Original Article

Effect of manual lymph drainage on removal of

blood lactate after submaximal exercise

J. Phys. Ther. Sci.

27: 33873391, 2015

Yesim Bakar, PT, PhD1)*, Hakk Coknaz, PhD2), mid K arl, PhD2), nder Semsek, PhD2),
Erdinc Sern, MD3), mer Osman Pala, PT, MSc4)
1) School

of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Abant Izzet Baysal University: 14280 Bolu, Turkey
of Physical Education and Sport, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Turkey
3) Istanbul Education & Research Hospital, Turkey
4) Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Gazi University, Turkey
2) School

Abstract. [Purpose] It has been well-established that exercise-induced muscle damage occurs following intense
exercise. Massage is commonly used to manage muscle damage resulting from exercise. However the effect of massage after exercise is still not clear. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of manual lymph drainage
on muscle damage and on the removal of blood lactate following submaximal exercise (SE), as part of a solution to
the challenging problem in sports medicine of muscular recovery after exercise. [Subjects and Methods] Eighteen
healthy male students, with moderate exercise training, were randomly assigned to either receive manual lymph
drainage (MLD) or serve as controls. Both groups were subjected to a graded exercise test, performed on a treadmill ergometer, to determine each subjects individual anaerobic threshold (IAT). Seven days later, all subjects
were made to run for 30 minutes on the same treadmill ergometer, at a running speed equivalent to the IAT. One
group received MLD treatment, while the control subjects received no treatment. [Results] Following an increase
immediately after exercise, lactic acid (LA) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serum levels dropped rapidly and
significantly at the end of MLD application and two hours after SE in the subjects receiving MLD. The course of
creatine kinase (CK) and myoglobin levels was comparable, and with myoglobin showing a significant difference
at 2h after SE, and CK at 24h after SE. [Conclusion] Manual lymph drainage after SE correlated with a more rapid
fall in LA and of the muscular enzymes of LDH, CK and myoglobin, and may have resulted in an improvement in
the regenerative processes elicted by structural damage to the muscle cells.
Key words: Manual lymph drainage, Recovery, Submaximal exercise
(This article was submitted Jun. 23, 2015, and was accepted Aug. 5, 2015)

INTRODUCTION
Exhaustive and/or unaccustomed exercises (particularly those involving high intensity muscle contractions) are
known to induce temporary muscle damage. This damage
includes a series of events occurring. It causes damage to
the sarcolemma and the muscle cell membrane. This damage
results in the release of biochemical markers of muscle damage including (e.g. lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine
kinase (CK), and myoglobin (Mb)1, 2). Coaches, athletic
trainers, and athletes should seek scientific support for therapeutic interventions which claim to help reduce the effects
of muscle damage and speed of recovery from exercise and
athletic endeavors2). Therefore, improving muscle recovery
after physical exercise is an important topic in sports medicine.

*Corresponding author. Yesim Bakar (E-mail: ptyesim@

yahoo.de)
2015 The Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-ncnd) License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>.

Many researchers investigated various intervention to

treat muscle damage such as active recovery, massage, cryotherapy, electrotherapy, hydrotherapy, supplementation and
compression garments310). Massage is also commonly assumed to enhance muscle recovery from intense exercise11).
However the effect of massage after delayed onset muscle
soreness (DOMS) is still not clear12). A recently review and
meta-analysis demonstrated that therapeutic massage is the
only intervention that has a positive effect on the recovery of
muscle soreness and function; however, its mean effect is
too small to be considered clinically relevant1). The potential
benefits of massage on recovery include increased blood
circulation and venous return, greater lactate clearance,
decreased pain sensation, and general well-being13).
Manual Lymph Drainage (MLD) is a massage technique
that involves the skin surface only and follows the anatomic
lymphatic pathways of the body. Unlike other types of massage, it produces neither blush nor pain and promotes lymph
flow14, 15). Some biochemical markers, such as CK, LDH,
aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Mb are particularly
significant in the evaluation of tissue damage16). Creatine
kinase, a dimeric enzyme with a particularly large molecule
(80,000 Da) cannot penetrate enter into the bloodstream
following muscular injury. And under injury conditions, it

3388 J. Phys. Ther. Sci. Vol. 27, No. 11, 2015

Table 1. Physical characteristics of the subjects

Age (years)
Height (m)
Body weight (kg)
Anaerobic threshold (km-hr)

MLD (n=10)
XSD

CG (n=8)
XSD

21.1 1.1
1.77 0
69.2 7
13.1 0.9

21.9 1.2
1.78 0.1
69.4 6.6
12.4 1.3

MLD: Manual lymph drainage group, CG: Control group

Fig. 1. Study flow diagram

passes into the lymphatic system from the intercellular fluid

and is transferred to the general circulation from the thoracic
lymph nodes. This has led to the hypothesis of an inverse
relationship between lymphatic circulation and CK levels17).
Havas et al. studied the effect of peripheral lymphatic flow
reduction, achieved by bed rest, on serum CK after exercise.
They concluded that physical inactivity of short duration
reduces the lymphatic transport of CK and the secretion of
muscle enzymes18). Currently, there is a lack of controlled
research to support the efficacy of manual lymph massage in
accelerating the rate of post-exercise blood clearance of lactate and biochemical markers such as CK, LDH, and AST19).
Although acute submaximal exercise (SE) may induce tissue
damage in trained individuals, MLD applied immediately
after exercise can reduce tissue or muscle damage and also
help the removal of blood lactate. In this study, we have
investigated the effect of MLD on reducing tissue or muscle
damage and removing blood lactate and muscle enzymes
after SE in moderately trained individuals was investigated.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Eighteen healthy and moderately trained male students
took part in this study. The subjects were randomly divided
into two groups, an MLD group and a control group. They
are illustrated in (Fig. 1). None of the subjects had any history of cardiovascular, metabolic or musculoskeletal injury,
or disease. This study was approved by the Human Research
Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Abant Izzet
Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey. All the subjects gave their
informed consent before the study started. Subjects were
instructed to avoid heavy exercise in the 72 hours before
coming on all occasions. The physical characteristics of the
subjects are shown in Table 1.
The subjects performed a graded exercise test on a treadmill ergometer (Hp Mercury, Germany) under standardized

conditions to determine the anaerobic threshold. The exercise

test began at 8kmhr1 and increased by 1kmhr1 every
three minutes. Heart rate was recorded by a Polar monitor
(Electro, Finland). Blood lactate levels were measured in
capillary blood drawn from a hyperemic ear lobe, at rest and
at the end of each exercise level. The subjects ran until their
blood lactate levels exceeded 5mmol/L. Seven days after
the graded exercise test, all subjects ran 30 minutes on the
same treadmill ergometer, at a running velocity equivalent
to the IAT. Capillary blood samples to determine the lactate
concentrations were taken from a hyperemic earlobe before
the beginning of each test procedure.
MLD was applied by a trained physiotherapist, who used
specialized hand movements in a range of different sequences. The treatment was carried out as very light, completely
pain-free, rhythmical translational movements of the skin in
the flow direction of the lymph vessels. The subjects lay in
the supine position with their knees bent. The MLD started
with abdominal lymph drainage after which central lymph
stimulation was performed. MLD was consecutively applied
to the right and left lower extremities (leg) consecutively.
Each treatment session lasted approximately 30 minutes.
The control group did not receive any therapy.
Blood samples were drawn from the antecubital vein
shortly before MLD. Serum and plasma were separated by
centrifugation at 1,500 g for 15 minutes. All serum and
the plasma samples were stored at 80C until analysis.
Serum levels of AST, LDH, CK and plasma levels of lactate were determined by an autoanalyzer (Architect c8000,
Abbott Inc., Abbott Park IL, USA), using test kits by the
same manufacturer. Serum myoglobin level was determined
by a chemiluminescentce immunoassay analyzer (Architect
i2000, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA) using the commercial kits recommended by the manufacturer.
The blood samples were taken: 1) directly before the submaximal exercise (B-SE); 2) directly after the submaximal
exercise (A-SE); 3) after 30min rest / after the MLD application (A-MLD-R); 4) 2 hours after the submaximal exercise (2hA-SE) 5); 24 hours after the submaximal exercise
(24hA-SE) and 6) 48 hours after the submaximal exercise
(48hA-SE)
The SPSS 16 statistical package was used for statistical
analyses. The Mann and Whitney U-test for two independent
samples was performed for intergroup comparisons. Differences between the groups and over time were examined by
repeated measurements analysis of variance and stepwise
multivariate tests. The probability level (p-value) for significance was chosen as 0.05.

3389
Table 2. Changes in lactic acid (LA) and muscle enzymes (LDH, Mb, CK)
Measure

Group

LA (IUml1)

LDH (IUml1)

Mb (IUml1)

CK (IUml1)

B-SE

MLD
CG

13.16
11.41.7

151.214.1
156.518.4

4021
34.17.2

190.187.3
275.7312.2

A-SE

MLD
CG

71.228.6
54.310.1

182.123.1
185.521.4

80.746.9
60.314.5

235.8111.2
325320.6

A-MLD

MLD
CG

196.695.7
310.7306.2

2hA-SE

MLD
CG

193.3190.4
94.338
*
69.551.2
52.628.6

192.241.6
347.5279.5

24hA-SE

15533.2
185.115.6
*
143.621.7
174.424.8
*
153.416.8
15612.1

120.963.7
88.434.3

MLD
CG

21.37.7
29.67.5
*
12.54.3
19.97.5
*
11.41.9
19.110.6

48hA-SE

MLD
CG

13.97.3
158.2

14218.6
152.68.6

64.486.6
44.114.9

145.138.8
235.789.9
*
182.494
208.2139.4

* Significant difference between the MLD group and CG (p <0.05)

Before submaximal exercise (B-SE), after submaximal exercise (A-SE), after manual lymph drainage
(A-MLD), two hours after submaximal exercise (2hA-SE), 24 hours after submaximal exercise (24hASE), 48 hours after submaximal exercise (48hA-SE), lactic acid (LA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH),
myoglobin (Mb), creatine kinase (CK)

RESULTS
There were no significant differences in the physical
characteristics of two groups (p>0.05) (Table 1). Changes
in LA and the muscle enzymes, (LDH, myoglobin and CK)
are presented in Table 2. Statistically significant differences
from baseline data were found at the repeated measurements
over time of LA, LDH, myoglobin and CK in both groups
(p<0.05), except for CK in the control group, which showed
no significant differences.
Significant differences were found between the two
groups in baseline LA (p=0.027) and LDH (p=0.016); two
hours after SE in LA (p=0.034), LDH (p=0.012) and myoglobin (p=0.034); and 24h after SE in CK (p=0.043). No
other significant differences were found between the groups.
LA increased directly after SE in both groups. The increase
was followed by a significant decrease in the MLD group
after MLD, a difference that remained significant two hours
after SE. A similar pattern was observed for LDH. Change in
the myoglobin level was only significant at 2h after SE, and
in CK only 24h at SE.
DISCUSSION
This study was performed to assess the effect of MLD on
the reduction of tissue or muscle damage and the removal of
blood lactate and muscle enzymes after SE, in moderately
trained individuals. The importance of this study is in its
being the first to show the influence of MLD on LA. The
results demonstrate that MLD might be effective at removing blood lactate and some muscle enzymes after SE.

MLD was used to accelerate lymphatic circulation in this

study. MLD is a type of massage used to increase lymph
flow and reabsorption without increasing ultrafiltration;
and it requires special training. It is hypothesized that the
specific handling at the skin level causes contraction of the
superficial lymph vessels, increasing lymphatic drainage20).
It was reported that MLD application not only speeds up the
blood circulation but may also lead to faster elimination of
metabolic waste from the body and increase oxygen transport to the muscle21).
Another study of the effect of MLD, not too familiar a
concept in sport medicine, on muscle injury arising during
SE and the disposal of metabolic waste, has been published.
Two important aspects differentiate this study from the
former: first our evaluation of LA levels in addition to the
muscular enzymes (LDH, CK, myoglobine), and second, the
drawing of blood samples immediately after the MLD application. Thus, evaluated both LA levels and the immediate
effect of MLD were evaluated. Blood samples were drawn
2h after the MLD application in the study of Schillinger et
al.19); however, it was reported that MLD effect peaks within
30 minutes following MLD22). We observed a significant fall
in both LA and LDH immediately after MLD, and their application, with levels remained low at the end of the second
hour. This is an aspect in which this study offers a superior
feature. LDH levels fell after 48 hours in Schillingers study.
The main cause of fatigue developing during exercise is
LA builds up. Accumulation of LA increases the H concentration, thus reducing action potentials. This in turn reduces
calcium secretion from the sarcoplasma and muscle enzyme
activity. The first sign of fatigue that follows is a loss of

3390 J. Phys. Ther. Sci. Vol. 27, No. 11, 2015

strength in voluntary muscle contraction23). According to
Dierking and Bemben, LA is also responsible for the muscle
pain accompanying delayed fatigue, which continues for
2448 hours after exercise24). Exercise also depletes cellular
ATP. This results in increased cellular permeability and in
increases in the serum concentrations of skeletal muscle
enzymes such as CK, LDH and AST17), an increase which
are also affected also by the type and intensity of exercise
and the duration of muscular activity. The overall serum CK
evolution shows an increase especially at 24h after exercise,
and the effect that may persist for more than 4 days25). While
Schillingers study did not establish a significant difference
in CK levels, the present study showed that MLD was followed by a decrease in CK within 24 hours, and a reduction
in delayed muscular fatigue. The results of both studies
suggested that MLD contributed to mitigation of muscular
damage and enhanced the regenerative process of muscle
cells. In our opinion, such a contribution is significant, especially for athletes who have to strive daily to present their
best performance in competition. However, Nogueira et al.
analyzed CK before and (except CK), 24 h, 48 h, 72h and
96h after an exercise protocol. They classified individuals
as low and high responders at the peak of maximum
voluntary concentric muscle contraction. The classification
of the subjects into low and high responders groups was important for demonstrating that the most responsive group to
strength decrease after eccentric exercise also showed higher
DOMS levels. This notwithstanding, a relationship with CK
could not be established26).
Different methods including massage, cold application,
tensing and light exercise are used to help recovery after
exercise. Studies of these methods are as yet insufficient for
the purpose of drawing definitive conclusions. Published
studies considering massage performed post-exercise have
investigated its effect on variables such as delayed muscle
pain, sensitivity, and muscular function and performance.
Abad et al. reported there was no effect of post-exercise
massage on delayed muscle pain reduction27); Farr et al.
indicated that massage has no effect on muscle performance
and function, it does diminish pain intensity28). Mancinelli et
al. investigated the effect of massage on post-exercise symptoms of 22 trained women using the pressure pain threshold,
shuttle race times and vertical leaps as outcome measures,
and reported it resulted in muscular pain and an improvement in vertical leaps29). Emiliano Ce et al. performed a
study comparing the effects of deep/superficial massage
with those of passive tension and active to passive recovery
on the lactate level in the blood. They concluded that neither
of the two massage methods (deep vs superficial) or the passive static tension application was correlated to a significant
change in lactate levels; in other words, that they could be
used as an alternative to active recovery (at 50% VO2max)30).
These contradictory results can be explained by the absence
of a standard procedure for the different techniques used
under the description of massage and the small numbers
of subjects in the different studies31).
Another application thought to be potentially useful for
recovery is intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC). A
study performed by Draper investigated the contribution of
intermittent pneumatic compression on the muscle inflam-

mation marker C-reactive protein (CRP) and DOMS in

trained athletes after long distance running. The results indicated statistically there was no significant difference in CRP
or pain levels between the control run and treatment run2).
These results arent compatible with our results. However,
the data suggests the test subjects recovered one day after
receiving IPC than to the control, and a full day recovery for
a professional athlete is very important. Studies with greater
numbers of subjects comparing MLD to different recovery
methods, following up values, especially CK serum levels,
up to 120 hours are still needed in order to proceed to a further advance our understanding of muscular recovery.
REFERENCES
1) Torres R, Ribeiro F, Alberto Duarte J, et al.: Evidence of the physiotherapeutic interventions used currently after exercise-induced muscle damage:
systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport, 2012, 13: 101114.
[Medline] [CrossRef]
2) Draper SN: Effects of intermittent pneumatic compression on delayed
onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in long distance runners. Cleveland State
University. PhD Thesis. 2014.
3) Pastre CM, Bastos FD, Netto JJ, et al.: Post-exercise recovery methods: a
systematic review. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2009, 15: 138144.
4) Nelson N: Delayed onset muscle soreness: is massage effective? J Bodyw
Mov Ther, 2013, 17: 475482. [Medline] [CrossRef]
5) Glasgow PD, Ferris R, Bleakley CM: Cold water immersion in the management of delayed-onset muscle soreness: is dose important? A randomised
controlled trial. Phys Ther Sport, 2014, 15: 228233. [Medline] [CrossRef]
6) Rashid SA, Quddus N: Effect of brief intense TENS and cryotherapy on
the symptoms associated with delayed onset of muscle soreness in healthy
male subjects. Indian J Physiotherapy Occup Therapy-An Int J, 2013, 7:
15. [CrossRef]
7) Felismino AS, Costa EC, Aoki MS, et al.: Effect of low-level laser therapy
(808 nm) on markers of muscle damage: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci, 2014, 29: 933938. [Medline]
8) Cuesta-Vargas AI, Trav-Mesa A, Vera-Cabrera A, et al.: Hydrotherapy
as a recovery strategy after exercise: a pragmatic controlled trial. BMC
Complement Altern Med, 2013, 13: 180. [Medline] [CrossRef]
9) Pasiakos SM, Lieberman HR, McLellan TM: Effects of protein supplements on muscle damage, soreness and recovery of muscle function and
physical performance: a systematic review. Sports Med, 2014, 44: 655
670. [Medline] [CrossRef]
10) Hill J, Howatson G, van Someren K, et al.: Compression garments and recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage: a meta-analysis. Br J Sports
Med, 2014, 48: 13401346. [Medline] [CrossRef]
11) Hemmings B, Smith M, Graydon J, et al.: Effects of massage on physiological restoration, perceived recovery, and repeated sports performance.
Br J Sports Med, 2000, 34: 109114, discussion 115. [Medline] [CrossRef]
12) Han JH, Kim MJ, Yang HJ, et al.: Effects of therapeutic massage on gait
and pain after delayed onset muscle soreness. J Exerc Rehabil, 2014, 10:
136140. [Medline] [CrossRef]
13) Delextrat A, Hippocrate A, Leddington-Wright S, et al.: Including stretches to a massage routine improves recovery from official matches in basketball players. J Strength Cond Res, 2014, 28: 716727. [Medline] [CrossRef]
14) Martn ML, Hernndez MA, Avendao C, et al.: Manual lymphatic drainage therapy in patients with breast cancer related lymphoedema. BMC
Cancer, 2011, 11: 94. [Medline] [CrossRef]
15) Shim JM, Kim SJ: Effects of manual lymph drainage of the neck on EEG
in subjects with psychological stress. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 127129.
[Medline] [CrossRef]
16) Martin NA, Zoeller RF, Robertson RJ, et al.: The comparative effects of
sports massage, active recovery, and rest in promoting blood lactate clearance after supramaximal leg exercise. J Athl Train, 1998, 33: 3035. [Medline]
17) Alibeyolu A: Dzenli spor yapmayan gen erkeklerde akut dayankllk
egzersizi sonras hematolojik ve serum enzim deerlerindeki
deiikliklerin incelenmesi. Kafkas University. Graduate School of Health
Sciences. Master of Science Thesis. Kars; 2008.
18) Havas E, Komulainen J, Vihko V: Exercise-induced increase in serum creatine kinase is modified by subsequent bed rest. Int J Sports Med, 1997, 18:

3391
578582. [Medline] [CrossRef]
19) Schillinger A, Koenig D, Haefele C, et al.: Effect of manual lymph drainage on the course of serum levels of muscle enzymes after treadmill exercise. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 85: 516520. [Medline] [CrossRef]
20) Rose KE, Taylor HM, Twycross RG: Long-term compliance with treatment in obstructive arm lymphoedema in cancer. Palliat Med, 1991, 5:
5255. [CrossRef]
21) Fldi M, Strssenreuther R: Foundations of manual lymph drainage, 3rd
ed. New York: Elsevier; 2005, pp 449.
22) Fldi M, Kubik S: Lehrbuch der Lymphologie, 4th ed. Jena, Urban Fischer
Publisher; 2001, pp 530557.
23) Gltekin Z, ler AK, Srenkk , et al.: Effect of electrical stimulation
with high voltage pulsed galvanic current and Russian currents on lactic
acid accumulation: a preliminary study. Fizyoter Rehabil. 2006, 17: 8994.
24) Dierking JK, Bemben MG, Bemben DA, et al.: Validity of diagnostic ultrasound as a measure of delayed onset muscle soreness. J Orthop Sports Phys
Ther, 2000, 30: 116122, discussion 123125. [Medline] [CrossRef]
25) Hazar S: Egzersize bal iskelet ve kalp kas hasar. Spormetre, 2004, II:
119126.

26) Nogueira FR, Chacon-Mikahil MP, Vechin FC, et al.: Muscle soreness and
creatine kinase activity after eccentric actions: a cluster analysis. Rev Bras
Med Esporte. 2014, 20: 257261. [CrossRef]
27) Abad CC, Ito LT, Barroso R, et al.: Effect of classical massage on subjective perceived soreness, edema, range of motion and maximal strength after delayed onset muscle soreness. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2010, 16: 3640.
[CrossRef]
28) Farr T, Nottle C, Nosaka K, et al.: The effects of therapeutic massage on
delayed onset muscle soreness and muscle function following downhill
walking. J Sci Med Sport, 2002, 5: 297306. [Medline] [CrossRef]
29) Mancinelli CA, Davis DS, Aboulhosn L, et al.: The effects of massage on
delayed onset muscle soreness and physical performance in female collegiate athletes. Phys Ther Sport, 2006, 7: 513. [CrossRef]
30) C E, Limonta E, Maggioni MA, et al.: Stretching and deep and superficial
massage do not influence blood lactate levels after heavy-intensity cycle
exercise. J Sports Sci, 2013, 31: 856866. [Medline] [CrossRef]
31) Best TM, Hunter R, Wilcox A, et al.: Effectiveness of sports massage for
recovery of skeletal muscle from strenuous exercise. Clin J Sport Med,
2008, 18: 446460. [Medline] [CrossRef]