Brannon Chap 1
Brannon Chap 1
Brannon Chap 1
Black blue
1
An introduction to
health psychology
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
This chapter examines the background against which health
psychology developed in terms of (1) the traditional
biomedical model of health and illness that emerged in the
nineteenth century, and (2) changes in perspectives of health
and illness over the twentieth century. The chapter highlights
differences between health psychology and the biomedical
model and examines the kinds of questions asked by health
psychologists. Then the possible future of health psychology
in terms of both clinical health psychology and becoming a
professional health psychologist is discussed. Finally, this
chapter outlines the aims of the textbook and describes how
the book is structured.
This chapter covers:
The background to health psychology
What is the biomedical model?
What are the aims of health psychology?
What is the future of health psychology?
How is this book structured?
Page 1
Black blue
Page 2
Black blue
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
come from outside the body, invade the body and cause physical changes within the
body, or originate as internal involuntary physical changes. Such diseases may be
caused by several factors such as chemical imbalances, bacteria, viruses and genetic
predisposition.
I Who is responsible for illness? Because illness is seen as arising from biological changes
beyond their control, individuals are not seen as responsible for their illness. They
are regarded as victims of some external force causing internal changes.
I How should illness be treated? The biomedical model regards treatment in terms of
vaccination, surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, all of which aim to change the
physical state of the body.
I Who is responsible for treatment? The responsibility for treatment rests with the
medical profession.
I What is the relationship between health and illness? Within the biomedical model, health
and illness are seen as qualitatively dierent you are either healthy or ill, there is no
continuum between the two.
I What is the relationship between the mind and the body? According to the biomedical
model of medicine, the mind and body function independently of each other. This
is comparable to a traditional dualistic model of the mindbody split. From this
perspective, the mind is incapable of inuencing physical matter and the mind and
body are dened as separate entities. The mind is seen as abstract and relating to
feelings and thoughts, and the body is seen in terms of physical matter such as skin,
muscles, bones, brain and organs. Changes in the physical matter are regarded as
independent of changes in state of mind.
I What is the role of psychology in health and illness? Within traditional biomedicine,
Page 2
Black blue
Page 3
Black blue
For example, cancer may cause unhappiness but mood is not seen as related to either
the onset or progression of the cancer.
Psychosomatic medicine
The earliest challenge to the biomedical model was psychosomatic medicine. This was
developed at the beginning of the twentieth century in response to Freuds analysis of
the relationship between the mind and physical illness. At the turn of the century, Freud
described a condition called hysterical paralysis, whereby patients presented with
paralysed limbs with no obvious physical cause and in a pattern that did not reect
the organization of nerves. Freud argued that this condition was an indication of the
individuals state of mind and that repressed experiences and feelings were expressed in
terms of a physical problem. This explanation indicated an interaction between mind
and body and suggested that psychological factors may not only be consequences of
illness but may contribute to its cause.
Behavioural health
Behavioural health again challenged the biomedical assumptions of a separation of
mind and body. Behavioural health was described as being concerned with the maintenance of health and prevention of illness in currently healthy individuals through
the use of educational inputs to change behaviour and lifestyle. The role of behaviour
in determining the individuals health status indicates an integration of the mind
and body.
Behavioural medicine
A further discipline that challenged the biomedical model of health was behavioural
medicine, which has been described by Schwartz and Weiss (1977) as being an amalgam
of elements from the behavioural science disciplines (psychology, sociology, health education) and which focuses on health care, treatment and illness prevention. Behavioural
medicine was also described by Pomerleau and Brady (1979) as consisting of methods
derived from the experimental analysis of behaviour, such as behaviour therapy and
behaviour modication, and involved in the evaluation, treatment and prevention
of physical disease or physiological dysfunction (e.g. essential hypertension, addictive
behaviours and obesity). It has also been emphasized that psychological problems such
Page 3
Black blue
Page 4
Black blue
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
as neurosis and psychosis are not within behavioural medicine unless they contribute
to the development of illness. Behavioural medicine therefore included psychology
in the study of health and departed from traditional biomedical views of health by
not only focusing on treatment, but also focusing on prevention and intervention. In
addition, behavioural medicine challenged the traditional separation of the mind and
the body.
Health psychology
Health psychology is probably the most recent development in this process of including
psychology into an understanding of health. It was described by Matarazzo as the
aggregate of the specic educational, scientic and professional contribution of the discipline
of psychology to the promotion and maintenance of health, the promotion and treatment of
illness and related dysfunction.
(Matarazzo 1980: 815)
Health psychology again challenges the mindbody split by suggesting a role for the
mind in both the cause and treatment of illness but diers from psychosomatic medicine,
behavioural health and behavioural medicine in that research within health psychology
is more specic to the discipline of psychology.
Health psychology can be understood in terms of the same questions that were asked
of the biomedical model:
I What causes illness? Health psychology suggests that human beings should be
seen as complex systems and that illness is caused by a multitude of factors and not
by a single causal factor. Health psychology therefore attempts to move away from a
simple linear model of health and claims that illness can be caused by a combination
of biological (e.g. a virus), psychological (e.g. behaviours, beliefs) and social (e.g.
employment) factors. This approach reects the biopsychosocial model of health and
illness, which was developed by Engel (1977, 1980) and is illustrated in Figure 1.1.
The biopsychosocial model represented an attempt to integrate the psychological (the
psycho) and the environmental (the social) into the traditional biomedical (the
bio) model of health as follows: (1) The bio contributing factors included genetics,
viruses, bacteria and structural defects. (2) The psycho aspects of health and illness
were described in terms of cognitions (e.g. expectations of health), emotions (e.g. fear
of treatment), and behaviours (e.g. smoking, diet, exercise or alcohol consumption).
Fig. 1-1 The biopsychosocial model of health and illness (after Engel 1977, 1980)
Page 4
Black blue
Page 5
Black blue
(3) The social aspects of health were described in terms of social norms of behaviour
(e.g. the social norm of smoking or not smoking), pressures to change behaviour (e.g.
peer group expectations, parental pressure), social values on health (e.g. whether
health was regarded as a good or a bad thing), social class and ethnicity.
I Who is responsible for illness? Because illness is regarded as a result of a combination
of factors, the individual is no longer simply seen as a passive victim. For example, the
recognition of a role for behaviour in the cause of illness means that the individual
may be held responsible for their health and illness.
I How should illness be treated? According to health psychology, the whole person should
be treated, not just the physical changes that have taken place. This can take the
form of behaviour change, encouraging changes in beliefs and coping strategies and
compliance with medical recommendations.
I Who is responsible for treatment? Because the whole person is treated, not just their
physical illness, the patient is therefore in part responsible for their treatment. This
may take the form of responsibility to take medication, responsibility to change beliefs
and behaviour. They are not seen as a victim.
I What is the relationship between health and illness? From this perspective, health and
illness are not qualitatively dierent, but exist on a continuum. Rather than being
either healthy or ill, individuals progress along this continuum from healthiness to
illness and back again.
I What is the relationship between the mind and body? The twentieth century has seen a
Page 5
Black blue
Page 6
Black blue
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Page 6
Black blue
Page 7
Black blue
(e) Evaluating the role of psychology in the treatment of illness. For example:
I If psychological factors are important in the cause of illness they may also
have a role in its treatment.
I Changing behaviour and reducing stress could reduce the chances of a further
heart attack.
I Treatment of the psychological consequences of illness may have an impact on
longevity.
2 Health psychology also aims to put theory into practice. This can be implemented by:
(a) Promoting healthy behaviour. For example:
I Understanding the role of behaviour in illness can allow unhealthy behaviours
to be targeted.
I Understanding the beliefs that predict behaviours can allow these beliefs to be
targeted.
I Understanding beliefs can help these beliefs to be changed.
(b) Preventing illness. For example:
I Changing beliefs and behaviour could prevent illness onset.
I Modifying stress could reduce the risk of a heart attack.
I Behavioural interventions during illness (e.g. stopping smoking after a heart
attack) may prevent further illness.
I Training health professionals to improve their communication skills and to
carry out interventions may help to prevent illness.
Page 7
Black blue
Page 8
Black blue
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
health psychology and their application to the health care setting (Johnston and
Kennedy 1998). A trained clinical health psychologist would tend to work within the
eld of physical health, including stress and pain management, rehabilitation for
patients with chronic illnesses (e.g. cancer, HIV or cardiovascular disease) or the development of interventions for problems such as spinal cord injury and disguring surgery.
Page 8
Black blue
Page 9
Black blue
analysis and the role of hypothesis testing and physiological theories with their interest
in biological processes and their links with health. Further, it utilizes many key psychological concepts such as stereotyping, self-identity, risk perception, self-ecacy and
addiction. This book describes many of these theories and explores how they have been
used to explain health status and health related behaviours. Some of these theories have
been used across all aspects of health psychology such as social cognition models and
stage theories. These theories are therefore described in detail in Chapter 2. In contrast,
other theories and constructs have tended to be used to study specic behaviours. These
are therefore described within each specic chapter. However, as cross-fertilization is
often the making of good research, many of these theories could also be applied to other
areas.
Page 9
Black blue
Page 10
Black blue
10 HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
assesses the psychological factors that relate to whether or not someone attends for a
health check and the psychological consequences of screening programmes.
Health psychology also focuses on the direct pathway between psychology and
health and this is the focus for the second half of the book. Chapter 10 examines
research on stress in terms of its denition and measurement and Chapter 11 assesses
the links between stress and illness via changes in both physiology and behaviour
and the role of moderating variables. Chapter 12 focuses on pain and evaluates the
psychological factors in exacerbating pain perception and explores how psychological
interventions can be used to reduce pain and encourage pain acceptance. Chapter 13
specically examines the interrelationships between beliefs, behaviour and health using
the example of placebo eects. Chapters 14 and 15 further illustrate this interrelationship in the context of illness, focusing on HIV and cancer (Chapter 14) and obesity and
coronary heart disease (Chapter 15). Chapter 16 explores the problems with measuring
health status and the issues surrounding the measurement of quality of life.
Finally, Chapter 17 examines some of the assumptions within health psychology
that are described throughout the book.
psychology: (1) testing a theory, which examines how a theory can be turned into
a research project with a description of the background, methods used (including
details of measures), results and conclusions for each paper chosen; and (2) putting
theory into practice, which examines how a theory can be used to develop an intervention. Each focus on research section takes one specic paper that has been
chosen as a good illustration of either theory testing or practical implications.
I An assumptions in health psychology section, which examines some of the assump-
tions that underlie both the research and practice in health psychology, such as
the role of methodology and the relationship between the mind and body. These
assumptions are addressed together in Chapter 15.
In addition, there is a glossary at the end of the book, which describes terms within
health psychology relating to methodology.
Page 10
Black blue
Page 11
Black blue
11
QUESTIONS
FOR DISCUSSION
Consider the last time you were ill (e.g. flu, headache, cold, etc.). Discuss the extent
to which factors other than biological ones may have contributed to your illness.
FURTHER READING
Kaplan, R.M. (1990) Behaviour as the central outcome in health care, American
Psychologist, 45: 121120.
This paper provides an interesting discussion about the aims of health
psychology and suggests that rather than focusing on biological outcomes,
such as longevity and cell pathology, researchers should aim to change
behaviour and should therefore evaluate the success of any interventions on the
basis of whether this aim has been achieved.
Page 11
Black blue
Page 12
Black blue
Page 12
Black blue