Scribd
Upload
131 views1 page

Rubric

This rubric outlines the criteria and point values for grading a nursing leadership and management project paper related to relationship-based care (RBC). The paper will be evaluated on its project description and rationale and how well it articulates the link to RBC concepts (8 points maximum). It will also be graded on the quality of the literature review and how well it supports the RBC project (8 points maximum). Finally, it will be assessed on the depth and relevance of the project implementation plan as it relates to RBC (8 points maximum). The total possible points are 44.

Uploaded by

api-268670617
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
131 views1 page

Rubric

This rubric outlines the criteria and point values for grading a nursing leadership and management project paper related to relationship-based care (RBC). The paper will be evaluated on its project description and rationale and how well it articulates the link to RBC concepts (8 points maximum). It will also be graded on the quality of the literature review and how well it supports the RBC project (8 points maximum). Finally, it will be assessed on the depth and relevance of the project implementation plan as it relates to RBC (8 points maximum). The total possible points are 44.

Uploaded by

api-268670617
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Rubric

Nursing Leadership and Management Project Paper (1)

Nursing Leadership and Management Project Paper (1)


Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Project description and rationale


(Why is this a Relationship-based
Care Project?).

Project presented
clearly with solid
articulation of the
projects link to RBC
concepts.
8 pts

Literature Review

Excellent literature review


with clear support for the
RBC project.
8 pts

In-depth literature review


with good support for the
RBC project.
6 pts

Project Implementation Plan

Points are an accurate


description, relevant to
the plan and based in
RBC.
8 pts

Covers essential points but


lacks adequate description of
the project and not based in
RBC.
6 pts

References

Sources are current and


from peer reviewed
journals or texts.
8 pts

Grammar/Content/Organization

No grammatical errors,
information presented in
logical sequence, content is
easy to read and understand,
good word choice.
8 pts

Description of criterion

No APA errors.
8 pts

Some errors in project


research and
implementation. Project
clearly relates to RBC
concepts.
6 pts

Most sources are from


current or from peer
reviewed articles.
6 pts

a few APA errors


6 pts

Judy A. Scott, MSN, RN, Apr 21 at 8:53pm

Poor project description and


rationale. Project does not
clearly relate to the concepts
of Relationship-based Care
(RBC).
2 pts

Moderately in-depth literature


review with adequate support
for the RBC project.
4 pts
Essential points are not
emphasized or vague in
describing the project.
4 pts

Some current or peer


reviewed sources but relies
too heavily on other sources.
4 pts

Some grammatical errors,


some sequence problems,
word choice occasionally
repetitive or problematic.
6 pts

Total Points: 44
Well done, good project.

Basic understanding of the


project and RBC, but poorly
presented. The RBC concepts
do not adequately relate to the
project.
4 pts

Grammatical errors,
organization, or word
choice interfere with
readability.
4 pts

Some APA errors.


4 pts

No project
description
and rationale.
0 pts

Literature review is scanty


with little support for the
RBC project.
2 pts
Plan fails to provide for
adequate implementation
of the project.
2 pts

Plan not
Implemented
0 pts

Sources are questionable (not peer


reviewed literature, cannot be
verified or are out of date.
2 pts
Numerous grammatical
errors, organization
illogical, content is
difficult to follow or
understand.
2 pts

Multiple APA errors.


2 pts

No
literature
review
0 pts

No
references
0 pts

A multiplicity of
grammatical
errors, no
organization
0 pts

Did not follow APA format


0 pts

8 / 8 pts

6 / 8 pts

8 / 8 pts

8 / 8 pts

8 / 8 pts

6 / 8 pts

You might also like