Potential Use of Proximate and Fatty Acid Composition To Distinguish Between Cultured and Wild Largemouth Bass (Micropterus Salmoides)
Potential Use of Proximate and Fatty Acid Composition To Distinguish Between Cultured and Wild Largemouth Bass (Micropterus Salmoides)
Potential Use of Proximate and Fatty Acid Composition To Distinguish Between Cultured and Wild Largemouth Bass (Micropterus Salmoides)
ae
48
Open Access
Potential Use of Proximate and Fatty Acid Composition to Distinguish Between Cultured and Wild Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides)
Bobban Subhadra1, Rebecca Lochmann2,* and Andrew Goodwin3
1
Fish Health Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Region, Portland, Oregon, USA
Abstract: Cultured largemouth bass (LMB) cannot be sold as food in some lucrative markets due to regulatory restrictions that protect wild LMB. Distinguishing between cultured and wild fish could open food markets for cultured fish.
Wild LMB eat freshwater fish and cultured LMB eat diets high in marine fish meal and oil, which should produce differences in flesh composition. We analyzed the proximate and fatty acid composition of wild and cultured LMB muscle to
determine the potential for distinguishing fish origin analytically. Protein and moisture were higher in wild fish, while
lipid was higher in cultured fish. The n-3 and n-6 fatty acids, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA), and the
ratio of n-3 to n-6 fatty acids all differed between cultured and wild fish. The n-3 to n-6 ratio and n-3 LC-PUFA were
higher in cultured fish, while elevated arachidonic acid (20:4n-6) in wild fish was a key distinguishing feature.
Keywords: Arachidonic acid, Fatty acids, Largemouth bass, Lipid, Proximate, Wild and cultured.
INTRODUCTION
The largemouth bass (LMB)(Micropterus salmoides) is
native to the midwestern and southeastern United States and
northeastern Mexico, and has been introduced throughout the
USA and other countries. This species is economically important as one of the most popular sportfishes in the USA. It
is also valuable as a foodfish sold live in fish markets patronized by Asian customers in major cities in the US and Canada. With the dual importance of maintaining wild populations of LMB and satisfying foodfish markets, state wildlife
managers are concerned that wild LMB will be caught and
sold as cultured foodfish. This would deplete wild stocks, so
many states prohibit the sale of all LMB to protect the sportfishing industry [1]. The development of a test that would
distinguish cultured from wild LMB unambiguously could
provide the basis for regulations that would allow the sale of
cultured LMB while protecting wild populations.
Diets of wild and cultured LMB are distinctive, which
might produce differences in body composition. Fatty acid
composition has been used successfully to distinguish cultured and wild members of other fish species [2-4]. The fatty
acid composition of fish tissues correlates directly with dietary fatty acids [5, 6]. Currently, culture of LMB depends
mostly on salmonid diets that contain high levels of marine
fish meal and oil [7]. These diets contain high concentrations
1874-3315/14
of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 LCPUFA), including eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5n-3), and
docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3). Previous growth
trials with LMB fed a commercial trout diet showed that
LMB retain these LC-PUFA preferentially in the tissues [8].
Freshwater wild fish generally contain higher levels of C-18
fatty acids (such as linolenic acid, 18:3n-3), but also substantial concentrations of EPA and DHA [9-12]. In addition,
freshwater fish are characterized by high proportions of n-6
fatty acids such as linoleic acid (18:2n-6) and arachidonic
acid (20:4n-6) [13]. Freshwater algae, crustaceans, and
aquatic fish larvae are rich in 18:2n-6, 18:3n-3, and 20:5n-3,
although there are considerable differences among species,
seasons, and geographical locations [14-16]. Largemouth
bass have a limited ability to modify dietary fatty acids, and
the fatty acids in the diet are invariably reflected in the fatty
acid profile of the tissues. Therefore, we analyzed the
proximate and fatty acid composition of the muscle of cultured and wild LMB to determine the feasibility of this approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
Seven cultured LMB were obtained live from a producer
who raises fish in outdoor ponds with a commercial diet
similar to those used for trout. The labeled composition of
the diet (Skretting USA, formerly Silvercup, Murray, Utah,
USA) was 45% protein and 20% lipid. Most of the protein
and lipid was from marine fish meal and oil, respectively,
and the majority of largemouth bass producers in the region
(midwestern and southeastern United States) used this diet.
49
Table 1. Hepatosomatic Index (HSI) and Proximate Composition (g/100g) of the Muscle of Cultured and Wild LMBa.
Analyzed composition
Cultured
Wild
HSIb,c
0.78 0.06
0.81 0.07
76.7 0.5**
79.6 0.1*
18.1 0.1**
18.9 0.1*
3.1 0.2*
0.9 0.0**
1.1 0.02
1.1 0.03
Moisture
Protein
Lipidc
Ash
The values are means SEM of 6-7 fish per treatment. A students t-test was performed to compare the difference in the means. Means within rows with different numbers of asterisks (*) are significantly different (P<0.05).
b
Hepatosomatic index (HSI) = Liver weight (g)/ body weight (g) x 100.
c
Wet weight basis.
prey availability varies. In general, wild fish are more susceptible to periods of inadequate energy intake. Therefore,
cultured fish frequently contain a higher concentration of
lipid than wild fish [22-24]. Muscle lipid in wild and cultured red porgy (Pagrus pagrus) was 0.65% and 3.03%, respectively [25], which is comparable to our results. Similarly, muscle lipid in wild and cultured sharpsnout sea bream
(Diplodus puntazzo) was 1.73% and 3.87%, respectively [2].
Fillets of cultured salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), rainbow
trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and channel catfish (Ictalurus
punctatus) are all higher in lipid than their wild counterparts
[26]. Nevertheless, based on our data and the classification
cited by Ackman [27] both cultured and wild LMB can be
considered lean. Moisture and protein in muscle of wild
LMB were higher than those of cultured LMB, but muscle
ash and hepatosomatic index did not differ between treatments (Table 1). The sizes of cultured and wild LMB in this
study were similar, so differences in proximate composition
were most likely due to diet and possibly other environmental factors, but not fish size [28, 29].
Cultured and wild LMB could be distinguished on the
basis of muscle saturates, monounsaturates, total n-3 and n-6
fatty acids, total n-3 LC-PUFA, and the ratio of n-3 to n-6
fatty acids (Table 2). Of the individual fatty acids, arachidonic acid (20:4n-6) was exceptionally high in the wild fish
(12.6 g/ 100g) compared to the cultured fish (2.9 g/ 100g).
Similar results were obtained in red porgy [25] and gilthead
sea bream (Sparus aurata) [3]. Concentrations of 20:4n-6 are
low in cultured fish because practical dietary lipid sources
such as marine fish oils contain small amounts of this fatty
acid [5]. In contrast, the 20:5n-3 was lower in wild bass (1.8
g/ 100g) than in the cultured ones (7.1 g/ 100g). This difference is also attributable to the use of marine fish oils in practical diets, which are rich in 20:5n-3. The natural diets of
wild freshwater fish such as largemouth bass contain more
22:6n-3 than 20:5n-3, since 22:6n-3 is the predominant n-3
LC-PUFA in insects, other invertebrates, and the fish that
consume them [28, 30]. The concentration of DHA did not
differ between wild and cultured fish, which is consistent
with the maintenance of DHA at a physiologically optimal
level regardless of dietary concentrations [31, 32]. Total n-3
fatty acids and n-3 LC-PUFA were higher in cultured than in
wild LMB, which reflects the marine fish meal and oil content of commercial diets typically fed to cultured LMB.
Subhadra et al.
Table 2. Fatty Acid Composition of Muscle (g/100g of total fatty acids by weight) of Cultured and Wild Largemouth Bassa,b.
Fatty Acids
Cultured
Wild
16:0
14.4 (0.2)
15.6 (0.8)
4.0 0.3**
7.8 0.2*
27.3 0.5**
29.7 0.8*
6.8 0.4*
3.9 0.7**
26.9 0.9*
20.1 2.9**
MUFA e
36.7 1.6*
27.5 3.4**
18:2n-6
8.3 0.1*
5.3 0.3**
18:3n-3
1.1 0.1**
3.1 0.3*
20:4n-6
2.9 0.3**
12.7 1.3*
20:5n-3
7.1 0.3*
1.8 0.2**
22:6n-3
15.9 0.6
16.5 1.5
n-6
12.0 0.4**
21.6 2.6*
n-3g
29.1 0.7*
25.1 2.1**
n-3 LC-PUFAh
27.9 0.7*
22.0 2.1**
n-3/n-6 ratio
2.4 0.1*
1.2 0.1**
18:0
Saturates
16:1
18:1
Values are means SEM of 4 fish per treatment. A students t-test was used to compare treatment means. Means within rows followed by different numbers of asterisks (*) were
significantly different (P<0.05).
Fatty acids detected at 0.1 g/ 100g of total fatty acids by weight are not included.
c
Saturates included 14:0, 16:0, 18:0 and 20:0.
d
Total n-9 and n-7 isomers.
e
Monounsaturates included 14:1, 16:1, 18:1 and 20:1.
f
Total n- 6 fatty acids included 18:2n-6, 20:3n-6 and 20:4n-6.
g
Total n-3 fatty acids included 18:3n-3, 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3.
h
Total n-3 LC-PUFA included 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3. The only n-6 LC-PUFA detected was 20:4n-6.
b
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.
[7]
[8]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Aaron Watson and Ben Batten for obtaining
the wild fish, and Nick Kinsey for processing samples and
assisting with laboratory analysis.
[9]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
Cowey CB, Sargent JR. Fish nutrition. Adv Marine Biol 1972; 10:
383-492.
Castell JD. In: Halver JE, Tiews K, Eds. Review of Lipid Requirements of Finfish. Finfish Nutrition and Fishfeed Technology, Berlin, Heenemann 1979; 1: 59-84.
Steffens W. Principles of fish nutrition, West Sussex: Ellis Horwood Ltd, 1989; p. 384.
Steffens W. Effects of variation in essential fatty acids in fish feeds
on nutritive value of fresh water fish or humans. Aquaculture 1997;
151(1-4): 97-119.
Wood BJB. In: Stewart WDP, Ed. Fatty Acids and Saponifiable
Lipids. Algal Physiology and Biochemistry, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1974; 236-65.
Takahashi H, Yamada M. Lipid composition of seven species of
crustacean plankton. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 1976; 42(7): 769-76.
Hanson BJ, Cummins KW, Cargill AS, Lowry RR. Lipid content,
fatty acid composition, and the effect of diet on fats of aquatic insects. Comp Biochem Physiol 1985; 80B(2): 257-276.
AFS. Guidelines for the use of fishes in research. Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society, 2014.
AOAC. Official methods of analysis. Arlington, Virginia: Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1995.
Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley GH. A simple method for the
isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol
Chem 1957; 226(1): 497-509.
Subhadra B, Lochmann R, Rawles S, Chen R. Effect of fish-meal
replacement with poultry by-product meal on the growth, tissue
composition and hematological parameters of largemouth bass
(Micropterus salmoides) fed diets containing different lipids.
Aquaculture 2006; 260(1-4): 221-31.
Morrison WR, Smith LM. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters
and dimethylacetals from lipids with boron fluoride-methonol. J
Lipid Res 1964; 5(4): 600-08.
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
51
Haard NF. Control of chemical composition and food quality attributes of cultured fish. Food Res Int 1992; 25(4): 289-307.
Shearer KD. Factors affecting the proximate composition of cultured fishes with emphasis on salmonids. Aquaculture 1994;
119(1): 63-88.
Serot T, Gandemer G, Demaimay M. Lipid and fatty acid compositions of muscle from farmed and wild adult turbot. Aquacult Int
1998; 6(5): 331-43.
Rueda FM, Lopez JA, Martinez FJ, Zamora S. Fatty acid in muscle
of wild and farmed red porgy, Pagrus pagrus. Aquacult Nutr 1997;
3(3): 161-5.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.
USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release
26
2013;
Nutrient
Data
Laboratory
Home
Page, http://www.ars.usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/ndl
Ackman RG. Seafood lipids and fatty acids. Food Rev Int 1990;
6(4): 617-46.
Henderson RJ, Tocher DR. The lipid composition and biochemistry
of fresh water fish. Prog Lipid Res 1987; 26(4): 281-347.
Martinez FJ, Garcia MP, Canteras M, De Costa J, Zamora S. Effect
of simultaneous variation of weight, density, temperature and O2
concentrations on rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) body
composition. Reprod Nutr Dev 1992; 32: 105-12.
Arts MT, Ackman RG, Holub BJ. Essential fatty acids in aquatic
ecosystems: a crucial link between diet and human health and evolution. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2001; 58: 122-37.
Wu FC, Ting YY, Chen HY. Docasahexanoic acid is superior to
eicosapentanoic acid as the essential fatty acid for growth of grouper, Epinephalus malabaricus. J Nutr 2001; 132: 72-9.
Torstensen BE, Froyland L, Lie O. Replacing dietary fish oil with
increasing levels of rapeseed oil and olive oil-effects on Atlantic
salmon (Salmo salar L) tissue composition and lipoprotein lipid
composition and lipogenic enzyme activities. Aquacult Nutr 2004;
10: 175-92.