Risk Management For Training Materials PDF

Risk
Management
Training Manual
September 2004
Developed by:
The California Department of Developmental Services
And
The Columbus Organization
Risk Management Training Manual

Table of Contents

Table of Contents
Section
Table of Contents
Use of this Manual
Module I: Principles of Risk Management
Instructors Guide
Learning Objectives
Script for Instructor
Power Point Presentation
Handouts:
Principles of Risk Management
Elements of Effective Risk Management
Module II: Risk Assessment, Evaluation & Planning
Instructors Guide
Learning Objectives
Handouts:
CDER Exercise Sample
Risk Assessment & Planning Worksheet: Sample A
Risk Assessment & Planning Worksheet: Sample B
Risk Assessment & Planning Worksheet: Sample C
Risk Assessment Inventory: Depression
Risk Assessment Inventory: Falls
Risk Assessment Inventory: Osteoporosis
Risk Assessment Inventory: Physical & Nutritional Management
Risk Assessment Inventory: Skin Breakdown
Risk Assessment Inventory: Substance Abuse
Consumer Profile Questions for Group Exercise
Consumer Profile A: Annie
Consumer Profile B: Bob
Consumer Profile C: Cecilia
Consumer Profile D: Donald
Consumer Profile E: Ed
Consumer Profile F: Felicia
Module III: Risk Assessment, Evaluation & Planning Committee
Instructors Guide
Learning Objectives
Handout:
Title 17 Requirements for Risk Assessment, Evaluation & Planning
Committees
Module IV: Special Incident Reporting
Instructors Guide
Learning Objectives
Handout:
Title 17 Requirements for Special Incident Reporting by Regional Centers
Title 17 Requirements for Special Incident Reporting by Vendors & Long-Term
Health Care Facilities
Incident Response Checklist
Page
i
iii
I-1
I-2
I-3
I-4
I-5
I-6
II-1
II-2
II-3
II-4
II-5
II-6
II-7
II-8
II-9
II-10
II-11
II-12
II-13
II-14
II-15
II-16
II-17
II-18
II-19
II-20
II-21
III-1
III-2
III-3
III-4
III-5
IV-1
IV-2
IV-3
IV-4
IV-5
IV-6
IV-7

Table of Contents
ii
Section
Page
Module V: Causal Analysis

Instructors Guide
Learning Objectives
Handout:
Preventative Action Checklist
Module VI: Mortality Review
Instructors Guide
Learning Objectives
V-1
V-2
V-3
V-4
V-5
VI-1
VI-2
VI-3
VI-4

Use of this Manual
Introduction
The Risk Management Training Manual is the outcome of a collaborative effort by
Californias Department of Developmental Services and The Columbus Organization. It
is one of many initiatives undertaken to enhance risk management for consumers with
developmental disabilities receiving services and supports in the community. The input
and experience contributed by regional centers, medical schools, and many other
stakeholders over the years have proven most beneficial to this endeavor.
This manual has been designed as a tool for regional centers to utilize in their staff
development and quality assurance efforts. Regional centers can utilize the training
modules for their own staff or as training opportunities for their vendors.
Structure
This manual is comprised of the following six training modules, each targeting a key
aspect of risk management.
Module
Title
Module I
Module II
Module III
Module IV
Module V
Module VI

Risk Assessment, Evaluation & Planning
Risk Assessment, Evaluation & Planning Committee
Special Incident Reporting
Causal Analysis
Mortality Review
Each training module is divided into the following sections:
Cover Sheet
Instructors Guide
Learning Objectives
Script & Suggestions for Instructor
Hand-outs
Options for Using the Material in this Manual

The material in this manual can be used in various ways. The manual in its entirety can
be used as a comprehensive curriculum in risk management. In addition, each module
can be presented as a stand-alone course. The handouts, including sample assessment
inventories and checklists, can be shared with staff to enhance their day to day work in
planning and coordination of services.
All of the materials in this manual can be tailored to any regional centers particular
needs. The instruments, forms, or tools incorporated in the modules are not mandated
for use by any regional center. They have, however, proven useful to many people in
service coordination, quality assurance, and staff development roles. Feel free to use
them and make them your own.
ii

Module I

Module I
Instructors Guide
Length of Session:
45 minutes to 1 hour
Intended Audience:
Regional center staff and vendored service providers
Class Size:
Limited only by room capacity
Training Materials:
Handouts:

Power Point presentation (or transparencies):

LCD projector or Overhead projector
Flipchart and markers (as desired)
Methods:
Lecture; instructor guided discussion; interactive
Course Outline
I.
Welcome and Introductions
II.
III.
I-1

Module I

Module I
Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this module, participants will:
1. Understand the broad concept of risk.
2. Be familiar with the principles of risk management.
3. Be able to describe elements of effective risk management.
I-2

Module I

Suggestions for Instructor
Risk Management is a term given to a set of practices that lead
Ask the group what risk means to them. What are
to minimizing possible harm to individuals.
some common risks of everyday life for all of us?
In this instance,
individuals are persons with developmental disabilities who receive
Use some common examples such as driving in
services through the regional centers. We will first examine risk traffic, family history of heart disease, cancer, or
management principles and discuss why risk management is high-risk behaviors such as riding a bicycle without
important.
In the second segment of this module, we will look at the specific
a helmet or walking alone in unfamiliar

neighborhoods after dark.
elements that should be present in an effective risk management

system.
While it may not be possible to totally protect individuals, a risk Distribute the Handout: Risk Management
management system seeks to identify factors that may increase Principles and review each principle.
those risks and actively promote practices that will keep risk as low
as possible.
The purpose of a risk management system is to promote a positive
quality of life for all persons with developmental disabilities by
ensuring their basic safety and well-being.

Module I
Slide 1: Prevention of Serious Incidents is The Highest
Start the Power Point or Overhead Projector
Priority
Presentation.
If it is possible, we want to anticipate what risks may exist and
Survey the group for examples. The following is
prevent them from happening.
one example that you may use to begin the

discussion. If you experience a power outage,
Can you think of an example? These examples illustrate
ensure that the food in the refrigerator is safe
interventions for risk factors that could be reasonably anticipated or
before anyone grabs a snack and risks food-borne
identified and prevented.
illness.
This is the best possible risk management.

Slide 2: Safe and Accessible Environments are Everyones
Responsibility
We all are responsible for looking out for risks and for doing what
we can to make environments safer.
If you visit an individual at their group home and notice a frayed
electrical cord, it is your responsibility to bring that to the attention
of the home staff and ensure that it is removed before there is a
problem.

Module I
Slide 2 (continued)
It is very effective to have participants use
Lets talk about some other examples that you have seen.
examples from their own environments. Provide

guidance but let them think a little and praise their
outstanding examples!
Slide 3:
Continuous Communication, Accurate Reporting,
Consistent Analysis of Information, and Development of

Sound Person-Centered Strategies are Essential to Prevent
Serious Incidents
We need all four elements: communication, reporting, analysis, and
strategy development to address individual situations.
Continuous communication and sharing of information among all
involved in supporting an individual is critical to identifying risk and
ensuring safety.
Individuals and their families have critical information about
potential risks to share with the planning team.

Module I
Slide 3 (continued)
When an incident does occur, accurate and timely reporting is
essential. Reports must include who, what, when and where.
Accurate analysis of risk based upon complete information enables
us to develop sound person-centered strategies to prevent future
incidents.
Slide 4:
Staff are Competent to Respond to, Report and
Document Incidents in a Timely and Accurate Manner

All regional center and vendor staff witnessing or learning of an
incident must report it in a timely and accurate manner. Training to
understand what to do when an incident occurs and how and
where to report it is key.
Lets review the timelines for reporting.
When should vendors
report special incidents to regional centers? When should regional

centers report special incidents to DDS?
Remind participants of the Tit le 17 requirements:

Vendors are to report special incidents to the regional
center immediately, but not more than 24 hours after
learning of the occurrence of the special incident.
Regional Centers are to report special incidents to
DDS within two working days of learning of the
occurrence.
Depending upon the roles of those in attendance, a
brief review of applicable regulations and statutes can
be included here. For example, vendors representing
residential services licensed by Community Care
Licensing, participants who work with children or who
work with persons who are elderly, etc.

Module I
Slide 5: Individuals have the Right to a Quality of Life Free

of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation
The focus of this training is on the requirements for risk
management, including those regarding regional center and vendor
special
incident
reporting.
In
addition,
other
reporting
requirements may be applicable depending upon the characteristics

of the individuals served or the types of setting in which services
are provided. Under Child and Adult Protective Services laws, you
are considered a mandated reporter. If you genuinely believe that
abuse, neglect or exploitation is occurring or has occurred, you are
legally obligated to report it.
Slide 6: Risk Management Systems Should Emphasize Staff Survey the group on specific types of information
Involvement as Integral to Providing Safe Environments
that direct support staff may have that others on

the individuals team may not. Examples may
Risk management is not just the job of management. The staff
include such things as sleep and wakefulness
involved in any situation need to also be involved when it comes
cycles, personal grooming habits, particular fears,
time to discuss future preventative actions or to help figure out how or behavioral changes during times of stress.
an incident could have been avoided.
When service providers review incidents, it is invaluable to have
input from direct support staff.

Module I

Slide 7: Quality of Life Starts with Those who Work Most
Closely with Persons Receiving Supports and Services
The people working most closely with consumers have a unique
responsibility in supporting quality of life. They see things first, and
often sense changes before there is a major problem.
Direct support staff should be alert to potential risks and work to
prevent incidents from occurring.
With the goal of harm prevention, the experts are those closest to
the individual.
Slides 8 & 9: Effective Risk Management
The protection of rights of individuals and their protection from
harm are the highest priorities. The implementation of effective risk
management practices should lead to a safer and improved quality
of life for consumers.

Module I
Slides 8 & 9 (continued)

Distribute the handout: Elements of Effective Risk
An effective system of Risk Management is based upon the Management. Review each of the points with the
principles of risk management we have just reviewed. group prior to the summary statement at the end of
Additionally, this system would incorporate other elements as listed the script.
on the handout being distributed.
In summary, the implementation of sound risk management
practices is intended as conscious and deliberate efforts to provide
a safer and less risky environment for consumers served by
regional centers and service providers.
Thank those in attendance for their participation

and wish them well in their efforts to improve the
quality of life for individuals receiving services and
supports.
Principles
of
I-4
Risk Management
Prevention of Serious Incidents

is
The Highest Priority
Safe and Accessible Environments
are
Everyones Responsibility
Prevention of Serious Incidents

n
Continuous Communication
Accurate Reporting
Consistent Analysis of Information
Development of Sound Person-Centered

Strategies
4
Staff are Competent to:

n
Respond to . . .
Report . . .
Document . . .
Incidents in a Timely Manner

5
Individuals have the Right

to
A Quality of Life
Free of Abuse, Neglect, and

Exploitation
6
Risk Management Systems

Should Emphasize Staff Involvement
as Integral to
Providing Safe Environments
Quality of Life Starts with:

Those who Work Most Closely
with
Persons Receiving Services and Supports
Effective Risk Management

n
Training of all involved in supporting individuals

with developmental disabilities in the risk
management process
Individual risk assessment, evaluation, and

planning
A well-defined process for reporting incidents

that is timely, complete, and accurate
9
Effective Risk Management

n
Immediate follow up and intervention to ensure

health and safety and to mitigate future risk
Regular review and analysis of incidents by a risk

management, assessment and planning committee
Trending of data to detect patterns and facilitate

development of risk mitigation strategies
Proactive measures to prevent or minimize the

likelihood of further incidents
10

Module I
RISK MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES

The following fundamental principles guide Risk Management Systems:
Prevention of serious incidents is the highest priority.
Safe and accessible environments are everyones responsibility.
Continuous communication, accurate reporting, consistent analysis of information,

and development of sound, person-centered strategies are essential to prevent
serious incidents.
Staff are competent to respond to, report and document incidents in a timely and
accurate manner.
Individuals have the right to a quality of life that is free of abuse, neglect, and
exploitation.
Risk management systems should emphasize staff involvement as integral to

providing safe environments.
Quality of life starts with those who work most closely with persons receiving
services and supports.
I-5

Introduction to Risk Management
Module I
v Training of all involved in supporting individuals with developmental disabilities in

the risk management process
v Individual risk assessment, evaluation, and planning
v A well-defined process for reporting incidents that is timely, complete, and accurate
v Immediate follow up and intervention to ensure health and safety and to mitigate
future risk
v Regular review and analysis of incidents by a risk management, assessment and

planning committee
v Trending of data to detect patterns and facilitate development of risk mitigation

strategies
v Proactive measures to prevent or minimize the likelihood of further incidents

I-6

Risk Assessment, Evaluation and Planning
Module II

Module II
Instructors Guide
Length of Session:
1 to 2 hours
Intended Audience:
Regional Center service coordinators; Quality Assurance staff;

Service Providers
Class Size:
Training Materials:

Methods:
Lecture; instructor guided discussion; interactive group exercise
Handouts:
IPP Resource Manual excerpt

CDER Sample Summary
Assessment, Evaluation and Planning worksheets (A-B-C)
Consumer Profiles
A: Annie
B: Bob
C: Cecilia
D: Donald
E: Ed
F: Felicia
Risk Assessment Inventories
Osteoporosis
Falls
Depression
Skin Breakdown
Substance Abuse
Physical & Nutritional Management

Module II
Additional Considerations:
Due to the large number of handouts used in this session, the

trainer should count out and sequence them ahead of time to limit
interruptions during distribution.
The group exercise using Consumer Profiles can be conducted
with the entire group as a whole or with the participants divided
into smaller groups. If the number of participants is 12 or fewer,
this exercise works very well with participants forming one group.
Allow approximately 20 minutes to complete the exercise.
Any or all of the Consumer Profiles can be used in either format
depending upon the size of the group or any preferences
articulated in advance by those requesting the training. The
instructor should ask about these preferences when preparing the
training session.
The handout Consumer Profiles: Questions for Group
Exercise is to be used with each of the profiles. It contains the
same questions regarding risk assessment and planning that
pertain to all of the situations described in the profiles.
Course Outline
I.
II.

A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
III.
Proactive Approach
Mitigation
Who Needs Risk Planning?
Assessment
Evaluation
Planning
Implementation of Risk Planning

A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Risk and Responsibility

Documentation
Communication and Training
Monitoring and Evaluation
Outcomes

Module II

Module II
Learning Objectives
1. Know how to complete risk assessments.
2. Know how to evaluate assessment information and identify risks.
3. Be able to utilize a sample of risk assessment tools.
4. Be able to develop individual risk management plans.
II-2

Module II

Slide 1: Risk Assessment, Evaluation and Planning

Start Power Point (or Overhead) Presentation and
have Slide 1 running as you begin.
Welcome to Risk Assessment, Planning and Evaluation. By the end

of this session, you will know how to complete risk assessments
for individuals, evaluate that information and develop risk plans.
We will cover some different methods for documenting risk
planning and have an opportunity to practice these skills. Some
tools to make risk assessment and planning easier will be
introduced.
Slide 2: Proactive Approach
This approach to risk management is considered proactive
because the intention is to address risk issues before they become
problematic. For example, diabetes can be life threatening but
careful planning and adherence to a health risk plan may help
keep the individual healthier and not as likely to go into crisis. A
proactive approach means that the team is involved in developing,
implementing, and monitoring assessment based plans.

Module II
Slide 3: Mitigation
Mitigation is an important word in risk management. It simply
Using the diabetes example, regular blood sugar
means reducing the likelihood of occurrence or recurrence of
checks will mean that appropriate interventions are
situations or events. Mitigation strategies are essential
taken to manage the disease before a person
components of the risk plan. These strategies may not totally
reaches a crisis point.
prevent an occurrence but proactive interventions may diminish

the consequences.
Slide 4: Who Needs Risk Planning?
Everyone needs to be assessed for risk. The process of risk
assessment, evaluation and planning is intended to be an ongoing,
routine part of the work of staff supporting the individual.
Some who are in a state of crisis will need immediate risk
planning.
Those with frequent special incident reports, serious
health or behavior challenges may need more extensive

assessment and planning.

Module II
Slide 5: Assessment
Begin by reviewing the Individual Program Plan.

Look for wants, needs, and preferences of the individual that
may involve risk.
Note any indicators on the IPP that signify a risk may be
present. These may include special diet, Behavior Support
Plan, desire to move, communication needs, health conditions,
diagnoses, history.
Review the Record for the following:

Physical
examination,
psychological
evaluation,
social
evaluations, therapy evaluations or progress reports, reports

from school, work or day program, and, any information to
indicate possible risk factors.
Any Special Incident Reports for the past year and note any
patterns.
The CDER, noting conditions, status or diagnoses that indicate
risk factors.

Module II
Slide 5 (continued)
Interview the Consumer

Interview the consumer and any other interested parties such
as family, friends, advocates, and staff in home or day
programs.
Observe
What is the individuals behavior telling you?
Do you see
things that cause you concern and may indicate that the
individual is at risk, such as withdrawal, tactile defensiveness,
avoidance of assistance with personal hygiene?
Sample Risk Assessment Inventories

Here are some examples of risk assessment inventories. Use of Distribute the 6 sample Risk Assessment
Inventory Handouts that are included with this
these simple assessments may alert you to a potential risk.
training module (e.g. falls, substance abuse, skin
Make Referrals as Determined
breakdown, etc.).
When a potential risk is identified, the consumer may need

further assessment or referral to a specialist, the regional Review some or all of the Risk Assessment
centers clinical team, or to some other resource for evaluation. Inventories and discuss how participants could use
Falls are a good example. Why do people fall? It may be that
these to identify risk factors with individuals.
a vision screening or environmental modification will be needed

Module II

Slide 5 (continued)
to reduce the number and/or the severity of falls. For some
people, exploration of changes in mobility status may be
critical in learning the reason why they fall.
The preventative action or mitigation strategy will vary based
on your assessment of the reason for the falls.

Module II

Slide 6: Evaluation

CDER Summary Exercise:
Once you have completed this risk assessment process, it is time 1. Distribute the CDER Summary handout. Discuss
to take the information and evaluate it to determine if significant the CDER as a tool that is available, contains a
risks are present and, if so, that effective risk mitigation strategies wealth of information, and is already in the persons
are in place.
record.
Convene the Team
2. Give the group a few minutes to review the
Discuss with the consumer and team members what may document and then ask participants to identify risks.
constitute a risk for the individual. Base decisions on actual as
For example, living in a high crime 3. Responses should note such things as poor selfneighborhood does not mean that you will become the victim of a care skills, incontinence, aggression, running away
crime. If you do not have good personal safety skills, however, behavior, and poor communication.
well as perceived risk.
you may be at a greater risk than others in the same

neighborhood.
4. Now tell the group that this is a three-year-old

child. What seems like a significant risk with this
CDER Summary Exercise
new information?
The purpose of this exercise is to enhance your awareness and

understanding of significant risk.
5. In summary, tell the participants that this exercise

has gone from assessment to evaluation.

Module II
Slide 7: Planning
Once you have completed the evaluation, determine if there is a

strategy, or multiple strategies, in place to address the individuals
most significant risk. If there are no plans, the team needs to
determine how these risks will be addressed.
There may be
multiple interventions for a single risk factor. The consumer must

participate in the planning process and agree to the plan.
Slide 8: Risk and Responsibility
Balancing individuals rights, including the right to make choices, 1. Encourage participants to describe specific
with the potential risks that may be involved in the exercise of situations where they supported individuals in
these rights, can be a very difficult task.
choices related to high-risk behaviors.

2. If the group needs prompting, ask participants:
Choice:
Individual choice should be respected but it may be
Have they ever worked with individuals who
necessary to probe to determine underlying causes for an engaged in high-risk behaviors?

individual making choices that are not in his or her best interest.
3. Prompt with examples such as: a person who

engages in unprotected sex; an individual who has a
Rights:
Keep the consumers rights in mind and remember respiratory condition and smokes; a person who has
your responsibilities to consumers. Some things may not be easy
a gall bladder condition and frequently eats greasy

Module II

Slide 8 (continued)

fast food, etc.
4. The conclusion of the discussion: we keep trying
to mediate and may require repeated attempts and different to ensure individual health and safety with creativity,
interventions before any success is found.
sensitivity, and commitment condition and eats a lot

of fast food, etc.
Slide 9: Documentation of the Assessment and Planning

Process
If the risk planning process has not been formally incorporated
into the persons IPP, there are other ways to ensure that these
proactive measures in risk management are captured in a
documented manner.
The regional centers Risk Assessment,
Evaluation, and Planning form(s) should be used to document the

risk planning process. If this regional center does not use its own
form, the following slides present samples that you may consider
using.

Module II

Slide 10: Risk Assessment, Evaluation, and Planning
Worksheet Sample A
This form provides for documentation of the review of an
individuals significant risk factors as well as the interventions
needed to mitigate risk.
Worksheet Sample B
This sample is similar to Sample A, but the categories are keyed to
the sections of the CDER. Your regional center may find other
ways to adapt this form to effectively document risk-planning
efforts.

Module II

Worksheet Sample C
This is an example of a record entry documenting the risk
assessment, evaluation, and planning process.
Any of these sample worksheets can be used to document a
persons risk mitigation plan.
10

Consumer Profile Exercise:
The next exercise can be conducted with the group as
a whole or with the participants divided into small
groups.
1. Hand out a Consumer Profile and Questions for
Group Exercise to each group.
2. Ask the group(s) to designate a recorder/reporter to
summarize their discussions at the end of the exercise.
3. Instruct the participants to review the Consumer
Profile and answer the Questions for Group
Exercise.
Now lets practice the process with an exercise using a selection of

different Consumer Profiles and the sample Risk Assessment,
Evaluation, and Planning Worksheets we have reviewed.
4. To assist in their discussion encourage the group to

refer to the Risk Assessment, Evaluation, and
Planning Worksheets and Risk Assessment
Inventories.
5. If conducting this exercise with one group, record
responses on a flip chart, dry erase board, or blank
transparency. If arranged in small groups, ask each
recorder or reporter to present the groups findings.
Clarify responses as needed.

Module II
11
Slide 13: Communication and Training

Risk planning will only be effective if all people who need to know Ask participants to suggest how to communicate the
about the Risk Plan follow it. For instance, if the risk assessment Risk Plan among all those involved with individuals,
identifies that the individual has difficulty swallowing, the team e.g., day program staff, respite providers, family
might decide that mealtime safety requires a staff member close
members who take individuals home for visits, etc.
by to respond if the person experiences problems while eating.
Anyone who assists with the individual when he eats must know
this and be prepared to intervene appropriately. It must be clear
what the staff is to do and when. If the person attends a dance on
Saturday night and refreshments are to be served, what should
Participants may suggest communication logs that

accompany the consumer between home and other
service sites, telephone contact systems set up by
providers, regional center distribution of IPP sections
the staff do?
providing information on precautions, or

Use
systems
already
in
place
to
document
training
or individualized approaches and interventions.
communication of risk planning. Verify that the plan will actually

affect the identified risk. Solicit input from team members who
may not have participated in developing the plan.
Slide 14: Monitoring and Evaluation of the Plan
Once risk management plans are in place for an individual
consumer, they must be tracked for effectiveness. If the plans are
identified on the IPP, then they will fit into the tracking processes

Module II

Slide 14 (continued)
already in place. This would mean review of the Plan at the time
of quarterly or annual reviews. If Risk Plans are not part of the
IPP process, the team should establish a schedule for review.
Slide 15: Outcome
The purpose of risk planning is to be proactive and improve the
quality of life for the individual. This desired outcome should guide
all efforts in helping consumers reduce and/or eliminate the
significant risks in their lives.
12
Risk Assessment,
Evaluation and
Planning
Proactive Approach
n
Risk Assessment and Evaluation
Team Planning
Risk Plans in Place
Monitoring of Plans
2
Mitigation
n Reducing
the Likelihood of
Occurrence or Recurrence
n Proactive
n Results
in Increased Safety
3
Who Needs Risk Planning ?

Anyone with an assessed risk, such as:
n
Frequent SIRs
Crises
Serious Health or Behavior Challenges

4
Assessment
n
Reviews IPP Records
Interviews
Observations
Evaluation
Who is at Risk?
Risk vs. Significant Risk
Team Decisions
6
Planning
n
Is there a Plan in place?
Should there be a Plan in place?
Make needed referrals
Risk and Responsibility

n Choice
n Rights
Documentation
n IPP
Process
n Informal
n Formal
Risk Assessment Evaluation & Planning Worksheet (Sample A)

Individuals Name:
Date of Discussion:
Date of Note:
Participants:
Significant Risk Factors in the Persons Life List
Are risks
present?
YES
NO
Description of the risk,

circumstances, frequency
Interventions required
to eliminate or minimize
risk
1. Functional Status
a. Eating
b. Ambulation
c. Transfers
d. Toileting
a. Self-abuse
b. Aggression towards others or property
c. Use of physical or mechanical restraint
d. Emergency drug use
e. Psychotropic meds
a. Gastrointestinal conditions
b. Seizures
c. Anticonvulsant meds
d. Skin breakdown
e. Bowel function
f. Nutrition
g. Treatments
a. Injuries
b. Falls
c. Community Mobility
5. Other
2. Behavioral
3. Physiological
4. Safety
Instructions for completing the risk assessment worksheet: Under each specific area, list the Significant Risks identified. Indicate yes or no as to whether a
significant risk has been identified in the listed category. Indicate yes or no as to whether training/service plans are present for the specific risk. If training/service
plans have been developed, indicate the training/area. Briefly, indicate a summary of the intervention required to eliminate or minimize the risk.
10
Risk Assessment Evaluation & Planning Worksheet (Sample B)

Individuals Name:
Participants:
Significant Risk
Factors in the
Persons Life - List
Date of Discussion:
1.
2.
Are risks
present?
YES
1. Qualifying
Developmental Disability
3.
N
O
Description of the risk, circumstances,

frequency
Date of Note:
4.
5.
Interventions required to
eliminate or minimize risk
2. Other Disabilities /
Health Conditions
3. Special Conditions /
Behaviors
4. Skill Development
5. Other
11
Risk Assessment Evaluation & Planning (Sample C)

Name:
Date:
Participants:
Tasks Completed for Assessment:

Documents Reviewed:
People Interviewed:
Assessments Completed or Referral Made:
Significant Risks Identified:
Plan:
Location of Plan Information:
Other Information:
12
Communication and Training

n Who
needs to know
n Location
n Verification
13
Monitoring and Evaluation

n IPP
Process
n Periodic
Revisiting of the Plan
14
Outcome
n Improved
Quality of Life for the
Individual
15

Module II
CDER SUMMARY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES

CLIENT DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION REPORT
CLIENT PROFILE
BASED ON CDER EVALUATION OF: __________
RUN DATE: _________

RUN TIME: _________
* * CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT INFORMATION W & I CODE SEC. 4514 * *

NAME: __________________ ___________________
UCI:
_________________
COUNSELOR: ______________________________________
DOB: ____________ AGE: _________ SEX: _____
PROG: _______ SECT:______ UNIT:_____
LGL STAT: ____________ S PARENT OR RELAT
RESIDENCE: PARENT / REL
ETHNICITY: ____________
LANGUAGE: _____________
HEIGHT: ____________
WEIGHT:_____________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------QUALIFYING DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIESMENTAL RETARDATION: NONE
CEREBRAL PALSY: NONE
AUTISM: FULL SYNDROME
FACTOR: OTHER UNKNOWN AND UNSPECIFIED CAUSE OF MORBIDITY OR MORTALITY
IMPACT: MODERATE
DATE: 1 / 02
EPILEPSY: NONE
OTHER TYPE OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY: NONE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OTHER DISABILITIES / HEALTH CONDITIONSCHRONIC MAJOR MEDICAL CONDITIONS
CONDITION: HEPATITIS B IMMUNE STATUS UNKNOWN
IMPACT: NONE
HEARING UNCORRECTED: HEARING WITHIN NORM LIMITS
VISION UNCORRECTED: VISION WITHIN NORM LIMITS
MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS
HAND USE: NO LIMITATION
AMBULATION: WALKS WELL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SPECIAL CONDITIONS/BEHAVIORS
-EVALUATIONAGGRESSION: VERBAL ABUSE, THREATS
SLF INJ: FREQUENCY AT LEAST 1/WK
RUNNING AWAY: SERIOUS PROBLEM
FRUSTRATION: MAY BE AGGRESSIVE
HYPERACTIVITY: NEEDS INDIVI. ATTN:
TANTRUMS: AT LEAST 1 PER WEEK
RESISTIVENESS: OFTEN RESISTIVE
ATTN SPAN: FOCUS FOR LESS THAN 1 MIN.
SFTY AWARE: SUPRVSD AT ALL TIMES
ASSESSMENT OF BEHAVIORS: (FF=34)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SKILL DEVELOPMENT
EATING: FINGER FEEDS SELF
TOILETING: NOT TOILET TRAINED
BLADDER CONT: INADEQUATE
BOWEL CONT.: INADEQUATE
HYGIENE: UNALBE TO PERFORM
BATHING: UNABLE TO BATHE SELF
DRESSING: COOPERATES IN DRESSING
READ SKL: DOES NOT READ
WRITING SKILL: DOES NOT COPY OR TRACE
RECEPT. LANG: SIMPLE WORDS ONLY
EXPRESSIVE LANG: SIMPLE WORDS
CLAR. SPEECH: UNDERSTOOD BY PEERS
DEVELOPMENTAL LEVEL-05%
II-5

Module II
Risk Assessment Worksheet: Sample A

Individuals Name:
Participants:
Significant Risk
Factors (List)
Date of Discussion:
Present
Yes
No
1. Functional Status
a.
b.
c.
d.
Eating
Ambulation
Transfers
Toileting
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
2. Behavioral
a. Self-abuse
b. Aggression toward
others or property
c. Use of physical or
mechanical restraint
d. Emergency drug use
e. Psychotropic meds
3. Physiological
a. Gastrointestinal
conditions
b. Seizures
c. Anticonvulsant meds
d. Skin breakdown
e. Bowel function
f. Nutrition
g. Treatments
4. Safety
a. Injuries
b. Falls
c. Community Mobility
Description of risk, circumstances, frequency
Date of Note:
Interventions required to eliminate or
minimize risk

Module II
5. Other
Instructions for Completing Risk Assessment Worksheet
Under each specific area, list the Significant Risks identified.
Indicate yes or no as to whether a significant risk has been identified in the listed category.
Indicate yes or no whether training/service plans are present for the specific risk.
If training/service plans have been developed, indicate the training/area.
Briefly, indicate a summary of the intervention required to eliminate or minimize the risk.

Module II
Risk Assessment, Evaluation and Planning Worksheet: Sample B

Individuals Name: Stephen Anderson
Date of Discussion: January 22, 2003
Date of Note: January 23, 2003
Participants: Steve Anderson, Brenda Smith (SC), Mary Anderson (Mother), Rhonda Johnson (Provider XYZ), Frances Mathers (Administrator)
Significant Risk
Present
Description of the risk, circumstances, frequency
Interventions required to
Factors (List)
eliminate or minimize risk
Yes
No
1. Qualifying
Developmental Disability
Seizure Disorder
2. Other Disabilities / Health

Conditions
3. Special Conditions /
Behaviors
4. Skill Development
5. Other
Average of six seizures per year for the last four years; takes
medication. Four of the last six occurred at night.
Plan developed (see IPP and

quarterly notes). Interventions:
supervision, medication
monitoring, special diet,
consumer education, bed rails,
Medic-Alert bracelet. IPP
modified to include plans.

Module II
Instructions for Completing Risk Assessment Worksheet
Under each specific area, list the Significant Risks identified.
Indicate yes or no as to whether a significant risk has been identified in the listed category.
Indicate yes or no whether training/service plans are present for the specific risk.
If training/service plans have been developed, indicate the training/area.
Briefly, indicate a summary of the intervention required to eliminate or minimize the risk.

Module II
Risk Assessment, Evaluation and Planning Worksheet: Sample C

Name:
Stephan Anderson
Date: January 22, 2003
Participants:
Stephan Anderson, Brenda Smith, Service Coordinator; Mary Anderson, Mother; Rhonda
Johnson, XYZ Day Services; Frances Mathers, Administrator
Tasks Completed for Assessment:

Documents Reviewed: Complete case record; medication history ; history and physical; CDER
(11/27/02); Physical Therapy Evaluation (10/11/02); Clinical Team Report (12/16/02)
People Interviewed: All above participants and Dr. Michael Holmes, Neurologist
Assessments Completed or Referral Made: Seen by Clinical Team 12/16/02
Significant Risks Identified:

Uncontrolled seizures, defined as averaging six per year for the past four years.
Plan:
1. Stephen must never be alone in a situation where a seizure could risk his life (bathing); he
must be accompanied when traveling; (residence, day program, family).
2. Modify environment for safety: bed rails because 4/6 seizures occurred at night (residence).
3. Quarterly monitoring of blood levels of medications (Dr. Holmes-residence will document).
4. High protein diet as recommended by neurologist (home).
5. Consumer education to help Stephen make informed decisions about risks (day program).
Location of Plan Information:

IPP of January 21, 2003; monitored quarterly by Service Coordinator
Other Information:
Although Dr. Holmes strongly recommends the use of a helmet, Steve stated on January 21,
2003, that he would never get a girlfriend wearing one of those things. XYZ will provide
education about safety and helmets and will reevaluate Steves preferences in April, 2003.
Steve did agree to this education, to bed rails and to receiving the special diet. He takes his
medication independently and appears to understand the danger of being hurt if he is alone. He
said that he doesnt want to drown in the tub like his friend, and it is okay for staff to be near as
long as they dont watch him bathe.

Module II
Risk Assessment Inventory: Depression

The following risk factors may be indicators of existing or developing problems. These should
be considered by the service coordinator, service provider, and other Team members when
assessing and planning for risk mitigation. Referrals for further evaluation by clinicians or the
regional centers Clinical Team may be needed to diagnose a specific condition or otherwise
address consumer risk. This inventory is not intended to take the place of a professional
diagnosis conducted according to accepted standards of clinical practice.
Personal Risk Factors
if
Present
Risk Factor
Loss of interest in things you used to enjoy, including sex
Feeling sad, blue, or down in the dumps
Feeling slowed down or restless and unable to sit down
Feeling worthless or guilty
Changes in appetite or weight (loss or gain)
Thoughts of death or suicide; suicide attempts
Problems concentrating, thinking, remembering, or making decisions
Trouble sleeping or sleeping too much
Loss of energy or feeling tired all of the time
Headaches
Other aches and pains
Sexual problems
Digestive problems (upset stomach, etc.)
Feeling pessimistic or hopeless
Being anxious or worried
Consumer: _______________________________________________Date_______________

Module II
Risk Assessment Inventory: Falls

The following risk factors may be indicators of existing or developing problems. These should
be considered by the service coordinator, service provider, and other Team members when
assessing and planning for risk mitigation. Referrals for further evaluation by clinicians or the
regional centers Clinical Team may be needed to diagnose a specific condition or otherwise
address consumer risk.

v if Present
Risk Factor
History of falls
Previous falls resulting in a fracture or laceration
Frequent falls (two or more per month)
Impaired vision
Muscle or strength weakness
Gait or balance disorders
Dizziness or vertigo
Incontinence or frequent toileting
Agitation
Sleep Disturbance
Medications with known side effects that may affect balance or ability to ambulate
Orthostatic hypotension (dizziness upon standing)
Impaired mobility
Requires assistance with ambulation
Uses mobility equipment (wheelchair, walker, cane)
Foot or leg deformity
Seizures
Environmental Risk Factors

v if Present
Risk Factor
Poor lighting
Wet or slippery floors
Loose electrical cords
Inappropriate footwear
Loose rugs
Other: specify _________________________________________________________
Consumer: ____________________________________________ Date: _______________

Module II
Risk Assessment Inventory: Osteoporosis

The following risk factors may be indicators of existing or developing problems. These should be
considered by the service coordinator, service provider, and other Team members when assessing and
planning for risk mitigation. Referrals for further evaluation by clinicians or the regional centers Clinical
Team may be needed to diagnose a specific condition or otherwise address consumer risk. This
inventory is not intended to take the place of a professional diagnosis conducted according to
accepted standards of clinical practice.
v if
Present
Risk Factor
Long term use of high dose corticosteroids
Heavy smoking (or passive smoking)
Heavy drinking
Immobility
Lack of sunshine
Low calcium intake
Other diseases
Family history of osteoporosis or fractures
Fracture after a minor bump or fall
Loss of height
Back pain
In women:
Early menopause (before 45 years old)
Early hysterectomy (before normal menopause age of 50)
Irregular or infrequent periods during your lifetime
Consumer:_________________________________________________Date______________

Module II
Risk Assessment Inventory: Physical & Nutritional Management

Physical Management
v if Present
Risk Factor
Does the consumer have difficulty with gross motor skills such as walking or sitting?
Does the consumer have:
Contractures (severe joint tightness)?
Severe scoliosis and/or kyphosis (curvature of the spine)?
Windswept deformity of the legs (both legs fixed or pointed to one side)?
Severe muscle tightness (spasticity) or muscle weakness (floppy)?
Does the consumer maintain his/her head in a tipped back (hyperextended) position?
Has the consumer had problems with skin breakdown, redness that does not disappear
after 20 minutes, or skin breakdown that doesn't heal?
Does the individual have poor bladder or bowel control?
Nutritional Management
v if Present
Risk Factor
Are there special dietary needs (i.e., caloric, consistency, texture)?
Has the consumer received modified food textures in the past (i.e., blended, chopped)?
Does the consumer need assistance to eat?
Does the consumer cough during meals?
Does the consumer have a history of choking?
Does the consumer frequently refuse certain types of foods or liquids?
Does the consumer eat in other than an upright position?
Does the consumer exhibit poor head control?
Does the consumer have a problem with:
poor lip closure and/or tongue thrust
bite reflex
gagging during meals and/or tooth brushing
rumination
excessive belching
frequent vomiting
persistent drooling
Has the consumer experienced dehydration in the past 12 months?
Does the consumer have history of nasogastric (NG) and/or gastrostomy (G) tube use?
Does the consumer tip his/her head back to swallow?
Does it take more than 30 minutes for the consumer to eat a meal?
Does the consumer have to swallow repeatedly to clear the mouth?
Has the consumer had any episodes of not breathing, turning blue, severe wheezing, or
pneumonia during the past year?
Is the consumer agitated during or after meals?
Does the consumer have reddened or whitened gums, visible film or plaque on the
teeth, or other significant dental problems?
Does the consumer not tolerate tooth brushing or being touched around the mouth?
Does the consumer eat rapidly; take large mouthfuls or too large bites?
Consumer: ____________________________________________ Date: _______________

Module II
Risk Assessment Inventory: Skin Breakdown


v if Present
Risk Factor
Inability to Move
Bed or Chair Confinement
A person in a chair who is able to shift his or her own weight
Loss of Bowel or Bladder Control

Poor Nutrition
Lowered Mental Awareness
Consumer: _____________________________________________Date: _______________

Module II
Risk Assessment Inventory: Substance Abuse
The following risk factors may be indicators of existing or developing problems. These should be considered by the service coordinator, service provider, and
other Team members when assessing and planning for risk mitigation. Referrals for further evaluation by clinicians or the regional centers Clinical Team may be
needed to diagnose a specific condition or otherwise address consumer risk. This inventory is not intended to take the place of a professional diagnosis
conducted according to accepted standards of clinical practice.
v if yes
Risk Factors
Frequent Intoxication
Does the consumer report or appear to be frequently high or intoxicated?
Do the consumers social activities focus on drinking or other drug use, including obtaining, using and recovering from use?
Has the consumer ever expressed his/her concerns about needing to cut down on use of drugs or alcohol?
Atypical Social Settings

Does the consumers immediate peer group encourage substance abuse?
Is the consumer socially isolated from others and is substance abuse occurring alone?
Is the consumer reluctant to attend social events where chemicals wont be available?
Intentional Heavy Use

Does the consumer use alcohol with prescribed medications?
Does the consumer use more alcohol than is safe in light of prescribed medications or compromised tolerance?
Does the consumer have an elevated tolerance, evidenced by use of large quantities of alcohol or other drugs without appearing
intoxicated?
Symptomatic Drinking
Are there predictable patterns of use which are well known to others?
Is there a reliance on drugs or alcohol to cope with stress?
Psychological Dependence
Does the consumer rely on drugs or alcohol as a means of coping with stress or problems?
Health Problems
Are there medical conditions which decrease tolerance or increase the risk of substance abuse problems?
Are there recurring bladder infections, chronic infections, bed sores, seizures, or other medical conditions which are aggravated by
repeated alcohol or other drug use?

Module II
Risk Assessment Inventory
Substance Abuse (continued)
v if yes
Risk Factors
Job Problems
Has the consumer missed work or gone to work late due to use of alcohol or other drugs?
Problems with Significant Others

Has a family member or friend expressed concern about the consumers use of alcohol or drugs?
Have important relationships been lost or impaired due to substance abuse?
Problems with Law or Authority

Has the consumer been in trouble with authorities or arrested for any alcohol or drug related offenses?
Have there been instances when the consumer could have been arrested but wasnt?
Consumer: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________

Module II
Consumer Profiles: Questions for Group Exercise

The following questions are presented for guidance to the group in its review of
consumer risk issues.
1. What risks can you identify from the profile?
2. What, if any, immediate interventions are needed to ensure safety?
3. What assessment information is needed for risk planning?
4. What resources can you access to obtain the assessment information you need?
5. What are the appropriate next steps?

Module II
Consumer Profile A: Annie
Annie is a 20-year old woman who has mild mental retardation. Annies Aunt Nancy
served as her foster care provider from the time she was 12 years old until her 18th
birthday. Under the care of her aunt, Annie grew up very isolated with few friends or
opportunities to socialize with other children. Annies aunt was a very private person
who preferred time alone. She structured Annies time and contacts with others
accordingly.
When Annie turned 18, her aunt arranged for a residential placement in a licensed
community care home. She lives with three housemates. Since coming to the home
two years ago, Annie has had difficulties getting along with the other people living there.
She argues and starts fights with the other women. She has also become increasingly
verbally abusive to staff.
Annie smokes, and consistently breaks house rules about when and where she can
smoke. Smoking in her bedroom has created a safety risk for everyone and she has
started a fire in the waste can. Annie becomes quite upset when anyone mentions her
smoking habits as a problem.
The residential provider is very concerned about being able to meet Annies needs and
is seriously considering termination of her placement. This provider has contacted
Annies service coordinator for help.

Module II
Consumer Profile B: Bob
Bob is a 52 year old gentleman with a mild level of mental retardation. He receives
independent living services in his efficiency apartment. Bob has lived in a group home,
a supported living arrangement, and then on his own since he left a developmental
center ten years ago. Bob is passionate about his desire to remain living independently.
Bobs family has long advocated for him to return to the institution because they feared
he was not capable of living in the community, much less living in his own place. After
Bob had a stroke a few years ago, his family was even more convinced that he should
be living back at the center.
Since his stroke, Bob has had trouble negotiating uneven surfaces, navigating around
corners, and walking more than a block in his neighborhood. His speech is frequently
slurred and drooling has become a difficult problem. Bob becomes frustrated when
people cant understand what he is saying and, as a result, has begun to withdraw from
others. The drooling has also made him feel very self-conscious and embarrassed.
Bobs family has never stopped trying to convince him that he would be better off living
in an institutional setting. Bob is especially worried that they will be even more adamant
if they see the progressive problems he is experiencing with his speech and mobility. In
fact, hes getting concerned himself that he will not be able to live independently much
longer.

Module II
Consumer Profile C: Cecilia
Cecilia is a 47 year old woman who has a seizure disorder and severe mental
retardation. She lives with Rosa, her elderly mother, who has dedicated her life
to caring for her daughter. Rosa has resisted making any concrete plans for
Cecilia after her own death.
Cecilias mother has rarely sought any type of support or assistance. She always
tries to do everything herself, stating that she believes no one else can take care
of Cecilia as well as she can. Rosa also believes that Cecilia is her responsibility
until the day either of them dies.
Cecilia has become so overweight that she uses a wheelchair for mobility. Rosa
has injured herself several times lifting Cecilia and helping her with bathing, using
the toilet, and many other activities of daily living. Incontinence has also become
a problem with Cecilia, as has her recent diagnosis of osteoarthritis.
It has become increasingly difficult to care for Cecilia, yet Rosa has only
requested occasional respite services. Rosa herself has had numerous medical
problems including severe osteoporosis, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis.
.

Module II
Consumer Profile D: Donald
Donald is an older gentleman, age 62, who has Down Syndrome. He spent most
of his younger life in a state developmental center. He first lived in licensed
community care homes, and then received supported living services. For the last
15 years he lived with a roommate who passed away a few months ago. That
roommate, Philip, was Donalds closest friend and companion. A new roommate
moved in three months ago.
Donald is a well-known figure in his small hometown. Donalds service

coordinator is beginning to get calls from people who see him often. Donald has
limited communication skills but makes his message known to people who know
him well. His friends and neighbors are concerned about him and many feel he
may need a more protective and supervised living situation.
Donald has evidently fallen and hurt his foot. It has not healed and the wound is
filthy and in need of care. Donalds own hygiene also seems to be deteriorating
and his whole appearance has become disheveled.

Module II
Consumer Profile E: Ed
Ed is a 25 year old man with severe cerebral palsy and a seizure disorder. Ed
uses a wheelchair for mobility. He can transfer himself but can not walk
independently.
Ed lives in a home with adults who also have physical disabilities. Ed only
recently moved to the home after his mother died. Until then, he lived in the
same hometown all his life, and had a close-knit group of friends, most of whom
do not have disabilities. Eds current residence is about 30 miles away from his
former home.
For the past several summers, Ed and his friends have gone camping at a spot
several hours drive away. Staff are quite concerned that this will be too risky for
him. Generally it is hot at these times and Eds anticonvulsant medicines can
sometimes make him very heat sensitive. The staff are also worried about his
capacity to move safely to, from, and around the campsite.
Ed is determined to go on this trip. Its a way to feel like he still has some of his
old life, but its also about feeling like he has some control in his new life. He has
begun to feel very angry.
Ed is adamant about going on this camping trip and wants his service coordinator
to advocate for him in this regard.

Module II
Consumer Profile F: Felicia
Felicia is a 58 year old female with moderate mental retardation. She lived in a
state ICF/MR for more than 20 years and was placed there by her aging parents.
Felicia is currently living in a community care home and has been there
approximately six months.
Felicia has developed Type II diabetes shortly after entering the home and is
currently 50 pounds overweight. She has problems with poor eating habits. She
does not monitor her food intake or the types of food she eats. She has few
other activities during her day and equates pleasure with food and mealtimes.
Her diabetes is worsening.
Felicias residential provider is considering the appropriateness of her placement

because she will not comply with her diet, and she cannot self medicate or
perform her own blood sugar testing.
Felicia has been exhibiting symptoms that her diabetic condition is progressing.
She is often fatigued, has dizzy spells and heals slowly when injured.

Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee
Module III

Module III
Instructors Guide
Length of Session:
1-1 Hours
Intended Audience:
Risk Committee members, management staff, others interested in

the implementation of risk management
Class Size:
Training Materials:
Equipment: LCD projector or overhead projector

Handouts: Title 17 Regulations 54327.2
Methods:
Power point or overhead presentation; group discussion; review

of regional center Risk Management and Mitigation Plan
Course Outline
I.
II.

A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
Introduction to Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee

Committee Composition
Committee Responsibilities: Risk Management and Mitigation Plans
Training and Technical Assistance
Coordination and Communication with Outside Investigative Agencies
Review of Special incident Data
Medical Records and Coroner Reports
Additional Committee Responsibilities
Frequency of Meetings
Suggestions for Documentation
Benefits of Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committees
III-1

Module III

Module III

Module III
Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this Module, participants will:
1. Understand regulations for regional center Risk Management, Assessment
and Planning Committees.
2. Understand the functioning of the Committee.
3. Become familiar with the elements of a regional center Risk Management
and Mitigation Plan.
III-2

Module III
Slide 1: Risk Management, Assessment and Planning
Display title overhead or start Power Point presentation with
Committee
the title slide (Slide 1).
The goal of this session is to learn about the function and

responsibilities
of
regional
centers
Risk
Management,
Assessment and Planning Committee. A major role of the
Distribute copies of the handout: Regional Center Risk

Management, Assessment and Planning Committee and Risk
committee is to develop and monitor the regional centers Risk Management Plans.
Management and Mitigation Plan.
Our focus is on the specific requirements for the committee as
mandated by Section 54327.2 of the Lanterman Act. Throughout
this session we will refer to the specific language of each
requirement.
We will also have an opportunity to offer suggestions on enhancing
the effectiveness of the committee in supporting the health and
safety of consumers.

Module III
Slide 1 (continued)
Not all regional centers refer to the committee by the name
designated in the regulations. What name does your committee go
Use this name as you proceed with the session.
by?
Slide 2: Committee Composition
List the titles/roles (not names) of committee members on a
Section
54327.2
(a)
requires
the
following
regarding
the flip chart. Ask the group about the different perspectives
composition of the committee:

Each
regional
center
shall
members bring to the committees work.

establish
Risk
Management,
Assessment and Planning Committee that, at a minimum, includes

a representative from the regional centers clinical, quality
assurance and training staff.
Who serves on the committee at this regional center? What are
their titles or roles?

Module III

Slide 3: Committee Responsibilities: Risk Management and
Mitigation Plan
Although the regulations mandate the aspects of risk management
that must be addressed in the plan, there are no specific
requirements for its design. Every regional center may structure
their Risk Management and Mitigation Plan to best fit the issues
they face in meeting the needs of consumers.
The following section identifies 5 areas for committee attention:
Section 54327.2 (b) The Risk Management, Assessment and
Planning Committee shall develop the regional centers Risk
Management and Mitigation Plan which shall address, at a
minimum:
Training and Technical Assistance
Coordination and communication with outside investigative

agencies
Review of Special Incident Data

Module III

Slide 3 (continued)
Medical Records and Coroner Reports
Lets proceed by discussing each of these components.

Slide 4: Special Incident Reporting
(b) (1): The Risk Management and Mitigation Plan shall address:
The process and procedures for ensuring accurate and timely

handling and reporting of special incidents by regional center
staff, vendors, and long-term health care facilities;
Special Incident reporting is a critical element of risk management.

The committee is central to ensuring that the regional center has
responsive and effective policies and processes that provide clear
guidance on the handling of all reported incidents.
To be effective in understanding and addressing problems with

Module III

Slide 4 (continued)
special incident reporting, the committee should review and
analyze issues related to the following:
Accurate reporting
Thorough documentation
Timely notifications to family/guardian, and other investigative

entities
Appropriate routing and review process
Relevant and functional preventative action steps
Competent disposition and follow up

Module III
Slide 5: Training and Technical Assistance

The provision of training and technical assistance to regional

center staff, vendors and long-term health care facility staff and
others on the legal obligations of abuse reporting, special
incident
reporting,
risk
assessment,
developing
and
implementing an incident prevention plan, and proactive

accident/safety planning through the individualized program
planning process;
The provision of training and technical assistance is a valuable
element of any regional centers initiatives in risk management.
Ask the group to describe the training and technical

assistance efforts underway regarding risk management.
Some regional centers may want to review and revise their Ask for suggestions of additional topics or strategies that
curriculum or other resources to better reflect the implementation could enhance this area for regional center staff, vendors,
of specific risk management practices.
and long-term health care facility staff.

Module III
Slide 6: Coordination and Communication with Outside

Investigative Entities
Coordination and communication with local licensing, protective

service and law enforcement agencies relative to investigative
actions and findings;
External agencies investigative actions and findings are integral to

the management of special incidents and more importantly, to the
protection of consumers from harm. Positive practices include
shared training opportunities with these entities, collaborative
review of incidents, and information exchange on issues of
common concern.

Module III
Slide 7: Review of Special Incident Data

A process for reviewing individual and aggregate special

incident report data to identify trends and unusual patterns
At the discretion of the regional center, you may wish to
which may require regional center action;
provide samples of data reports to the participants. If not,

ask the participants to identify the types of targeted reports
Perhaps the most detailed and comprehensive work of risk

committees is the review of trends in individual and aggregate
special incident data. As the data is processed, multiple reports
may be generated. The analysis of targeted reports should identify
trends and unusual patterns that may require regional center
action. Suggested targets for review and analysis include, but are
not limited to, the following:
Multiple SIRs for one individual
Multiple SIRs from one location
Multiple SIRs from one vendor operating in multiple locations
Reports of frequency by type of incident, such as falls
Detailed reports of one type of incident, e.g., alleged abuse
that are managed by the Committee.

Module III
Slide 8: Medical Records and Coroner Reports

A process for reviewing medical records and coroner reports, as

appropriate, associated with special incidents to ensure that
appropriate medical attention was sought and/or given.
This element of the Risk Management and Mitigation Plan may be

operationalized through the work of a stand-alone mortality and
morbidity review committee.
This may also be addressed by a sub-committee of the Risk
Management, Assessment and Planning Committee.
To carry out the functions of these reviews, additional membership
from clinical and consultant staff need to be in place.

Module III
10
Slide 9: Additional Committee Responsibilities

54327.2 (c): The Risk Management, Assessment and Planning
Committee shall:
(1) Monitor the regional centers Risk Management and Mitigation
Plan to ensure it is being implemented;
(2) Annually review the regional centers internal special incident
reporting and risk management systems; and
(3) Update the Risk Management and Mitigation Plan as necessary.
Slide 10: Frequency of Meetings
Section 54327.2 (d) The Risk Management, Assessment and
Planning Committee shall meet at least semi-annually.
Most regional centers meet more frequently than required for
enhanced
stewardship
in
the
Management and Mitigation Plan.
implementation
of
the
Risk

Module III
Slide 11: Suggestions for Documentation

The Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee should
document its activities.
The agenda for a committee meeting should be structured and
focused.
Minutes should focus on outcomes and recommendations, and
reflect follow up actions from previous meetings.
Meeting minutes serve to chronicle the Committees efforts and the
oversight of the regional centers Risk Management and Mitigation
Plan.
Slide 12: Benefits of Risk Management, Assessment and
Planning Committees
In closing, here are some of the benefits afforded to a regional
center from the work of their Committee.
11

Module III
Provides opportunities to problem solve and implement

proactive strategies to keep consumers safe.
Focuses on the preventative aspects of risk management. The

emphasis is on reducing the risk of incident recurrence for one
or for other consumers.
Provides a central point for system-wide, as well as consumerspecific, improvements in health and safety.
12
Risk Management,
Assessment and Planning
Committee
III-4
Committee Composition
Section 54327.2 (a) requires:
n
Each regional center shall establish a Risk

Management, Assessment and Planning
Committee that, at a minimum, includes a
representative from the regional centers
clinical, quality assurance and training
staff.
2
Committee Responsibilities:
Risk Management & Mitigation Plan
Section 54327.2 (b) requires:
n
The Risk Management, Assessment

and Planning Committee shall develop
the regional centers Risk Management
and Mitigation Plan which shall address,
at a minimum:
3

Section 54327.2 (b) (1) requires:
n
The process and procedures for

ensuring accurate and timely handling
and reporting of special incidents by
regional center staff, vendors, and
long-term health care facilities;
4
Training & Technical

Assistance
n
The provision of training and technical

assistance to regional center staff, vendors
and long-term health care facility staff and
others on the legal obligations of abuse
reporting, special incident reporting, risk
assessment, developing and implementing an
incident prevention plan, and proactive
accident/safety planning through the
individualized program planning process;
Coordination & Communication with

Outside Investigative Agencies
n
Coordination and communication with

local licensing, protective service and
law enforcement agencies relative to
investigative actions and findings;
6
Review of Special Incident Data

n
A process for reviewing individual and

aggregate special incident report data
to identify trends and unusual patterns
which may require regional center
action;
7
Medical Records & Coroner

Reports
n
A process for reviewing medical

records and coroner reports, as
appropriate, associated with special
incidents to ensure that appropriate
medical attention was sought and/or
given.
Additional Committee
Responsibilities
Section 54327.2 (c) requires:
n
The Risk Management, Assessment and Planning

Committee shall:
(1) Monitor the regional centers Risk
Management and Mitigation Plan to ensure it is being
implemented;
(2) Annually review the regional centers internal special
incident reporting and risk management systems; and
(3) Update the Risk Management and Mitigation Plan as
necessary.
Frequency of Meetings
Section 54327.2 (d) requires:
n
The Risk Management, Assessment

and Planning Committee shall meet at
least semi-annually.
10
Suggestions for Documentation
Agenda
Minutes or Committee report
11
Benefits of Risk Management

Committee
n
Provides opportunities for problem

solving & implementing proactive
strategies
Facilitates a preventative model
Provides a central point for

improvement in consumer health and
safety
12

Module III
54327.2. Regional Center Risk Management, Assessment and Planning

Committee and Risk Management and Mitigation Plans.
(a)
Each regional center shall establish a Risk Management, Assessment and

Planning Committee that, at a minimum, includes a representative from the
regional centers clinical, quality assurance and training staff.
(b)
The Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee shall develop the
regional centers Risk Management and Mitigation Plan which shall address, at a
minimum:
(c)
(d)
(1)
The process and procedures for ensuring accurate and timely handling
and reporting of special incidents by regional center staff, vendors, and
long-term health care facilities;
(2)
The provision of training and technical assistance to regional center staff,

vendors and long-term health care facility staff and others on the legal
obligations of abuse reporting, special incident reporting, risk
assessment, developing and implementing an incident prevention plan
and proactive accident/safety planning through the individualized program
planning process;
(3)
Coordination and communication with local licensing, protective service

and law enforcement agencies relative to investigative actions and
findings;
(4)
A process for reviewing individual and aggregate special incident report

data to identify trends and unusual patterns which may require regional
center action, and;
(5)
A process for reviewing medical records and coroner reports, as

appropriate, associated with special incidents to ensure that appropriate
medical attention was sought and/or given.
The Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee shall:

(1)
Monitor the regional centers Risk Management and Mitigation Plan to

ensure it is being implemented;
(2)
Annually review the regional centers internal special incident reporting

and risk management systems; and
(3)
Update the Risk Management and Mitigation Plan as necessary.
The Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee shall meet at least
semi-annually.
Authority: Section 11152, Government Code. Reference: Sections 4434, 4500, 4501,
4502, 4629, 4648, 4648.1 and 4742, Welfare and Institutions Code.
III-5

Module IV

Module IV
Instructors Guide
Length of Session:
1 to 1.5 hours
Intended Audience:
Regional center staff or vendored service providers
Class Size:
Training Materials:

Handouts:

Requirements for Special Incident Reporting by Regional Centers
Requirements for Special Incident Reporting by Vendors and
Long-Term Health Care Facilities
Methods:
Course Outline
I.
II.
III.
Summary and Closing
IV-1

Module IV

Module IV

Module IV
Learning Objectives
1. Understand special incident reporting as an element of risk management.
2. Understand the significance of special incident reporting.
3. Learn how to obtain and document all relevant information for an incident report.
4. Relate how special incident reporting influences data analysis.
IV-2

Module IV
Slide 1: Special Incident Reporting: The Process

Special Incident Reporting is generally thought of as simply how Start the Power Point Presentation (or display first
to complete a Special Incident Report. While, of course, it is transparency on overhead projector). Have the Special
necessary to understand how to do this, it is not the intent of this Incident Reporting title page running as you begin.
session to present detailed information on how to complete each
blank on the form. Correctly completing the SIR form is only the
beginning.
During this session, we will spend time discussing how to write the
incident description portion of the SIR, as this forms the basis of
everything that follows. Without a good incident description we
will have problems later in reviewing the incident and in
developing appropriate preventative actions.
In addition, a complete incident description will facilitate accurate
analysis of the data, on regional and statewide levels, so that the
SIR system can promote safe and healthy lives for everyone.

Module IV
Slide 2: Something Really BAD Happened!

As service providers or regional center staff, it is imperative that If the regional center conducts specific training on
everyone understand what must be reported:
recognizing and reporting SIRs, then refer to it now.
Any special incident as defined in Title 17 that occurs during the Differentiate between what is reported to DDS (Title 17)
time the individual was receiving services and supports from any and what else must be reported to the regional center.
vendor or long-term health care facility must be reported to the
regional center.
Distribute copies of the following two handouts:
Requirements for Special Incident Reporting
The handouts now being distributed include all the specific
by Vendors and Long-Term Health Care
requirements for Special Incident Reporting for both service
Facilities; and
providers and regional centers. They serve as ready references as
Requirements for Special Incident Reporting
you address special incidents in your day to day work with
by Regional Centers.
consumers.
The regional center may have additional special incident reporting
requirements. Deaths and victim of crime incidents for all
individuals, regardless of where they live, must be reported to
DDS.

Module IV
Slide 3: Why Report Incidents?

What are some of the reasons why incident reporting is Record these on a blackboard, marker board, flip chart,
important?
or blank transparency.
Lets review a few of these reasons. Incident reporting systems:
The reasons may differ from those listed in the script in

the left hand column; however, you should ensure that
Ensure accurate data is available to the region, the state, these are included. Add others on your own if not
and to CMS, the federal agency that monitors Medicaid volunteered by the group.
waiver services
Analyze and trend incident data from both an individual and

systems perspective for monitoring and improvement
To satisfy regulations
To meet our personal & professional responsibility
To provide a healthier and safer environment for everyone

we serve

Module IV
Slide 4: The Incident

Service Coordinators are faced with difficult decisions about how Ask participants how they report or receive reports of
much information should be included on the SIR. There is no special incidents and what information is typically
single, easy answer to this question that fits every situation.
included.
To know the correct answer, it is necessary to look at why the
Description of the Incident is necessary.
Another strategy is to read or display a description of a
The purpose of this section is to objectively report the facts of an

incident in as much detail as necessary to answer a few simple
questions: Who? What? Where? When? In other words, enough
special incident, and:

(a) Have participants state what additional information
they would want to know about what happened, OR
information should be provided to give important clues to the

(b) Have participants tell the person sitting next to them
actual circumstances of the incident.
what they think happened. Ask a few people to share

Some history related to the incident may also be relevant (e.g. this their ideas as an illustration of how different people
is the third time the consumer has fallen at home in the past six interpret the details of the same incident differently.
months). Additional information should be added to the report as
it is obtained by the regional center.
Reopening an SIR and
adding new information as it is received will lead to more fact

based conclusions.

Module IV
Slide 5: The Incident Description

As we have seen, the Special Incident Report should contain This section can be reinforced by having participants
sufficient information to answer the 4 W questions (Who? What?
review sample SIRs and critique how well these reports
When? Where?), but how much information is enough? When is
meet the Thorough-Accurate-Clear guidelines.
it too much?
Information should be included so the Special Incident Report is Another technique is to have participants tell what
thorough, accurate and clear. This means the words should draw information should be included based on an incident you
a mental picture of the circumstances surrounding the incident.
describe.
After reading the Report, everyone should have the same
understanding of what happened.
Grammar and spelling are important if they compromise thorough,
accurate and clear interpretation.
Slide 6: Incident Description TIP
If staff who have limited experience are in the audience,

you can include examples or have an activity requiring
Remembering these "tips" will provide guidance in determining participants to re-write inappropriately worded
what (and how much) information to include when reporting a statements. This activity can be done individually or in
special incident. The emphasis is to be factual. Include facts, as small groups. Sharing results at the end of the activity
you know them, giving the source of your information. Don't "go will allow opportunity for you to provide guidance and
beyond" the facts to make judgments.
feedback.

Module IV
Slide 7: Incident Response

Now that we have discussed the type of information needed to Hand out the Incident Response Checklist.
complete an SIR, let's talk about both the reporting of and
Give participants a few minutes to review it.
responding to special incidents. If you have had previous training
Ask participants to apply the checklist to one of the
on completing the SIR, you know the mechanics already - who
reports what type of incident, to whom do you report, what are incidents used in a previous example to become more
familiar with this tool.
the required time lines, etc.

This Incident Response Checklist gives you a way to help you
work through these steps.
The Incident Response Checklist is
intended for use in almost every situation; hence, many of the

entries say "if appropriate".
Discuss any special requirements of this regional center

concerning steps on the checklist.
It is intended to be a useful tool to help everyone understand the For example, if the participants regional center(s)
expectations of reporting and responding to incidents regardless requires a phone or face-to-face contact between
of your job assignment. Although service coordinators have regional center staff and the consumer, discuss this
responsibility for ensuring that special incidents are entered into when reviewing the "ensure safety" step.
the SIR system, using this checklist will guide conversations
regarding incidents among reporters, service providers, regional

center staff and members of the Risk Management Committee.
Acquiring all relevant information and distilling it into thoroughaccurate-clear incident reports requires skills in observing,
listening, interviewing, and processing a large amount of
information.

Module IV
Slide 8: Why Report Incidents?

In this session, we have reviewed why special incident reporting is This slide reviews previously presented information that
important and some basic information that should be included. can be used as a wrap-up or closure to the training.
Special incident reporting systems are critical to:
You may also include other information that you feel

your audience needs to have reinforced.
Ensure accurate data is available to the region, the state, You may want to include a time for questions following
and to CMS, the federal agency that monitors Medicaid your closing.
waiver services
Analyze and trend incident data from both an individual and

systems perspective for monitoring and improvement
Satisfy regulations
Meet our personal & professional responsibility
Provide a healthier and safer environment for everyone we

serve
Special Incident
Reporting
The Process
IV-4
WHY Report Incidents?
To ensure accurate data is available
To analyze and trend incident data
To meet personal and professional

responsibility
To provide a healthier and safer environment
The Incident
Who
What
Where
When
4
The Incident Description
Thorough
Accurate
Clear
Grammatical
Incident Description
Tips
EXPLAIN HOW INFORMATION
WAS ACQUIRED
Dont write as if you witnessed an incident

(unless you did).
Document what witnesses reported
(occurred/caused).
Dont draw conclusions or make judgments.
6
Incident Response
Insure safety
Notify entities as
required
Check for
completeness
Inquire into
inconsistencies
Document details
Explore causes
Note necessary
additions or
corrections
Track follow-up &
completion
WHY Report Incidents?
To ensure accurate data is available
To analyze and trend incident data
To meet personal and professional

responsibility
To provide a healthier and safer environment
54327.1. Requirements for Special Incident Reporting by Regional Centers.
(a)
The regional center shall submit an initial report to the Department of any special
incident, as defined in Section 54327(b) within two working days following receipt of the
report pursuant to Section 54327(b).
(b)
When a regional center has knowledge of a special incident for which the vendor or longterm health care facility is responsible for reporting but has not submitted a report to the
regional center within the required time period, the regional center shall submit an initial
report to the Department within two working days of learning of the occurrence.
(c)
The initial report shall include the following information, to the extent the
information is available at the time of the initial report:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
The consumer(s) name and date of birth;

The vendor or long-term health care facilitys name, address and telephone
number;
The name and telephone number of the regional center contact person regarding
the special incident;
The consumer(s) Unique Consumer Identifier (UCI);
Name of the consumers conservator or guardian, if applicable;
Date, time and location of the incident;
Date the incident was reported to the regional center;
Name of the person preparing the report;
Date the report was prepared;
Type of incident;
Any medical care or treatment required as a result of the special
incident;
Relationship of the alleged perpetrator to the consumer;
Identification of any persons or entities notified about the incident and the date
they were notified;
A description of the special incident;
If the special incident was a death, indication if the death was disease related;
non-disease related; or, unknown;
IV-5

Module IV
(16)
A description of any actions/outcomes taken by any of the following persons or

entities in response to the special incident:
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
(H)
(I)
(17)
Regional center(s);
Vendor(s);
Department of Health Services Licensing;
Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing;
Child Protective Services;
Adult Protective Services;
Long Term Care Ombudsman;
Law enforcement; and/or
Coroner.
Any additional information the regional center determines is necessary to

explain or describe the special incident.
(c)
Any required information that is not submitted with the initial report in (b) shall be
submitted within 30 working days following receipt of the report of the special
incident pursuant to Section 54327(b).
(d)
The regional center shall comply with all Department requests for initial and follow-up
information pertaining to a special incident.
(e)
The report shall be considered complete when the regional center has submitted all the
information required by this section.
(f)
Effective January 1, 2002, all reports of special incidents prepared by the

regional center shall be transmitted to the Department utilizing the Departments
Electronic Data Reporting System.
Authority: Section 11152, Government Code. Reference: Sections 4434, 4500, 4501, 4502,
4629, 4648, 4648.1 and 4742, Welfare and Institutions Code.
IV-5-a
ARTICLE 2. VENDORIZATION PROCESS

54327.
Requirements for Special Incident Reporting by Vendors and Long-Term

Health Care Facilities.
(a)
Parent vendors, and consumers vendored to provide services to themselves, are exempt
from the special incident reporting requirements set forth in this Article.
(b)
All vendors and long-term health care facilities shall report to the regional center:
(1)
The following special incidents if they occurred during the time the consumer was
receiving services and supports from any vendor or long-term health care facility:
(A)
The consumer is missing and the vendor or long-term health care facility
has filed a missing persons report with a law enforcement agency;
(B)
Reasonably suspected abuse/exploitation including:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
(C)
Reasonably suspected neglect including failure to:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
(D)
Physical;
Sexual;
Fiduciary;
Emotional/mental; or
Physical and/or chemical restraint.
Provide medical care for physical and mental health needs;

Prevent malnutrition or dehydration;
Protect from health and safety hazards;
Assist in personal hygiene or the provision of food, clothing or
shelter; or
Exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would
exercise in the position of having the care and custody of an elder
or a dependent adult.
A serious injury/accident including:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Lacerations requiring sutures or staples;

Puncture wounds requiring medical treatment beyond first
aid;
Fractures;
Dislocations;
Bites that break the skin and require medical treatment
beyond first aid;
Internal bleeding requiring medical treatment beyond first aid;
Any medication errors;
IV-6

Module IV
8.
9.
(E)
Any unplanned or unscheduled hospitalization due to the following

conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
(2)
Medication reactions that require medical treatment beyond first

aid; or
Burns that require medical treatment beyond first aid.
Respiratory illness, including but not limited, to asthma;

tuberculosis; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
Seizure-related;
Cardiac-related, including but not limited to, congestive heart
failure; hypertension; and angina;
Internal infections, including but not limited to, ear, nose and
throat; gastrointestinal; kidney; dental; pelvic; or urinary tract;
Diabetes, including diabetes-related complications
Wound/skin care, including but not limited to, cellulitis and
decubitus;
Nutritional deficiencies, including but not limited to, anemia
and dehydration; or
Involuntary psychiatric admission;
The following special incidents regardless of when or where they

occurred:
(A)
(B)
The death of any consumer, regardless of cause;

The consumer is the victim of a crime including the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Robbery, including theft using a firearm, knife, or cutting

instrument or other dangerous weapons or methods which
force or threaten a victim;
Aggravated assault, including a physical attack on a victim using
hands, fist, feet or a firearm, knife or cutting instrument or other
dangerous weapon;
Larceny, including the unlawful taking, carrying, leading, or
riding away of property, except for motor vehicles, from the
possession or constructive possession of another person;
Burglary, including forcible entry; unlawful non-forcible entry;
and attempted forcible entry of a structure to commit a felony or
theft therein;
Rape, including rape and attempts to commit rape.
(c)
The report pursuant to subsection (b) shall be submitted to the regional

center having case management responsibility for the consumer.
(d)
When the regional center with case management responsibility is not the vendoring
regional center, the vendor or long-term health care facility shall submit the report

Module IV
pursuant to subsection (b) to both the regional center having case management responsibility and
the vendoring regional center.
(e)
The vendor's or long-term health care facility's report to the regional center
pursuant to subsection (b) shall include, but not be limited to:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
The vendor or long-term health care facility's name, address and telephone
number;
The date, time and location of the special incident;
The name(s) and date(s) of birth of the consumer(s) involved in the
special incident;
A description of the special incident;
A description (e.g., age, height, weight, occupation, relationship to
consumer) of the alleged perpetrator(s) of the special incident, if
applicable;
The treatment provided to the consumer(s), if any;
The name(s) and address(es) of any witness(es) to the special incident;
The action(s) taken by the vendor, the consumer or any other
agency(ies) or individual(s) in response to the special incident;
The law enforcement, licensing, protective services and/or other
agencies or individuals notified of the special incident or involved in the special
incident; and
The family member(s), if applicable, and/or the consumer's authorized
representative, if applicable, who have been contacted and informed of the special
incident.
(f)
The report pursuant to subsection (b) shall be submitted to the regional center by
telephone, electronic mail or FAX immediately, but not more than 24 hours after learning
of the occurrence of the special incident.
(g)
The vendor or long-term health care facility shall submit a written report of the special
incident to the regional center within 48 hours after the occurrence of the special incident,
unless a written report was otherwise provided pursuant to subsection (e). The report
pursuant to this subsection may be made by FAX or electronic mail.
(h)
When a vendor makes a report of an event to the Department of Social Services'

Community Care Licensing Division pursuant to Title 22, California Code of
Regulations, Section 80061(b) the vendor shall simultaneously report the event to the
regional center by telephone, FAX or electronic mail.
(1)
(i)
The vendor shall concurrently submit to the regional center a copy of

any subsequent written report regarding the event that is submitted to the
Department of Social Services' Community Care Licensing Division.
When a long-term health care facility reports an unusual occurrence to the Department of
Health Services' Licensing and Certification Division pursuant to Title 22, California

Module IV
Code of Regulations, Sections 72541, 75339, 76551 or 76923, the long-term health care
facility shall simultaneously report the unusual occurrence to the regional center
immediately by telephone, FAX or electronic mail.
(1)
The long-term health care facility shall concurrently submit to the

regional center a copy of any subsequent report, or any written
confirmation of the unusual occurrence, that is submitted to the Department of
Health Services' Licensing and Certification Division.
(j)
The vendor or long-term health care facility may submit to the regional center a copy of
the report submitted to a licensing agency when the report to the licensing agency contains all the
information specified in subsection (d)(1) through (10).
(k)
These regulations shall not remove or change any reporting obligations under the Elder
and Dependent Adult Abuse Reporting Act commencing with Welfare and Institutions
Code Section 15600 or the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act commencing with
Penal Code Section 11164.
Authority: Section 11152, Government Code. Reference: Sections 4500, 4501, 4502, 4648,
4648.1 and 4742, Welfare and Institutions Code.

Module IV

The following steps will assist you to respond when a report of a special incident is received.
The steps on the left are intended to guide you through the process. The strategies on the right
are suggested guidelines for completing each step. Not all strategies will be applicable in every
situation. Code Strategies as follows: Y = Yes, N = No, NA = Not Applicable.
Response Steps
Insure the safety of
the consumer
Strategies
___
___
___
___
Notify legally required

entities (as
appropriate)
Check for
completeness of
information
Inquire into
inconsistencies
Document details
(NOTE: If reportable
incident, the SIR must
be transmitted to DDS
within 48 hours.)
Explore causes of the
incident
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
Note necessary
___
additions or
corrections to the SIR
T rack SIR for followup and completion
___
___
Is the consumer safe now?

Is medical treatment being provided? Needed?
Are further risks evident (fire or safety hazard, lack of adequate
food or shelter, broken equipment, etc.)?
What interim measures have been taken to protect the consumer? Other
consumers?
CCL
___
APS
CPS
___
Family/Guardian/Conservator
Police
___
LTC Ombudsman
DHS Licensing
Coroner
Have the who, what, when, and where questions been answered?
Is the type of incident reported consistent with the information and
circumstances reported?
What may have contributed to the incident?
What aspects of the incident need to be further explored?
Are there unanswered questions about this incident?
When there are multiple reporters, are conflicts evident among reporters
(e.g., family, consumer, direct service provider) from the various incident
descriptions?
What additional information is needed to clarify these conflicts?
Has the SIR been completed?
Has a preventative action plan been developed, if needed?
Have all why questions been answered?

Has the consumer had other incidents?
Should others be involved in analyzing this incident (e.g., nurse, PT,
Behavior Analyst)?
Have significant changes in the persons life been explored?
Have some preventative actions already been implemented?
What is the status of preventative action?
Has long-range planning been conducted to eliminate or minimize risk to
this individual or others?
Are any updates needed to the SIR?
Do you have a tracking system for ensuring follow-up actions are

completed on time?
How will effectiveness of preventative actions be determined? When? By
Whom? Who will monitor implementation?
IV-7

Causal Analysis
Module V
Causal Analysis
Module V
Instructors Guide
Length of Session:
1 to 1.5 hours
Intended Audience:
Regional center staff and vendored service providers
Class Size:
Training Materials:
Handout: Preventative Action Checklist

Causal Analysis
Methods:

Course Outline
I.
II.
Analysis of Contributing Causes
III.
Development of Preventative Action
IV.
Summary and Closing
V-1

Causal Analysis
Module V
Causal Analysis
Module V
Learning Objectives
1. Understand the definition of causal analysis.
2. Understand how incident reporting influences causal analysis and the
development of preventative action plans.
3. Complete a sample causal analysis of an incident.
4. Integrate information from the causal analysis into preventative action
strategies.
5. Develop effective follow-up plans.
V-2

Causal Analysis
Module V
Causal Analysis
Slide 1: Causal Analysis
Start the Power Point Presentation (or overhead

transparencies and projector). Have the "Causal
The purpose of this training is to learn a new way to determine
Analysis" title page running as you open the
what preventative actions should be taken after an incident presentation.

occurs. Causal analysis has become common practice in industries
that address major disasters, such as aerospace, nuclear power, If participants have not received training in incident
and transportation.
Causal analysis has been applied to the reporting, spend a few minutes on the importance of
discovery of why certain catastrophes occurred.
These include providing thorough and accurate information in
airplane crashes, nuclear power plant leaks, unplanned power reporting the incident.
outages, train derailments, and the like.
Root Cause Analysis is a standardized way to review and analyze a
situation to determine WHY an incident occurred. Causal analysis
is determining the most basic cause or causes of an incident.
During this session, we will review causal analysis and apply this
method to the development of effective preventative action plans.

Causal Analysis
Module V

We know from our work in services for people with developmental In this example, you want to make the point that most
disabilities that rarely, if ever, does any one thing cause an incidents have more than one cause, and that at times,
incident to occur.
Generally, incidents occur because of a those causes are inter-related.
combination of different factors. It is this unique combination of List on a flip chart all the possible causes volunteered by
factors that results in an accident, illness, or injury. Think about participants. These may include: Mary was dizzy when
causal analysis as "peeling an onion" to reveal all contributing she stood up due to blood pressure problems, Mary has
causes to an incident.
In order to develop appropriate an ear infection that affected her balance, Mary's
preventative action that will lessen the likelihood of the incident roommate had spilled something on the floor, the
overnight staff moved Mary's shoes and she tripped, etc.
recurring, contributing causes need to be examined.

Lets talk about a situation that may appear to be straight forward,
but very well could be caused by many different things.
This
example involves Mary, a woman in her late 60s who fell when
she got out of bed this morning.
What are some possible causes for Marys fall?

Causal Analysis
Module V
Slide 3: Purposes of Causal Analysis

The difference between causal analysis and special incident
reporting is that, in causal analysis, we want to learn more about
an incident than just the facts that surround it. We want to do
more than simply report an incident. In causal analysis, our goal
is to learn from the incident. We want to learn why the incident
occurred and then minimize the possibility of it happening
again.
Are any of you aware of an incident that, within a short time, List these examples on a flip chart you can refer to
reoccurred with the person or happened to another person in a
during later discussions of preventative action.
similar situation?
Examples may include falls in the same location of the
Causal analysis is a way to be proactive when an incident occurs.
day program, choking on food that was not prepared
When we are reactive, we simply react to what has happened: according to texture modification requirements, being
We report the incident to the appropriate people and complete the injured repeatedly by a house mate who has assaultive
necessary paper work.
behavior, etc.
When we are proactive, we still report and document, but we also

learn from what has occurred.
With a proactive approach, we
consider how the same incident could happen to this person

again or how the same situation may negatively affect other
people.

Causal Analysis
Module V

Slide 4: Traditional or Cause Analysis
Another way to understand causal analysis is to look at a
traditional approach to an incident compared to a causal analysis
approach. Typically in the traditional approach, we want to know
what happened, who caused it, and what will happen to them.
With the causal approach, we may still address those things, but
we don't stop there. We ask "Why" the incident happened, what
contributed to the incident happening, and how could it have been
prevented.
Remember: most incidents do not have only one cause. Usually
several things, all working together, contribute to an incident.
The traditional approach is concerned with individual blame. The
causal approach, on the other hand, is more concerned with
problems in the system, such as:
Poorly designed policies
Procedures not carried out
Supplies not available
Lack of training or supervision

Causal Analysis
Module V
Slide 4 (continued)
The causal approach admits that sometimes people are put into
situations where mistakes are likely to be made. Changing the
person will not prevent recurrence without changing the situation
or the factors that contributed to a human error occurring in the
first place.
Slide 5: A 12 Step Process
This slide outlines causal analysis as a 12-step process.
For Steps 1-3, you need to get the appropriate people

together, review the facts, and determine the primary or most
obvious cause. The appropriate people would be those who
have first hand knowledge of the incident, or who know the
consumer well.
Steps 4-6 involve brainstorming possible causes, remembering

that with brainstorming, no idea is wrong or too far-fetched.
This will lead to identifying barriers and common factors that
contributed to the incident.
Steps 7-12 are then used to complete the analysis. Questions

regarding all common factors need to be asked and answered.
To do this, you will have to ask WHY over and over again.
Don't settle for a single answer until "the onion is completely
peeled" and you have arrived at the most basic, or root cause,
of the incident.
This slide will remain displayed during the review of the

process and the application of the example with Maria
and Sue that follows.

Causal Analysis
Module V
Slide 5 (continued)
After the causal analysis is complete, preventative actions can be
developed, leadership support can be obtained, and the plan can
be implemented, and then monitored for effectiveness.
Lets apply these steps to a situation involving a consumer named Lead the group, step by step with questions regarding
Maria and a staff member named Sue.
the scenario of Maria being injured.

When the primary cause is mentioned, (e.g., Maria was
One evening while Sue was helping Maria take a bath, Sue left the left unsupervised in the bathroom), ask "WHY?" to
bathroom briefly to get a towel. When she returned, Maria was encourage participants to go deeper into the situation.
lying on the floor bleeding from a large cut on her head.
For example: Maria was unsupervised because Sue did

not get the towel first. WHY? Because Sue was
distracted and did not prepare completely. WHY?
Because there was another emergency going on at the
same time. WHY? Because Sue was going to help
Maria bathe while another staff person was on break.
WHY? Continue until the most basic cause can be
determined along with various contributing factors.

Causal Analysis
Module V
Slide 6: Possible Common Factors

These Common elements are factors that typically contribute to Following the review of this slide, it will be important for
special incidents. To complete a causal analysis and determine
participants to practice reviewing an incident to arrive at
the contributing factors, each of these should be considered.
causal factors.
Staff: Available staff, tenure, training, competency level, and

experience.
A way to do this is to have them review an incident,

either individually or in groups. The above incident on
Consumer: Medical status, functional ability, cognitive level, Maria can be used, as well as an incident volunteered by
behavior, physical ability, needs, and preferences.
one of the participants.
Communication: Communication systems between

consumer, family, providers, staff, shifts, supervisors,
disciplines, information, and availability.
Equipment: Needed, available, working, and in need of

adaptation.
One way to structure this activity is to have each of the

factors listed on a sheet of paper and have the
participants list what about that factor "caused" or
contributed to this event.
Policies: Policies in place, known, followed, and effective.
Environment: Life Safety Code violations, cold/hot, noise

level, distractions, light/dark, modified, and distractions.
It is important to point out that discussing common
Leadership: Supervision, training, oversight, and

organizational support for a culture that focuses on health and
safety.
do not have all the facts and that they have to go back
factors may result in the participants realizing that they

to fact finding.

Causal Analysis
Module V
Slide 7: Advantages of Cause Analysis

Causal analysis provides a standard way to review incidents. It is
cost effective as it uses information that is already available and
helps eliminate difficult or costly reactions to incidents that may
not effectively minimize the possibility of the incident recurring.
Learning from the incident through causal analysis is a way to
prevent partial or incomplete solutions.
Now that we have determined the cause(s) of the incident, we can
begin to decide what an appropriate follow-up plan would be.
Slide 8: Preventative Action
Preventative action is the ability of the system to ensure
appropriate actions are taken following an incident. Effective
preventative action plans apply corrective actions to the areas of
concern found in the causal analysis. Preventative action plans
should be developed with a specific goal in mind: what is the
intended outcome or result of this preventative action and how
will it prevent recurrence?
Effective preventative action plans identify responsible parties,
timelines, and methods for measuring results. Just as completing
a causal analysis takes more than one person, development of
preventative actions will take more than one person.

Causal Analysis
Module V
Slide 8 (continued)
All relevant people, including the provider and service coordinator,
should collaboratively develop action plans.
responsibility
for
implementation
and
All parties share
oversight
so
that
preventative actions minimize the likelihood of recurrence.

Slide 9: Preventative Action Checklist
Distribute the Preventative Action Checklist. Give

participants a few minutes to review it and ask
When developing preventative action plans, there are several questions on individual steps. Have participants apply
things you should ask. The Preventative Action checklist will give the checklist to a recent incident with which they are
you guidance on this task.
This checklist is intended to be familiar. You may also use this opportunity to note any
something you can use for almost every incident; therefore, special requirements of this regional center regarding
everything on it will not apply in every situation.
A few preventative action planning.
fundamental questions, however, apply.
Does the action to be taken address the cause of the incident?
Is the action to be taken within the control of the responsible

person?
Are the necessary resources available?
If the preventative action is effectively implemented, can it

minimize recurrence of the incident?

Causal Analysis
Module V

Causal analysis is an integral part of the risk management process.
It provides direction to planning for preventative actions and
focuses on the outcomes that will reduce the likelihood of
incidents reoccurring.
10
Causal
Analysis
V-4
Causal Analysis
The most basic reason(s)
for an undesirable
condition or problem
Purposes of Cause Analysis

Ensure Accurate Reporting
Learn from the Incident
Minimize Possibility of Recurrence
Traditional or Cause Analysis

Traditional Approach
n What happened?
n Who was
responsible?
n What are we going
to do to them?
Cause Analysis
n WHY did it happen?
n What factors
contributed?
n Were barriers
present?
n How could it have
been prevented?
A 12 Step Process
1) Involve appropriate
people
2) Review facts
3) Determine primary
cause
4) Brainstorm potential
contributing factors
5) Identify barriers
6) Check common
factors
7) Complete analysis
8) Ask WHY questions
9) Determine
contributing causes
10) Develop
preventative action
11) Obtain leadership
support
12) Monitor results
Possible Common Factors

n
Staff
Equipment
Consumers
Policies
Communication
Systems
Environment
Leadership
6
Advantages of Cause Analysis

n
Standardized process
More complete analysis
Increased likelihood of improvement

oriented conclusions
Greater buy-in from participants

7
Preventative Action
n
Identifies situations where corrective

actions are needed
Ensures appropriate actions are taken
Provides method to evaluate

effectiveness
8

Does the action address the cause of the
incident?
n Is the action within the control of the
responsible person?
n Are needed resources available?
n If the preventative action is implemented,
could it prevent the incident from
happening again?
n
Causal Analysis
n
Contributes to the Risk Management

Process
Gives direction to preventative action
Focuses on outcomes
10
Causal
Analysis
V-4
Causal Analysis
The most basic reason(s)
for an undesirable
condition or problem
Purposes of Cause Analysis

Ensure Accurate Reporting
Learn from the Incident
Minimize Possibility of Recurrence
Traditional or Cause Analysis

Traditional Approach
n What happened?
n Who was
responsible?
n What are we going
to do to them?
Cause Analysis
n WHY did it happen?
n What factors
contributed?
n Were barriers
present?
n How could it have
been prevented?
A 12 Step Process
1) Involve appropriate
people
2) Review facts
3) Determine primary
cause
4) Brainstorm potential
contributing factors
5) Identify barriers
6) Check common
factors
7) Complete analysis
8) Ask WHY questions
9) Determine
contributing causes
10) Develop
preventative action
11) Obtain leadership
support
12) Monitor results
Possible Common Factors

n
Staff
Equipment
Consumers
Policies
Communication
Systems
Environment
Leadership
6
Advantages of Cause Analysis

n
Standardized process
More complete analysis
Increased likelihood of improvement

oriented conclusions
Greater buy-in from participants

7
Preventative Action
n
Identifies situations where corrective

actions are needed
Ensures appropriate actions are taken
Provides method to evaluate

effectiveness
8

Does the action address the cause of the
incident?
n Is the action within the control of the
responsible person?
n Are needed resources available?
n If the preventative action is implemented,
could it prevent the incident from
happening again?
n
Causal Analysis
n
Contributes to the Risk Management

Process
Gives direction to preventative action
Focuses on outcomes
10

Causal Analysis
Module V

The following steps will assist you to develop preventative actions in response to a report of a special incident. The
steps on the left are intended to guide you through the process. The strategies on the right are suggested guidelines
for completing each step. Not all steps will apply to every situation. Strategies should be coded as follows:
Y = Yes N = No NA = Not Applicable
Steps
Does the action address the cause of
the incident?
Have prior data and documentation
been analyzed to determine any
possible contributing factors?
Does the preventative action plan

include specific actions?
Are the preventative actions doable?
Can it be monitored?
If the preventative actions are
implemented, can they prevent the
incident recurring?
Strategies
___ Have all who, what, when, and where questions been answered?
___ Does the incident description adequately depict what happened?
___ Could the incident occur again?
___ Is more than one explanation possible for what happened?
___ Has there been a record review?
___ Have there been documented skills deterioration, sleep disturbances,
changes in eating habits, or changes in medication?
___ Have there been changes in events, stressors, and/or noise levels?
___ Has the person been a victim of abuse or neglect?
___ Can you identify any related patterns (employees, place, times of day,
setting conditions, other consumers, etc.)?
___ Have environmental issues been identified and corrected?
___ Is it measurable?
___ Are timelines for preventative action included?
___ Does the preventative action plan include the responsible person(s) and
actions needed to be taken?
___ Are noted actions within the control of the service coordinator, regional
center, and/or provider?
___ Are necessary resources available?
___ Does the responsible person have the authority to implement prescribed
actions?
___ Is there a clear and objective system in place to monitor the
implementation and effectiveness of the preventative action plan?
___ Have past preventative actions been effective in reducing risk?
___ Have all elements of previous preventative action plans been
implemented?
If the incident was linked to a medical

issue, is medical or clinical
assessment or follow-up needed?
___ Was it completed?

___ Was it documented?
If the incident involves a behavioral

issue, does the person(s) involved
have a behavior plan?
___ If no, is one needed?

___ If yes, has it been reviewed to determine its continued effectiveness?
___ Was it implemented effectively?
If the incident involved an

environmental factor, was it rectified?
___ Was the action implemented and documented?
If the incident was linked to a

programmatic issue, has the person
responsible for the training program
been notified and involved?
___ Has the program been reviewed and revised as necessary?

___ Are any revisions documented?
V-5

Causal Analysis
Module V

Mortality Review
Module VI
Mortality Review
Module VI
Instructors Guide
Length of Session:
1 to 1.5 hours
Intended Audience:
Regional center staff; Mortality Review Committee Members;

Members of the regional centers Risk Management, Assessment,
and Planning committee; health care providers
Class Size:
Training Materials:

Mortality Review
Methods:

Course Outline
I.
II.
Introduction to Mortality Review
III.
Designing Mortality Review Systems
IV.
Potential Pitfalls
V.
Summary and Closing
VI-1

Mortality Review
Module VI
Mortality Review
Module VI
Learning Objectives
1. Describe the Mortality Review process.
2. Identify reasons for completing mortality reviews.
3. Describe the basic elements of a mortality review system.
4. Identify potential limitations of mortality review systems.
VI-2

Mortality Review
Module VI
Mortality Review
Slide 1: Mortality Review
Start the Power Point presentation or display the title

overhead transparency.
The goal of mortality review is to learn from a persons death, to

discover if the same or similar situations may affect others in the Ask participants to identify actions typically taken at
future, and to improve overall quality of care. Assessing this regional center following a death.
incompetence, intentional injury or violation of rights, rules, or
regulations is not the intended goal of mortality review. These Ask participants to identify how their regional center
issues,
if
present,
are
generally
addressed
through
other could benefit from looking at deaths as an opportunity

to improve services.
administrative means.
Deaths, regardless of where or when they occur, must be reported
as Special Incidents.
In addition, regional centers have an
obligation to develop and implement a process for reviewing

medical records and coroner reports, as appropriate, associated
with special incidents to ensure that appropriate medical attention
was sought and/or given" (Title 17, Article 2, 54327.2, (b) (5). This
must be covered in the regional centers Risk Management and
Mitigation Plan.

Mortality Review
Module VI
Slide 2: Benefits of Mortality Review

In a mortality review system, factual information is reviewed to
determine ways to improve the quality of future services. Benefits
of mortality review systems include:
Improved monitoring of quality of care
Development of a mortality database
Improved timeliness of documentation and reporting
Increased attention to quality across all service areas
Enhanced ability to respond to external inquiry/scrutiny

(licensing, media, etc.)
Slide 3: Organizational Support

There are specific organizational factors that support the mortality
review process. Foremost is an organizational culture supportive of
risk reduction and safety.
When this culture is present, the Ask participants how their organization is (or could
organization utilizes mortality review as a preventative process. be) supportive of the mortality review process (for
Additionally, a cross-disciplinary, collaborative team approach is example, policies in place, an active mortality review
necessary to integrate knowledge, experience with the persons committee, training for committee members,
circumstances, and different areas of expertise.
documentation requirements, etc.)

Mortality Review
Module VI

Slide 4: Purposes of Mortality Review
Mortality Reviews should be conducted to:
Determine if there are any red flag areas that need immediate
resolution.
Determine contributing factors of the circumstances surrounding

the individuals death.
Identify patterns or trends of concern (areas needing system

support).
Determine whether changes are needed to prevent similar

circumstances affecting other consumers.
Propose care and treatment recommendations, if appropriate.
Slide 5: Designing the Mortality Review System

When designing a mortality review system, some fundamental
questions need to be asked:
Why conduct mortality reviews?
How are mortality reviews conducted?
When are mortality reviews conducted?
Who will be involved?

Mortality Review
Module VI

Slide 6: Why Conduct a Mortality Review?

If participants are involved in the mortality review
process currently, have them discuss this intended
The outcome of the review should be a determination of areas outcome and why or why not their process is
where, in retrospect, support for the consumer could have been
improved. The committee should pool ideas of recommendations
for future changes in the service system.
Changes may include such activities as follow-up training for
provider and/or regional center staff; training and information
dissemination to hospitals, physicians, other care providers; and
organizational changes within the provider or regional center.
Recommended organizational changes might vary from revising
communication systems among providers to establishing a task
force charged with increasing the availability of specific services.
If the committee identifies a significant issue that requires
immediate attention for the health and safety of other consumers,
a committee member should be charged with ensuring that the
situation is rectified as soon as possible.
successful in meeting it.

Mortality Review
Module VI
Slide 7: How are Mortality Reviews Conducted?
Ask participants currently involved in mortality reviews

to discuss their procedures. You might ask for
Several methods may be used to complete the review process. It is strategies they think work well in their system or for
suggested that, prior to the meeting, each committee member
areas they think could be enhanced.
reviews the facts surrounding the events to be reviewed.
A thorough review should be made of the case history, medical
records, and facts surrounding the incident/illness leading to the
death, treatment plans, and other relevant records.
In addition to medical and nursing issues, residential supports, day
services, healthcare utilization, special incidents, and individual
planning efforts during the life of the consumer should be reviewed to
identify instances where supports might have been better provided.
The review should consider information available throughout the life of
the consumer but should focus on the previous twelve months to
identify:
trends in planning;
use of resources;
deviations from normal health status; and,
limitations or failures of support.

Mortality Review
Module VI
Slide 7 (continued)
All aspects of the review should be discussed during the committee
meeting.
If the committee determines that further information is needed, a
request should be made to obtain these records and a subsequent
review is scheduled.
The objective is to examine the impact of all supports on the person's
life, not to second-guess the provision of medical and nursing care or
to provide a second-opinion of the cause of death.
The committee should summarize its findings by identifying areas of
concern and making recommendations for any needed follow-up.

Mortality Review
Module VI
Slide 8: When are Mortality Reviews Conducted?

Regional centers review all deaths. Consideration should be given
to the information on the special incident report (SIR) that would
prompt a mortality review.
Suggested "triggers" include the following:
High percentage of deaths of unknown origin
Lack of preventative health care
Lack of emergency health care services
Lack of availability of routine health services
Unexpected deaths with one or more of the following

conditions:
gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal obstruction,
aspiration pneumonitis, malnutrition, decubitus ulcers, cervical

cancer, melanoma, diabetic ketoacidosis, tardive akathisia,
tardive dyskinesia, or neuroleptic malignant syndrome
All injury-related deaths

Mortality Review
Module VI
Slide 9: Who Will Be Involved?

When designing a mortality review process, it is important to
determine who should be involved in the review process.
Generally, a committee composed of a clinical staff person such as
a physician or nurse, or both, completes a mortality review. Some
committees include other members who are specifically charged
with addressing program planning issues, social issues and
relationships, environmental issues, etc.
It is also recommended that representatives of the regional center Ask participants who serves on their committee, if
management team such as a service coordination supervisor and committees are currently being used in their
quality assurance supervisor be included.
A regional center may choose to form a mortality review committee
as a sub-committee of the Risk Management, Assessment and
Planning Committee. The mortality review committee should meet
on a routine basis (e.g., once monthly, twice monthly) depending
on the number of cases to be reviewed.
organization.

Mortality Review
Module VI
Slide 10: Information Dissemination
Ask participants what happens to the findings from

these reviews. If mortality reviews are not used, have
Following the review process, recommendations for improvement participants list those who should receive, or could
should be compiled and shared across the entire system. Regional benefit, from this information. Lead a discussion on
centers will need to consider methods of information dissemination, how sharing could be done without compromising
paying particular attention to confidentiality issues related to the confidentiality. Possible solutions could be to: share
decedents and their families, vendors, and others involved in the aggregate results to supervisors such as the number
persons care and treatment.
of reviews completed, number and type of

recommendations, information available for review,
etc.; making aggregate data (altered for
confidentiality) available for review by appropriate
parties; composing fictitious accounts based on actual
reviews that could be used for training.
Slide 11: Potential Challenges

What are some problems typically found when completing mortality
reviews?
There may not be sufficient information available to conduct a

satisfactory review or arrive at definitive conclusions.
Regional centers may not be notified of a death in a timely

manner.

Mortality Review
Module VI
Autopsies may not be conducted or reports may not be

available, even in situations where the cause of death is
unclear.
Death certificates, if available, may list a cause of death that is

not included as a diagnosis in pre-mortem records.
Despite these possible variables, the process of mortality review

can still serve as an enhancement to the delivery of services and
supports.
Slide 12: Mortality Review
A structured mortality review process is a way to analyze mortality
statistics, monitor sentinel health events, and provide qualitative
review of individual events. A structured mortality review process
results in system-wide quality enhancement.
10
Mortality Review
VI-4
Benefits of Mortality Review
improved monitoring of quality of care
development of a mortality database
improved timeliness of documentation and reporting
increased attention to quality across all services
enhanced ability to respond to outside inquiry

(licensing, media, etc.)
Organizational Support
n Culture
n Cross-disciplinary
approach
team
3
Purposes of Mortality Review

n
To determine red flags
To determine contributing factors of the circumstances

surrounding the individuals death
To identify patterns or trends
To prevent similar occurrences
To determine whether changes are needed
To make care and treatment recommendations

4
Designing the
Mortality Review System
n
Why Conduct Mortality Reviews?
How Are Mortality Reviews Conducted?
When Are Mortality Reviews Conducted?
Who Will Be Involved?
Why Conduct a Mortality

Review?
n Outcomes
n Recommendations
How?
n
Collect Information
Review Life of Consumer
Identify Issues and Concerns
Propose Recommendations
7
When are Mortality Reviews

Conducted?
Triggers from Special Incident Reports
Who?
n
Clinical Staff
Members of Management Team
Sub-Committee of Risk Management,

Assessment and Planning Committee
Information Dissemination
n
Recommendations Shared
Confidentiality Ensured
10
Potential Challenges
n
Sufficient information available
Timely notification
Autopsies not conducted
Death certification information

11
Mortality
Review
System-Wide
Quality Enhancement

Risk Management For Training Materials PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Risk Management For Training Materials PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Risk Management For Training Materials PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of conducting mortality reviews?

What is the purpose of conducting mortality reviews?

What information is typically collected during the mortality review process?

What information is typically collected during the mortality review process?

Risk

Risk Management Training Manual

Risk Management Training Manual

Risk Management Training Manual

Module V: Causal Analysis

Risk Management Training Manual

Principles of Risk Management

Each training module is divided into the following sections:

Options for Using the Material in this Manual

Risk Management Training Manual

Principles of Risk Management

Regional center staff and vendored service providers

Limited only by room capacity

Principles of Risk Management

Power Point presentation (or transparencies):

Lecture; instructor guided discussion; interactive

Welcome and Introductions

Principles of Risk Management

Elements of Effective Risk Management

Risk Management Training Manual

Principles of Risk Management

Risk Management Training Manual

Principles of Risk Management

Suggestions for Instructor

Risk Management is a term given to a set of practices that lead

Ask the group what risk means to them. What are

to minimizing possible harm to individuals.

some common risks of everyday life for all of us?

individuals are persons with developmental disabilities who receive

Use some common examples such as driving in

a helmet or walking alone in unfamiliar

elements that should be present in an effective risk management

Risk Management Training Manual

Script for Instructor

Suggestions for Instructor

Slide 1: Prevention of Serious Incidents is The Highest

Start the Power Point or Overhead Projector

If it is possible, we want to anticipate what risks may exist and

Survey the group for examples. The following is

prevent them from happening.

one example that you may use to begin the

Can you think of an example? These examples illustrate

ensure that the food in the refrigerator is safe

interventions for risk factors that could be reasonably anticipated or

before anyone grabs a snack and risks food-borne

identified and prevented.

This is the best possible risk management.

Risk Management Training Manual

Script for Instructor

Suggestions for Instructor

It is very effective to have participants use

examples from their own environments. Provide

Continuous Communication, Accurate Reporting,

Consistent Analysis of Information, and Development of

Risk Management Training Manual