Case Study: The Federal Reserve Bank 3. Conclusion References
Case Study: The Federal Reserve Bank 3. Conclusion References
1. Introduction
3. Conclusion
References:
!
"
Federal Reserve Bank wanted to see as to how well Max operated in an initial
application group, prior to releasing it for the whole entity and for that a questionnaire
was made and given to persons who were hands on with the system for more than six
months. Planning, tracking and reviewing which are the three elements for Max were
rated on a scale of 1 to 7 with 1 being not at all and 7 being to a large extent, by
seventy six participants.
þ
&
Even-though the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City is on the verge of starting the
application of new performance management system but the outcomes are very
positive from the preliminary survey of customers. It appears that the initial phases of
the process are operating quite well, specifically the participants have the opinion that
the latest system enables them to ally their personal performance aims with that of the
bank¶s objectives. Further such configuration must aid the bank¶s endeavor to apply a
cultural change and define the consumer oriented characteristics needed for triumph
in the new atmosphere.
Although majority of the system is working well, additional regions can gain from
further development endeavors. Supervisors can enhance their ability to give well
timed and important response with regards to their immediate subordinates
performance, as believed by the participants. Furthermore the participants will prefer
greater supervisory participation in their individual development endeavors. The
performance management system can be much more useful with further supervisor
support and enhanced growth openings and policies. Max as a partner is aiding the
Federal Reserve Bank which is very much on the path of applying a cultural change,
to make sure its success through offering a constant framework by way of which the
bank can drive its client oriented approach.
' $
1.Ê Bisoux, T. (2004). Man, one business. Biz Ed, 3(4), 18-25.
2.Ê Nankervis, A.R. , & Compton, R. (2006). Performance Management: Theory
in practice? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44, 83-101.
3.Ê Thomas, S. L., & Bretz, R.D. (1994). Research and practice in performance
appraisal: Evaluating employee performance in America¶s largest companies.
SAM Advanced Management Journal, 59 (2), 28-34.
4.Ê Peters, T. (1987). The new masters of excellence. Niles, IL: Nightingale
Conant Corp.