Calculos Termodinamicos Motor Diesel
Calculos Termodinamicos Motor Diesel
Calculos Termodinamicos Motor Diesel
hence:
(1.9.6)
If Eq. 1.9.5 is applied in this fashion to all of the simulations conducted in Sec. 1.9.1.6,
where the AFR is varied widely from rich to lean settings, then an equivalent set of simulation
output becomes available which is related to brake, rather than indicated, data. So, on Figs.
1.57-1.59 are drawn all of the simulation output as brake data to be compared and contrasted
with the indicated data. This output may also be compared with data typical of production si
engines in order to assess how closely this simple simulation is approaching reality. The simulation output of brake-related values is for brake mean effective pressure in Fig. 1.57, for brake
thermal efficiency in Fig. 1.58, and for brake specific fuel consumption in Fig. 1.59.
In Fig. 1.57, the friction and pumping loss at a combined 4.46 bar is seen drawn on the
graph, giving a constant difference of4.46 bar between the imep and bmep lines. When this is
translated into brake thermal efficiency, nb, it can be seen that the effect is no longer a hnear
shift from indicated thermal efficiency, lit. The brake thermal efficiency profile is now very
much flatter through the stoichiometric region, a trend that would be very typical of real si
engines. This same trend is also seen in the bsfc graph in Fig. 1.59.
The peak bmep is now observed to be around 15 bar, a value that is still on the high side for
a real si engine with a delivery ratio of 1.0, but that is not so hugely different from practice.
The best bsfc point of about 220 g/kWh is about 14% too optimistic compared to one of
today's production si automobile engines.
Even Closer to Reality
It will be recalled that these simulation data incorporate input data for the indices of compression and expansion at the ideal value of 1.4, which is equal to the ratio of specific heats for
air. Recalling the discussion in Sec. 1.9.1.4 above, if these indices are each shifted by 0.1, to
1.3 and 1.5, respectively, and the present simulation rerun at a stoichiometric AFR, the bmep
becomes 11.62 bar and the bsfc increases to 247 g/kWh, both ofwhich numbers would be well
in line with current practice.
109
6.OL 16 4V TC DI DIESEL
IMEP=12.43 bar
sa 120
Li
a
2.OL 14 4V NA Si OTTO
80IMEP=14.26 bar
100
(ICO
w
ac
80
60
W
20
0
20S
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
CYLINDER VOLUME RATIO
There is no denying that the two p-V diagrams are not alike, either in shape or character.
The Otto diagram is short and squat compared to the longer, leaner Diesel diagram.
The Definition of the Ideal Diesel Cycle
The ideal Diesel cycle is presented in some theoretical detail inAppendixAl .1, Sec. A.1.1.0.
It is illustrated there by Figs. A.4 and A1.5, showing pressure-volume characteristics and
temperature-volume characteristics, respectively. There is a common bond in fundamental
thermodynamic thinking between the ideal Diesel and the ideal Otto cycle, the latter being
described in Sec. 1.6.9. The elements of the ideal Diesel cycle are, referring to Figs. A1.4 and
A1.5:
(a) Adiabatic and isentropic compression from state condition 1-2
(b) Constant volume combustion as heat transfer from 2-3
(c) Constant pressure combustion as heat transfer from 3-4
(d) Adiabatic and isentropic compression from state condition 4-5
(e) Constant volume heat rejection to represent exhaust process from 5-1
Thus, there is an extra heat addition process for diesel combustion compared to the ideal
Otto cycle, otherwise the two cycles are identical. The original definition of the ideal Diesel
cycle was that it had only constant pressure combustion whereas that described above is often
called the Dual cycle [1.2]. I define either, or both, as an ideal Diesel cycle.
AppendixAI .1, Sec. Al.1.10 contains all ofthe thermodynamic theory required to resolve
a given design in terms ofits performance characteristics, or its state conditions at points 1-5
throughout the cycle. This theory will be used below to examine a test case for the ideal Diesel
cycle.
110
=p1V1
RT1
111
=25.084 x10
kg
mta=PlVsv
RT,
=23.61x10 kg
Pat
p=
a
RTat
DR-
mas
mdref
mta =
M
PatVsv
23.61 x 10
= 1.96
1.205 x 997.5 x 104
The delivery ratio, DR, is 1.96 and shows the considerable amount of air blown into the
engine from the compressor section of the turbocharger.
From Eq. 1.6.20, the mass of fuel trapped, mtf:
mtf=ta
23.61 x 10 -
5.354x105 kg
From Eq. 1.6.21, total heat transfer around tdc is equivalent to heat energy in fuel:
=
= 1.0 x 5.354 x 10
QR TlCmtfCfl
x 43.5 x
106 = 2329
As the bum proportion at constant volume, kcv, is decided at 0.1, then from Eq. A1.76:
= (1-kCV)QR
P2 =p4
2-J
112
=2.33x105 x52.8
T__ (VI. )
T2 = 343x3.106 = 1065.4 K
=(CR)Y-
From Eqs. A1.21 and A1.23, the work done during compression is negative:
WI
-mCv(T2 - T
-25.084
-1301.1 J
From Eq. A1.23, the change of intemal energy done during compression is positive:
Q2
U3 - U2 +w2
mlCv(T3-T2 +0
=1194.7
mICV 1065.4232.9
25.084 x 104 x 718
T3=T2+ Q2
U3 - U2 = Q2=2329 J
113
= 137.95 x 105 Pa
2096.1
=22.
Q__4 =1194.7+
2026.1
10-4
25.084 x
x 1005
m,Cp
T4=T3+
N = P3
T3
1194.7
m3
The change of internal energy during the process from 3-4 is analyzed using the first law
of thermodynamics for the closed system, from Eqs. A1.77 and Al.83:
T4
-0.4
'-.Y
T55=62026.10
T226l
VT
1059.8
xl10
=805.6 K
V4
=
17.95 105
= 1379
114
805.6) = -833.1 J
T5)= -833.1 J
Wnet = W2 + W3
n - 1495.4
QR 2329
The mean effective pressure, imep, can be found using Eq. 1.6.31 or Eq. A1.86:
meimVp
VSV
1495.4
997.5x10@ =14.99x1055 Pa(i.e., 14.99 bar)
997.5 x 104
The power output of one engine cylinder can be found using Eq. 1.6.33:
W=Wnet
rpm
5
1800
x
=1495.4
120
120
115
22.43 x
=x r
kg W
Ws kW h
0.129 kg/kWh
116