Catena: A. Latapie, B. Camenen, S. Rodrigues, A. Paquier, J.P. Bouchard, F. Moatar
Catena: A. Latapie, B. Camenen, S. Rodrigues, A. Paquier, J.P. Bouchard, F. Moatar
Catena: A. Latapie, B. Camenen, S. Rodrigues, A. Paquier, J.P. Bouchard, F. Moatar
Catena
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/catena
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 20 September 2013
Received in revised form 25 April 2014
Accepted 27 April 2014
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Morphological evolution
Hydraulic model
Reach delineation
Gravel mining
Middle Loire River
a b s t r a c t
This paper describes an approach to assess channel changes of a long anthropogenised river (the Middle Loire
River) over decadal timescales. Channel changes are evaluated along geomorphically homogeneous river
reaches. The classic geomorphic parameters (active channel width, bed slope, grain size) are complemented
with parameters extracted from a 1D hydraulic model: widthdepth ratio, effective bed shear stress and specic
stream power calculated for the biennial discharge assimilated to bankfull ow conditions. The delineation of
reaches is undertaken by combining visual inspection with the implementation of simple statistical tests to
corroborate discontinuities in ow and sediment transport. The 450 km long study area has been divided into
167 homogeneous reaches. The general trends observed over the last fty years are narrowing of the active channel
width and incision of the river bed. However, changes in bed level and active channel width are not consistently
correlated. Channel changes at the reach scale are mainly controlled by the presence of former sediment extraction
sites. Signicant incision is observed at the peak of the in-stream sediment mining period. This was followed by
channel recovery when extractions stopped. The 1D numerical model provides a more rigorous manner to derive
hydraulic parameters. The effective bed shear stress made dimensionless by its critical value and the width
depth ratio helps to explain observed channel responses more effectively by relating patterns to geological units
along the Middle Loire.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Natural alluvial channels adjust their slope and shape in response to
water and/or sediment inputs, whether as a consequence of climate
change or anthropogenic inuences. Since channel changes can have
detrimental effects on ood extent, groundwater recharge and the
stability of infrastructure and ecology (Bravard et al., 1999), better understanding of channel adjustments is crucial to predict future evolution
and thus adapt river management strategies.
As river managers are working to understand and/or reverse channel
changes, geomorphic reach scale assessments are being developed to
support restoration interventions (e.g. Brierley and Fryirs, 2005;
Kellerhals et al., 1976; Montgomery and Bufngton, 1997; Rinaldi et al.,
2013; Rosgen, 1994). These approaches tend to perform poorly on
anthropogenised reaches as human inuences such as channel embankments and gravel extraction have signicantly altered some of the basic
variables that go into most classication schemes.
Often, designation of reach boundaries can be subjective and difcult
to reproduce (Miller and Ritter, 1996; Simon et al., 2007). In order to
improve the detection of threshold conditions along the river continuum,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.017
0341-8162/ 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
oods happened, but on a smaller scale. Dams built at the upstream end
of the catchment have only impacted upon the 1996, 2003 and 2008
oods.
At Gien, located 564 km downstream from source, ood events with
a return period of 2 years correspond to a discharge of 1600 m3/s. Fig. 2b
examines the ood frequency and magnitudes of ow recorded at Gien
between 1936 and 2011. The data were compiled from peak annual
discharges with a threshold of 1600 m3/s. Floods above 2700 m3/s
(equivalent to an event with a ten year return period) have been relatively rare throughout the period (5 occurrences).
la Mayenne
PARIS
e
rth
la
Sa
la Maine
MONTJEAN
SUR
LOIRE
(PK897)
ORLEANS
(PK635)
ir
le Lo
TOURS
(PK755)
SAUMUR
(PK823)
Loire
GIEN
(PK564)
LYON
BLOIS
(PK696)
l'Indr
e
la Creuse
le
Ch
er
NEVERS
(PK445)
la
Lo
ire
l'A
llie
r
la Vienne
Key
Dams
Power plants
Main cities
50
100 km
(b)
1200
1000
800
drier
600
wetter
400
200
0
200
400
1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
(a)
1400
3200
3000
2800
Q10
2600
2400
Q5
2200
2000
1800
1600
1935
1945
1955
1965
1975
1985
1995
2005
Time (year)
Time (year)
Fig. 2. (a) Cumulative departure from the mean annual discharge for the period 18632011 at Blois gauging station, (b) Annual maximum daily discharge above Q2 (Q2 = 1 600 m3/s) for
the period 19362011 at Gien gauging station.
The valley of the Middle Loire River is naturally large, 3.5 km wide on
average. Lateral migration of the channel did not occur over the last
centuries because of anthropogenic inuences.
2.3. Anthropogenic inuences
The Loire River has been intensively modied over the last centuries.
Flood embankments were constructed between the 13th and 18th
century and have been raised following ood events (Dion, 1961). The
Middle Loire River is now constricted along 300 km of its length. Flood
embankments have conned the ow and prevented lateral migration
of the channel. Oblique groynes were erected in the 19th century to
maintain a single channel, to ensure sufcient depth conditions during
the low ow season and thus facilitate navigation in the main channel.
These structures have caused the deepening of the main channel as
intended but sediments have accumulated behind them, inducing the
development of vegetation, closing secondary channels and thus reducing
ood conveyance (Rodrigues et al., 2006).
The construction of bridges also inuences the river by conning the
ow and stabilizing the river bed: from 30 bridges in 1850, 50 bridges
can now be found on the Middle Loire. The presence of old bridge
piers also induces some ow disruption. As energy needs grew during
the 20th century, three dams were constructed at the upstream end of
180
b1
0.44 m/km
b2
160
0.41 m/km
b4
0.18 m/km
140
120
100
80
60
40
UNIT 1:
20 JURASSIC
LIMESTONES
0
450
500
UNIT 2:
TERTIARY FORMATION
(sand, clay and limestones)
550
600
650
700
UNIT 3:
CRETACEOUS
CHALKS
750
800
the catchment, along with four nuclear power stations in the Middle
Loire (Fig. 1).
Sand and gravel extraction in the main channel started in an industrialized manner at the beginning of the 1950s. Dambre and Malaval
(1993) reported that nearly 83 106 m3 of sediment was extracted between 1949 and 1992 (i.e., about 2 106 m3/year in average). Given
that the mean annual total sediment transport (i.e., bedload and
suspended load) in the Loire River was estimated at 405,000 m3 for
the period 19531968 (Berthois, 1971), the sediment extraction rate
was higher than the replenishment rate. Extractions in the main channel
were signicantly reduced following a ministerial recommendation in
1981 before being formally prohibited in 1995. The decision to reduce
mining in the main channel was also dictated by the collapse of the
Wilson's Bridge in Tours in 1978, due to the scouring of a pier. Changes
in agricultural and human uses of the river banks should also be noted.
Islands and river banks used to be maintained as pasture lands
(Gautier et al., 2000). As this practice stopped, the vegetation developed,
affecting the connection of secondary channels at low ow and sediment
transport.
Since the end of granular extractions, local remedial actions have
been undertaken: protecting the toe of embankments, increasing ow
capacity by cutting down vegetation in secondary channels, removing
oblique groynes to restore ow conveyance etc. (Belleudy, 2000).
850
900
The regional environment agency (DREAL Centre) regularly monitored two hundred sites to record water levels at low and high ows
since 1978. Aerial photographs taken during low ow conditions are
available for 1955, 1984, 1995, 2002 and 2010. A topographic survey
of the Middle Loire River was undertaken in 1995. Cross sections,
surveyed every 2 km on average, cover the main channel and can be
completed with oodplain data extracted from Lidar data collected in
2003. These data have allowed the determination of geomorphic characteristics and the construction of a hydraulic model.
3.2. Geomorphic parameters
3.2.1. Active channel width and change in river bed level
The longitudinal pattern of the active channel width was dened
using aerial photographs. The active channel width B corresponds to
the non-vegetated river width and thus includes secondary channels
and sand bars frequently altered during ood events. The channel active
widths were measured on the 2002 and 2010 aerial photographs every
500 m in a GIS environment. This distance is consistent with the size of
the macroforms and complements previous studies undertaken by
Ginestet (1999) on the older photography dataset (1955, 1984, 1995).
The oodplain width Bf was extracted from the 2003 Lidar data. The resolution of the aerial photographs used to determine the active channel
width is relatively good but we cannot exclude distortion effects for
measurements away from the central photograph area. In particular,
the digitalization of river banks is challenging in areas covered by vegetation. The error is estimated at a maximum of 25 m for the dataset,
that is an error of about 7%.
Changes in river bed levels were calculated by assimilating the low
water prole to the bed prole. Comparisons were made for low
water levels recorded at similar discharges (19781986, 19861995,
19952002 and 20032011). These data were also used to estimate
the river bed slope. Errors associated with low water level measurements are estimated to be in the range of 3 cm.
3.2.2. Median grain size
The river bed material median grain size d50 was determined for all
granulometric sample analysis available in the main channel between
1970 and 2008 provided by the DREAL Centre. Despite the uncertainties
associated with the denition of a single river bed material grain size,
due to transverse variability in grain size between the main channel,
sand bars and islands (Babonaux, 1970), a grain diameter was associated
to variations in the longitudinal gradient so as to relate changes in median
grain size with changes in stream power and in shear stress (Fig. 4). The
sediments available on the Middle Loire originated mainly from the
upstream Loire, locally enriched by int from sedimentary formations
of the Parisian Basin. A downstream ning exponential law in the form
of the Sternberg (1875) formulation was adopted:
d50 d50x0 expax
with d50 as the river bed material median grain size at a distance x
from upstream, d 50(x = 0) is the river bed material median grain
size measured upstream (d50(x = 0) = 4.4 mm) and a is a coefcient
(a = 4.65 10 6 m 1 in our case). As observed in Fig. 4, there is a
signicant scatter and a general lack of data. The proposed downstream variation of the grain size is thus imprecise. Valverde et al.
(2013) made a recent extensive survey on the main channel grain
Cher
102
Vienne
Maine
gRh S
K
Kg
!3=2
103
QS
W
10
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
where the energy slope S and the width W are computed for the
assumed bankfull discharge, i.e., Qbf = Q2.
3.4. Delineation of homogeneous reaches along the uvial continuum
The delineation of reaches along the uvial continuum generally
consists in a visual distinction of changes (Orr et al., 2008). A rst
division of the river into homogeneous geomorphic reaches was conducted in two steps (Latapie et al., 2009):
4. Results
4.1. Reach denition
The rst delineation based on a visual detection of discontinuities on
low water long prole and aerial photographs differentiated 167
reaches with length ranging from 250 m to 4750 m and an average
length of 2500 m. Due to the presence of numerous structures in the
cities of Orlans and Tours, all singularities were not accounted for in
Table 1
Number of discontinuities identied on the geomorphic and hydraulic parameters and on temporal lateral and vertical changes with the Data Over Threshold test (noted DOT in the table)
and the Pettitt's test.
Hydraulic parameters (Q2)
Geomorphic parameters
B
Date
Nb. values
DOT
Pettitt
Bf
1955
1984
1995
347
20
370
20
343
17
2002
2010
2003
339
21
311
24
366
56
eff
W/D
265
106
41
107
1995
1827
858
655
70
748
72
Temporal changes
B
Date
Nb. values
DOT
Pettitt
5584
z
8495
9502
0210
121
13
76
9
858
177
13
95
5
7886
86
34
70
8695
145
74
62
9502
145
62
53
0311
184
70
47
(a)
(b)
600
8
6
4
500
B / t (m/year)
1955
2010
550
450
400
350
2
0
2
4
6
300
8
250
200
450
10
12
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
5584
8495
9502
0210
B / t (m/year)
10
Type 1
Type 2
Type 3
Type 4
5
0
5
10
15
B / t (m/year)
10
5
0
5
10
15
7886
9502
8695
7886
0311
9502
8695
0311
Fig. 6. Rate of change in active channel width for reaches presenting different boundaries (see legend of Fig. 5 for explanation of box-plots).
prevented the upstream migration of bed degradation and the consequent dynamic response in the uvial system. In the absence of bedrock
outcrops, the observed adjustments may reect a time lag between the
disturbance and the channel response (Knighton, 1998). Finally, the
drier hydrological period observed after 1984 might have enhanced
vegetation development and hence contributed to the stabilization of
in channel bars and a reduction in active channel width.
5. Use of a 1D model to assess channel changes
As the instream sediment mining period cannot be directly associated
to systematic adjustments of channel properties (narrowing and deepening), the hydraulic parameters are considered to assess whether the
broad-scale adjustments to river morphology vary in relation to different
combinations of widthdepth ratio (e.g. Doll et al., 2002).
5.1. Longitudinal evolution of hydraulic parameters
The implementation of a 1D hydraulic model to calculate parameters
provides major advantages: multiple modelling scenarios can be envisaged and the derivation is more rigorous; in particular, the specic
stream power is generally calculated using the energy slope S assimilated
to the bed (or low water) slope Sb (Bernot et al., 1996; Nanson and
Knighton, 1996). This assumption can be discussed as the slope should
be estimated for the bankfull discharge. Based on the results of the 1D
model for the biennial discharge, we found 0.17 b SQ2/Sb b 19. Signicant
scatter reects the presence of articial and natural singularities, which
have a high inuence at low to intermediate discharges (such as Q2).
The hydraulic parameters obtained for the biennial discharge, Q2,
which may be assimilated to the bankfull discharge, are reported in
Fig. 9. Q2 is nearly constant for the rst 300 km of the Middle Loire before being affected by the main tributaries which double the discharge
(Fig. 9a).
The widthdepth ratio computed for Q2 varies between 57 and 421.
It is higher in the upstream and downstream part of the studied area
where multiple channels predominate (Fig. 9b). As the mean water
depth does not vary signicantly from the upstream to the downstream
Type 1
Type 2
Type 3
Type 4
x 10
S / t (m/year)
6
4
2
0
2
4
6
8
8
x 10
S / t (m/year)
6
4
2
0
2
4
6
8
7886
9502
8695
7886
0311
9502
8695
0311
Fig. 7. Rate of change in reach-averaged slope for reaches presenting different boundaries (see legend of Fig. 5 for explanation of box-plots).
75
Type 1
Type 2
Type 3
Type 4
z / t (mm/year)
50
25
0
25
50
75
100
125
75
z / t (mm/year)
50
25
0
25
50
75
100
125
7886
9502
8695
7886
0311
9502
8695
0311
Fig. 8. Rate of change in bed level for reaches presenting different boundaries (see legend of Fig. 5 for explanation of box-plots).
(b)
(a)
500
3500
450
350
W/Dratio
Discharge Q2 in m3/s
400
3000
2500
300
250
200
150
2000
100
50
1500
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
0
450
900
500
550
600
45
40
35
6
5
4
10
5
650
850
900
850
900
20
15
600
800
25
550
750
30
500
700
(d)
50
(W/m2)
eff (N/m2)
(c)
10
0
450
650
700
750
800
850
900
0
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
Fig. 9. Longitudinal variation of (a) modeled bankfull discharge (Qbf Q2), (b) widthdepth ratio, (c) effective bed shear stress (cr in plain line), (d) specic stream power (cr in plain
line). The vertical dotted lines delineate the four geological units.
5.2. Interest of the effective bed shear stress and widthdepth ratio
The effective bed shear stress made dimensionless by its critical
value for inception of transport and the widthdepth ratio computed
for the biennial discharge is presented in Fig. 10. These two parameters
allow a clear distinction between the four geological units. For units 1
and 4, the large W/D values are directly connected to the presence of
10
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
model
9
8
7
6
eff / cr
part of the Middle Loire River (from DQ2 3 m to DQ2 4 m), it appears logical that the W/D ratio behaves similarly to the active channel
width B W Q 2 =B1:5 . In geological unit 1, W/D decreases as the Middle
Loire changes from a multiple channel system to a single (constrained)
channel. In the middle part of the studied area (geological unit 2), the
widthdepth ratio is nearly constant and W/D 100. In geological
units 3 and 4, W/D increases simultaneously with discharge and the
presence of multiple channels. A larger dispersion is observed in the
downstream part of the model (second part of unit 3 and unit 4). This
is mainly due to the presence of multiple channels; the difference in
water levels between the two channels cannot be rigorously integrated
in our model inducing a larger dispersion in the hydraulic results.
The calculated effective bed shear stress eff is within the range of 0.9
to 8.2 N/m2 (Fig. 9c). In terms of sediment transport magnitude, the
results may be affected by the high entrainment threshold. The increasing
eff in unit 1 indicates a potential for erosion. A maximum is observed for
eff at a distance of 550 km from source. This forms the boundary
between unit 1 and unit 2. Finally, the decreasing eff in units 2, 3 and 4
indicates a potential for sediment deposition.
The calculated specic stream power is within the range of 4 to
47 W/m2. Downstream patterns of change in are highly correlated
to downstream changes in channel slope and width. The general trend
of the curve is directly the opposite of the widthdepth ratio plot. As
observed by Knighton (1999), a maximum of specic stream power is
evident, in this instance 650 km from source. Then, decreases to
values of less than 10 (except at conuences where a slight increase is
noticed). Channel changes have often been associated with specic
stream power (e.g. Bledsoe et al., 2002; Brookes, 1987; Orr et al., 2008).
Since threshold values are specic to a catchment, the analysis of downstream changes in stream power should be considered as an indicator of
zones of potential sediment transport. Large changes in stream power
from one reach to the next are generally associated to erosion (increase
of ) or sediment accumulation (decrease of ), whereas high values
alone are not necessary indicative of changes (Reinfelds et al., 2004;
Vocal-Ferencevic and Ashmore, 2012). It should be noted that, based on
the Strickler (1923) concept, we can derive 1.5, which explains the
similar behaviour of and albeit the larger dispersion in the specic
stream power.
To be more accurate in characterizing the potential sediment transport, the bed shear stress or specic stream power was compared to its
critical value for inception of sediment transport. The critical bed shear
stress (cr) was obtained from the Shields curve based on the grain size
estimates. The critical specic stream power (cr) was estimated using
the development of Bagnold (1980). As the river bed median grain size
decreases (from d50 4 mm to d50 0.6 mm), the critical bed shear
stress decreases from cr = 36 to 0.3 N/m2; and the critical specic
stream power from cr = 15 to 0.4 W/m2 (see plain line in Fig. 9(c)
and (d), respectively). Despite uncertainties in the estimation of the
critical bed shear stress and specic stream power, not only due to
some sensitivity to the slope (Camenen, 2012) but also because of the
scatter in the grain size measurements, Fig. 9(c) and (d) indicates that
critical values are generally exceeded all along the river. Results indicate
that sediment transport occurs at ows lower than the biennial discharge, which is consistent with measurements and analysis realized
around the site of Brhmont (776 km from source; see Claude et al.,
2012). This behaviour is typical in sandgravel bed rivers where sediment transport is inuenced not only by ood events but also by
lower discharges occurring over a longer period.
5
4
3
2
1
0
100
200
300
400
500
W/D
Fig. 10. Effective bed shear stress made dimensionless by its critical value for inception of
transport versus the widthdepth ratio computed for Q2.
multiple channels and islands. Since d50 is larger in unit 1 than in unit
4, eff/cr differs in those two units.
Unit 1: The eff/cr ratio is relatively small (eff/cr 1.5) and slightly
decreases with the W/D ratio (80 b W/D b 280).
Unit 2: The eff/cr ratio is intermediate (2 b eff/cr b 6.5) but
decreases rapidly with the W/D ratio (60 b W/D b 130).
Unit 3: The eff/cr ratio is relatively high (3 b eff/cr b 7.5), increasing
with the W/D ratio (70 b W/D b 330).
Unit 4: The eff/cr ratio is high (5 b eff/cr b 9) and slightly decreases
with the W/D ratio (120 b W/D b 420).
Using a continuous t for each parameter (eff, D, and W) in a similar
way as for the median grain size (Eq. (1)), it is possible to obtain a curve
for the eff/cr W/D relationship that is function of the longitudinal
distance (solid line in Fig. 10). It appears from this analysis that the hydraulic and geomorphic parameters allows the distinction of different
trends of channel response but the latter changes need to be associated
with human disturbance (in particular instream sediment mining).
Fig. 11 illustrates the rate of change in river bed level considering the
effective shear stress made dimensionless by its critical value and the
widthdepth ratio for the periods 19861995 and 19952002 (where
1995 is the year corresponding to the cross section data used to construct the hydraulic model and ofcial termination of instream mining).
Different trends can be distinguished for the two periods. Between 1984
and 1995, the rate of change in bed level decreases as the ratio /cr
increases. During the following period (19952002), the contrary is
observed (i.e., the rate of change in bed level increases as the ratio /cr
decreases). The widthdepth ratio equally illustrates different behaviours
for the two periods but with larger dispersion. Those trends indicate river
recovery since extraction stopped (Fryirs and Brierley, 2000).
6. Impact of sediment mining upon channel changes
Instream mining has directly altered the channel geometry and bed
elevation in the Middle Loire. One hundred and two ofcial sites have
been identied from archive data between Nevers and Saumur (located
respectively 445 km and 823 km downstream from source, Fig. 1).
Unfortunately, the amount of sediment extracted is not always quantied in the historical database. Based on the data available, we distinguished reaches with low average annual extraction rate (i.e., less
than 1000 T/year) from reaches with moderate extraction rate (i.e.,
less than 100,000 T/year) and intensive extraction rate (i.e., more than
100,000 T/year). The annual rate of change in bed level considering
10
100
19861995
19861995
19952002
19952002
z / t (mm/year)
50
50
100
z / t (mm/year)
100
50
50
100
eff / cr
10
100
200
300
400
500
W/D
Fig. 11. Rate of change in bed level related to the effective bed shear stress made dimensionless by its critical value and to the widthdepth ratio (legend for the distinction of the four
geological units is the same as for Fig. 10).
100
z / t (mm/year)
50
50
100
150
E1 E2 E3
E1 E2 E3
E1 E2 E3
E1 E2 E3
19781986
19861995
19952002
20032011
Fig. 12. Annual changes in bed level considering the amount of sediment extracted per
reach (E1: low extraction rate, E2: moderate extraction rate and E3: high extraction
rate; same explanation for each box as in Fig. 5).
11
Table 2
Comparison between the volume of sediment annually extracted (Vex) and the calculated volume of deposition or erosion (Vd/e) for ve reaches located by their distance from source (in km).
Distance from source
502.65
536.29
625.35
705.81
748.28
19962002
20032011
19781984
Vd/e (104 m3)
19841996
Vd/e (104 m3)
11.5
78.6
13.4
15.1
15.8
9.4
9.2
3.6
2.9
0.4
2.8
0.5
4.8
4.3
6.1
6.1
0.03
0.6
1.6
2.8
8.2
0.4
0.6
0.5
0.4
14.6
0.02
4.8
3.8
5.6
to the construction of the nuclear power plant has had a larger inuence
on the channel response than extractions. It is assumed that as records of
low water levels are not evenly distributed, gravel pits could be located in
between two measures, leading to an underestimation of changes in bed
levels at the reach scale. Another explanation could be that the degradation is very localized and calculated volumes at the reach scale are incorrectly spread over the whole length of the reach.
The three other reaches presented in Table 2 present an expected
behaviour indicating the inuence of extractions. Signicant erosion is
observed during the extraction period before the reach starts its recovery
at the end of the mining period (1995).
7. Conclusion
An understanding of channel response over recent decades is a prerequisite for assessing recovery potential and predicting how a reach
may respond to future disturbance (Fryirs and Brierley, 2000). Customary
analyses using longitudinal proles show salient features and spatial
interrelationships. These are enhanced by reach determinations,
which enable spatial distributions to be appraised for reach by reach
comparison.
The general trends observed on the Middle Loire River over the last
50 years are a narrowing of the active channel width and an incision of
the river bed (Gasowski, 1994). This has led to adjustments of island
widths (Dtrich et al., 2010) and secondary channels (Rodrigues
et al., 2006). These adjustments are similar to those reported on other
European rivers affected by human disturbances (Bravard et al., 1997;
Surian and Rinaldi, 2003). Changes in channel pattern have not
occurred on the Middle Loire River as it is highly constricted by ood
embankments. However lateral adjustments associated to bank erosion
occurred in the last 50 years. This lateral stability (i.e., no change in
channel pattern) differs from changes observed on the Upper Loire
River, upstream of the conuence with the Allier River, which is not
conned (Leteinturier et al., 2000).
The reach scale approach implemented on the Middle Loire River
complements observed longitudinal variation of geomorphic characteristics. Statistical tests corroborate the location of clear discontinuities
and so reach denitions. Given the Water Framework Directive context,
this approach could inform decision makers about further localized
studies to support decisions to take to achieve good conditions. Results
show that channel changes at the reach scale are largely inuenced by the
presence of former extraction sites. Sediment mining caused signicant
erosion but the river bed has been restored since gravel mining stopped
in the 1990s. Several reaches that were in severe erosion are now in
aggradation. Fryirs et al. (2009) refer to this as a response gradient. On
the other hand, the channel response for the active width appears slower
since no clear indication of recovery was observed.
Hydraulic parameters derived from a 1-D hydraulic model allow a
more precise denition of parameters, supporting modelling scenarios.
The effective bed shear stress made dimensionless by its critical value
for inception of transport eff/cr and the widthdepth ratio W/D computed for the biennial discharge help in the understanding of channel
responses. Although a 1D hydraulic model requires a signicant amount
of topographic and hydrologic data, it provides several additional indicators such as eff/cr and W/D for different discharges. With the
12
Camenen, B., 2012. Discussion of understanding the inuence of slope on the threshold
of coarse grain motion: revisiting critical stream power by C. Parker, N.J. Clifford, and
C.R. Thorne. Geomorphology 139140, 3438.
Champion, M., Maillard, P., Cario, P., 1971. Les alluvions de la Loire dans la rgion Centre.
Inventaire de la production et des gisements (The Loire alluvium in the region Centre.
Inventory of production and deposit sites). Technical Report, Bulletin de Liaison des
Laboratoires des Ponts et Chausses (in French).
Clark, J.S., Rizzo, D.M., Watzin, M.C., Hession, W.C., 2008. Spatial distribution and geomorphic condition of sh habitat in streams: an analysis using hydraulic modelling and
geostatistics. River Res. Appl. 24, 885899.
Claude, N., Rodrigues, S., Bustillo, V., Brhret, J.-G., Macaire, J.-J., Jug, P., 2012. Estimating
bedload transport in a large sand-gravel bed river from direct sampling, dune tracking and empirical formulas. Geomorphology 179, 4057.
Clment, P., Pigay, H., 2003. Statistics and uvial geomorphology. In: Kondolf, G.M.,
Pigay, H. (Eds.), Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology. Wiley. & Sons, Chichester, UK,
pp. 597630.
Dacharry, M., 1996. Les grandes crues historiques de la Loire (Historical ood events of
the Loire River). La Houille Blanche 6 (7), 4753 (in French).
Dambre, J.-L., Malaval, P., 1993. Evaluation des conditions de poursuite de la politique de
limitation des extractions de matriaux dans le lit de la Loire du Bec d'Allier Nantes
(Evaluating the conditions to pursue gravel extractions in the Loire River main channel
between the conuence with the Allier River and Nantes). Technical report, Loire
Estuaire, nantes, France (in French).
Debrand-Passard, S., Macaire, J.-J., Clozier, L., Fleury, R., 1998. Particularits de l'volution
du systme solognot dans le bassin de la Loire au Quaternaire. corrlations possibles
(Particularities in the evolution of the Sologne system in the Loire bassin). Gol. Fr. 2,
5568 (in French).
Dtrich, S., Rodrigues, S., Macaire, J.-J., Bont, P., Brhret, J.-B., Bakyono, J.-P., Jug, P.,
2010. Caesium-137 in sandy sediments of the River Loire (France): assessment of
an alluvial island evolving over the last 50 years. Geomorphology 115 (12), 1122.
Dion, R., 1961. Etude des leves de la Loire. The Loire River's dykes, Flammarion, Paris,
France (in French).
Doll, B.A., Wise-Frederick, D.E., Buckner, C.M., Wilkerson, S.D., Harman, W.A., Smith, R.E.,
Spooner, J., 2002. Hydraulic geometry relationships for urban streams throughout
the Piedmont of North Carolina. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 38, 641651.
Donsimoni, M., Berthier, H., Martin, J.C., Nachbaur, A., 2008. Dtermination de la prsence
de karsts sous les leves domaniales du bassin de la Loire et rduction du risque
d'effondrement de la digue li la prsence de ces conduits souterrains naturels
(Tranche 1: analyse gologique et hydrogologique) (Determination of the presence
of karsts underneath the state-owned ood embankments of the Loire catchment
and reduction of the risk of collapse of the embankment associated with the presence
of those natural underground features (phase 1: geologic and hydrogeologic analysis)).
Technical Report, BRGM (in French).
Duband, H., 1996. La gense des crues dans le bassin de la Loire (Genesis of ood events in
the Loire catchment area). La Houille Blanche 67, 5462 (in French).
El Kadi Abderrezzak, K., Paquier, A., 2009. One-dimensional numerical modeling of sediment transport and bed deformation in open channels. Water Resour. Res. 45
(W05404) (20 pp.).
Frings, R.M., Kleinhans, M.G., 2008. Complex variations in sediment transport at three
large river bifurcations during discharge waves in the river Rhine. Sedimentology
55, 11451171.
Fryirs, K., Brierley, G.J., 2000. A geomorphic approach to identication of river recovery
potential. Phys. Geogr. 21, 244277.
Fryirs, K., Spink, A., Brierley, G.J., 2009. Post-European settlement response gradients of
river sensitivity and recovery across the upper Hunter catchment, Australia. Earth
Surf. Process. Landf. 34, 897918.
Gasowski, Z., 1994. L'enfoncement du lit de la Loire (The entrenchment of the Loire's river
bed). Gocarrefour 69, 4145 (in French).
Gautier, E., Pigay, H., Bertaina, P., 2000. A methodological approach of uvial dynamics
oriented towards hydrosystem management: case study of the Loire and Allier rivers.
Geodin. Acta 1, 2943.
Ginestet, P., 1999. Sectorisation gomorphologique de la Loire entre le Bec d'Allier et
Monjean sur Loire (Geomorphic sectorisation of the Loire River between the conuence with the Allier River and Montjean sur Loire). (59 pp. in French).
Kellerhals, R., Churchand, M., Bray, D.I., 1976. Classication and analysis of river processes.
J. Hydraul. Div. 102, 819829.
Knighton, A.D., 1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective. , Oxford University
Press.
Knighton, A.D., 1999. Downstream variation in stream power. Geomorphology 29 (34),
293306.
Latapie, A., Camenen, B., Paquier, A., Rodrigues, S., Moatar, F., Bouchard, J.-P., 2009.
Morphological evolution of the middle Loire River (France): denition of geomorphic
homogeneous reaches. Proc. 6th IAHR symposium on River, Coastal and Estuarine
Morphodynamics. , vol. 1, pp. 4350 (Santa Fe, Argentina).
Leopold, L.B., Maddock, T., 1953. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and
some physiographic implications. Professional Paper. U. S. Geological Survey.,
252 (57 pp.).
Leteinturier, B., Engels, P., Petit, F., Chiffaut, A., Malaisse, F., 2000. Morphodynamisme d'un
tronon de Loire bourbonnaise depuis le 18me sicle (Changing dynamics of the Loire
River in Burgundy (France) during the last 200 years). Gomorphol. Relief Process.
Environ. 4, 239252 (in French).
Leviandier, T., Alber, A., Le Ber, F., Piegay, H., 2012. Comparison of statistical algorithms for
detecting homogeneous river reaches along a longitudinal continuum. Geomorphology
138, 130144.
Macaire, J.-J., Gay-Ovejero, I., Bacchi, M., Cocirta, C., Patryl, L., Rodrigues, S., 2013. Petrography of alluvial sands as a past and present environmental indicator: case of the
Loire River (France). Int. J. Sediment Res. 28, 285303.
Meyer-Peter, E., Mller, R., 1948. Formulas for bed-load transport. Proc. IInd IAHR Congress. IAHR, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 3964.
Miller, J.R., Ritter, J.B., 1996. An examination of the Rosgen classication of natural rivers.
Catena 27, 295299.
Montgomery, D.R., Bufngton, J.M., 1997. Channel reach morphology in mountain drainage
basins. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 109, 596611.
Nanson, G.C., Knighton, A.D., 1996. Anabranching rivers: their cause, character and classication. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 21, 217239.
Nelhig, P., 2010. Gologie du bassin de la Loire (Geology of the Loire River catchment).
Geosciences 12, 1223.
Orlowski, L.A., Schumm, S.A., Mielke, P.W.J., 1995. Reach classication of the lower
Mississipi River. Geomorphology 14, 221234.
Orr, H.G., Large, A.R.G., Newson, M.D., Walsh, C.L., 2008. A predictive typology for
characterising hydromorphology. Geomorphology 100, 3240.
Parker, C., Clifford, N.I., Thorne, C.R., 2011. Understanding the inuence of slope on the
threshold of coarse grain motion: revisiting critical stream power. Geomorphology
126, 5165.
Pettitt, A., 1979. A non-parametric approach to the change point problem. Appl. Stat. 28,
126135.
Reinfelds, I., Cohen, T., Batten, T., Brierley, G., 2004. Assessment of downstream trends in
channel gradient, total and specic stream power: a GIS approach. Geomorphology
60, 403416.
Rethoret, H., 2001. Etat des connaissances des seuils et points durs en Loire - Campagne de
localisation 2000 entre le Bec d'Allier et Nantes (Inventory of articial and natural
outcroups on the Loire River 2000 Location survey between the conuence with
the Allier River and Nantes). Technical report, Direction Rgionale de l'Environnement
Centre (in French).
Rinaldi, M., 2003. Recent channel adjustments in alluvial rivers of Tuscany, central Italy.
Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 28, 587608.
Rinaldi, M., Surian, N., Comiti, F., Bussettini, M., 2013. A method for the assessment and
analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: the Morphological
Quality Index. Geomorphology 180, 96108.
Rodrigues, S., Brhret, J.G., Macaire, J.J., Moatar, F., Nistoran, D., Jug, P., 2006. Flow and
sediment dynamics in the vegetated secondary channels of an anabranching river:
the Loire River (France). Sediment. Geol. 186, 89109.
Rosgen, D.L., 1994. A classication of natural rivers. Catena 22 (3), 169199.
Simon, A., Doyle, M., Kondolf, M., Shields, F.D.J., Rhoads, B., McPhillips, M., 2007. Critical
evaluation of how the Rosgen classication and associated natural channel design
methods fail to integrate and quantify uvial processes and channel response. J.
Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 43 (5), 11171131.
Soulsby, R.L., Whitehouse, R.J.S.W., 1997. Threshold of sediment motion in coastal environment. Proc. Pacic Coasts and Ports'97 Conf. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 149154.
Sternberg, H., 1875. ber lngen- und querprol geschiebefhrender sse (On the longitudinal and cross-sectional proles of bed-load transporting rivers). Z. Bauwesen
25, 483506 (in German).
Strickler, A., 1923. Beitrge zur frage der geschwindigkeitsformel und der rauhigkeitszahlen
fr strme, kanle und geschlossene leitungen (Contributions to the questions of velocity formulations and roughness values for rivers, canals, and closed ducts). Mitteilung
16, Amt fr Wasserwirtschaft, Bern, Switzerland (in German).
Surian, N., Rinaldi, M., 2003. Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy. Geomorphology 50, 307326.
Valverde, L., Rodrigues, S., Jug, P., Desmet, M., Recking, A., Tal, M., 2013. Variations of
grain size in relation with cross-section dynamics and tributary conuences in a
large sand-gravel bed river: the Loire (France). Proc. 8th International SedNet Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
Vocal-Ferencevic, M.V., Ashmore, P., 2012. Creating and evaluating digital elevation
model-based stream-power map as a stream assessment tool. River Res. Appl. 28,
13941416.
Zilani, L., Surian, N., 2012. Evolutionary trajectory of channel morphology and controlling
factors in a large gravel bed river. Geomorphology 173, 104117.