Facial Nerve Palsy in Newborn Period
Facial Nerve Palsy in Newborn Period
Facial Nerve Palsy in Newborn Period
GuidelineNo.F16
Title:
Version:
Ratification Date:
Review Date:
Approval:
Authors:
Job Title:
Consultation:
1 (May 2013)
26.3.13.
April 2016
Nottingham Neonatal Service Clinical Guideline Meeting
Dr Dushyant Batra
Consultant Neonatologist
Nottingham Neonatal Service Staff, Clinical Guideline Meeting
Mr Ciaran OBoyle (Consultant Plastic Surgery) and Ms Katya Tambe
(Consultant Ophthalmology)
Guideline Contact: Dr Stephen Wardle, Guideline Coordinator and Consultant
Neonatologist, C/O Stephanie Tyrell, Nottingham Neonatal Service
[email protected]
Distribution:
Nottingham Neonatal Service, Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Target Audience:
Staff of the Nottingham Neonatal Service
Patients to whom
Patients of the Nottingham Neonatal Service who fit the
this applies:
inclusion criteria of the guideline below
Key Words:
facial nerve palsy
Risk Managed:
Morbidity from facial nerve palsy
Evidence used:
The contemporary evidence bas has been used to develop this
guideline. References to studies utilised in the preparation of this
guideline are given at its end.
Clinical guidelines are guidelines only. The interpretation and application of clinical
guidelines remain the responsibility of the individual clinician. If in doubt, contact a senior
colleague. Caution is advised when using guidelines after the review date. This guideline has
been registered with the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust.
KEY POINTS
Facial nerve palsy in the newborn period may be congenital, caused by
events around the time of birth, or developmental, resulting from anomalies
or mishaps in development of facial pathway
More than 90% of infants with congenital facial palsy will recover by 3-6
months
Eye care may be paramount in infants with incomplete eye closure
Persistent residual weakness at 3 months should warrant referral to plastic
surgery clinic
1. Introduction/Background
Facial nerve palsy in the newborn period may be congenital, caused by conditions acquired during
or at birth (e.g. birth trauma) or developmental, a result of developmental abnormalities of facial
pathway (isolated or as part of syndromes like Mbius syndrome). The congenital form is most
common and carries a good prognosis. More than 90% of infants with congenital form will have full
recovery; the process may take hours to 6 months1, 2. The majority, although not all of these cases,
have been associated with instrumental deliveries especially forceps use. Pressure of the posterior
blade compressing the bone overlying the vertical segment of the facial canal is implicated3. For
non-instrumental deliveries, intrauterine trauma from pressure on the infant's face by the sacral
prominence during labor has been suggested as possible cause in such cases4.
NottinghamNeonatalServiceClinicalGuidelines
GuidelineNo.F16
Developmental facial nerve palsy results from developmental mishaps during embryogenesis. This
may result from aplasia/ hypoplasia of cranial nerve nuclei or abnormal differentiation and neuronal
connections of cranial neuronal pools, or from abnormal axonal transport of molecules necessary
for muscle function and development5. Genetic factors, vascular events, or teratogenic insults have
been implicated6. Please see Appendix 2 for common causes, their presenting features and
management.
2. Patient group
Newborn infants noted to have facial nerve palsy at birth or on postnatal examination.
3. Patient Assessment:
All infants suspected to have facial nerve palsy should be reviewed by a tier 2 Speciality Trainee
(registrar). The details of pregnancy, labour and delivery, maternal medical history and family
history should be documented.
Facial nerve palsy is usually unilateral and evident by
Absence of forehead wrinkling
Shallow or absent nasolabial fold on affected side
Impaired movement of lips
Asymmetry of the face especially on crying with deviation of angle of mouth
In severe cases:
Impaired eye closure
Complete absence of facial movements on affected side
Facial asymmetry at rest
Difficulty in feeding because of impairment of sucking
Bilateral facial palsy can be easily missed as the facial symmetry is often maintained. Face
examination should evaluate upper and lower half of face on both sides for movements, nasolabial
folds as well as assessment of sucking. In addition, a detailed clinical examination including full
neurological assessment, evidence of other features associated with difficult deliveries like bruising
of scalp, haemotympanum, severe sutural moulding, Erbs palsy should be looked for. Difficult
delivery, prolonged labour, instrumentation especially forceps and evidence of other birth injuries
suggest congenital aetiology. On the other hand, dysmorphic features, other cranial nerve palsies,
other coexisting anomalies and family history of facial nerve palsy favour developmental cause.
NottinghamNeonatalServiceClinicalGuidelines
GuidelineNo.F16
Additional management of infants with suspected developmental facial nerve palsy (see Appendix
2) will depend upon other abnormalities and may include involvement of multidisciplinary team like
Genetics, Paediatric Neurology, family care team and physiotherapy.
REFERENCES
1.
Hughes CA, Harley EH, Milmoe G, Bala R, Martorella A. Birth trauma in the head and neck.
Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 1999 Feb;125(2):193-9.
2.
Falco NA, Eriksson E. Facial nerve palsy in the newborn: incidence and outcome. Plastic
and reconstructive surgery. 1990 Jan;85(1):1-4.
3.
McHugh HE. Facial Paralysis in Birth Injury and Skull Fractures. Arch Otolaryngol. 1963
Oct;78:443-55.
4.
Shapiro NL, Cunningham MJ, Parikh SR, Eavey RD, Cheney ML. Congenital unilateral facial
paralysis. Pediatrics. 1996 Feb;97(2):261-4.
5.
Song MR. Moving cell bodies: understanding the migratory mechanism of facial motor
neurons. Archives of pharmacal research. 2007 Oct;30(10):1273-82.
6.
Terzis JK, Anesti K. Developmental facial paralysis: a review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
2011 Oct;64(10):1318-33.
NottinghamNeonatalServiceClinicalGuidelines
GuidelineNo.F16
Antenatalhistory,birthhistory;detailedclinicalexaminationincludingallcranial
nervesandneurologicalassessmentbyTier2traineeorSeniorANNP
Presenceoffaciallaceration
shouldwarrantreferraltoon
callplasticsurgeryregistrar
Ifinfantcantcloseeye:Starteye
lubricationwithartificialtears
Reassesswithin24hours
FullRecovery
Anyofthefollowingfeatures:
Completeabsenceoffacial
movementonaffectedside
Noeyeclosure
Difficultfeedingbecauseof
facialnervepalsy
Discharge
NO
YES
OPDAssessmentat6weeks
OPDAssessmentat2weeks
Reviewfeeding,eyeclosure
andfacialnervefunction
Ophthalmologyreferralto
MsKTambeifnotclosingeyes
spontaneously
FullRecovery
Yes
NO
Ifnosignofimprovement
considerplasticsurgeryreferral
Outpatientreviewat3months
ifsomeimprovement
FullRecovery
ReferraltoMrCiaranOBoyle,Consultant
PlasticSurgeryandMsKatyaTambe,
ConsultantOphthalmology
ConsiderMRIscanHeadwithtemporalbone
andNeurophysiologyoffacialnerve
No
Yes
Discharge
NottinghamNeonatalServiceClinicalGuidelines
GuidelineNo.F16
Appendix 2:
Developmental facial nerve palsy: common causes, clinical features and management
S
No
Clinical
Condition
Clinical Features
Management
1.
Mbeus
Syndrome
2.
Asymmetrical
crying faces
(ACF)
3.
Hemifacial
microsomia
(includes
Goldenhar
Syndrome)
-As above
4.
22q deletion
(DiGeorge
Syndrome)
5.
CHARGE
syndrome
-As above +
-Echocardiogram
As above
All of above +
-Specific genetic test
-Speech and language therapy
(SALT) involvement if problems
with sucking and swallowing