MP Vs FP
MP Vs FP
MP Vs FP
supply.
Fiscal policy involves the government changing tax rates and levels of
Monetary Policy
Monetary policy is usually carried out by the Central Bank / Monetary authorities and
involves:
Setting base interest rates (e.g. Bank of England in UK and Federal Reserve in
US)
Influencing the supply of money. E.g. Policy of quantitative easing to increase the
supply of money.
The Central Bank may have an inflation target of 2%. If they feel inflation is going
to go above the inflation target, due to economic growth being too quick, then they will
increase interest rates.
Higher interest rates increase borrowing costs and reduce consumer spending
and investment, leading to lower aggregate demand and lower inflation.
If the economy went into recession, the Central Bank would cut interest rates.
See: Cutting interest rates
Fiscal Policy
Fiscal Policy is carried out by the government and involves changing:
Levels of taxation
1.
To increase demand and economic growth, the government will cut tax and
increase spending (leading to a higher budget deficit)
2.
To reduce demand and reduce inflation, the government can increase tax rates
and cut spending (leading to a smaller budget deficit)
Example of Expansionary Fiscal Policy
In a recession, the government may decide to increase borrowing and spend more on
infrastructure spending. The idea is that this increase in government spending creates
an injection of money into the economy and helps to create jobs. There may also be
a multiplier effect, where the initial injection into the economy causes a further round of
higher spending. This increase in aggregate demand can help the economy to get out of
recession.
See more at: Expansionary fiscal policy
If the government felt inflation was a problem, they could pursue deflationary fiscal
policy (higher tax and lower spending) to reduce the rate of economic growth.
Monetary policy is set by the Central Bank, and therefore reduces political
influence (e.g. politicians may cut interest rates in desire to have a booming economy
before a general election)
Fiscal Policy can have more supply side effects on the wider economy. E.g. to
reduce inflation higher tax and lower spending would not be popular and the
government may be reluctant to purse this. Also lower spending could lead to reduced
public services and the higher income tax could create disincentives to work.
Expansionary fiscal policy (e.g. more government spending) may lead to special
interest groups pushing for spending which isnt really helpful and then proves difficult to
reduce when recession is over.
Monetary policy is quicker to implement. Interest rates can be set every month. A
decision to increase government spending may take time to decide where to spend the
money.
However, the recent recession shows that Monetary Policy too can have many
limitations.
Liquidity Trap. In a recession, cutting interest rates may prove insufficient to boost
demand because banks dont want to lend and consumers are too nervous to spend.
Interest rates were cut from 5% to 0.5% in March 2009, but this didnt solve recession in
UK.
Even quantitative easing creating money may be ineffective if banks just want
to keep the extra money in their balance sheets.
Government spending directly creates demand in the economy and can provide a
kick-start to get the economy out of recession. Thus in a deep recession, relying on
monetary policy alone, may be insufficient to restore equilibrium in the economy.
In a liquidity trap, expansionary fiscal policy will not cause crowding out because
the government is making use of surplus saving to inject demand into the economy.