Plate Element
Plate Element
The Finite Element Library of the MIDAS Family Programs includes 3-node triangular and 4-node
quadrilateral Plate/Shell elements.
The MIDAS shell elements are flat shell elements and are formulated as a combination of a plane stress
and plate-bending elements. The stiffness terms associated with two in-plane translational degrees of
freedom (DOF) are formulated in the same way as for plane stress element. The stiffness terms related to
one out-of-plane translational DOF and two out-of-plane rotational DOF are formulated by the same
procedure used for the plate-bending element.
Shell
Plane stress
Plate-bending
u = z x ( x, y ) , v = z y ( x, y ) , w = w ( x, y )
where,
x and y
are the rotation angles of the lines normal to the undeformed neutral surface in the
x-z and y-z planes, respectively. According to Kirchhoff plate theory, which ignores shear deformations,
x =
w
w
and y =
x
y
b = z = z
y
x+
x
y
where, z is the distance from the neutral surface and
x + x
=
w +
y
y
The state of the stresses is assumed equal to that of a plane stress element. Therefore, for an isotropic
x
E
b = y = zD = z
1 2
xy
1
0 0
(1 ) 2
0
xz
E 1 0
s = = E =
2 (1 + ) 0 1
yz
Now, the strain energy is obtained as follows:
U = Ub + U s =
1
1
T Db dA + T Ds dA
A
2
2 A
where,
Db
Ds
1
Eh3
1
Db = Dz dz =
2
h 2
12 (1 )
0 0
h2
kEh 1 0
Ds = k Edz =
h 2
2 (1 + ) 0 1
h2
0
0
(1 )
in which, k is the correction factor for considering the non-uniform characteristic of shear strains, and is
usually assumed as 5/6.
Then, by definition, flexural moments M and shear forces Q are obtained through integration of stresses
over the thickness as follows:
Mx
h2
M = M y = zdz = Db
h 2
M xy
h2
Qx
Q = = k s dz = Ds
h 2
Qy
The boundary condition of this element is C0 continuation condition, which includes only the
compatibility of displacements and rotations. Since it does not involve differential terms, it is an easy task
to satisfy the condition.
The above equations represent the formulation of a thick plate element, which includes shear
deformations. Now, we proceed to formulation of a DKT element without shear deformations. The DKT
element and node numbering convention is illustrated in Fig. 3. We first ignore the Us term and assume
the following:
(1) The element has only three DOF, i.e., displacement w and two rotations
x and y
at each node.
(2) Since the shear deformations are ignored, the nodal rotations must satisfy the Kirchhoff boundary
conditions,
x =
w
w
and y =
.
y
x
(3) The assumptions of the Kirchhoff plate theory can be constrained at some discrete points.
(4) The compatibility condition of rotations,
The rotations
i =1
i =1
x = fi xi and y = f i yi
where,
xi and yi
represents the shape functions associated with i-th node and defined as follows:
f1 = 1 ( 21 1)
f 2 = 2 ( 2 2 1)
f3 = 3 ( 2 3 1)
f 4 = 4 2 3
f 5 = 4 31
f 6 = 41 2
1 + 2 + 3 = 1
(2) The Kirchhoff hypothesis is constrained at each node and mid-node. That is, the following
conditions must be satisfied:
x
= 0 (at nodes 1, 2 & 3)
=
+ w
y y
s +
w
=0
s
(3)
3
1 w
3
1 w
w
wi
wj
=
+
2lij
4 s i 2lij
4 s j
s k
where, k denotes the mid-node of the side ij, and lij represents the length of the side ij.
(4)
nk =
1
( ni + nj )
2
u = w1 x1 y1
w2 x 2 y 2
w3 x 3 y 3
x c s n
=
y s c s
w
s c s x
=
w s c y
n
where, c = cos(x, nij) and s = sin(x, nij)
x and y
1.5 ( a6 f 6 a5 f 5 )
b5 f5 + b6 f 6
f1 c5 f5 c6 f 6
1.5 ( a4 f 4 a6 f 6 )
x = HTx ( 2 , 3 ) U = b6 f 6 + b4 f 4
f1 c6 f 6 c4 f 4
1.5 ( a f a f )
5 5
4 4
b
f
b
f
+
4 4
5 5
f c f c f
1 4 4 5 5
1.5 ( d 6 f 6 d5 f 5 )
f1 + e5 f 5 + e6 f 6
( b5 f 5 + b6 f 6 )
1.5 ( d 4 f 4 d 6 f 6 )
y = HTy ( 2 , 3 ) U = f1 + e6 f 6 + e4 f 4
( b6 f 6 + b4 f 4 )
1.5 ( d f d f )
5 5
4 4
f1 + e4 f 4 + e5 f5
( b4 f 4 + b5 f 5 )
w1
x1
y1
w2
x
2
y2
w
3
x3
y3
w1
x1
y1
w2
x
2
y2
w
3
x3
y3
where
3
1
1
xij yij lij2 , ck = xij2 yij2 lij2
2
4
4
1
1
d k = yij lij2 , ek = yij2 xij2 lij2 , lij2 = xij2 + yij2
2
4
ak = xij lij2 , bk =
in which for ij = 23, 31 & 12, k = 4, 5 & 6, respectively, and xij = xi-xj, yij = yi-yj
Then, the vector of curvatures
is obtained as follows:
= Bu
2A
x31HTx , x12 HTx , + y31HTy , + y12 HTy ,
2
3
2
3
K DKT = 2 A
1 13
0 0
BT Db Bd 2 d 3
The stiffness matrix in the above equation is calculated by numerical integration using the 3-point
Gaussian quadrature.
Also, the bending moments M at any point in the element are obtained as follows:
M ( x , y ) = Db B ( x , y ) U
x = x1 + 2 x21 + 3 x31
y = y1 + 2 y21 + 3 y31
The thick plate element included in MIDAS Finite Element Library is a modified Discrete KirchhoffMindlin Triangular/Quadrilateral (DKMT/DKMQ) element.
The formulation procedure for the DKMT element is quite similar to that used for DKT element. Except,
the terms related to the shear stiffness are included in the formulation. Also, for the sake of convenience
of formulation, some parts are expressed in somewhat different forms.
First, the equation for the curvatures and the stress-strain relation are identical to those used in the DKT
element.
The DKMT element and node numbering convention is illustrated in Fig. 4. The shape functions are
expressed by dividing the node terms and mid-node terms as follows:
3
6
=
+
x i xi Pk ck sk
i =1
k =4
3
6
=
+
f
Pk sk sk
i yi
y
i =1
k =4
fi = i , P4 = 41 2 , P5 = 4 2 3 , P6 = 4 31 (1 + 2 + 3 = 1)
(i =1, 2, 3)
= Bb u + Bb
where:
B b
B b
0 y32
1
=
0
0
2A
0 x32
0 y13
0 y21
x32
x13
y32
x13
y13
x21
P
k y13 + k y21 ck
3
2
Pk
Pk
1
( k = 4,5, 6 )
=
"
x
+
x
s
"
13
21 k
3
2A
2
Pk
Pk
Pk
Pk
x13 +
x21 ck
y13 +
y21 sk
3
3
= [ s 4
s 5
s 6 ]
xz
= = B s
yz
where
0
x21
y21
B s
s5
s6
2 1 4
A1
2 A2
=
3 c6
1 c5 2 4
A1
A2
k =
2 h2
, A1 = c4 s6 c6 s4 , A2 = c5 s4 c4 s5 , A3 = c6 s5 c5 s6
k (1 ) lij2
s6
s4
3 2 5
A2
A3
c4
c6
2 3 5
A3
A2
s4
s5
1 3 6
A3
A1
c5
c4
3
1 6
A1
A3
in which
A1 = c4 s6 c6 s4 , A2 = c5 s4 c4 s5 , A3 = c6 s5 c5 s6
Accordingly, the strain-displacement matrix B is given by,
= Bbu = ( Bb + Bb A n ) u
= B s u = B s A n u
where, An is the transformation matrix, which relates = A n u and is given by,
A n = A 1 A w
2
0
0
3 l12 (1 + 4 )
0
0
l23 (1 + 5 )
A =
0
0
l31 (1 + 6 )
3
x21
y21
x21
y21
0
0
1 2 2 1 2 2
x
y
x
0
0
1 32 32 1 32
Aw = 0
2
2
2
x
1 x13 y13 0
0
0
1 13
2
2
2
y32
2
y
13
2
K = Kb + K s
K b = BTb Db Bb dA, K s = BTs Ds B s dA
A
Also, the bending moments and shear forces at any point in the element are defined as,
M = Db B b u
T = Ds B su
The formulation procedure of the DKMQ element is quite similar to that used for the DKMT element.
Except, some differences exist due to the differences in the number of nodes and shape functions. The
matrices for the DKMQ element corresponding to those for the DKMT element are as follows:
f1 = 4 (1 )(1 )
f = 1 (1 + )(1 )
2 4
f = 1 (1 + )(1 + )
3 4
1
f 4 = (1 )(1 + )
B b
fi
fi
ai = j11 + j12
, ( i = 1, 2,3, 4 )
b = j f i + j fi
21
22
i
Pk
P
j11 + k j12 ck
Pk
Pk
"
j
j
s
= "
+
( k = 5, 6, 7,8)
21
22 k
Pk
Pk
Pk
Pk
j21 +
j22 ck
j11 +
j12 sk
0 ai
= " 0 0
0 bi
B b
= [ s 5
B s =
k =
1
1 2 ) (1 )
(
2
1
P6 = (1 + ) (1 2 )
2
1
P7 = (1 2 ) (1 + )
2
1
P8 = (1 ) (1 2 )
2
P5 =
s 6
bi " ,
ai
s 7
1 j11 (1 ) l125
6 j21 (1 ) l125
2 h2
k (1 ) lij2
s 8 ]
j12 (1 + ) l236
j22 (1 + ) l236
j11 (1 + ) l347
j21 (1 + ) l347
( k = 5, 6, 7,8)
where, j11, j12, j21 and j22 are the components of the inverse Jacobian matrix.
The transformation matrix An takes the following form:
j12 (1 ) l418
j22 (1 ) l418
A n = A 1 A w
2
0
0
3 l12 (1 + 5 )
l23 (1 + 6 )
0
0
3
A =
2
l34 (1 + 7 )
0
0
0
0
0
x21
y21
x21
y21
0
1 2 2 1 2 2
x
y
0
0
0
1 32 32 1
2
2
Aw =
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
x
y
0
0
0
1 14 14 0
2
2
2
l41 (1 + 8 )
3
0
0
x32
2
x
43
2
0
y32
2
y
43
2
0
x43
2
x
14
2
1
1
y
43
2
y
14
2