Patrick W.

Jordan: The Good Society Framework Understanding Quality of Life

THE GOOD SOCIETY FRAMEWORK UNDERSTANDING QUALITY OF LIFE

Professor Patrick W. Jordan

Good societies are those in which the conditions enable their citizens to have a high
standard of wellbeing. Traditionally, the main measures used to quantify a societys level
of wellbeing have been financial measures, in particular standard of living, which is
mainly a measure of peoples income and spending power.
More recently, attention has been focussed on wider and more far-reaching measures of
wellbeing which look at quality of life in a broader sense. A variety of indices for
measuring quality of life have been developed, but currently there is little consensus on
what the key dimensions are.
This paper presents a framework, the Good Society Framework (GSF), for assessing quality
of life and explains how it was developed. It is conceived as a comprehensive model of
wellbeing incorporating all of the major factors included in the various indices and
grouping them into nine dimensions.

Relationships the quality of peoples social, family and interpersonal

relationships; the extent to which society is coherent and harmonious.
Economy peoples degree of economic prosperity and spending power; the
extent to which jobs are rewarding and offer potential for growth and
development.
Environment and Infrastructure the pleasantness and sustainability of the
natural environment; the degree to which the built environment is pleasant and
functions well and extent to which the infrastructure is effective and efficient.
Health whether people have access to good healthcare and healthy food;
whether work, home and public environments are generally safe.
Peace and Security whether crime is low and people feel safe in their homes and
public areas; whether or not society is affected by war or terrorism.
Culture and Leisure whether there is a rich and rewarding culture, both high
and popular; whether there are opportunities to participate in rewarding leisure
activities.
Spirituality, Religion and Philosophy whether there is access to religious and
spiritual teachings and the opportunity to practice ones religion of choice;
whether there is access to philosophical teachings and ideas about how to live.
Education whether there is education that enables people to function effectively
in society; whether the education is intellectually enriching.
Governance whether there is democracy, fairness and freedom of expression;
whether justice is transparent and consistent, and whether society is governed
with compassion and equality.

1
Social Indicators Network News (SINET), International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, Oct. 2010

Patrick W. Jordan: The Good Society Framework Understanding Quality of Life

1. INTRODUCTION
In recent years there has been an increasing focus, both in government and in academia, on
the subject of quality of life.
Traditionally, the main criterion on which a societys level of wellbeing has been judged is
standard of living. This is essentially a measure of the wealth and spending power of a
countrys citizens.
Quality of life (QoL), on the other hand, is a broader measure, including not only financial
considerations, but also a wider definition of wellbeing.
So far, a wide variety of indices for measuring QoL have been proposed and, although there
is some overlap in their dimensions, there is little consensus as to which is the most
appropriate.
The indices differ both in terms of the dimensions that they use and in the weightings that
they give to each dimension.
The Good Society Framework (GSF) was complied through amalgamating the dimensions
used in the other indices and merging them into a manageable number of dimensions (nine).
The GSF is not intended as an index of quality of life as there is no attempt to score nations
on its dimensions, nor are the dimensions weighted or ranked in order of importance.
Rather the GSF can be seen as a framework, model or checklist outlining the characteristics
that a great society should have in order to enable its citizens to have an optimum QoL.
It was initially created as part of a project involving professional bodies who were interested
in looking at how the professions that they represent could contribute to wellbeing in a
sense that went beyond just the financial. The aim of the GSF was to help them to structure
thinking about this.
Its compilation was both analytical and pragmatic in nature. The framework was put
together by looking at the various indices used for measuring QoL (described in the next
section of this paper), listing their various elements and then grouping them into a
manageable number of dimensions.
A challenge facing not only professional bodies, but also government at all levels as well as
other policy makers and other organisations in both the public and private sector is how to
help to improve society and improve the quality of life for people. This applies both to the
most developed societies as well as the least developed, although the nature of the
challenges in each case may be rather different.
The GSF is intended as a reference tool to stimulate thinking about how to improve QoL on
all of these dimensions and improve life for all people irrespective of their current
circumstances.

2
Social Indicators Network News (SINET), International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, Oct. 2010

Patrick W. Jordan: The Good Society Framework Understanding Quality of Life

2. QUALITY OF LIFE INDICES

The GSF was developed using information and indices from a number of sources including:
Quality of Life Index
Gross National Happiness
Human Development Index
Genuine Progress Indicator
World Values Survey
Life Quality Index
Satisfaction with Life Index
Happy Planet Index
Each is described below
2.1 Quality of Life Index
The Quality of Life Index was created by the Economist magazines intelligence unit. It ranks
countries according to quality of life based on the following dimensions: health, family life,
community life, material wellbeing, political stability, climate, job security, political freedom,
gender equality.
2.2 Gross National Happiness
This index was originally started by the government of Bhutan, but has been developed into
an international collaborative project involving many academic and research institutions. It
ranks countries based on how they perform on the following dimensions: economy,
environment, physical health, mental health, work, society and politics.
2.3 Human Development Index
This index was created by the United Nations Development Program. It ranks countries
based on a combination of life expectancy, education and wealth.
2.4 Genuine Progress Indicator
The Genuine Progress Indicator was developed by the Methodist Church in collaboration
with the University of Maryland. It ranks countries based on a combination of economic
conditions and environmental sustainability.
2.5 World Values Survey
This survey was founded by the University of Tilberg in The Netherlands and is now run as a
collaborative project involving social scientists from all over the world. It ranks countries
according to happiness based on peoples subjective ratings of how happy they are.
2.6 Life Quality Index
This index also results from an international collaborative academic project having originally
been created at the University of Waterloo in Canada. It ranks countries based on: wealth,
life expectancy and leisure time.
2.7 Satisfaction with Life Index
Another collaborative international project, this was founded by the University of Leicester.
It ranks countries based on peoples subjective ratings of how satisfied they are with their
lives.

3
Social Indicators Network News (SINET), International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, Oct. 2010

Patrick W. Jordan: The Good Society Framework Understanding Quality of Life

2.8 Happy Planet Index

The Happy Planet Index was created by the New Economics Foundation. It ranks countries
based on: peoples subjective ratings of happiness, life expectancy, and ecological footprint.
The GSF was created from a content analysis and cross referencing of these indices, followed
by a grouping of the content in to a manageable number of dimensions.

3. DIMENSIONS OF QUALITY OF LIFE

This section gives more detail of each of the dimensions of the GSF.
3.1 Relationships
This category is about the relationships between the people within society.
Good societies are those that have strong communities where people know their neighbours
and are friendly and supportive. They are well integrated, for example people of different
races live in harmony with each other and interact fully.
They are also societies in which personal relationships can flourish. This includes people
finding love and staying together, parenting children effectively and in a loving environment.
It also includes having good and meaningful friendships.
Key Issues
Communities
Marriages
Racial integration
Parenting
Romance
Friendship

3.2 Economy
This category is about the benefits that the economy brings to the people.
Good societies are economically prosperous. They enable their citizens to enjoy a good
standard of living which covers the essentials and also gives plenty of disposable income.
Both essentials and luxuries are plentiful.
The jobs in good societies are highly rewarding, both financially and in terms of the
fulfilment that they provide to those that do them. They also provide plentiful opportunities
for personal and career development.
Key Issues
Wealth
Essentials
Luxuries
Jobs
Personal Development

4
Social Indicators Network News (SINET), International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, Oct. 2010

Patrick W. Jordan: The Good Society Framework Understanding Quality of Life

3.3 Environment and Infrastructure

This category is about the physical conditions in which people live.
Good societies have a pleasant and sustainable natural environment, free of pollution. They
also have an attractive and functional built environment that is pleasant to live and work in.
They have an effective infrastructure with good transport and communication links and
cheap and plentiful energy that is available to all.
Key Issues
Natural environment
Sustainability
Built environment
Transport
Energy
Communications

3.4 Health
This category is about how well a society supports the good health of its citizens.
In good societies healthy food and drink is plentiful and affordable for all. There is effective
healthcare and the conditions in which good health can thrive. People are safe in their
homes and in public, and have safe working conditions.
People have a long life expectancy and good physical and mental health.
Key Issues
Physical health
Mental health
Safety from attack
Preventing accidents
Health and safety
Longevity

5
Social Indicators Network News (SINET), International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, Oct. 2010

Patrick W. Jordan: The Good Society Framework Understanding Quality of Life

3.5 Peace and Security

This category is about whether a society creates a peaceful, secure environment for people.
In good societies, crime is low and people and their possessions are safe. People feel
comfortable in their homes and in public areas.
Good societies have civil harmony and are at peace with other nations, their citizens are not
at risk from domestic or foreign conflict or from terrorism, nor do they visit war or terrorism
on other nations.
Key Issues
Crime
Antisocial behaviour
Terrorism
Civil war
War

3.6 Culture and Leisure

This category is about opportunities for rewarding activities outside of work.
Good societies have a rich culture with people having access to excellent arts, literature,
music, movies and plays, TV shows, sporting events and other forms of both high and
popular culture.
People have a wide variety of leisure opportunities that are affordable to participate in. They
also have plenty of time to pursue them.
Key Issues
High culture
Popular culture
Entertainment
Sports
Leisure

3.7 Spirituality, Religion and Philosophy

This category is about having access to teachings which look at the meaning and purpose of
life.
In good societies people have access to a wide variety of religious and spiritual teachings and
the opportunity to practice the religion or belief of their choice.
They also have access to philosophical teachings and different views about how to live. They
have the opportunity to put these philosophies into practice.
Key Issues
Spirituality
Philosophy
Religion

6
Social Indicators Network News (SINET), International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, Oct. 2010

Patrick W. Jordan: The Good Society Framework Understanding Quality of Life

3.8 Education
This category is about the quality of education a society provides for people.
In good societies people have access to an excellent education. This education enables them
to function and thrive within society. It also enriches them intellectually and is fulfilling and
rewarding in and of itself.
This education empowers the individual, giving them choices about how they live their lives
and the ability to make informed judgements and participate fully in society.
Key Issues
Education
Intellectual development
Personal empowerment
Judgement

3.9 Governance
This category is about the way society is governed.
Good societies are democratic with full political and civil liberties. They enable their citizens
to have freedom of expression, freedom of religion and freedom of movement and action.
They are compassionate and grant equal rights and responsibilities to all regardless of race,
religion, sexuality and age (except minors). They have a fair, consistent, transparent and
proportionate justice system. They also act with fairness and peaceful intent towards other
nations.
Key Issues
Political freedom
Civil liberties
Freedom of expression
Freedom
Justice
Compassion
Equality

7
Social Indicators Network News (SINET), International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, Oct. 2010

Patrick W. Jordan: The Good Society Framework Understanding Quality of Life

4. DISCUSSION
As can be seen from the richness of the dimensions of the GSF, quality of life is a
multifaceted and complex issue. All organisations and individuals governments, public
services, private enterprise, social institutions, professions and citizens potentially have a
role to play in improving society on all of these dimensions.
This may require a shift in mindset and emphasis, away from making judgements about
wellbeing that are based mainly on metrics such as wealth to broader measures that
incorporate all nine dimensions of the GSF.
While there have been moves in this direction, as witnessed by the variety of indices cited in
this paper, there is still little consensus as to how the overall wellbeing of a society should be
measured.
Although the GSF is not itself a metric of quality of life as it does not offer a ranking or
weighting of the importance of the dimensions, nor a set of formulas by which a societys
wellbeing can be measured on each it could be used as a starting point for such an
analysis.
Whatever the measure that is ultimately used to assess quality of life, it is important that it
includes all the elements that contribute significantly to the wellbeing of a societys citizens.

5. CONCLUSIONS
As quality of life gains increasing prominence as an issue and is considered in increasingly
broad terms, the challenges facing all organisations and individuals are also increasingly
broad and far reaching.
To gain a true understanding of the level of wellbeing that a society offers to its citizens, it is
important to look beyond simplistic measures of wealth and material prosperity and to also
assess the wider factors that contribute to quality of life.
The GSF offers a comprehensive model on which such an analysis could be based.

8
Social Indicators Network News (SINET), International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, Oct. 2010

Patrick W. Jordan: The Good Society Framework Understanding Quality of Life

6. FURTHER READING
For more detail of the indices that were used in compiling the GSF take a look at the
Wikipedia entries for each index. See also the following references.
Quality of Life Index
Economist Intelligence Unit 2005, The Economist Intelligence Units Quality of Life Index, The
World in 2005
Human Development Index
United Nations Development Program 2009, Human Development Report 2009
Genuine Progress Indicator
Cobb C., Goodman, G.S., Wackernagel M. 1999, Why Bigger Isnt Better: The Genuine
Progress Indicator 1999 Update
World Values Survey
Inglehart R, Foa R, Peterson C, Welzel C 2008 Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness:
A Global Perspective (19812007), Perspectives on Psychological Science
Life Quality Index
Nathwani J,S., Lind N.C. and Pandey M.D. 1997, Affordable Safety By Choice: The Life Quality
Method, Institute for risk Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Satisfaction with Life Index
White, A., 2007, A Global Projection of Subjective Well-being: A Challenge To Positive
Psychology?, Psychtalk 56, 17-20
Happy Planet Index
New Economics Foundation 2009, The (Un)Happy Planet Index 2.0: Why Good Lives Dont
Have to Cost the Earth

9
Social Indicators Network News (SINET), International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, Oct. 2010