http://writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej15/a1.

html

Vol. 4. No. 3 A-1 May 2000

Return to Table of Contents Return to Main Page

Students' Language Learning Preferences

Erdogan Bada & Zuhal Okan
Cukurova University
Turkey
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Abstract

For effective language learning and teaching, both learner skills and learner
assumptions should be given due attention. In promoting this idea, students should be
provided with the opportunity to clarify and assess their preferences, particularly in
reference to definition of objectives in general and awareness of strategies in learning.
Moved with the conviction that learners and learners' preferences are of crucial
importance in the development of learner autonomy, we asked 230 students at the
ELT Department, Faculty of Education, Cukurova University, to state their views as
to how they prefer learning English. As a further step, 23 teachers working at the
same department with the same students were also asked to express their views
regarding the extent of their awareness of their students' learning preferences. The
data obtained reveal significant results suggesting a need for a closer co-operation
between students and teachers as to how learning activities should be arranged and
implemented in the classroom.

Introduction

Many ESL teachers experience student resistance when they introduce an

instructional activity in the classroom. Some students want more opportunities to
participate in free conversation, expressing their wish towards a more
communicatively oriented approach. On the other hand, there are those who would
prefer more emphasis on grammar teaching. We believe that the teacher, in making
decisions regarding the type of activities to conduct in a language classroom, should
take into account such learner diversities. In this respect, Corder states:

In the end successful language "teaching-learning" is going to be dependent upon the

willing co-operation of the participants in the interaction and an agreement between
them as to the goals of their interaction. Co-operation cannot be imposed but must be
negotiated (1977, p. 13).

We would like to reiterate the last sentence in the quotation above: "Co-operation
cannot be imposed but must be negotiated." If we truly believe that considering
subjective preferences felt by the learner is crucial for effective language learning,
then some kind of negotiation is needed between the participants, in our case, teachers
and students. Information has to be exchanged about roles and expectations, both
teachers' and learners' awareness of each other's needs and resources has to be raised
and compromises have to be reached between what learners expect and want and what
the teacher feels he/she can and ought to provide (Brindley, 1989, p. 73). [-1-]

Although many teachers acknowledge the need to understand the ways in which
learners differ in terms of needs and preferences, they may not consult learners in
conducting language activities. The basis for such reluctance to cooperate may be that
learners are not generally regarded capable of expressing what they want or need to
learn and how they want to learn it. Besides, it is argued by many teachers, quite
rightly, that in some societies, social roles of teachers and learners are so rigidly
drawn that expecting learners to participate in decision-making in the classroom may
not be viewed as appropriate.

We agree such a consultation-negotiation approach will inevitably involve a change in

the power structure in the classroom. That is especially true in Turkey, where a
majority of learners and teachers wish to continue to play the role of "pupil-acquirer
of knowledge" and "teacher-transmitter of knowledge," to use Stevick's (1976) terms.
Such a process of change surely requires sharing information about each other's
perceptions of classroom aims and events, and a compromise on actual needs and
preferences.

Learners' preferences have been emphasised in some research. Reid (1987), for
example, based on survey data, distinguished four perceptual learning modalities:

1. visual learning (for example, reading and studying charts);

2. auditory learning (for example, listening to lectures or audio tapes);
3. kinaesthetic learning (involving physical responses); and
4. tactile learning (hands-on learning, as in building models).

He then administered a questionnaire to 1,388 students of varying language

backgrounds to investigate their preferred modalities. This revealed that the learners'
preferences often differed significantly from those of native speakers of American
English. They showed a general preference for kinesthetic and tactile learning styles,
and for individual as opposed to group learning.

In another survey, Willing (1987) investigated the learning styles of 517 adult ESL
learners in Australia. Based on their responses to a 30-item questionnaire, Willing
sought to identify how differences in cognitive learning styles affected learners'
preferences in six different areas:

1. preferences for particular kinds of classroom activities;

2. preferences for particular types of teacher behaviour;
 3. preferences for particular grouping arrangements;
4. preferences for particular aspects of language which need emphasis;
5. preferences for particular sensory modes, such as visual, auditory, or tactile
learning; and
6. preferences for particular modes of learning on one's own outside class.

It was found that differences in cognitive styles affected learners' preferences for
particular approaches to learning. For example, concrete learners tended to choose the
following:

• In class, I like to learn by games.

• I like to learn English by working in pairs.

Learners with analytical learning styles, however, reported the following preferences:

• I like to study grammar.

• I like the teacher to let me find my mistakes. [-2-]

Although Richards and Lockhart (1994) argue that such information can prove to be
significant as to whether both teachers and learners approach learning in the same
way, they still oppose the idea of putting "learners into boxes labelled according to
cognitive styles" (pp. 62-63). Nunan (1989) points out that accommodating learners'
needs and preferences is vital in designing a learner-centered curriculum. Such
importance given to students' feelings has also been stressed in Barkhuizen's (1998)
study, in which he reports an investigation of high school ESL learners' perceptions of
the language teaching-learning activities presented in their classes. The outcome of
such investigation surprised the teachers in that perceptions of teachers and students
differed greatly from each other. Block (1994, 1996), in this respect, states that a
harmony between students and teachers' aims regarding task assignment and
performance must be maintained. In line with the views of the researchers mentioned
above, this study also aims to contribute to the literature in this field.

The Study

Subjects

The subjects who participated in this research are 230 ELT students (158 female; 72
male) and 23 instructors (16 female; 7 male) teaching English at the ELT Department
of the University of Cukurova. The students ranged between 18 - 25 years of age;
teachers were between 25 and 45.

Questionnaire

The data for this study were collected through a 13-item questionnaire, adapted from
Brindley (1984). The questionnaire had two versions; Version 1 was designed for
students, and Version 2 for teachers. Apart from addressing and reference
conventions, the versions do not differ significantly. Only items 3 and 4 were not
included in the teachers' version, because they were relevant to students only.
Each item in the questionnaire explores a particular L2 topic. However, they can be
categorized into three major classes: Learning, Error Correction, and Assessment
and/or Evaluation. The Learning class is divided into two subcategories: Course
Content, and Non-course Content. While Course Content includes strategies for
learning through the basic four skills, learning and expanding vocabulary, making use
of audio-visual aids, and general L2 improvement, the Non-content subcategory looks
to individual preferences in actualising the Course Content subcategory. Here we ask
whether students benefit from working in groups, pairs, or individually, and if/how
they allocate and utilise time for homework, inside and/or outside classroom.

Data Analysis

The data collected were analysed using the SPSS statistical package. A chi-square
frequency analysis was carried out in order to define significance of dispersion of the
yes/no choices (p < 0.05). Additionally, a t-test was also conducted to observe if there
was a correlation between teachers' and students' responses (p > 0.05).

Results concerning each item in the questionnaire will be presented in a tabular form.
In the columns, Items stands for the numeric values of the questionnaire items; Opts,
options for each item; Yes, positive responses elicited from either students or
teachers; No, negative responses elicited from either students or teachers; and %,
responses expressed as a percentage. [-3-]

Presented here are the results for each item, beginning with Item 1. In the students'
version, we asked students if they were satisfied with their overall achievement in
English, and in the teachers' version, whether they were pleased with their students'
achievement in English.

Table 1: Satisfaction with Achievement

Item 1 Students Teachers

Options Yes % No % Chi-sq Yes % No % Chi-sq
(1) Are you satisfied
with your achievement 66 28.7 164 71.3 0.00 7 30.4 16 69.6 0.06
in English?

As shown, 71.3% of the students replied negatively, and a similar result, 69.6%, was
reported by the instructors. Thus, both students and teachers are aware of students'
dissatisfaction with their achievement in English (p=0.86).

With Item 2, being one of the Non-course Content items, students were asked to
express whether they preferred working individually, or in any other way, and
whether their instructors were in fact aware of that. Results for this item are presented
in the table below:

Table 2: Working Styles

Item 2 Students Teachers

 Options Yes % No % Chi-sq Yes % No % Chi-sq
(1) individually 139 60.4 91 39.6 0.02 17 73.9 6 26.1 0.02
(2) in pairs 118 51.3 112 8.7 0.69 13 56.5 10 43.5 0.53
(3) in small groups 99 43.0 131 57.0 0.03 10 43.5 13 56.5 0.53
(4) in one large group 24 10.4 206 89.6 0.00 3 13.0 20 87.0 0.00
(5) other 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00

The results for this item suggest that students generally prefer to work either
individually, 60.4%, or in pairs, 51.3%. Similarly, 73.9% of teachers believe that
students prefer working individually (p=0.20), and 56.5% in pairs (p=0.63). This
correlation indicates teacher awareness of students' preference regarding in-class
learning. It is obvious that students do not like working in large groups, and their
teachers are aware of that. This is a clear message to the teacher that students feel
more comfortable, productive and relaxed by working individually or in pairs, where
their voices would be heard, and views listened to and valued.

For Item 3, Learners seem to be divided on the issue of homework. With Item 3, we
asked learners if they wanted work assigned as an outside classroom activity. The
results can be observed in the table below: [-4-]

Table 3: Preference for Homework

Item 3 Students
Options Yes % No % Chi-sq
(1) Do you want homework? 75 32.6 155 67.4 0.00

As can be seen, only 32.6% of the learners believed that some sort of outside
classroom activity would be helpful to their learning, while 67.4% did not hold this
belief.

With Item 4, we try to see how students would like to utilize the time they allocate for
homework. Their options are (1) preparing for the next class, (2) reviewing the day's
work, and (3) other. The results received for this item are illustrated in the table
below:

Table 4: Time Allocation for Homework

Item 4 Students
Options Yes % No % Chi-sq
(1) preparing for the next class 131 57.0 99 43.0 0.03
(2) reviewing the day's work 130 56.5 100 43.5 0.04
(3) other 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00

By 57.0%, students give priority to Option (1), that is, preparing for the next class
session. 56.5% would like to utilize this time reviewing the day's work were. Learners
may usually be inclined to finish a task in the classroom, and spend their outside-
classroom time working on new topics. Assignments concerning future topics, with
new insights and views added seem to appeal more to students.

Moreover, when this issue involves native speakers in the process, it becomes more
attractive and appealing. A rather wide-spread belief among learners is that outside-
classroom interaction and communication with other (native) speakers contribute
greatly to their L2 competence and performance.

Table 5: Learning Inside/Outside Classroom

Item 5 Students Teachers

Options Yes % No % Chi-sq Yes % No % Chi-sq
(1) spend all your
learning time in the 40 17.4 190 82.6 0.00 8 34.8 15 65.2 0.14
classroom
(2) spend some time in
the classroom and some
time practising your 197 85.7 33 14.3 0.00 15 65.2 8 34.8 0.14
English with people
outside
(3) other 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00
[-5-]

Students, by 85.0%, expressed their attitude towards a non-classroom-centred

learning. The results received by teachers (65.2) display a significant correlation with
those of students, although the t-test value indicates a statistically insignificant result:
p=0.01. Teachers' awareness of learner preference is heartening, since now they can
work on ways that would enable learners to utilize outside-class time most efficiently.

With Item 6, we asked whether students liked learning by (1) listening, (2)reading,
(3)repeating what they hear, (4)listening and taking notes, (5)copying from the board,
and (6)making summaries. The results for this item are presented in the table below:

Table 6: Ways of Learning

Item 6 Students Teachers

Options Yes % No % Chi-sq Yes % No % Chi-sq
(1) listening 125 54.3 105 45.7 0.18 15 65.2 8 34.8 0.14
(2) reading 131 57.0 99 43.0 0.03 8 34.8 15 65.2 0.14
(3) copying from the board 74 32.2 156 67.8 0.00 12 52.2 11 47.8 0.83
(4) listening and taking notes 174 75.7 56 24.3 0.00 12 52.2 11 47.8 0.83
(5) reading and making notes 131 57.0 99 43.0 0.03 9 39.1 14 60.9 0.29
(6) repeating what you hear 82 35.7 148 64.3 0.00 6 26.1 17 73.9 0.02
(7) making summaries 102 44.3 128 55.7 0.08 2 8.7 21 91.3 0.00
(8) other 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00

75.7% of students prefer learning by listening and taking notes. This preference is
known by 52.2% of their teachers (p=0.01). The result shows that learners do not
want to adopt a totally passive role in the learning process, since they could have
otherwise focused on the first two options, 'listening' or 'reading'. Low percentages
received for two other activities, 'copying from the board' (35.7%) and 'repeating what
they hear' (32.2%) support students' reluctance to be viewed as passive learners.
Making summaries was preferred by 44.3% of students. Teachers' responses to this
was only 8.7%, however. One-directional instruction, i.e., from teacher to student is
not the preferred mode for students.

Vocabulary learning is a complicated task, though many may perceive it as simple.

The learner has to perform several tasks when learning a new word: spelling,
pronunciation, stress, grammatical class, semantic category, in combination with other
semantic and grammatical elements in the sentence, and possible contextual
occurrence in various situations. Thus, a language learner, attempting to learn a word,
may overlook these characteristics of the word, and remain content with one or two.
With Item 7, we wanted to find out as to how learners would like to learn new
vocabulary. The options are: "by using the word in a sentence," "thinking of
relationship between known and new," "saying or writing the word several times,"
"guessing the unknown," and "reading with no dictionary help." Results received for
this item can be observed below: [-6-]

Table 7: Vocabulary Learning

Item 7 Students Teachers

Chi-
Options Yes % No % Yes % No % Chi-sq
sq
(1) using new words in a
102 44.3 128 55.7 0.00 13 56.5 10 43.5 0.53
sentence
(2) thinking of relationships
155 67.4 75 32.6 0.00 13 56.5 10 43.5 0.53
between known and new
(3) saying or writing words
58 25.2 172 74.8 0.00 3 13.0 20 87.0 0.00
several times
(4) avoiding verbatim translation 64 27.8 166 72.2 0.00 5 21.7 18 78.3 0.00
(5) guessing the unknown 140 60.9 90 39.1 0.00 14 60.9 9 39.1 0.00
(6) reading without looking up
77 33.5 153 66.5 0.00 5 21.7 18 78.3 0.00
words
(7)other 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00

Establishing a semantic relation with other words received the highest percentage,
67.4%. Teachers' responses for this option, 56.5%, show close correlation to those of
students' (p=0.29).
"Guessing the unknown" is another option which received rather high percentages
from both students and teachers: 60.9% for both (p=1.0). A mini protocol conducted
with teachers on this topic revealed that "guessing the unknown" is the most
emphasised vocabulary learning strategy in the classroom. Thus, a plausible
explanation might be that teachers continuously motivate students to infer meaning
from context rather than heavily rely on dictionary use.

As in any other field, errors in language teaching, learning, perception and production
are inescapable. What is important though is coping with them in such a way that they
do not frustrate, inhibit and/or discourage language learners. With Item 8, we asked
learners as to how they would prefer to be corrected by their instructors. Results
concerning this item are cited in the table below:

Table 8: Error Correction

Item 8 Students Teachers

Chi-
Options Yes % No % Yes % No % Chi-sq
sq

(1) immediately, in front of

68 29.6 162 70.4 0.00 3 13.0 20 87.0 0.00
everyone
(2) later, at the end of the
68 29.6 162 70.4 0.00 6 26.1 17 73.9 0.02
activity, in front of everyone
(3) later, in private 113 49.1 117 50.9 0.79 12 52.2 11 47.8 0.83
(4) other 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00

As is shown, 49.1% of students would like to be corrected by their instructors in

private. And teachers, by 52.2%, are aware of this preference (p=0.78). However,
59.2% of students do not mind having their instructors correct them publicly. Our
belief is that error correction, made immediately, or later, does not have much impact
on learners' L2 competence and performance as do manner, approach and attitude of
the teacher during the error correction process. To reiterate, the approach of the
teacher is of crucial value here.

Item 9 is also related to error correction. Here, students were asked whether (1) they
would mind if corrected by other students, or (2) asked to correct themselves. In the
table below, we cite the results about this item: [-7-]

Table 9: Peer Correction

Item 9 Students Teachers

Chi- Chi-
Options Yes % No % Yes % No %
sq sq
(1) do you mind if other students
sometimes correct your written 81 35.2 149 64.8 0.00 8 34.8 15 65.2 0.14
work
(2) do you mind if the teacher
sometimes asks you to correct 103 44.8 127 55.2 0.11 1 4.3 22 95.7 0.00
your own work

As can be observed here, a significant number of students would not mind having
their written work corrected by other students (64.8%). Teachers also, by 65.2%,
render a correlational percentage here (p=0.96). Regarding correcting their own work,
students, by 55.2%, indicated that they would gladly correct themselves with no
external intervention, and teachers, by a rather high percentage (95.7%), shared this
view with their students.

With Item 10, we asked learners whether they like learning from (1)
television/video/films, (2) radio, (3) tapes/cassettes, (4) written material, (5) the
blackboard, or (6) pictures/posters. The results received for this item are given in the
table below:

Table 10: Media Preference

Item 10 Students Teachers

Options Yes % No % Chi-sq Yes % No % Chi-sq

(1) television/video/films 193 83.9 37 16.1 0.00 19 82.6 4 17.4 0.00

(2) radio 106 46.1 124 53.9 0.23 9 39.1 14 60.9 0.29
(3) tapes/cassettes 120 52.2 110 47.8 0.51 14 60.9 9 39.1 0.29
(4) written material 178 77.4 52 22.6 0.00 15 65.2 8 34.8 0.14
(5) the blackboard 125 54.3 105 45.7 0.18 15 65.2 8 34.8 0.14
(6) pictures/posters 103 44.8 127 55.2 0.11 7 30.4 16 69.6 0.06
(7) other 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00

Television and video, being powerful media, receive a high percentage of preference
(83.9% from students, and 82.6% from teachers). The striking resemblance of
percentages is well supported by the statistical t-test value: p=0.87. We can observe
that Option 4, 'learning from written material', also received relatively similar
percentage of preference: 77.4% from students, and 65.2% from teachers (p=0.19).

Item 11 delves into what learners find very useful in the classroom: (1) role play (2)
language games, (3) songs, (4) talking with and listening to other students, (5)
memorising conversations/dialogues, (6) getting information from guest speakers, (7)
getting information from planned visits, (8) writing a learning diary, and (9) learning
about culture. Pertaining results are illustrated in the table below: [-8-]

Table 11: Learning Activities

Item 11 Students Teachers

Chi-
Options Yes % No % Yes % No % Chi-sq
sq
(1) role play 92 40.0 138 60.0 0.00 12 52.2 11 47.8 0.83
(2) language games 45 19.6 185 80.4 0.00 12 52.2 11 47.8 0.83
(3) songs 69 30.0 161 70.0 0.00 10 43.5 13 56.5 0.53
(4) talking with and listening to
187 81.3 43 18.7 0.00 18 78.3 5 21.7 0.00
other students
(5) memorising
43 18.7 187 81.3 0.00 3 13.0 20 87.0 0.00
conversations/dialogues
(6) getting information from guest
58 25.2 172 74.8 0.00 6 26.1 17 73.9 0.02
speakers;
(7) getting information from
41 17.8 189 82.2 0.00 2 8.7 21 91.3 0.00
planned visits
(8) writing a learning diary 41 17.8 189 82.2 0.00 8 34.8 15 65.2 0.14
(9) learning about culture 117 50.9 113 49.1 0.79 17 73.9 6 26.1 0.02

The striking point about these results is that students believe that student-to-student
interaction is most beneficial among the options cited here. Students express this
belief by 81.3%. Teachers, by 78.3%, are aware of such a preference, and provide
situations which lead to student-student activities. The correlation between the two
groups is strongly supported by the carried out t-test analysis: p=0.72.

'Learning about culture' also received high percentages from both students and
teachers (50.9% and 73.9% respectively). Although the statistical analysis renders an
insignificant correlation between the two groups (p=0.03), still slightly more than half
of the students and a great majority of the teachers believe that culture and language
are embedded, and should be dealt with as such.

With Item 12, we asked about assessments: how would learners like to develop an
idea about their language competence and performance. Their choices were: (1)
through written tasks set by the teacher, or (2) ability to use the language they have
learnt in real-life situations. Results are presented in the table below:

Table 12: Assessment of Langauge Performance

Item 12 Students Teachers

Chi-
Options Yes % No % Yes % No % Chi-sq
sq
(1) written tasks set by the
98 42.6 132 57.4 0.02 12 52.2 11 47.8 0.83
teacher
(2) using the language you have
212 92.2 18 7.8 0.00 20 87.0 3 13.0 0.00
learnt in real-life situations
(3) other 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00

An overwhelming majority (92.2%) state that they are capable of telling whether they
are doing well or badly in authentic communications, and a significant number of
teachers 87.0% believe that their students usually assess themselves based on their L2
performance in such situations. Responses of the two groups display a statistically
significant result: p=0.38. [-9-]

Teachers can and should indeed occasionally refer to students' opinion about their
performance, and ask for recommendations in order to create better learning
situations. Such 'non-grading' reference to students' views may yield some
outstanding results guiding teachers in many ways: material development,
presentation, teacher-student interaction, etc.

The satisfaction learners get from their L2 performance varies from student to student.
Some are after high marks; some after command of L2; and some after both. With
Item 13, we asked learners if they get a sense of satisfaction from (1) having their
work graded, (2) being told that they have made progress, or (3) feeling more
confident in situations which they found difficult before. The results received are
given in the table below:

Table 13: Expression of Satisfaction in Progress

Item 13 Students Teachers

Chi- Chi-
Options Yes % No % Yes % No %
sq sq
(1) having your work graded; 128 55.7 102 44.3 0.08 13 56.5 10 43.5 0.53
(2) being told that you have made
145 63.0 85 37.0 0.00 21 91.3 2 8.7 0.00
progress
(3) feeling more confident in
situations that you found difficult 190 82.6 40 17.4 0.00 20 87.0 3 13.0 0.00
before
(4) other 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00

Students, at 82.6%, feel satisfied in seeing themselves performing confidently in

situations where they would feel less confident before. Thus, high grades fall short in
giving learners genuine satisfaction. Teachers, by 87.0%, share this view with their
students (p=0.59). However, by 91.3%, the same teachers feel that learners would like
to be told they have made good progress. However, students' responses to this
particular option (63.0%) are far lower than the teachers'. The difference in both
views is illustrated by the t-test result: p=0.00.

Findings and Conclusions

The findings obtained from this research provide some significant value, suggesting
that:

• Students' tendency toward working individually and/or in pairs is well

perceived by teachers.
• A significant number of students expressed their views in favour of more
outside-classroom activities that would help them gain proficiency in English;
teachers' responses seem to correlate with these views.
 • Types of learning that focus merely on receptive skills do not appeal to
students; there is a significant tendency among learners towards class content
that observes both receptive and productive skills emphasised equally.
• Vocabulary learning for students is not a writing activity. The most significant
way of mastering new words is in fact 'thinking of relationships between
known and new' and 'guessing the unknown from context'.
• Being corrected by either the teacher or other students does not seem to bother
students.
• In classroom sessions, students would like to see more instructive television
programmes shown to them, rather than extensive use of blackboard or tape
recorders.
• Finally, students expressed views that they would only feel satisfied with their
language proficiency level when they see themselves involved and actively
functioning in English. External judgement regarding their FL competence and
performance does not seem to be that realistic and appealing to them. [-10-]

Effective language teaching and learning can only be achieved when teachers are
aware of their learners' needs, capabilities, potentials, and preferences in meeting
these needs. In this study, we have only dealt with the preferences. Here, we have
observed that students' preferences do indeed correlate with those of teachers in many
instances. The results obtained here call for a step forward towards a teacher-student
co-operation in designing syllabuses, doing weekly course planning, and classroom
management.

References

Barkhuizen, G.P. (1998). Discovering learners' perceptions of ESL classroom

teaching/learning activities in a South African context. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 85-108.

Block, D. (1994). A day in the life of a class: Teacher/learner perceptions of task

purpose in conflict. System, 22, 473-486.

Block, D. (1996). A window on the classroom: Classroom events viewed from

different angles. In K.M. Bailey and D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the Language
Classroom: Qualitative Research in Second Language Education. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

Brindley, G. (1984). Needs Analysis and Objective Setting in the Adult Migrant
Education Program. Sydney: NSW Adult Migrant Education Service.

Brindley, G. (1989). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design. In
R.K.Johnson (Ed.), The Second Language Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.

Corder, S.P. (1977). Language teaching and learning: a social encounter. In Brown,
Yorio, and Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL'77. Washington,D.C.: TESOL.

Nunan, D. (1989). Hidden agendas: The role of the learner in programme

implementation In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The Second Language Curriculum.
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21,
87-103.

Richards, J. and C. Lockhart. (1994). Reflective Teaching in Second Language

Classrooms. Cambridge University Press.

Stevick, E.W. (1976). Memory, meaning and method: Some psychological

perspectives on language learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.

Willing, K. (1987). Learning Styles in Adult Migrant Education. Sydney: NSW Adult
Migrant Education Service. [-11-]

About the Authors

Erdogan Bada received his Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics from the University of Exeter
in 1993. He is currently an Assistant Professor and Vice-chair of the ELT
Department. Faculty of Education, Cukurova University

Zuhal Okan holds a Ph.D. degree from the University of Kent. She currently works as
an Assistant Professor at Cukurova University, Faculty of Education, ELT
Department, Turkey. Her research interests include discourse analysis and teacher
thinking.

APPENDIX: The Questionnaire

HOW DO YOU LIKE LEARNING?

Please put a circle around your answer.

Name:
Age:
1 Male
2 Female

Are you satisfied with your achievement in English? YES NO

a) In class do you like learning

1 individually? YES NO
2 in pairs? YES NO
3 in small groups? YES NO
4 in one large group? YES NO
5 other (specify please) ..............................

b) Do you want to do homework? YES NO

If so, how much time do you spend
for homework outside class hours? ...... hours a day or ......
hours a week

How would you like to spend this time?

1 Preparing for the next class? YES NO
2 Reviewing the day's work? YES NO
3 other (specify please)..............................
c) Do you want to

1 spend all your learning time in the classroom? YES NO

2 spend some time in the classroom and some time
practising your English with people outside? YES NO
3 other (specify please)..............................

d) Do you like learning

1 by listening? YES NO
2 by reading? YES NO
3 by copying from the board? YES NO
4 by listening and taking notes? YES NO
5 by reading and making notes? YES NO
6 by repeating what you hear? YES NO
7 by making summaries? YES NO
8 other (specify please)..............................

e) When learning new vocabulary, do you like

learning

1 by using new words in a sentence YES NO

2 by thinking of relationships between
known and new YES NO
3 by saying or writing words several times YES NO
4 by avoiding verbatim translation YES NO
5 by guessing the unknown YES NO
6 by reading without looking up words YES NO
7 other (specify please)..............................
[-12-]

f) When you speak do you want to be corrected

1 immediately, in front of everyone? YES NO

or...
2 later, at the end of the activity, in front
of everyone? YES NO
3 later, in private? YES NO
4 other (specify please)..............................

g) Do you mind if other students sometimes correct

your written work? YES NO

Do you mind if the teacher sometimes asks you to

correct your own work? YES NO

h) Do you like learning from

1 television/video/films? YES NO
2 radio? YES NO
3 tapes/cassettes? YES NO
4 written material? YES NO
5 the blackboard? YES NO
6 pictures/posters? YES NO
7 other (specify please)..............................

i) Do you do the following in your class?

1 Role play YES NO

2 Language games YES NO
 3 Songs YES NO
4 Talking with and listening to other students YES NO
5 Memorising conversations/dialogues YES NO
6 Getting information from guest speakers YES NO
7 Getting information from planned visits YES NO
8 Writing a learning diary YES NO
9 Learning about culture YES NO

If so, put a cross (+) next to the five things you find most useful.

j) How do you like to find out how much

your English is improving?

By .....
1 written tasks set by the teacher? YES NO
2 seeing if you can use the language you have
learnt in real-life situations? YES NO
3 other (specify please)..............................

k) Do you get a sense of satisfaction from:

1 having your work graded? YES NO

2 being told that you have made progress? YES NO
3 feeling more confident in situations that
you found difficult before? YES NO
4 other (specify please)..............................

[-13-]

HOW DO YOUR STUDENTS LIKE LEARNING?

Please put a circle around your answer.

Name:
Age:
1 Male
2 Female

Are you satisfied with your students' achievement

in English? YES NO

a) In class do your students like learning

1 individually? YES NO
2 in pairs? YES NO
3 in small groups? YES NO
4 in one large group? YES NO
5 other (specify please)..............................

c) Do they want to

1 spend all their learning time in the classroom? YES NO

2 spend some time in the classroom and some time
practising their English with people outside? YES NO
3 other (specify please)..............................
d) Do they like learning

1 by listening? YES NO
2 by reading? YES NO
2 by copying from the board? YES NO
4 by listening and taking notes? YES NO
5 by reading and making notes? YES NO
6 by repeating what you hear? YES NO
7 by making summaries
8 other (specify please)..............................

e) When learning new vocabulary, do they like learning

1 by using new words in a sentence YES NO

2 by thinking of relationships between
known and new YES NO
3 by saying or writing words several times YES NO
4 by avoiding verbatim translation YES NO
5 by guessing the unknown YES NO
6 by reading without looking up words YES NO
7 other (specify please)..............................

f) When they speak do they want to be corrected

1 immediately, in front of everyone? YES NO

or...
2 later, at the end of the activity, in front
of everyone? YES NO
3 later, in private? YES NO
4 other (specify please)..............................
[-14-]

g) Do they mind if other students sometimes correct

their written work? YES NO

Do they mind if you as the teacher sometimes ask

them to correct their own work? YES NO

h) Do they like learning from

1 television/video/films? YES NO
2 radio? YES NO
3 tapes/cassettes? YES NO
4 written material? YES NO
5 the blackboard? YES NO
6 pictures/posters? YES NO
7 other (specify please)..............................

i) Do you do the following in your class?

1 Role play YES NO

2 Language games YES NO
3 Songs YES NO
4 Talking with and listening to other students YES NO
5 Memorising conversations/dialogues YES NO
6 Getting information from guest speakers YES NO
7 Getting information from planned visits YES NO
8 Writing a learning diary YES NO
9 Learning about culture YES NO

If so, please put a cross (+) next to the five things that
you find most useful.

j) How do you think students like to find out how much

their English is improving?

By .....
1 written tasks set by you? YES NO
2 seeing if they can use the language they have
learnt in real-life situations? YES NO
3 other (specify please)..............................

k) Do you think students get a sense of satisfaction from:

1 having their work graded? YES NO

2 being told that they have made progress? YES NO
3 feeling more confident in situations that
they found difficult before? YES NO
4 other (specify please)..............................
[-15-]
© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor's Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of

each page for purposes of citation.
Return to Table of Contents Return to Top Return to Main Page