table 2. The total percentage errors of the ultimate pile
bearing capacities were found to be -4.77% and -3.01% for the
corresponding residual site of Hulu Langat and Mutiara
Damansara respectively. Correspondingly the percentage error of
the ultimate pile bearing capacity for the alluvial soil at
Collierville site was found to be -0.93%. The negative values of
percentage errors in the ultimate bearing capacities that were
obtained for all the sites indicates that the values from the seismic
method are all lower than the conventional methods. This study
has shown that the seismic methods are slightly more
conservatives as compared to the conventional methods. The
phenomena maybe attributed to the difference in the coverage

The authors would like to thank the Geotechnical Division, Public

Works Department of Malaysia for their support in conducting
this research. Prof. Paul W. Mayne, School of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
should be remembered for his consent to utilize the SCPTu data.
References
[1]

Abbiss, C. P. 1981. Shear Wave Measurements of Elasticity on the

Ground. Geotechnic. 31(1): 91104.
[2] Alexander Vamie McGillivray. 2007. A PhD Dissertation: Enhanced
Integration of Shear Wave Velocity Profiling in Direct-Push Site
Characterization Systems. Edisi Ke-2. London: Springer-Verlag.
[3] Ali Keceli. 2012. Soil Parameters Which Can Be Determined with
Seismic Velocities. Jeofizik. 16: 1729.
[4] Das, Braja, M. 2006. Principles of Foundation Engineering. Thompson
Publication.
[5] Eslami, Aflaki, E. & Hosseini, B. 2011. Evaluating CPT and CPTu based
Pile Bearing Capacity Estimation Methods Using Urmiyeh Lake
Causeway Piling Records. Scientia Iranica. 18(5): 10091019.
[6] Joh Sung-Ho, Jang Dae-Woo , Kang Tae-Ho , Lee Il-Wha. 2005.
Evaluation of Stiffness Profile for a Subgrade Cross-Section by the CAP
(Common-Array-Profiling)-SASW Technique. Journal of the Korean
Geotechnical Society. Korean Geotechnical Society. 21(4):7181.
[7] Joh, S. H. 1996. A PhD Dissertation: Advances in Data Interpretation
Technique for Spectral Analysis of Surface Wave (SASW) Measurements.
University Texas, Austin, United Stated of America.
[8] Meyerhof, G. 1976. Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile
Foundations. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division. 102(3):
195228.
[9] Robertson, P. K. 2010. Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: An Update.
2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing.
[10] G
&
P
Geotechnics
Sdn.
Bhd.
[Online].
From: http://www.gnpgeo.com.my/download/publication/L2009_03.pdf
[Acessed on 2 September 2014].