Operant Conditioning
Operant Conditioning
Operant Conditioning
B.F.Skinner was very much influenced by Watson’s behaviourist ideas. However, he also realised that the psychology
proposed by Watson had some serious shortcomings. In particular, a psychology based wholly on classical conditioning
assumes that organisms are essentially passive – they just hang around waiting for stimuli to respond to. To Skinner it
seemed obvious that people and animals actively engage with their environments. Skinner’s important insight was that
an animal’s – or a person’s – behaviour was determined by the consequences of its past behaviour.
Operant Conditioning
Skinner called learning from consequences ‘operant conditioning’ because it is based on how organisms operate on their
environment. Essentially, Skinners theory is that the likelihood of future behaviour is determined by the consequences of
past behaviour. In common with Watson, Skinner did not think it necessary to speculate on what went on in people’s
minds. He believed that the environment and behaviour were all that was necessary to an understanding of psychology.
So how do the consequences of behaviour affect future behaviour? In Skinner’s terms, three things can happen. If a
behaviour has no consequence, then the likelihood of that behaviour being repeated in future does not change.
However, if a behaviour brings about a consequence that the organism finds pleasant, then they behaviour is likely to be
repeated in future. For example, suppose we take a rat and in its cage we put a lever it can press. The lever is rigged
up to a mechanism that dispenses food, so when the rat presses the lever it gets a bit of rat-food.
Sooner or later, the rat will press the lever by accident. When this happens, some food will appear. The rat may or may
not connect the appearance of the food with the pressing of the lever, but after a few similar occurrences it will. It will
then start pressing the lever in order to obtain food. So the presentation of food has acted as a positive reinforcement
for the behaviour of lever pressing.
Punishment
Suppose we now play a dirty trick on the rat. We change the mechanism so that when it presses the lever, instead of
receiving a food pellet it is given an electric shock to its paw. Very quickly, the rat will stop pressing the lever. The
electric shock has acted as a punishment which had the effect of weakening then extinguishing the lever pressing
behaviour.
Negative Reinforcement
Now we get really cruel. We set up the cage so that the floor can be electrified and alter the mechanism so that the lever
now switches off the current. Once we electrify the floor of the cage the rat will start bouncing about and will probably
accidentally hit the lever. This will turn off the electric current. We then repeat the experiment. Eventually, the rat will
learn to press the lever immediately the current is turned on. We have re-established and strengthened the lever
pressing behaviour, so we must have been reinforcing it. However, this was not a positive reinforcement, as we were not
rewarding the rat with something it liked. Rather, we were reinforcing it by taking away something it didn’t like. This is an
example of negative reinforcement.