Observation Report
Observation Report
Observation Report
Course Description
The class that I observed had 13 students enrolled in an advanced grammar class taught at
the INTO language school at Colorado State University (CSU); the title of the class was
AEAD8403: Advanced Grammar. The INTO language school is where international students go
for an academic English pathway program before their entrance into CSU; INTO is a private
British company that sets up international students with various American universities.
The students came from three different native languages: Brazilian Portuguese, Arabic and
Chinese. Students came from China (1), Oman (3), Brazil (2), and Saudi Arabia (1) with the
majority of the students coming from Kuwait (6). The students varied in age from 18 all the way
up to 26 years old in addition to different amounts of English education, ranging from one year
upwards to thirteen. According to the teacher, the students proficiency level varied; however,
she believed that their grade in class did not reflect the proficiency she felt that they possessed.
Out of the thirteen students, only two were female. The students were able to sit wherever they
wished; although through observation they tended to sit in the same places.
The class met M-F at 8:00-9:20 am for ten weeks. The classroom, where the class was
held included computer access along with technological aid such as different types of projectors
that were computer-compatible. As far as other types of aid in the class, the class textbook was
Understanding and Using English Grammar by Azar and Hagen. Within the syllabus it is also
stated that other handouts and assignments will be posted via RamCT, an educational platform.
There were also guest speakers that came in, although not mentioned in the syllabus; these
speakers seem to have served the students needs outside of their grammar learning.
The goal of class as referenced in the syllabus states: Raise awareness of grammar points
taught at the upper advanced level and equip learners with greater grammatical proficiency for
communicative use in other skill area classes. The objectives listed in order to obtain said goal
are:
Producing accurate and more complex grammar in various speaking and writing contexts,
including drill-oriented exercises, controlled communication practice, and free
communication application activities
The specific grammar points that students should learn by the end of the quarter include:
Noun clauses
Conditionals
Instructional Procedures
Throughout my observations, it seemed as though the 8am start time for the class seemed
challenging for the students to start on time. So in order to stall the first five minutes or so, the
teacher would often start by asking the class general questions like, How was your weekend?
What did you do? Did anyone have questions about the homework? Once it seemed as though
all of the students were present, the teacher would get started with her lesson plan. This generally
included a review of what was talked about in class the day before or going over the homework,
starting in groups and then eventually engaging in a class dialogue or vice-versa. If there wasnt
homework, there was usually a small quiz administered at the beginning of class; it seemed as
though these quizzes were not only comprehension checks but also ensured that the students
were more likely to do their homework since the quiz material was over problems dealt with in
the homework.
Once the homework review and/or the quiz were completed, the teacher would open up to
the class. This would involve practicing exercises based on the material that was tested/reviewed.
The majority of exercises that were practiced during class time were performed in groups. The
group work consisted of many different varieties. One example included direct exercises from
the book to be worked on in pairs and then reviewed for the whole class by use of the projector.
Another variation included the creation of a poster that included a visual representation in order
to interpret the meaning of an idiom. If group work wasnt started then that would usually lead
way to the presentation of new material. The teacher would open the floor to students if she was
presenting a new topic; the opening of the floor would consist of the teacher essentially asking
the students whether or not they knew the new topic. She would do this by asking directive
questions in order for them to have the potential to come to the correct conclusion. Upon
discussion, she mentioned that this was extremely important; it enables the students to take
control of their learning, something that allows for better comprehension of the topics for
students.
Upon the presentation of new material, the teacher used abundant of different teaching
techniques. Since this was solely a grammar class, the teacher utilized aspects of the GrammarTranslation Method quite often; the rules that were associated with a topic were explicitly given
to students, whether through instruction directly by the teacher or from within their textbook, and
then were practiced in exercises that pertained to that rule (Larsen-Freeman & Anderson, p.19).
Along with the direct explanation of these rules, the teacher would typically supply the correct
answer when students had an error, another aspect of the Grammar-Translation Method being
used.
The majority of class time was spent between these two types of activities, review and the
presentation of new material. Once both of those were completed then the teacher would wrap up
class by generalizing what was learned and assign homework, usually along with the date and
content of the next quiz or test.
Most assigned homework was reviewed in groups, as mentioned above. Group work
seemed to be a key feature in this classroom. More often times than not, group sizes consisted of
two or three people and generally broke up the alike native speakers, although this was difficult
since the majority of the class speaks Arabic. The teacher would pair students up a number of
ways. Sometimes she would allow them to chose partners, usually students would turn to the
person sitting next to them or around them, and other times she would intentionally partner
students up. The reasoning for this forced partnership would be for one of two things: either she
would pair a strong student with a weak student or two students with similar proficiency levels.
In general, if theyre practicing new material, then she typically pairs opposite strengthened
students together (weak-strong) in order to allow for both of the students to be given a stronger
learning opportunity. Since the strong student would have to explain to the weaker student the
difficulties they are having, this would essentially allow for them to be teaching them. This is
also beneficial for the weaker student because it allows for them to receive student driven
informational input and this could allow for a different explanation and could provide a new
level of understanding for the weak student. When the teacher was pairing up students who were
at a similar level, it was towards the end of working on a topic, so that the two students could
push one another, this means that the students were able to challenge one another since they
were on the same playing field. This group work falls in line with the characteristics displayed
in Cooperative Learning. The students did not think of the activity in a competitive manor but
rather cooperatively, the teacher would assign groups with intentionally and finally
accountability and responsibility were shared amongst peers (Larsen-Freeman & Anderson, p.
189)
Involvement in Class
My involvement in the class consisted of attending five of their classes, although nonconsecutively due to the attendance of a guest speaker along with other factors. Initially I started
off simply observing the class and their interactions. I typically sat in the front row so I was able
to see the whole classroom.
During group work, which was a fairly utilized activity, I would walk around like the
teacher and observe while occasionally stepping in for assistance on the exercise that they were
working on. After my observation of these group exercises the teacher asked if I would be
willing to participate in the activities going on. So I was soon able to step in and interact with the
students, as a student. I would participate in activities such as Have you ever? This is when
students ask one-another a set of questions and look for the student that has done said activity,
and write their name down on the assignment sheet. In addition to this type of aid, I was used as
a clarification tool for the teacher when demonstrating certain phrases that native speakers say or
dont say. The culmination of these was the extent of my in-class participation.
Outside of the classroom, I met with the teacher and provided grading assistance to her. I
graded about two out of the three pages of students tests, the third page being a written prompt,
which the teacher felt more comfortable in grading. Initially I was given little instruction about
the way in which the teacher wanted me to grade, however after a couple of tests she analyzed
the method I was using, corrected that and suggested a faster and more efficient method. In
addition to this, I was able to talk with the teacher about the various questions that arose
throughout my observation period.
Personal Reflection
Coming from an adult-driven ESL teaching background, something I found that my
students always had was motivation. The type of environment that those classes were set up for,
only allowed for those types of students in order to truly thrive. My first realization in the
observation of these classes was that: just because a student is learning a language, doesnt mean
they want or care to. I found this to be quite surprising. For the students at INTO I assumed that
they would generally be motivated since they were driven to apply to a school that was not in
their home country, which required many hoops to jump through. However, through discussion
with my observation teacher I came to realize that the way the INTO program is set up tends to
prompt students to an unmotivated stage upon reaching an advanced level. Since my class was an
upper level class, most if not all of the students had already gotten into University; what this
meant is that the reason they are continuing classes at INTO is to maintain their VISA status.
This allowed for smart students (based on the assumption that they got into an American
University as an L2 speaker of English) to feel as though the classes that they are currently
taking arent important, relevant and this tends to lead to bad grades; at one point in the class
even, the teacher mentioned how many students were failing. This led me to wonder, what truly
motivates a student? The desire to learn a language? The need to? When does a student feel as
though they dont really need to learn any more language-focused skills? And most importantly,
as a teacher, what can you do to motivate students?
Through my observations, the teacher primarily used one tactic to try to motivate
students. The way in which this was done was through the discussion of future expectations that
teachers at the University level would have for their students. The tone of the discussion was
usually in a stern, yet realistic manor. She was consistently trying to motivate her students in this
way. If she wasnt using this method to engage the students, then she was using more of a scare
tactic approach. What that means is that she would mention to the class that the majority of the
students were failing and that with their respected levels, it seemed to be absurd that they werent
putting in more effort to pass, or even learn.
Motivation is not the only thing a teacher needs to be concerned with. Creating lesson
plans, grading, and even student-student interactions are something that teachers need to
constantly be aware of. Something else that caught my eye in my out-of-classroom time was the
different types of techniques of grading. From the adult ESL teaching point-of-view, it is
something I rarely came in contact with, so it was a skill that I was extremely unfamiliar with. I
found that I started out like most teachers, in the fact that I was trying to correct every small
detail. I found this to be very daunting and time-consuming. When the teacher came back to
check on me while I was grading she made a great point, dont take more time than the time that
students are going to take looking it over. More often than not students look over the errors, and
toss them aside. So its important to spend time where it truly matters, maybe by using that time
to create more engaging lessons, something that would have a greater pay off with the students.
Creating engaging lessons plans is important, however I found that students that spent
time in class practicing English with one-another was just as (if not more) important. Listening in
10
on group discussions allowed for me to first-hand witness the negotiated feedback that goes on
during classroom time- and to be able to view it from more of a student-perspective rather than a
teacher. It seemed as though students who actively participated in the small group tasks allowed
for more discussion of the material, what was right, what was wrong and the reasoning behind
either. This allowed students to better understand the difficult grammar concepts that were being
presented throughout the class. When regrouping into the whole class dynamic, it was apparent
that they were able to comprehend and explain the ideas better than when they just worked on
projects individually.
Overall I found that these observations not only allowed me to see what its like to be a
teacher and all the details involved with being one but also gave me a very important perspective
and thats of the student. It can be easy to loose perspective of what is interesting to students, or
how to present information (that they might consider boring) in a way that is interesting and
engaging to them. The overall goal of a teacher is to be of service to students in their path to
learning English, so its imperative to always be able to keep the students perspective in mind
when preparing for the class.
Classroom Observation Tasks
Task 1: Lesson Phases
#
When/lesson phase
Okay, ready?
We are going over exercises
26, 35 and 44 which is the
last one in the chapter.
Okay, okay.
11
Go over Ex 35 (HW) as a
class
Ex 46
Worksheet
Wraps up class
Reflection
The general patterns that emerged when observing the occurrences of a change within the
class included: physical movement from the teacher, generally by pointing and using hand
movements, as well as certain transition phrases that the teacher utilized to indicate a different
direction of the class. When the teacher wanted to move on to a new topic, she started by looking
at the class, and then scanned over them, in what looked as though she was checking for
understanding amongst the class. After she scanned, she generally asked if everything is OK?
During this questioning, she used hand movements to: point at exactly what she was referring to,
open her palms up to elicit responses from students or would give a thumbs up or down for
12
checking comprehension. If she wasnt asking OK?, then in other observed classes, she would
use phrases such as Moving on now to, Finally, and To summarize
Signposting is used for many different reasons within teaching. It allows the students to
regroup on what was just discussed, allowing the teacher to wrap up and review of the activity.
The closing of the activity tended to allow for comprehension checks amongst the students,
giving fully clarification on the subject and inviting students to ask questions. Even before
comprehension is checked, signposting can be used to indicate examples of the topics presented;
this teacher always provided examples, which is important for students to see how these rules are
used within English. Finally, it indicates to the student that there will be a transition in the
activity of the class and that a new topic will be presented. Maybe this could allow for students
who were unmotivated from the previous part of the lesson to become interested in the next
phase.
Its important to ensure that all students in the class are to stay engaged within the class
period; this alone is a difficult task depending on the attitudes of the students, material presented
and even the day of the week. Signposting can play an important role within keeping all students
interested. It can allow for easy transition between topics, whenever it appears to the teacher that
there needs to be a change made within the class based on the energy that the students exude.
This can allow for a faster pace within the class since it can allow for movement between topics
easily.
However, it can be easy to generalize that students are solely unmotivated by what is
being taught. Its crucial that not too much time is taken up by one activity because over time the
students ability to concentration on the phase of the lesson decreases. Signposting gives the
opportunity to get students back on focus, alert and concentrated on the material being discussed.
13
It can also provide the opportunity to know of whats to come. For example, the teacher used
We will be going over this homework next class as a signpost to display the indication of
what would be to come.
Not only can signposting allow for review, comprehension checks and get students
reengaged, it can also provide a transition between topics. These explanations can allow for the
reasoning for presenting material (a) before material (b) and how (a) and (b) are connected. Its
important to explain to students the reasoning behind why one decides to teach specific things so
the student can make those connections within their English learning. If students do not make
these connections on their own another technique that could be utilized as signposting would be
to ask questions as to why the topics discussed are relevant and important.
Inference
Discussion questions
Reiterates course
procedures, focusing on the
students ability to
resubmit assignments for
credit.
14
Acknowledges that
students are enrolled in
INTO for certain reasons
15
- Is it necessary to continue to
reiterate the same point if the
students dont seem to be
caring as much as shed like?
Necessary to evaluate
comprehension, since this is
an EAP class. Evaluated on
the material that was
previously discussed in class
Reflection
16
17
Although this change of direction is fairly likely to happen, its also the teachers job to
ensure that these off-topic discussions are relevant to the student and their leaning. So if they are
leading it in a direction that does not allow for productive use of classroom then, then its also
the teachers responsibility to refocusing the class and get back to that general format of the
class.
Format after:
When reflecting upon the class and the activities within it, its essential for teachers to
ask themselves: what worked and what didnt work about it? This allows for the editing of
activities that the teacher thought might work, and didnt. It can also allow for evaluation of the
topics that need to be discussed within the next class period or even the necessity to revisit items
that were thought to have been previously learned.
Task 3: Focus on the Learner
Student
Level
Signs of Level
Teachers Strategies
Mazin
Fixes problem
Musaab
Saud
Abdulaziz
(Aziz)
4.5
18
Mobarak
4.7
Mohammad
Ala.
Mubarak
4.2
Mohammad
Alm.
4.2
Saleh
4.5
Matheus
4.2
Mariana
4.5
Steven
19
Reflection
When teaching a class, I am very aware of the different levels within the classes, even
within the different aspects of learning (speaking, listening, reading and writing). These levels
are most apparent when performing freethinking written responses done by the individual. It
shows the vocabulary that they know and understand, their grammatical knowledge and their
ability to connect these two thoughts, demonstrating fluency. Another aspect of a lesson plan
could display these differences are on-the-spot dialogues. It provides the student a real-time
conversation allowing for them to freely express themselves displaying their productive
knowledge of English and their receptive knowledge of the other persons input.
I find that its important to group students of different levels. This grouping allows for a
display in gap of knowledge for those lower-leveled students and provides an opportunity for a
stronger leveled student to be able to display their knowledge of the subject in a meaningfocused directed output style.
Ways of
Grouping
levels
Expected Outcomes
Sample
activity
Group weak
students
together
Cloze
activities
Group
strong
students
together
Creation of
a dialogue
Mix the
groups
I would expect that mixing the groups in this activity allows for
greater competition among peers, which then leads to more class
participation and motivation in students. The exercise is not too
Running
Dictation
20
Instructions
Comments
Going over
homework
EX 23
EX 22
Quiz
Introduction
of the
Infinitive
EX 24
EX 25
We will finish it
tomorrow. What do you
think? Starts giving
examples from the book
21
Reflection
Its important that a teacher thinks about the way in which a task is presented and the
instructions given to complete said task. There are many different ways in which this can be
accomplished. While observing, I noticed the use of visual support through the use of the
projector. This allows for different types of learners (i.e. visual) to be given models and
examples in a conceptual format. Along with the visual support, its imperative to stress details
that important to the directions that are being given.
The stressing details can be presented in a number of different ways. One is for teachers to
provide examples that the instructions allude to. While providing examples, it would be more
beneficial to the students if they can figure out the answer on their own or within a whole class
setting. Teachers can do this by using related examples pulling from past knowledge of the
material. These examples could be done through modeling to the students. This can give them
explicit expectations and allows the student to be able to conceptually visualize all aspects of the
assignment.
Another way that teachers can stress the important details of an assignment could include
the teachers becoming conscious of the pace in which they talk, the articulation of important
terms and also the way they stress (or dont stress) certain words. In addition to the way they say
words, teachers needs to be conscious of the segmenting of phrases and sentences. This allows
for time to check for clarification during pauses. Its essential for teachers to allow for the
opportunity for students to have a chance to ask questions about what is being discussed in order
for them to be able to fully complete the assignment to the teachers expectations.
While giving these opportunities to check for clarification, it would be ideal for the
teacher to move around the room. This movement allows the teacher to be looking at the
22
students, glancing over them to look for those deer in headlight looks. If these looks were
stumbled upon, it would be necessary to ask the student questions to elicit them to ask what they
need clarified. This activity could allow for more effective instruction giving, since it would
allow for complete understanding from the students.
23