The Annihilation of Lord Buddha's Family', by Paripurnanand Verma Pioneer18.5.56
The Annihilation of Lord Buddha's Family', by Paripurnanand Verma Pioneer18.5.56
The Annihilation of Lord Buddha's Family', by Paripurnanand Verma Pioneer18.5.56
of 18-5-56]
Gorakhpur Terai
The oldest and perhaps most authenticated book on Gorakhpur
Teraithe area called Nepal Teraiwas written by Mr. W.
Gibbons nearly 60 years ago. It was published in Buckingham,
England, and contains valuable information. In Nepal, the area
leading from the Trivem Ghat on Narayani river to the district of
Arrah in Bihar , i.e., a distance of 60 miles, is called
GorakhpurTerai. In 1801, the East India Company purchased this
plot of land from Nawab Wazir of Avadh on payment of
Rs.1,33,47,135|12|9. The whole region was covered with rich Sal
forests and was famous in Buddhist history.
In the year 1846-47, the Company earned Rs.2,11,68,175 from this
forest. During the same year the total income from land Revenue to
the East India Company from Gorakhpur district was Rs.23,86,990
while from Kanpur district its income was Rs.23,34,700. Due to
dense forests, the Board of East India Company decides that it
would not be possible for them to have any administrative or
business control over the area and therefore, the land was given to
some Englishmen on long leases. One of such leases gave a big
and prosperous estate to Mr. Peppy. While managing the land,
cutting the jungles and levelling the ground , the Peppy family
discovered Piperahwa Stoop. Pipraerhwa is 10 miles from Naugarh
railway station in Basti District on the North-Eastern Railway, in
the property of Mr. W.C. Peppy in his Howard Lehra estate. It is
east of Kapil-Waththu (now called Kapil Vastu), the capital of
Shuddodhan, father of Buddha. Lumbini forest is north-east of this
place. In the south is the Birdpur Estate of another Englishman.
Piperahwa is 19.75 miles on Nepal-Uska Road, half a mile from
th
the 45 pillar on Indo-Nepal border. The excavated stoop is 16 feet
in length. 10 feet in breadth and 2 feet in height. Its discovery
created such a commotion among the historians that the famous
scholar, Mr. Vincent Smith, visited this place in October, 1898.
The Story
In January, 1906, the Royal Asiatic journal published a very
learned article by Mr. J.F. Fleet, I.C.S., on this stoop and it was
then that the world came to know of the great event which we shall
narrate now. With the growth in eminence and importance of Lord
Buddha and the spreading of his religion, it became a question of
honour and prestige to the ruling families to give alms to the
Bhikkus i.e. the mendicants, when they came to the town with their
begging bowls for food. It is interesting that although the Bhikkus
were not allowed to live in the towns, they had their monasteries
quite near to the town to facilitate begging. It was thus that the
Srawasti (Sahet in Bahraich
District), Sarnath (Banaras) and Sanchi (Bhhopal District), etc.,
grew to be important Buddhist centres. The kingdom of Sakyas
(i.e., Shuddhodhan of Kapil-vastu) was subordinated to the
kingdom of Srawasti where king Pasenedi ruled. While Sakyas
claimed to belong to purest Kshatriya blood, the ruling family at
about those younger to him in age and was given some flimsy
excuse, which he sincerely accepted to be correct.
After four days of entertainment and reception in the town, when
the king left and had gone hardly a few miles, it was discovered by
one of his soldiers that some weapons were left in the capital and
he hurriedly returned to pick them up. He discovered in the palace
that a slave girl was cleaning a stool and was murmuring to her
mate that because a child born of a Shudra woman sat on it,
therefore, the stool had to be cleansed thoroughly.
Having overheard this, the soldier returned to his master who,
immediately on arrival at Srawasti, questioned his mother at length
and got the truth from her. Thus, he took a vow to avenge the insult
to himself and invaded Kapil-vastu after a few years.
During the first two attacks, Lord Buddha reached the scene and
persuaded him to return but on the third attack, Buddha was not
present and invasion took place. The king was determined that he
would not spare anyone born of the Sakya family. It was decided
by the elders to avert this calamity, that whenever anyone was
questioned whether he was a Sakya or not, he would reply:--NO
SAKO TRINAM OR SAKO NALO
While replying thus, the Sakya should keep a straw in his mouth.
Both these sentences have got two meanings. The one means that
I am not eating grass while actually it will mean that I am not a
Sakya. Those who spoke this line, on the same way as the famous
episode of Mahabharat when Yudhishthir spoke a lie, the life of
that Sakya was spared but it is said that so much blood was shed in
this invasion that a huge tank of blood was formed there and the
ruins of this tank still remain there.
After a couple of years, the bones and ashes of those destroyed
were safely preserved and stoopas were erected and the ashes
along with the ornaments etc. of those killed were deposited. The