0% found this document useful (0 votes)
205 views7 pages

A Class of K-Quasi-Pnormal Operators

T U *( T )2k - T ( T )2k U* The document introduces a new class of operators called k-quasi-p normal operators as a generalization of quasi-p normal operators. Some key points: =0 1) An operator T is k-quasi-p normal if (T*T)k commutes with (T+T*). Hence UT = TU 2) Several properties of k-quasi-p normal operators are characterized, including that powers and scalar multiples of k-quasi-p normal operators are also k-quasi-p normal. Conversely, assume UT = TU, then by

Uploaded by

rajasekarkala
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
205 views7 pages

A Class of K-Quasi-Pnormal Operators

T U *( T )2k - T ( T )2k U* The document introduces a new class of operators called k-quasi-p normal operators as a generalization of quasi-p normal operators. Some key points: =0 1) An operator T is k-quasi-p normal if (T*T)k commutes with (T+T*). Hence UT = TU 2) Several properties of k-quasi-p normal operators are characterized, including that powers and scalar multiples of k-quasi-p normal operators are also k-quasi-p normal. Conversely, assume UT = TU, then by

Uploaded by

rajasekarkala
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016

ISSN: 2348-3040

A Class Of K-Quasi-Pnormal Operators


1

K.MANIKANDAN & 2M.ATHIYAMAN

Assistant professor & Hod, Department of Mathematics, Dr.SNS Rajalaksmi College of Arts &
Science
2
Research Scholar,Department of Mathematics, Dr.SNS Rajalaksmi College of Arts & Science

AbstractIn this paper we introduce a new class of k quasi-p normal operator as a generalization
of quasi -p normal operator. Let H be a non zero complex Hilbert space & let B(H) denote the
algebra of all bounded linear operators on H. an operator TB(H) is called k quasi p normal if
(T*T)k commutes with (T+T*) i.e..
(T*T)k (T+T*)=(T+T*) (T*T)k and it is denote [KQPN]. In this paper we investicate sum
properties of quasi p normal opertors & k quasi p normal operators are also characterized in
terms of commutativity with the multiplication operator induced by the Radon-Nikodyn
derivative of the measure (Tk)-1 with respect to .
Keywords: self-adjoint operators, unitary operators, binormal operator, composition operators
Introduction:
class of k-quasi-P-normal is introduced and
is defined as (T*T)k (T+T*) = (T+T*)
(T*T)k in the Hilbert space H for k 0 and
some characterisations are proved. This k1.1 k-quasi p- normal operator

quasi-P-normal operator is introduced as a


generalization of k-quasi normal operator
and quasi P -normal operators.
If k=1, then k-quasi P- normal operator
becomes quasi -P normal operator.

An operator () is said to be k-quasi


P- normal operator if (T*T)k commute with

1.2 Related Theorem to k-Quasi-P-

T+T*

Normal Operator

i.e. (T*T)k (T+T*)=

1.2.1 Proposition

(T+T*) (T*T)k for k 1

If T is k-quasi-P- normal operator, then the


equality ((T*T)k (T+T*))n
1

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016


ISSN: 2348-3040

= ((T*T)k (T+T*))q (T*T)k(T+T*)

= (T+T*)n ((T*T)k)n holds true for all


.

= (T+T*)q ((T*T)k)q (T*T)k (T+T*)

Proof

Since T is k-quasi P-normal, applying


definition q+2 times

Let us prove the theorem by mathematical


induction method.

We can drive the derived result as

When n=1

( (T*T)k (T+T*) )q+1

(T*T)k (T+T*)

= (T+T*)q+1 ( (T*T)k )q+1

= (T+T*) (T*T)k

(1)

Hence the result is true for all n N.

In this case T is k-quasi-P-normal operator

1.2.2 Proposition

When n=2, LHS of the equality becomes

If is a k-quasi P normal operator

((T*T)k (T+T*))2

and is any scalar which is real,


then is also a k- quasi -P- normal

= (T*T)k (T+T*) (T*T)k (T+T*)

operator.
= (T+T*)(T*T)k (T*T)k (T+T*)
Proof
k

=(T+T*) (T*T) (T+T*)(T*T)

Since T is a quasi P normal operator


= (T+T*)(T+T*) (T*T)k (T*T)k

[T+T*, (T*T)k]=0

= (T*T)2 ((T*T)k)2

(T*T)k (T+T*) = (T+T*) (T*T)k =0

When n=1 is true and n=2 is true also

(1)

If be any scalar which is real, then (T)*

Assume the theorem is true for n=q

=T*=T* (Where is real so = )

((T*T)k (T+T*))q = (T+T*)q ((T*T)k)q

Now

(2)

((T)*( T))k ( T+ ( T)*)

When n=q+1, we get


= ( T+ ( T)*) ((T)*( T))k
((T*T)k (T+T*))q+1
Take LHS
2

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016


ISSN: 2348-3040

((T)*( T))k ( T+ ( T)*) = 2 (T*T)k

Therefore T*T = TT*

[T+T*]

(2)

Now substituting T* for T in (1) we have


= 2+1 (T*T)k [T+T*]

(2)

(T*+ (T*)*) ((T*)* T*)

And RHS

= (T*+T) (TT*) (3)

( T+ ( T)*) ((T)*( T))k

and ((T*)*T*) (T*+ (T*)*)

= [T+T*] 2 (T*T)k

= (TT*) (T*+T) (4)

( T+ ( T)*) ((T)*( T))k

By (2), (3) and (4)

=2+1 [T+T*] (T*T)k

We get (T*+ (T*)*) ((T*)*T*)

From (1), (2) and (3) we get that

= ( (T*)*T*) (T*+ (T*)*)

((T)*( T))k ( T+ ( T)*)

(T*+T**) (T**T*) = (T**T*) (T*+T**)

= ( T+ ( T)*) ((T)*( T))k


Hence T* is also k-quasi P normal operator.
Hence is a k quasi P- normal
1.2.4 Proposition

operator.

If T is a self ad-joint operator,

1.2.3 Proposition

Then T is a k quasiP normal operator.

If T is a k-quasi -P normal

Proof

operator which is a normal operator also,

Since T is a self-adjoint operator.

Then T* is also a k-quasi- P- normal


operator.

Therefore T* = T

Proof

(T*T) (T+T*) = (T+T*) (T*T)

Since T is a k-quasi P normal operator.

Now,Take LHS

We know that
(T+T*)(T*T) =(T*T) (T+T*)

(T*T) (T+T*) = (TT) (T+T)


(1)

= 2 2T

Since T is normal
3

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016


ISSN: 2348-3040

= 2 2+1

Therefore [T+T*, (T*T) ] = 0

(1)

Take RHS (T+T*) (T*T) = (T+T) (TT)

i.e. (T*T) (T+T*) = (T+T*) (T*T)

= 2T ( 2 )
(T+T*) (T*T) = 2 2+1

Now putting ST for T we have


((ST)*(ST) ) (ST+ (ST)*)

(2)

= (T*S ST) (ST+T*S)

Hence (1) and (2)


(T*T) (T+T*) = (T+T*) (T*T)

= 2 (T*T) S (T+T*)

So T is a k-quasi P- normal operator.

= 2+1 (T*T) (T+T*)

1.2.5 Proposition

(ST+ (ST)*) ((ST)*(ST) ) = (ST+T*S)


(T*S ST)

Let T be a k quasi P normal


operator on a Hilbert Space H. Let S be a

= S (T+T*) 2 (T*T)

Self adjoint operator for which T and S


(ST+ (ST)*) ((ST)*(ST) )

Commute, and then ST is also a k quasi Pnormal operator.

= 2+1 (T+T*) (T*T)

Proof

(ST)*(ST) (ST+ (ST)*)


Since S is a Self adjoint operator.

= (ST + (ST)*) (ST)*ST

Therefore S* =S.

Hence ST is a k-quasi P normal operator.

Now S and T Commute.

1.2.6 Proposition

Therefore

ST = TS

Let T be a self adjoint operator on a Hilbert

(ST)* = (TS)*

Space H. and S be any operator on H, then


S*TS is a k-quasi- P- normal operator on H.

T*S* = S*T*
Proof
(or)

T*S

= ST*
Since T is self adjoint

Now Since T is a k quasi P normal operator.


We know that
4

T* = T

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016


ISSN: 2348-3040

(T*T) (T+T*) = (T+T*) (T*T)

1.2.7 Proposition

Now putting S*TS for T

Let T= be the polar decomposition of


an operator T, then T= is a k-quasi P-

((S*TS)* S*TS ) (S*TS +(S*TS)*)


= (S*TS+(S*TS)*) ((S*TS)* S*TS )

normal if and only if =


(1)

Proof

((S*TS)*S*TS) (S*TS+(S*TS)*)

Assume

=((S*T*S**) S*TS ) (S*TS +(S*T*S**))

then

= ((S*T*S) S*TS ) (S*TS + (S*T*S))

(T+T*) (T*T) - (T*T) (T+T*)

((S*TS)*S*TS) (S*TS+(S*TS)*)

=( + *)( * ) - * )

=((S*TS) S*TS ) (S*TS +(S*TS))

(2)

( + *)=( + *)( )2 - )2
( + *) = ( )2 + *( )2

(S*TS +(S*TS)*) ((S*TS)* S*TS )


=(S*TS +(S*T*S**)) ((S*T*S**) S*TS )
=(S*TS +(S*T*S)) ((S*T*S) S*TS )

that

- ( )2 -( )2 *)

=( )2+1 + *( )2+1

- ( )2+1 -( )2+1 *

(S*TS +(S*TS)*) ((S*TS)* S*TS)

=0

=(S*TS +(S*TS)) ((S*TS) S*TS ) (3)

So T is k-quasi P- normal
Hence (2) and (3) we get
( )2+1 = ( )2

Which shows that S*TS is self adjoint,

= ( )21

and since every self adjoin operator is kquasi- P- normal operator

= ( )21

Hence S*TS is also k-quasi P- normal

= ( )2+1

operator.

If T is k-quasi P-normal, then


0 = (T+T*) (T*T) - (T*T) (T+T*)

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016


ISSN: 2348-3040

=( + *)( * ) -

*( )2 - ( )2 * annihilates on H=

( * ) ( + *)

N ( ), that is *( )2
( )2 *

=( + *)( )2 -( )2 ( + *

= *hold since
= ( )2 + *( )2

*( )

-( )

1.2.8 Proposition

*)

A power of k-quasi P- normal

= ( )2 - ( )2 +

operator

*( )2 - ( )2 *
= (( )2 -

is approximated

constant terms.

= ( )2 - ( )2 +
2

uniformly by polynomials of ( )2 without

- ( )2 -( )2 *)

consequently

is

again

k-quasi-p-normal

operator.
( )2 ) +

Proof

( *( )2 - ( )2 *)

Let T be a k-quasi P-normal. We


prove

The first part of the equality means

the

assertion

by

mathematical

that (( )2 - ( )2 ) annihilates on

induction since T is k-quasi-P-normal, the

( ) by continuity of an operator and also

result is true for m=1,

( )2 - ( )2 annihilates on N ,

(T+T*) (T*T) = (T*T) (T+T*)

(1)

since ()= N , so that ( )2 Now assume that the result is true for m=n

( )2 annihilates on H= N ( ),
that is ( )2 = ( )2 consequently

[(T+T*)

( )=

(2)

( )

hold

since

is

approximated uniformly by polynomials of

(T*T) ] =[(T*T)

(T+T*)]

Now let us prove the result for m=n+1

( )2 without constant terms.

[(T+T*) (T*T) ]+1 =[(T*T) (T+T*)] +1


The second part of the equality
means that *( )2 -( )2 * annihilates

[(T+T*) (T*T) ]+1 = [(T+T*) (T*T) ]

on ( ) by continuity of an operator and

(T+T*) (T*T)

also *( )2 - ( )2 * annihilates on

= [(T*T) (T+T*)] (T*T) (T+T*)

N , since ( *)= N , so that


[(T+T*) (T*T) ]+1 = [(T*T) (T+T*)] +1
6

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016


ISSN: 2348-3040

Thus result is true for m=n+1

[5]

research and management (IJRM) volume 2


issue 12 page 1811-1814, 2014

Recently, lot of research work is


being carried out in the field of operator
theory particularly in area of general
operators.
The further work can be introduced
as k-quasi-P-normal composition operators
on L2 space
References
[1] Dipshikha Bhattacharya and Narendran
Prasad, quasi-P- normal operators linear
operators on Hilbert space for which T+T*
commute,

Ultra

Scientist

Vol.24(2)A, 269-272 (2012).


[2] Senthilkumar.D, Maheswari Naik.P,
Santhi.R,

Sivasathya.A

operators, International journal of scientific

Conclusion

T*T

Vimala.V, Some properties of quasi normal

is also a k-quasi P-normal for each n.

and

Vidhyaprapa.k

k-quasi

normal

operators,

International Journal of Mathematics and


Computation, Vol 15; Issue No.2; Year 2012
[3] Somasundaram.D, A First course in
Functional analysis Published by N.K Mehra
for narosa publishing house Pvt.Ltd NEW
DELHI 110002
[4] Sterling.K. Berberian state university of
lowa, Introduction to Hilbert space, NEW
YORK. OXFORD University PRESS1961
7

You might also like