Playing1.e4e5 Excerpt
Playing1.e4e5 Excerpt
Playing1.e4e5 Excerpt
Playing 1.e4 e5
By
Nikolaos Ntirlis
Quality Chess
www.qualitychess.co.uk
Contents
Key to Symbols used
4
Foreword by Parimarjan Negi
5
Bibliography 7
Introduction 9
Summary of Recommendations
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Open Games
Early Deviations and Gambits
13
Bishops Opening and Vienna Game
45
Four Knights Introduction
63
Four Knights 4.d4 and 4.b5 87
Scotch Game
110
Two Knights 4.d4 and 4.d3
142
Two Knights with 4.g5 167
8
9
10
11
12
13
Spanish
Exchange Variations
203
On the Road to the Main Line
238
The Trendy d2-d3
261
Breyer 10.d3 and Sidelines after 10.d4
285
Breyer Alternatives to 13.f1 309
Breyer Main Lines
341
375
377
In this book, I was particularly impressed by Nikoss direct, dynamic ideas for Black against
the various non-Spanish variations. Black players, and books, often give these lines generic,
regurgitated treatment. Nikos, on the other hand, provides the ideal, principled solutions to
Whites various options in the Open Games. One example is the 4.g5 variation of the Two
Knights Defence. The critical 9.h4! has been giving Black a lot of trouble lately, but Nikos
analysed it extensively and came up with the almost unknown 9...c7!?, which leads to vibrant
play for Black and might even shut this line down as a try for a White advantage.
Against the Spanish, Nikos has wisely avoided any of the ultra-dynamic set-ups which can flutter
in and out of fashion. Instead he advocates the classical Breyer, which has been tried and tested by
numerous world champions and other leading players. The arising positions are hard to analyse,
as engines tend to lose some of their effectiveness in closed structures. I have often used that
to my advantage with White, winning many nice games by strangulating my opponents from
positions that were supposedly close to 0.00. Nikos, being Nikos, has done much more than
present a bunch of lines with dry, superficial engine assessments. Instead he has looked more
deeply, utilizing high-level correspondence games (including a few of his own) and sophisticated
analytical tools to refine his ideas. The result is a bombproof repertoire which is solid enough
never to be refuted, yet complex enough to offer plenty of winning chances.
Parimarjan Negi
Stanford, December 2015
Introduction
In 2012, the year after my first book (a collaboration with GM Jacob Aagaard on the Tarrasch
Defence) was published, I was hired as the openings coach of the Danish national team during
the Istanbul Olympiad. I was already a pretty respectable opening analyst back then, but I knew
I could improve. I followed the discussions in specialized forums regarding chess software and
opening analysis, and noticed that the main contributors were usually strong correspondence
players. I therefore made the decision to become one! This made a lot of sense, as I dont have time
for over-the-board competitions, and correspondence chess has enabled me to test my abilities as
an analyst against the worlds best.
At this point 9...b8! introduces the Breyer System, which sees Black reroute his knight to the
flexible d7-square. The Breyer has been used by the worlds elite for decades, so its soundness is
10
Playing 1.e4 e5
not in question. In some theoretical lines there is not a single piece or pawn exchange for more
than 25 moves, which tells you something about its complexity. The Breyer is the perfect choice
for the ambitious, strategically-oriented player who wants to fight for the win with Black. This is
proven by the list of our Breyer heroes, which includes Smejkal, Spassky, Portisch, Karpov, and
Carlsen. I might add that Adams, Leko and Svidler have all employed the Breyer when they have
wanted a break from the Marshall.
The Breyer has been tested for several decades at high levels of play, so there was already an
abundance of material. The challenge for me was to work on the numerous variations using the
software and tools at my disposal, with an especially deep focus on those variations which are
currently regarded as theoretically critical.
Repertoire Choices
This book is intended to be useful for ambitious correspondence players and grandmasters, while
also teaching amateurs how to play 1...e5 without overloading them with useless information. It
sounds like an impossible task, and readers will have to judge for themselves how close I came to
succeeding, but I am satisfied that I gave my best efforts.
In the chapters that follow, you will find antidotes to all of Whites main attempts after 1.e4 e5.
All authors write their books in the way they like to read them; I appreciate chess analysis of the
highest possible quality, but I also like books with more general instructive and entertainment
value as well. This is why I chose a format of complete games, which has the advantage of showing
how the play may develop after the opening. Also, a certain characteristic of 1...e5 is that it
has been played by all the World Champions and their challengers since the dawn of time, so
history has presented us with some incredibly instructive and beautiful games, which deserve to
be admired in full. Some of them are classic, famous games, in which modern analysis software
can shed new light on the work of previous commentators. In this book you will find new
games, old games, correspondence games and even the occasional blitz encounter; if I thought
a particular game showed in the best possible way what is happening in a particular variation,
I went ahead and included it.
Chapter 9
Diagram Preview
On this page you will find
eight diagrams with critical
moments from the coming
chapter. I recommend that
you take up to ten minutes
to think about each of them
(though much less in some
cases). The solutions are found
in the following chapter.
Black is to move unless
otherwise indicated.
How should Black continue?
(page 245)
How should Black respond to the
advance of the white knight?
(page 240)
How can Black gain
the initiative?
(page 241)
240
Spasskys 5.c3
1.e4 e5 2.f3 c6 3.b5 a6 4.a4 f6
5.c3
+
V
O
on
b+p
+
8...a5!
8...xd5?! is not advisable as White plays
9.xd5 with tempo, then plays c2-c3 and
d3-d4 as in the classic encounter Spassky
Beliavsky, Reykjavik 1988.
9.xe7 xe7 10.00 00
Black is poised to eliminate the b3-bishop,
with comfortable equality. We will follow a
model game in which he went on to seize the
initiative.
11.d2
11.g5 looks more natural, but Black can go
for a similar plan with: 11...h6 12.h4 xb3
(12...g5 is given by Mikhalevski intending
13...b7
This final developing move is necessary, as
the immediate 13...f5? runs into 14.exf5 xf5
15.d4! followed by c6.
14.d4 f5!
Black obtained the initiative and went on
to win in Spassky Yusupov, Linares 1990.
If you remember this simple plan, it becomes
pretty easy to deal with the 5.c3 variation. If
you want more complete coverage of this line
from Blacks side, Mikhalevskis Open Spanish
book is excellent.
241
5...e7!
5...b5 6.b3 c5 is perfectly respectable,
but the bishop on c5 does not really tie in with
the rest of our repertoire; besides, we would
have to learn a different set-up against 5.00
e7 6.e2.
5...b5 6.b3 e7 is not bad, but it allows
White the extra option of 7.a4.
6.c3
The justification of Blacks last move is that
6.xc6 dxc6 7.xe5 d4 sees Black regain the
pawn with an easy game.
6...b5 7.b3
7.c2 is an attempt to exploit the delayed
...b5, but it looks odd to put the bishop on
a closed diagonal. 7...d5! is a good response;
that being said, 8.d4!? leads to tricky play.
A logical continuation is 8...g4!? 9.exd5
xf3! 10.xf3 xd5 11.xd5 xd5 12.dxe5
xe5 13.00 00 when Blacks lead in
development and centralized knights offered
full compensation for Whites bishop pair in
Bisguier Matanovic, Zagreb 1955.
7...d5!
7...00 invites a transposition to Game 38
below, but White has the extra option of 8.d4,
a favourite line of Tiviakov. The text move does
not give him so much freedom.
242
8.d3
This has been by far the most popular choice.
8.exd5 xd5 9.xe5 xe5 10.xe5 f6
11.00 00 12.d4 d6 can be compared with
the note to Whites 9th move in the main game
below. Black has lost a bit of flexibility, as he
was forced to play ...f6 instead of ...b7, but
he still has full compensation for the sacrificed
pawn.
8...00 9.bd2
9.00 leads straight to Game 38 below, so
the question is whether White can exploit the
fact that he has not yet castled. Transferring
the knight to g3 is the obvious try, but Black is
well placed to meet it.
9...e6 10.f1
GAME 38
Judit Polgar Michael Adams
Las Palmas 1994
6...b5!
Perhaps the exclamation mark is a bit
generous, but I want to remind you of why
it was worth inserting 3...a6 as soon as the
bishop landed on b5. Since 6.e2 (as well as
6.e1, 6.d3 etc.) defends e4 and thus threatens
to capture on c6 and e5, it is useful to have
...b5 available to stop this idea altogether.
243
9.d3
9.exd5?! has been played in a lot of games, but
Black gets an excellent version of the Marshall
Attack: 9...xd5 10.xe5 xe5 11.xe5 b7
12.d4 d7 Black intends ...ae8 and ...d6
with more than enough compensation for
the pawn, as has been demonstrated in many
practical games.
9...e6!
If it wasnt for this move I would have found
it hard to recommend something against the
Worrall that I find completely fine for Black,
at least in the practical sense. There are, of
course, other respectable ways for Black to
play, such as Karpovs 9...d4 or the Kaufmannrecommended 9...b7, but both of them
allow White to maintain annoying pressure
along the a2-g8 diagonal. I would advise you
to check Greets book to see exactly how White
can cause problems.
To see the advantages of the text move, it is
worth comparing it to the alternative:
9...e8
This is actually what Adams played in the
main game, but I have taken the liberty
of changing the move order to show my
preferred sequence. Essentially, the drawback
of the rook move is that White gets to take
advantage of his powerful bishop on b3,
whereas my main line strives to neutralize
this piece as quickly as possible.
10.bd2
Greet recommends 10.e1!? to maintain the
option of meeting ...f8 with g5, but I
think the text move is trickier.
10...f8
10...h6 does not work due to 11.exd5 xd5
12.xe5 xe5 13.xe5 b7 14.e4 when
Blacks compensation is inadequate.
It is also a bad time for 10...e6 in view of
11.g5 g4 12.df3! h6 13.exd5! xd5
14.e4!.
244
11.exd5!
11.a3 h6 12.a2 e6 13.d1 was the
continuation of Polgar Adams. I would be
happy to reach this position with Black, but
I will do so via the bolded move order to rule
out the tricky option given in the main line
of this note.
11...xd5
If my opponent captures a central pawn,
I would prefer to be able to take it back.
11...a5 is most likely a better move, when
White can choose between trying to hold
on to his extra pawn or retreating his bishop
and playing an interesting middlegame.
Maybe its equal, but I would rather not give
my opponent this kind of choice.
12.g5!N
This strong move puts Black under some
pressure. Now you can see why neutralizing
the b3-bishop is my top priority.
10.d1
This has been Whites most popular choice,
and it keeps us on track to reach our target
position from Polgar Adams.
Of course 10.g5 makes little sense as
10...g4 is annoying for White.
It is too early for 10.exd5 xd5 11.xe5 xe5
12.xe5, as Black has excellent compensation
after 12...d6 or 12...e8.
Greet points out that 10.bd2 h5!? is
irritating for White. Black could also play
10...h6 with a likely transposition to our main
line.
Finally, 10.g5 usually only makes sense
when Blacks bishop has retreated to f8.
A strong reply for Black is: 10...e8 11.bd2
h6 12.h4
11...h6! 12.a3
This is a typical Worrall move, ensuring that
the bishop can remain on the a2-g8 diagonal
in the event of ...a5. However, it is slow and
not the most testing move overall.
12.f1 was recommended by Greet, and
subsequently tested by Adams. 12...d6
(Greet gives 12...f8 13.g3 d7 14.d4!?
with interesting play; Blacks best reply looks
to be 14...d6 with approximate equality)
13.g3 e7!? 14.d4 White eventually won in
Adams Gustafsson, Gibraltar (rapid playoff)
2010, but Blacks play can be improved with:
245
19.b4 e5
19...g5!? followed by a pawn assault with
...f5 and ...g4 looks gruesome for White.
20.xe5
246
8.c3
Otherwise Black will be able to eliminate the
Spanish Bishop with ...a5.
8.h3 a5 9.c3 00 10.d3 has occurred in
quite a number of games over the years, but
I will just show one nice example: 10...b7
(10...e8 was played in Korchnoi Portisch,
Belgrade 1970, but the text move is more
dynamic) 11.g5 c6 12.e2