Mathematical Induction Solutions: Problems
Mathematical Induction Solutions: Problems
Mathematical Induction Solutions: Problems
2 4 6 . . . 2n
2n + 1
The result for n + 1 is similar, except we need to
multiply the left side of the above
2n + 1
2n + 1
equation by
, while the right side by p
. So as long as we show
2n + 2
2(n + 1) + 1
that we multiply the left side by a smaller number, than the right side, the result will
hold. Thus we just need to prove:
2n + 1
2n + 1
p
2n + 2
2(n + 1) + 1
Squaring both sides we get:
(2n + 1)2
2n + 1
1
1 3 5 . . . (2n 1) 2n + 1
1
2n + 1
p
=p
2 4 6 . . . 2n
2n + 2
2n + 1
2(n + 1) + 1
2(n + 1) + 1
and we are done.
8. We look at the first few terms of the sequence and try to spot a pattern. Have a1 =
1, a2 = 2, a3 = 4, a4 = 8, . . .. This suggests that an = 2n1 . Let us prove this using
strong induction.
Base Step: For n = 1 and n = 2 the result holds: a1 = 1 = 211 and a2 = 1 = 221 .
Note: In this base step, we considered two cases, and not one as usual. We need to
do it for this problem since the n + 1-st term depends on two previous terms, and not
just one.
Induction Step: Let n 2 be a positive integer, and assume the result holds for all
positive integers k n. To prove the result holds for n + 1, we use the definition of
the sequence:
an+1 = an + 2an = 2n1 + 2 2n2 = 2n = 2(n+1)1
where the second equality holds since the result holds for n and n 1, so that an =
2n1 , an1 = 2n2 , by the induction assumption. We have thus shown the result holds
for n + 1, and we are done.
9. We will call a positive integer n good if Bob can pay for an item worth n dollars with
two- and five- dollar bills without change. Its clear that if n is good, then n + 2 must
be good, since Bob just pays with another two-dollar bill. So for a particular positive
integer n to prove that is good, it would suffice to know that n 2 is good and not
just that n 1 is good, so we will again use strong induction.
Base Step: n = 4 is good: Bob can pay using two two-dollar bills.
n = 5 is good: Bob can pay using one five-dollar bill.
Induction Step: Let n be a positive integer, n 5 and suppose for all integers k
satisfying 4 k n, k is good. We need to show that n + 1 is good.
Since n 5, then n 1 4 so k = n 1 satisfies 4 k n and hence n 1 is
good. But then n + 1 is good (remember Bob just uses an extra two-dollar bill), and
therefore n + 1 is good as well, so the induction step is finished.
Note: Make sure you understand the logic in the above argument well, and if not,
re-read the solution. The induction step itself is quite simple, but the logic for setting
it up is more tricky than in the previous problems.
1
10. Base Step: For n = 1 we have 3(2 ) 1 = 8 which is divisible by 23 = 21+2 but not by
24 = 21+3 . So the base step is done.
Induction Step: Assume the result is true for some positive integer n. Then we have
n
n
3(2 ) 1 is divisible by 2n+2 but not 2n+3 . This is the same as saying that 3(2 ) 1 =
1
1
1
1
= (x + )2 2 x = (x + )2 2
2
x
x
x
x
which is an integer since x + x1 and 2 are both integers. This completes the base step.
Induction Step: Let n 2 be an integer, and assume the result holds for all positive
1
integers k, k n. In particular, this means that xn + n is equal to some integer a,
x
1
n1
and x
+ n1 is equal to some integer b. For n + 1 we have:
x
xn+1 +
1
xn+1
1
1
1
)(x + ) (xn1 + n1 )
n
x
x
x
1
= a(x + ) b
x
= (xn +
1
which must be an integer, since a, b are integers, and by the problem condition, x +
x
is also an integer. Thus the result is true for n + 1 as well, and we are done.
Hard Problems
13. Notice that for (a) and (b) m and n have greatest common divisor equal to 1, therefore
on each turn a player can always make a move of replacing the number k with its
divisor l strictly less than k, as long as l > 1, or as long as l = 1 and 1 has not yet
appeared on the board.
Instead of dealing with the actual numbers we will deal with the number of prime
factors they have. Then, the game becomes equivalent to the following. Two numbers
m and n are written on the board. On each turn a player can select a number k greater
than 0 and replace it with any positive integer less than k, or replace it with 0, as long
as 0 is not already written on the board. A player who cannot make a move loses.
It immediately follows that m = 0, n = 1 is a losing position. Therefore, m = 0, n 2
is a winning position (since a player replaces n with 1 and wins). Furtheremore,
m = 1, n 1 is a winning position (since a player replaces n with 0 and wins). Hence
m = 2, n = 2 is a losing position; m = 2, n 3 is a winning position; m = 3, n = 3 is
a losing position, m = 3, n 4 is a winning position. By induction it follows that for
k 2, m = k, n = k is a losing position, while m = k, n k + 1 is a winning position.
(a) We are in the case of m = 40, n = 51 41 in the transformed game, thus this is
a winning position and Alphonse wins.
(b) This case is different, since now m and n have more than one divisor in common.
We will deal with the original game and not make any transformations. Note that m
6
= n + lp + 1
for some integer l. Replacing np with kp + n we get:
(n + 1)p = kp + n + lp + 1 = p(k + l) + (n + 1)
which means that (n + 1)p gives the remainder of (n + 1) when divided by p, and the
induction step is complete.
15. Base Step: n = 4. We have:
x1
x2
x3
x4
+
+
+
x4 + x2 x1 + x3 x2 + x4 x3 + x1
r
x1 + x3 x2 + x4
x1 + x 3 x2 + x 4
=
+
2
=2
x2 + x4 x1 + x3
x2 + x 4 x1 + x 3
using the AM-GM inequality. This completes the base step.
Induction Step: Assume the result holds for some positive integer n; we wish to prove
it for n + 1. Let x1 , x2 , . . . , xn+1 be arbitrary positive real numbers; we wish to show:
A=
x1
x2
xn+1
+
+ ... +
2
xn+1 + x2 x1 + x3
x n + x1
In the above expression, we can without loss of generality assume that xn+1 is the
smallest among x1 , x2 , . . . , xn+1 . This will be used later.
8
x1
x2
xn
+
+ ... +
2
xn + x2 x 1 + x3
xn1 + x1
)+(
)+
xn+1 + x2 xn + x2
xn1 + xn+1 xn1 + x1
xn + x1
AB =