Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) - Strategic Management Insight
Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) - Strategic Management Insight
Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) - Strategic Management Insight
Home
Strategy Tools
CPM
r
u
o
y
t
a
h
w
w
o
n
k
u
o
Do y
S
R
O
T
I
T
E
P
COM
?
g
n
i
o
d
are
De nition
The Competitive Pro le Matrix (CPM) is a tool that compares the rm and its
rivals and reveals their relative strengths and weaknesses.
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
1/12
3/16/2016
CPM Table
Company A
Critical
Success
Factor
Brand
Company B
Company C
Weight
Rating
Score
Rating
Score
Rating
Score
0.13
0.26
0.39
0.13
0.08
0.32
0.24
0.08
reputation
Level of
product
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
2/12
3/16/2016
integration
Range of
products
0.05
0.15
0.05
0.10
Successful new
0.04
0.12
0.12
0.12
Market Share
0.14
0.28
0.56
0.56
Sales per
0.08
0.08
0.16
0.24
Low cost
structure
0.05
0.05
0.15
0.20
Variety of
0.07
0.28
0.14
0.14
0.02
0.04
0.08
0.02
0.11
0.33
0.44
0.44
Strong online
presence
0.15
0.45
0.45
0.60
Successful
0.08
0.08
0.16
0.08
1.00
2.44
2.94
2.71
introductions
employee
distribution
channels
Customer
retention
Superior IT
capabilities
promotions
Total
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
3/12
3/16/2016
Market Share
Union relations
Product Quality
Skilled workforce
Location of facilities
Customer service
Production capacity
Customer loyalty
On time delivery
Brand reputation
Price competitiveness
Customer satisfaction
Clear strategic
direction
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
4/12
3/16/2016
Financial position
Variety of products
Cash reserves
Pro t margin
Complementary products
quali cation
and experience
Innovation in products
and
services
Inventory turnover
Successful product
promotions
Innovative culture
Employee retention
Superior marketing
capabilities
E cient production
Superior advertising
capabilities
Innovations per
employee
Superior IT capabilities
R&D spending
E ectiveness of sales
distribution
Strong distribution
network
Product design
Strong patent
portfolio
Employee satisfaction
Level of vertical
integration
E ective corporate
social
responsibility programs
Variety of distribution
product
channels
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
5/12
3/16/2016
Successful new
introductions
Parent company
support
Weight
Each critical success factor should be assigned a weight ranging from 0.0 (low
importance) to 1.0 (high importance). The number indicates how important the
factor is in succeeding in the industry. If there were no weights assigned, all factors
would be equally important, which is an impossible scenario in the real world. The
sum of all the weights must equal 1.0. Separate factors should not be given too much
emphasis (assigning a weight of 0.3 or more) because the success in an industry is
rarely determined by one or few factors. In our rst example, the most signi cant
factors are strong online presence (0.15), market share (0.14), brand reputation
(0.13).
Rating
The ratings in CPM refer to how well companies are doing in each area. They range
from 4 to 1, where 4 means a major strength, 3 minor strength, 2 minor weakness
and 1 major weakness. Ratings, as well as weights, are assigned subjectively to each
company, but the process can be done easier through benchmarking. Benchmarking
reveals how well companies are doing compared to each other or industrys average.
Just remember that rms can be assigned equal ratings for the same factor. For
example, if Company A, Company B and Company C, have the market share of 25%,
27% & 28% accordingly, they would all receive the rating of 4 rather than receiving
ratings 2, 3 & 4.
Score & Total Score
The score is the result of weight multiplied by rating. Each company receives a score
on each factor. Total score is simply the sum of all individual score for the company.
The rm that receives the highest total score is relatively stronger than its
competitors. In our example, the strongest performer in the market should be
Company B (2.94 points).
Bene ts of the CPM:
The same factors are used to compare the rms. This makes the comparison
more accurate.
The analysis displays the information on a matrix, which makes it easy to
compare the companies visually.
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
6/12
3/16/2016
The results of the matrix facilitate decision-making. Companies can easily decide
which areas they should strengthen, protect or what strategies they should
pursue.
Example
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
7/12
3/16/2016
CPM Example
Android OS
iOS
Windows
Phone
Critical
Weight
Rating
Score
Rating
Score
Rating
Score
Market share
0.13
0.52
0.26
0.26
Number of
apps in store
0.10
0.40
0.40
0.20
Frequency of
updates
0.06
0.18
0.24
0.12
Design
0.07
0.21
0.21
0.21
Product brand
0.05
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.11
0.44
0.22
0.33
Usability
0.11
0.33
0.33
0.33
Customization
0.04
0.16
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.08
0.16
0.08
Success
Factor
reputation
Distribution
channels
features
Marketing
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
8/12
3/16/2016
capabilities
Company
brand
reputation
0.10
0.40
0.40
0.30
Openness
0.02
0.08
0.04
0.04
Cloud
integration
0.12
0.48
0.24
0.24
Rate of OS
crashes
0.08
0.08
0.32
0.24
Total
1.00
3.51
3.05
2.53
The CPM analysis reveals that Android is the strongest player in the industry with
relative strengths in market share, distribution channels, customization features,
openness and cloud integration. On the other hand, iOS prevails in frequency
updates, marketing capabilities and the rate of OS crashes. Windows Phone is the
weakest of them all and doesnt have any relative strengths against its rivals. The
companies should create their strategies according to their strengths and weakness
and improve their ratings in the most signi cant industrys areas.
Next Topic
BCG Matrix
Previous Topic
Benchmarking
Back to Tools
Related Articles
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
9/12
3/16/2016
Benchmarking
Identifying the best practices in the industry
supplier
power
buyer
power
RIVALRY
barriers
to enter
threat of
substitutes
Popular topics
Part nershi ps
Teamwork
Gl obal presence
Wel l -managed
processes
VRIO Analysis
Innovat i ve i deas
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
10/12
3/16/2016
Part nershi ps
Teamwork
Gl obal presence
Wel l -managed
processes
Innovat i ve i deas
New topics
GE-McKinsey Matrix
Benchmarking
11/12
3/16/2016
r
h at y o u
know w
Do y o u
S
R
O
IT
T
C OMPE g ?
are d o in
Subscribe
Navigate to
Home
Contact us
Topics
Strategy Tools
More Resources
About
About Us
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/competitive-profile-matrix-cpm.html
12/12