Deegan5e SM Ch25
Deegan5e SM Ch25
Deegan5e SM Ch25
Segment reporting
25.1
25.2
It highlights the performance of the management within the different segments and,
therefore, helps to identify those segments that are performing above or below
expectations.
(ii)
Well-performing segments will not be able to mask those segments that perform
poorly.
(iii)
(iv)
Investors should be better able to determine whether the segments are providing a
return which is commensurate with the associated risk.
(v)
(vi)
By providing more refined data, it enables financial statement users to make more
informed predictions about future profitability.
(vii)
Management may be less inclined to take business risks if results are made more
visible (and, therefore, not hidden through a process of aggregation).
(ii)
(iii)
The additional segment data might provide encouragement for additional entrants into
the industry.
(iv)
If segment disclosures are made which indicate that particular segments are making a
loss, there is a possibility that these disclosures may lead to takeover bids by other
organisations or pressure being exerted upon management to sell the loss-making
segments.
(v)
The disclosure of operating segment data that indicates different profit rates
internationally may attract host-government attention.
(vi)
251
(vii)
Segment data may attract political attention from various interest groups, such as
employee groups or environmental groups, if it is shown that particular segments are
making unusually high profits.
25.3
If segment information is available then arguably it is more difficult to disguise the results of
poor business decisions. As such, there is a possibility that the disclosure of segment
information may stifle the introduction of new ideas.
25.4
Even where segment data is provided, the information is still highly aggregated, so it is
difficult to understand how competitors could really take advantage of the information.
Segment data does not provide information about the actual business practices employed. For
a competitive disadvantage to arise, the competitors would somehow need to access further
confidential information from the organisation.
25.5
Surveys by Edwards and Smith (1996) indicate that issues associated with competitive
disadvantage do bias a firm towards providing lower-quality segment disclosures. Some of
the respondents to the surveys indicated that issues of competitive disadvantage actually
drove their entity towards providing segment information which could be construed as being
misleading. Students should be encouraged to consider the merit of the argument that
segment disclosures can actually lead to competitive disadvantage. Is the information detailed
enough to really be competitively disadvantageous?
25.6
25.7
25.8
252
25.10 For the purposes of external reporting, individual operating segments may be aggregated.
Indeed, it might be advisable to aggregate similar segments and thus avoid overwhelming
readers with information about too many segments. As paragraph 12 of AASB 8 states:
Operating segments often exhibit similar long-term financial performance if they
have similar economic characteristics. For example, similar long-term average
gross margins for two operating segments would be expected if their economic
characteristics were similar. Two or more operating segments may be aggregated
into a single operating segment if aggregation is consistent with the core principle
of this Standard, the segments have similar economic characteristics, and the
segments are similar in each of the following respects:
(a) the nature of the products and services;
(b) the nature of the production processes;
(c) the type or class of customer for their products and services;
(d) the methods used to distribute their products or provide their services; and
(e) if applicable, the nature of the regulatory environment, for example, banking,
insurance or public utilities.
Clearly, whether or not we aggregate two or more operating segments for the purposes of
external reporting will be a matter of professional judgment. In relation to the aggregation of
similar operating segments, the Basis for Conclusions that accompanied the release of SFAS
131 stated (paragraph 73):
The Board believes that separate reporting of segment information will not add
significantly to an investor's understanding of an enterprise if its operating
segments have characteristics so similar that they can be expected to have
essentially the same future prospects. The Board concluded that although
information about each segment may be available, in those circumstances the
benefit would be insufficient to justify its disclosure. For example, a retail chain
may have 10 stores that individually meet the definition of an operating segment,
but each store may be essentially the same as the others.
Similarity of operating segments is not the only criterion for aggregating operating segments
for disclosure purposes. Apparently to avoid overwhelming readers with information about a
multiplicity of operating segments, AASB 8 sets quantitative thresholds that provide guidance
on when an operating segment should be disclosed (or, perhaps, aggregated with other
segments instead). According to paragraph 13 of AASB 8:
253
254
255
25.14 As we know, if the chief operating decision maker reviews particular components of an
organisation for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance, these
components will be considered to represent the operating segments of the organisation.
Hence, there are four operating segments. However, whether we report information about
each individual operating segment will depend on whether the operating segments are
considered to be reportable. To determine if they are reportable we apply the quantitative
tests provided in AASB 8.
Mining and Food qualify as reportable segments as their revenue is more than 10 per cent of
total segment revenue, thus satisfying test (a).
Mining, Food and chemicals qualify as material using test (b), as the absolute-amount total of
the profits/losses of the segments that earned a profit is $125 000, whereas the combined
reported loss of those that generated a loss totals $35 000. Hence for test (b) we need to
compare the absolute amount of the profit/loss with $125 000. Using these criteria, mining,
Food and Chemicals are reportable operating segments.
Using test (c), Mining and Food are reportable operating segments, as their assets are 10 per
cent or more of the total segment assets of all segments.
Therefore, Mining, Food and Chemicals are all reportable segments. Clothing is not a
reportable segment as it did not pass any of the three tests. Mining, food and chemicals also
generate more than 75 per cent of the entitys total revenues (875/965 x 100 = 91 per cent),
and so meet the test of paragraph 15 of AASB 8.
Note that even though we have considered each segment under all three tests, the passing of
only one of the tests would be enough to establish a segment as reportable.
25.15 Timber and Steel qualify as reportable segments as their revenue is more than 10 per cent of
total segment revenue, thus satisfying test (a).
Timber, Steel and Cardboard qualify as material using test (b), as the absolute-amount total of
the profits/losses of the segments that earned a profit is $100 000, whereas the combined
reported loss of those that generated a loss totals $15 000. Hence for test (b) we need to
compare the absolute amount of the profit/loss with $100 000. Using these criteria, all three
segments are reportable operating segments.
Using test (c), all three operating segments are reportable, as their assets are 10 per cent or
more of the total segment assets of all segments.
Therefore, Timber, Steel and Cardboard are all reportable segments. Note that even though
we have considered each segment under all three tests, the passing of only one of the tests
would be enough to establish a segment as reportable.
25.16 Clothing, Travel and Agriculture are reportable segments as their revenue is more than 10 per
cent of total segment revenue, thus satisfying test (a).
Clothing, Travel and Agriculture qualify as material using test (b), as the absolute-amount
total of the profits/losses of the segments that earned a profit is $180 000, whereas the
combined reported loss of those that generated a loss totals $15 000. Hence for test (b) we
need to compare the absolute amount of the profit/loss with $180 000. Using these criteria,
Clothing, Travel and Agriculture are reportable operating segments.
256
Using test (c), Clothing and Travel are reportable operating segments, as their assets are 10
per cent or more of the total segment assets of all segments.
Therefore, Clothing, Travel and Agriculture are all reportable segments. Motor Vehicle
Manufacture is not a reportable segment as it did not pass any of the three tests. Clothing,
Travel and Agriculture also generate more than 75 per cent of the entitys total revenues
(510/555 x 100 = 92 per cent), and so meet the test of paragraph 15 of AASB 8.
Note that even though we have considered each segment under all three tests, the passing of
only one of the tests would be enough to establish a segment as reportable.
25.17 Food and Beverages qualify as reportable segments as their revenue is more than 10 per cent
of total segment revenue, thus satisfying test (a).
Food and Beverages qualify as material using test (b), as the absolute-amount total of the
profits/losses of the segments that earned a profit is $210 000, whereas the combined
reported loss of those that generated a loss totals $20 000. Hence for test (b) we need to
compare the absolute amount of the profit/loss with $210 000. Using these criteria, Food and
Beverages are reportable operating segments.
Using test (c), all segments are reportable operating segments, as their assets are 10 per cent
or more of the total segment assets of all segments.
Therefore, Food, Beverages and Hotels are all reportable segments. Note that even though
we have considered each segment under all three tests, the passing of only one of the tests
would be enough to establish a segment as reportable.
25.18 In the absence of other factors, a segment would be considered material if one or more of the
following conditions applied:
(a)
its revenue is 10 per cent or more of total revenue of all segments (including intersegment sales and transfers); or,
(b)
the absolute amount of its profit or loss is 10 per cent or more of the greater, in
absolute amount, of:
the combined reported profit of all segments that earned a profit; and
the combined segment loss of all segments that earned a loss; or,
(c)
its segment assets are 10 per cent or more of total assets of all segments.
Entertainment (passes tests a, b and c), Clothing (passes tests b and c), Food (passes test a),
and Agriculture (passes test b) would all be considered to be material industry segments.
The following disclosure is appropriate:
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Entertainment
$
Clothing
$
Food
$
Agriculture
$
Eliminations
$
Consolidated
$
REVENUE
External sales
Inter-segment sales
Total segment revenue
600
50
650
80
80
200
200
40
10
50
(60)
(50)
920
920
RESULT
Segment profit
100
20
(10)
20
(15)*
105
257
Unallocated corporate
expenses
Profit before income tax
expense
Income tax expense
Net profit
Segment assets
Unallocated corporate
assets
Consolidated total assets
Segment liabilities
Unallocated corporate
liabilities
Consolidated total
liabilities
Acquisition of property,
plant and equipment and
intangible assets
Depreciation
Unallocated depreciation
Non cash expenses other
than depreciation
Unallocated expenses
(10)
95
40
55
800
200
300
100
100
150
110
100
1 310
50
1 360
550
250
800
50
20
10
10
20
15
10
25
90
70
20
90
10
10
15
60
20
80
* This number for profit on inter-segment sales has been assumed, as the information was not provided in the
question.
Geographical information
Petersen Ltd operates solely within Queensland, Australia.
Information about major customers
Revenues from one customer of Petersen Ltds entertainment segment represents approximately $100 000 of Petersen
Ltds total revenues. No other single customer is responsible for 10 per cent or more of the entitys total revenues.
258
25.19 Because the chief operating decision maker considers six segments of the entity when making
decisions about resource allocations and when assessing performance, these are the six
operating segments of the entity pursuant to AASB 8.
To determine whether the individual segments are reportable, we need to apply the tests
provided in paragraph 13 and paragraph 15 of AASB 8. Paragraph 13 of AASB 8 requires
that for each segment it must first be established that:
(a) its reported revenue, including both sales to external customers and intersegment sales
or transfers, is 10 per cent or more of the combined revenue, internal and external, of
all operating segments;
(b) the absolute amount of its reported profit or loss is 10 per cent or more of the greater,
in absolute amount, of (i) the combined reported profit of all operating segments that
did not report a loss and (ii) the combined reported loss of all operating segments that
reported a loss;
(c) its assets are 10 per cent or more of the combined assets of all operating segments.
As we have noted, AASB 8, paragraph 13, specifies three tests, and a segment needs to
pass any one of these to be deemed to be a reportable segment.
Test (a) is whether revenues, including from sales to internal and external customers,
account for 10 per cent or more of the total segment revenues of all segments. In this
example the total revenue from sales made by all segments, including inter-segment sales,
is $3 625 000. Therefore, the materiality threshold is $3 625 000 x 10% = $362 500
Applying this threshold to the four segments:
Travel: sales total $1 750 000, therefore this segment passes the test.
Student Accommodation: sales total $625 000, therefore this segment passes the
test.
Entertainment: sales total $375 000, therefore this segment passes the test.
Consulting: sales total $750 000, therefore this segment passes the test.
259
Revenue from
External sales
Inter-segment sales
Interest revenue
Segment liabilities
Acquisition of property, plant
and equipment and intangible
assets
Other non-cash expenses other than
depreciation
(b)
($000)
($000)
(000$)
($000)
1750
625
375
625
125
125
12.5
Total
($000)
3500
125
12.5
7.5
75
162.5
20 000
37.5
50
6250
62.5
(250)
5 000
50
87.5
8750
25
25
1250
250
300
41250
7500
3750
2500
6250
500
20500
625
125
250
500
1500
37.5
25
37.5
50
12.5
162.5
Revenues
Total revenues from operating segments
Other revenues (received by head office)
Elimination of intersegment revenues
Total revenue shown in income statement
($000)
3625
25
(125)
3525
Profit or loss
Total profit or loss from operating segments
Elimination of intersegment profits
Unallocated corporate expenses
Profit before income tax expense
Tax expense
Profit after tax as shown in income statement
($000)
300
(12.5)
(50)
237.5
75
162.5
Assets
Total assets of operating segments
Goodwill not allocated to reportable segments
Other unallocated corporate assets
Total assets as shown in balance sheet
($000)
41250
5000
125
46375
Liabilities
Total liabilities of operating segments
Unallocated liabilities
Total liabilities as shown in the balance sheet
($000)
20500
250
20750
(c)
All other
segments
($000)
Interest expense
Depreciation and amortisation
Profit before tax
Segment assets
Student
Accom. Entertainment Consulting
Geographical information
2510
Ulluwatu Ltd operates predominantly within Australia; however, some sales are made to
customers in Kuwait.
Sales by geographical area
($000)
Australia
Kuwait
(d)
3 450
50
3 500
Non-current assets
($000)
30 000
30 000
2511