1463520118

Determine Case Depth In Truck Axles-Without Cutting!
Scope
Sonix recently completed a case study with axle manufacturer, Traxle, where case hardness depths were nondestructively measured on 24 truck axles. Depth measurements were made with the Sonix Ultrasonic
Microstructural Analyzer (UMA), a device that uses ultrasonic waves to yield quantitative depth values in a few
seconds without cutting, and with very high accuracy. The UMA measures case depth in induction hardened
parts. Axles were inspected at both the flange root fillet and along the shaft body, taking an average measurement
around the circumference. For comparison, the parts were then cut, polished and etched. Micro hardness tests
were performed, measuring the case depth. The destructive tests were correlated with the ultrasonic results. The
average error of the ultrasonic case depth was less than 5%.
Figure 1: Rear Axle Cross Section showing typical ultrasonic

inspection points to measure case depth.
Figure 2: Cut, polished and etched crosssection showing hardened outer region and
soft core on a hardened axle.
Results
Figure 1 shows a cross section of the axles tested. These parts were approximately 2.0 inch diameter rear-drive truck
axles. Ultrasonic measurements were taken near the center along the shaft, and 45-degrees into the flange root fillet.
Figure 2 shows an axle shaft body that has been cut, polished and etched. Note that the transition from the hardened
case down to the softer core is clearly visible. Figure 3a shows the averaged ultrasonic waveforms generated for
three shafts at the bodies having case depths of 0.33, 0.44, and 0.51 inches. Similarly, figure 3b shows the ultrasonic
waveforms recorded at the fillet areas having case depths of 0.11, 0.16, and 0.25 inches. Note in both sets of plots,
that the reflection from transition zone shifts to the right as the case depth increases. The UMA measures the time
between the front surface echo and the transition zone echo, then converts this to a case depth from a calibration
standard. The time measurement is shown (in microseconds) on each plot.
a) Shaft body
b) Fillet
Part Surface
Echo
Case Depth
(in)
Case Depth
(in)
0.33
9.0
0.44
11.5
3.1 usec
0.11
0.51
15.4
0.16
Transition
Zone
Echo
4.4 usec
0.25
Time
Time
Figure 3: Ultrasonic responses from: (a) 3 shaft bodies having case depths of .33, .44, and .51 inches, and
(b) three fillets having case depths of 0.11, 0.16, and 0.25 inches.
5.7 usec
Figure 4: Traxle Axles: Estimated Case Depth using

Ultrasound vs Actual Case Depth (All Data)
0.6
Estimated Case Depth (inches)
Figure 4 shows the case depth obtained

ultrasonically plotted against the actual
destructive case depth measurements for all
24 axles: Case depths for the shaft bodies
were in the range of 0.3 - 0.55 inches. The
fillets were in the range of 0.1- 0.25 inches.
Note that the ultrasonic depths closely track
the results obtained by cutting. Overall, the
average error was less than 5%.
0.5
Body Area
Calib Data (Body)
0.4
Advantages
The key advantage of the UMA method is
that it is non-destructive: tested parts can be
returned to the production line, saving
significantly in scrap. Depth measurements
are produced in seconds, so many more
parts can be tested compared to
conventional destructive methods. Process
problems can be corrected sooner. The
UMA provides a direct reading of case
depth and is not sensitive to surface
roughness, material properties, dimensional
tolerances, small changes in temperature or
magnetic fields. Core hardening is also
easily detected.
Calib Data (Flange)
0.3
Blind Data (Body)

Blind Data (Flange)
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
Ultrasonic = Destructive
Tests
Flange Area
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Actual Case Depth (inches)
For more information contact Sonix at 703440-0222. See our web site at
http://www.sonix.com.
What People Are Saying About The UMA!

Gary C. -- Chief Metallurgist --DANA Corp. Marion Forge
Application: Medium to Heavy Rear Wheel Truck Axles
Comments: Have saved 60% of destructive testing scrap by using UMA,
This device is like a dream come true
Scott P. -- Quality Assurance Manager -- Traxle:
Application: Medium to Heavy Rear Wheel Truck Axles
Comments:This is the most promising non-destructive technology we have seen to date. This
is the first device we have seen that actually give a quantifiable output our confidence is high
for integrating this device into our plant in the near future.
John D. -- Senior Metallurgist -- Major Automotive Axle Manufacturer
Application: Front Wheel Drive Automotive Shafts
Comments: Have saved 25% of destructive testing scrap by using the UMA system.

1463520118

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1463520118

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1463520118

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Determine Case Depth In Truck Axles-Without Cutting!

Figure 1: Rear Axle Cross Section showing typical ultrasonic

Figure 4: Traxle Axles: Estimated Case Depth using

Estimated Case Depth (inches)

Figure 4 shows the case depth obtained

Calib Data (Flange)

Blind Data (Body)

Actual Case Depth (inches)

What People Are Saying About The UMA!

You might also like