Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 152 views

    Pawan Kumar Dubey - JKT - FO - HR-15-N PCP-Appraisal Form

    Uploaded by

    PawanDubey
    Pawan Kumar Dubey's annual performance appraisal form summarizes his work as an SAP QM Consultant from March 2015 to March 2016. The form includes sections to assess his performance on key result areas, soft skills, and a career development plan. For key deliverables, Pawan self-rates his performance as a 4 or 5 out of 5 on most measures, including timeliness, project delivery, SOP adherence, and competence building. His manager rates his performance slightly lower on some measures. The soft skills assessment rates Pawan's quality of work, knowledge, teamwork, initiative, and dependability as high. The form provides an overall performance summary and guides setting goals for the next review period.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Pawan Kumar Dubey - JKT - FO - HR-15-N PCP-Appraisal Form

    Uploaded by

    PawanDubey
    152 views9 pages
    Pawan Kumar Dubey's annual performance appraisal form summarizes his work as an SAP QM Consultant from March 2015 to March 2016. The form includes sections to assess his performance on key result areas, soft skills, and a career development plan. For key deliverables, Pawan self-rates his performance as a 4 or 5 out of 5 on most measures, including timeliness, project delivery, SOP adherence, and competence building. His manager rates his performance slightly lower on some measures. The soft skills assessment rates Pawan's quality of work, knowledge, teamwork, initiative, and dependability as high. The form provides an overall performance summary and guides setting goals for the next review period.

    Original Title

    Pawan Kumar Dubey_JKT_FO_HR-15-N PCP-Appraisal Form.doc

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Pawan Kumar Dubey's annual performance appraisal form summarizes his work as an SAP QM Consultant from March 2015 to March 2016. The form includes sections to assess his performance on key result areas, soft skills, and a career development plan. For key deliverables, Pawan self-rates his performance as a 4 or 5 out of 5 on most measures, including timeliness, project delivery, SOP adherence, and competence building. His manager rates his performance slightly lower on some measures. The soft skills assessment rates Pawan's quality of work, knowledge, teamwork, initiative, and dependability as high. The form provides an overall performance summary and guides setting goals for the next review period.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    152 views9 pages

    Pawan Kumar Dubey - JKT - FO - HR-15-N PCP-Appraisal Form

    Uploaded by

    PawanDubey
    Pawan Kumar Dubey's annual performance appraisal form summarizes his work as an SAP QM Consultant from March 2015 to March 2016. The form includes sections to assess his performance on key result areas, soft skills, and a career development plan. For key deliverables, Pawan self-rates his performance as a 4 or 5 out of 5 on most measures, including timeliness, project delivery, SOP adherence, and competence building. His manager rates his performance slightly lower on some measures. The soft skills assessment rates Pawan's quality of work, knowledge, teamwork, initiative, and dependability as high. The form provides an overall performance summary and guides setting goals for the next review period.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 9

    TITLE

    Format ID
    Classificati
    on
    Location

    PCP-Appraisal Form

    :
    :
    :

    JKT_FO_HR-15N
    Proprietary
    Noida

    Name:
    Pawan Kumar Dubey

    Designation: SAP QM CONSULTANT

    Deptt:
    SAP
    DOJ: 14-03-2015

    Location:
    BASE LOCATION -> NOIDA
    Qualifications (Academic & Prof)
    B.Tech (Mechanical Engineering) (2007 -2011 ) ,

    Skill Area: SAP QM, SAP PM


    Total Exp (In Yrs):
    4 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS
    Relevant Exp (In Yrs): 4 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS

    Immediate Manager: Mr.Hirendra Kumar

    Reviewing Manager/s: Mr. Hirendra Kumar

    HOD:Mr. Ravneet Singh

    Appraisal form sent on: 03-05-2016

    Appraisal for period: March 2015 March 2016

    PCP- PERFORMANCE COUNSELLING PLAN


    GUIDELINES FOR APPRAISAL PROCESS
    Review of Performance against Objectives of previous Appraisal Period & Career Development Plan for
    Current Year.

    Overall Assessment by
    the Immediate Manager
    and HR

    Listing of Key
    Result Areas

    Appraisees Comments
    on KRAs
    and Self Appraisal

    Assessment by
    Immediate Manager on
    KRAs and Soft Skills

    Reference : JKT_PR_HR-02N

    Performance Planning
    for Next Appraisal
    Period

    Performance
    Summary

    Version : 03

    Career Development Action


    Plan to be planned together
    by Appraisee and Appraiser

    Released On : 24-Apr-15

    TITLE

    Format ID
    Classificati
    on
    Location

    PCP-Appraisal Form

    :
    :
    :

    JKT_FO_HR-15N
    Proprietary
    Noida

    STRUCTURE OF PCP FORM

    SECTION A:
    Assessment on
    Deliverables

    SECTION B: Soft
    Skill Assessment

    SECTION C:
    CDAP

    SECTION D: Perf.

    (Career Development
    Action Plan)

    Planning for Next


    App Period

    SECTION A: ASSESSMENT ON DELIVERABLES


    R1- Weightage 60%
    ( To be filled first by the Appraise. Assessment by Appraiser to be filled after discussion and mutual consent
    on the rating between Appraiser & Appraise) Please use additional sheet on the specified format, if
    required.
    Key
    Result/Performance
    Areas (KRAs)

    Performance measures/Indicators of
    success/Specific Tasks & Objectives

    K1

    Weightage
    to each
    KRA (in %)

    Target
    Dates

    Self
    Assessment by
    Appraisee
    between 1 to
    5( 5 being the
    highest)
    4

    <5%

    35

    Timeliness

    Timeliness of Deliverables - (Timely


    Delivery against Project
    milestones/Planned activities)

    K2

    30

    Project
    Delivery

    Defect rate

    ii

    Planned vs Actual

    K3

    SOP
    Adherence

    Final
    Assessment by
    Appraiser
    between 1 to
    5( 5 being the
    highest)

    10

    10

    Adherence to Standards defined for


    Quality procedures and
    Documentation as per project
    Charter

    K4

    Attendance

    Regularity
    Reference : JKT_PR_HR-02N

    Version : 03

    Released On : 24-Apr-15

    TITLE

    Format ID
    Classificati
    on
    Location

    PCP-Appraisal Form

    K5

    15

    Competence
    Building

    :
    :
    :

    JKT_FO_HR-15N
    Proprietary
    Noida

    Quality Planning, Quality


    Management, Cross Application
    Component like Audit
    Management, FMEA and Control
    Plan, Extended notification tools

    Calculation: KRA/KPA point K1=Rating (1-5) * Weight age=


    K2=
    K3=
    K4=
    K5=
    R1= Total Average Score of the above
    Signature (Appraisee)

    Signature (Immediate Manager)

    Signature (Reviewing Manager)

    Pawan Kumar Dubey


    Date: 03.05.2016

    Date:

    Date:

    SECTION B: SOFT SKILL ASSESSMENT SECTION R2 : Weightage = 40%


    (To be filled in by Appraise and Immediate Manager/ Reviewing Manager/ HOD) The scores are on a rating
    scale of 1-5; 5 being the highest. Scores are ticked against each statement in the relevant box.Please
    mention NA not applicable incase a particular parameter is not applicable.
    1. Quality of Work- (capable of accomplishing work as per the acceptable
    standard)
    - Works consistently below acceptable level and no effort to improve
    - Work meets quality but needs constant monitoring.
    - Work meets good quality and needs occasional Monitoring
    - Work done is thorough and requires minimal correction
    - Consistently thorough and accurate in work under all conditions

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    Score (By
    IM)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    2. Quantity of Work- (volume and speed of acceptable work and respect for
    delivery schedule)
    - Speed, volume, respect to time schedule below acceptable standard
    - Work generally completed in time but needs constant follow up
    - Mostly meets time schedule but needs occasional guidance & follow up
    - Works Smart and keeps commitment to achieve targets in time
    - Excellent approach with respect to volume, speed in all conditions

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    Score (By
    IM)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    3. Knowledge of job assigned- (in-depth technical/functional knowledge of job)

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    Score (By
    IM)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    Score (Self

    Score (By

    - Inadequate knowledge and no will to learn and improve


    - Adequate job knowledge, needs coaching and shows inclination to learn
    - Good job knowledge, is able to apply to assigned job with some guidance
    - Very Good job knowledge and applies to assigned job with little monitoring
    - Excellent job knowledge and ability to apply to assigned and related jobs
    independently
    4. Conceptualization - (Conceptualizes & foresees future development within the

    Reference : JKT_PR_HR-02N

    Version : 03

    Released On : 24-Apr-15

    TITLE

    PCP-Appraisal Form

    Format ID
    Classificati
    on
    Location

    :
    :
    :

    JKT_FO_HR-15N
    Proprietary
    Noida

    environment)
    - Does not have capability to take view of/ analyze complex or abstract issues
    - Requires guidance in understanding and handling complex and abstract issues
    - Understands concepts and with little guidance able to handle complex issues
    - Understands developments and prioritizes areas of complexities and takes
    action.
    - Very good in grasping & analyzing the developments, takes logical approach to
    handle complex issues

    Rating)
    1
    2
    3
    4

    5. Team spirit/ Team working- (Co-ordination and co-operation with colleagues to


    achieve team objective)
    - Can not work in a team, create conflicts, dissipates the energy of the group
    - Prefers to work alone with marginal contribution to team
    - Not clear of his role in team, average contribution when job assigned
    - Effective team member, very well aware of own role in a team
    - Outstanding team member, keeps larger goal in view, can energize the group

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    Score (By
    IM)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    6. Initiative - (Identifying an opportunity, Pro-activeness, enthusiasm in taking up


    assignments and make significant contribution)
    - Alienated, evades/sheds responsibility
    - Accepts but does not seek responsibilities
    - Accepts and partially seeks responsibilities
    - Good initiative, undertakes all tasks and overcomes obstacles independently
    - Totally self reliant puts forward ideas and suggestions to tackle problems

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    Score (By
    IM)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    7. Planning and organizing - (effectiveness in anticipating needs, forecasting


    conditions, setting goals scheduling and ensuring completion)
    - Nominal planning, unsystematic and unmethodical
    - Generally systematic and is able to prioritize functions but at times loses track
    of work schedule resulting slow action
    - Normally anticipates needs and is able to prepare a plan of action
    - Good in prioritizing functions to meet plans
    - Exceptional ability to anticipating needs and make work schedule to achieve
    goal in logical manner to achieve milestones

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1
    2

    Score (By
    IM)
    1
    2

    8. Delegation - (Effectiveness in use of human resources ability to know when,


    how and to whom to delegate to obtain their commitment to share work load to
    achieve milestones)
    - Cannot delegate. Juniors take job in piecemeal
    - Delegates with a lot of fear and anxiety. Keeps constant check
    - Delegates with reasonable amount of trust
    - Provides opportunities to the juniors to do things on their own, provides support
    when required
    - Delegates with complete trust with necessary instructions and guidance make
    every effort to develop juniors

    Score (Self
    Rating)

    Score (By
    IM)

    1
    2
    3
    4

    1
    2
    3
    4

    9. Communication - (Capability to make clear and formal presentation of ideas


    and exchange information with all concerned
    - Confused thought and lack of clarity in presentation of ideas
    - Manages to present ideas with some guidance
    - Can generally communicate with ease and effectiveness
    - Can mostly communicate with ease and effectiveness. Sensitive to others
    feelings
    - Is extremely clear and apt in language, tone and content. Is very sensitive to the
    needs of others and takes ample care in communicating with others

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1
    2
    3
    4

    10. Dependability / Reliability - (Dedication to work and extent of reliability to


    undertake and complete any assignment)
    - Cannot be depended upon. Evades / sheds responsibility

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1

    Reference : JKT_PR_HR-02N

    Version : 03

    3
    4
    5

    IM)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    3
    4
    5

    Score(By
    IM)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    Score(By
    IM)
    1

    Released On : 24-Apr-15

    TITLE

    PCP-Appraisal Form

    Format ID
    Classificati
    on
    Location

    - Can be normally relied on to complete tasks, reluctant to accept additional


    responsibility
    - Generally reliable to complete tasks and hesitantly accepts some additional
    responsibility
    - Reliable, accepts all additional responsibilities
    - Completely dependable to complete tasks in spite of constraints always owns
    full responsibility

    :
    :
    :

    JKT_FO_HR-15N
    Proprietary
    Noida
    2

    4
    5

    4
    5

    11. Decision Making- (capable of analyzing the situations and accordingly making
    a decisions)
    - Seldom makes decisions on his own and looks for support from peers and / or
    supervisors
    - Usually makes impulsive decisions without analyzing
    - Mostly makes prompt decisions, however does not analyze the situation
    completely
    - Takes prompt decisions after complete analysis of the situation
    - Is an excellent Decision Maker as per the situation

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1

    Score(By
    IM)
    1

    2
    3

    2
    3

    4
    5

    4
    5

    12. Receptiveness to Feedback (handling feedback with maturity)

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1

    Score(By
    IM)
    1

    - Takes feedback on self negatively and lets it affect interpersonal relationship.


    Never tries to take corrective action on the feedback received
    - Does not always welcome feedback on self. Sometimes takes corrective action
    on the feedback received
    - Is open to feedback most of the times and tries to take corrective action upon
    the feedback received
    - Is always open to feedback on self and takes corrective action upon the
    feedback received
    - Is Pro-active to ask for feedback and in taking the necessary corrective actions.

    13. Leave Planning

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    Score(By
    IM)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    14. Pro-Active Approach (capability to anticipate situations and problems, and


    take action. Having a knack of identifying possible opportunities in the face of
    crisis, and converting them into opportunities)
    - Not able to anticipate issues at all
    - Able to anticipate issues, but not able to plan in order to take action
    - Able to anticipate issues, needs helps of peers or superiors to plan and act
    - Able to anticipate issues, plan for them and take action in time with minimal
    help
    - Able to anticipate issues, plan for them and take action in time independently

    Score (Self
    Rating)

    Score(By
    IM)

    1
    2
    3
    4

    1
    2
    3
    4

    15. Systems, Procedures / Work Practices - (capability to work systematically


    using standard work practices of ISO)
    - Does not comply with organizations standard processes and practices at all
    - Complies with standard processes regarding day to day work
    - Understands, respects and complies with the standard work practices
    - Understands, respects, complies with the standard work practices and actively
    participates in related issues
    - Drives others to work systematically and initiates changes in the current
    practices independently

    Score (Self
    Rating)
    1
    2
    3
    4

    Always takes unplanned leaves


    Can not be categorized, takes both planned and unplanned leaves equally
    Often plans out leaves in advance
    Plans out leaves in advance always
    Keeps work at the utmost priority while planning and taking leaves

    Reference : JKT_PR_HR-02N

    Version : 03

    Score(By
    IM)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    Released On : 24-Apr-15

    TITLE

    PCP-Appraisal Form

    Format ID
    Classificati
    on
    Location

    :
    :
    :

    JKT_FO_HR-15N
    Proprietary
    Noida

    GENERAL QUALITIES - The scores are on a rating scale of 1-5; 5 being the highest. To be filled by IM/RM.
    .
    Quality
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    Punctuality
    Honesty
    Discipline
    Positive Attitude
    Ability to find out solutions
    within limited Resources
    Stress tolerance/Patience
    Maturity
    Managing Interference of
    More
    Less
    personal problems in
    Interferenc
    Interference
    Professional Life
    e
    MANAGERIAL CAPABILITIES (ONLY FOR MANAGERS)
    The scores are on a rating scale of 1-5; 5 being the highest. To be filled by IM/RM.
    Parameter
    EMPOWERMENT
    Provides authority to team members to perform the assigned tasks
    GROWTH
    Assigns responsibilities to team members which provide opportunities for
    growth
    ALL ROUND DEVT
    Imparts knowledge and skills to team members. Takes adequate steps For
    the overall development of the team members
    APPRECIATION
    Makes it a point to appreciate good work publicly
    RESPONSE TIME
    Gives timely response to the queries of team members
    INTER-DEPARTMETNAL HARMONY
    Makes all efforts to promote inter-departmental co-operation. Is willing to
    understand the problems of other departments and accommodate them in
    day-to-day functioning

    Reference : JKT_PR_HR-02N

    Version : 03

    Released On : 24-Apr-15

    TITLE

    PCP-Appraisal Form

    Format ID
    Classificati
    on
    Location

    R2 - Average Rating of the above scores :


    Signature (Appraisee)
    Signature (Immediate Manager)

    Date:

    S.
    No.

    Date:

    :
    :
    :

    JKT_FO_HR-15N
    Proprietary
    Noida

    Signature (Reviewing Manager)

    Date:

    SECTION C: CDAP - CAREER DEVELOPMENT ACTION PLAN


    To be filled in by Appraise and Immediate Manager/RM/ HOD
    Trainings Attended
    Trainings Conducted
    Name/Title
    Duration
    Trainer
    S.
    Name/Title
    Duration
    No.

    Participants
    Covered

    Qualification(s)- Professional/ Academic added during the current year

    S. No.

    Training Needs: To be planned together by the Appraisee and IM / RM / HOD


    Please do not write names of courses or programs. Only indicate the areas.
    Soft Skill Development Areas

    Technical Training Areas

    SECTION D: PERFORMANCE PLANNING FOR NEXT APPRAISAL PERIOD


    (To be planned by Appraisee and Immediate Manager/ HOD)
    Key Result/Performance
    Performance measures/Indicators of success/Specific Tasks &
    Areas (KRAs)
    Objectives
    K1

    Weightage to
    each KRA (in %)

    Target
    Dates

    K2

    K3

    K4

    K5

    Signature (Appraisee)

    Reference : JKT_PR_HR-02N

    Signature (Immediate Manager)

    Version : 03

    Signature (Reviewing Manager)

    Released On : 24-Apr-15

    TITLE

    Format ID
    Classificati
    on
    Location

    PCP-Appraisal Form

    Date:

    Date:

    :
    :
    :

    JKT_FO_HR-15N
    Proprietary
    Noida

    Date:

    CONFIDENTIAL REPORT: to be filled by HOD/HR


    1. Over all Rating ( To be filled in by HR)
    Over all Deliverables rating (KRAs/KPAs) - R1
    Over all Soft Skill Assessment rating - R2
    Over all rating: R3 ( 0.6 x R1 + 0.4 x R2)

    Signature HR:

    Date:

    2. Potential for holding high position, please specify reasons. To be filled jointly by HOD/HR
    POTENTIAL
    Technical Skills Required
    Managerial Skills Required
    Soft Skills Required
    1. Ready Now for position of
    2. Ready in 1 Year for position of
    3. Not ready now
    Over all Comments by HOD

    Over all Comments by HR

    3. OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING: To be filled jointly by HOD/HR


    EXCELLENT
    VERY GOOD
    GOOD

    Signature- HR

    Signature-HOD

    AVERAGE

    POOR

    Date:

    4. DIRECTORs COMMENTS

    Reference : JKT_PR_HR-02N

    Version : 03

    Released On : 24-Apr-15

    TITLE

    PCP-Appraisal Form

    Signature- DIRECTOR

    Reference : JKT_PR_HR-02N

    Format ID
    Classificati
    on
    Location

    :
    :
    :

    JKT_FO_HR-15N
    Proprietary
    Noida
    Date:

    Version : 03

    Released On : 24-Apr-15

    You might also like