Obr1053 PDF
Obr1053 PDF
Obr1053 PDF
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01053.x
Obesity Comorbidity
Summary
While many women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are overweight,
obese or centrally obese, the effect of excess weight on the outcomes of PCOS is
inconsistent. The review aimed to assess the effects of overweight, obesity and
central obesity on the reproductive, metabolic and psychological features of
PCOS. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled
Trials (CENTRAL) and PSYCINFO were searched for studies reporting outcomes
according to body mass index categories or body fat distribution. Data were
presented as mean difference or risk ratio (95% confidence interval). This review
included 30 eligible studies. Overweight or obese women with PCOS had
decreased sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), increased total testosterone,
free androgen index, hirsutism, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, homeostatic model
assessment-insulin resistance index and worsened lipid profile. Obesity significantly worsened all metabolic and reproductive outcomes measured except for
hirsutism when compared to normal weight women with PCOS. Overweight
women had no differences in total testosterone, hirsutism, total-cholesterol and
low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol compared to normal weight women and no
differences in SHBG and total testosterone compared to obese women. Central
obesity was associated with higher fasting insulin levels. These results suggest that
prevention and treatment of obesity is important for the management of PCOS.
Keywords: Central obesity, obesity, overweight, polycystic ovary syndrome.
obesity reviews (2013) 14, 95109
Introduction
The prevalence of obesity has increased worldwide in the
last few decades including Europe, United States and Australia (13). This had significant impact on the development of chronic diseases such as the metabolic syndrome,
coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes. In addition,
obesity also has a significant impact on reproductive
health, as excess body weight is the main cause for ovulatory infertility (4). This is closely associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a common endocrine
disorder among reproductive-aged women associated
with anovulation, infertility and hyperandrogenism. It is
obesity reviews
Methods
Identification of studies and eligibility criteria
Relevant studies were identified from the following electronic databases using the subject headings as shown in
Supporting Information Table S1: MEDLINE, EMBASE,
CINAHL, PSYCINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of
Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). All articles published before
November 2010 were considered for eligibility. Only articles
published in the English language were included. The search
strategy shown in Supporting Information Table S1 was
constructed for MEDLINE. Equivalent subject headings
were used for the searches in other databases. All reviewers
were also asked to provide any potentially relevant studies
for consideration. All studies of women with PCOS were
considered for eligibility. We selected studies where the
metabolic, reproductive and psychological outcomes of
PCOS were compared between overweight or obese and
normal weight women and where participants were either
consecutively recruited or randomly sampled. We excluded
studies where body weight, BMI, waist circumference or
waisthip ratio was part of the selection criteria. For study
inclusion, PCOS was defined according to the NIH (5) or
ESHRE/ASRM (45) criteria. Overweight or obesity in adults
was defined by World Health Organization (WHO) (46)
(BMI 25 kg m-2 for overweight, BMI 30 kg m-2 for
obesity). In studies on Asian subjects, overweight was considered at BMI 23 and obesity at BMI 25 (46). For
adolescents, agegender specific percentile distributions for
BMI in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
growth charts were used to identify those who were overweight (85th95th percentile) or obese (>95th percentile)
(47). Central obesity was defined as waisthip ratio above
0.85 (48). Two reviewers (SL and LM) independently identified the articles that met the selection criteria of this review.
Discrepancies were resolved by consultation and arbitration
(SL, LM, RN and MD).
Data extraction
General characteristics of the study (author, year of publication, study location, study period, study design), characteristics of the study population (recruitment source,
sampling method, age, ethnicity, number of women with
and without PCOS, proportion of women who were lean,
overweight, obese or centrally obese), definition of PCOS,
pre-existing medication, physical activity and diet history,
definition of obesity or central obesity, measurement of
height, weight and waist circumference, and the outcomes
of PCOS by BMI (total-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein [HDL]-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein [LDL]cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting insulin, fasting glucose,
homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance index
2012 The Authors
obesity reviews 2012 International Association for the Study of Obesity
obesity reviews
Quality assessment
Quality of the included studies was assessed using criteria
based on the NewcastleOttawa scale for non-randomized
studies (49). Criteria assessed the selection of women with
PCOS, comparability of the normal weight, overweight,
obese or centrally obese groups, and the quality of outcome
measurement. One reviewer assessed all the articles
while another independently appraised 10% of randomly
selected studies. Inter-reviewer agreement of 0.78 was
reached, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
Outcomes of interest
The primary a priori end points were the metabolic, reproductive and psychological outcomes of overweight and
obese women combined compared to normal weight
women with PCOS. The secondary a priori end point was
the comparison of metabolic, reproductive and psychological outcomes in normal weight, overweight and obese
women with PCOS as separate subgroups (i.e. comparing
normal weight with overweight, normal weight with obese,
and overweight with obese women with PCOS), and in
PCOS women with or without central obesity.
(The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Results
Characteristics of included studies and quality
assessment
The search yielded 9,874 citations as shown in Fig. 1.
Based on our selection criteria, 1,485 studies were identified for further assessment in full text. Of these, 670 were
excluded due to insufficient data to determine the proportion of women who were overweight, obese or centrally
obese, 234 due to women with PCOS not being consecutively or randomly sampled, 188 due to PCOS diagnosis
not consistent with NIH or ESHRE/ASRM criteria, 178
due to definition of the overweight and obesity not consistent with WHO criteria, 91 due to patients recruited based
on BMI or body weight, 77 due to outcomes not presented
according to BMI categories, 7 due to non-English reports,
and 10 due to duplication of data. Finally, 30 studies were
included in this systematic review and meta-analysis.
Characteristics of the included studies are shown in
Table 1. Twenty studies compared the outcomes of overweight and obese women to normal weight women with
Records identified
through database
searching (n = 9870)
Additional records
identified by reviewers
(n = 4)
Data analysis
Mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals
(CIs) were calculated for each continuous outcome for all
included studies. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI were calculated for each dichotomous outcome for all included
studies. Continuous data were combined using the inverse
variance model while dichotomous data were combined
using the MantelHaenszel model. Heterogeneity between
the studies was examined by c2 tests for significance
(P < 0.1 was considered statistically significant). Inconsistency between studies was quantified using I2 tests (I2 < 25%
was considered low heterogeneity, I2 > 50% was considered substantial heterogeneity). The fixed fixed-effects
model was used when there was no statistically significant
heterogeneity and the random-effects model was used when
significant statistical heterogeneity was present. Funnel
plots were used to assess publication bias. The data analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1
2012 The Authors
obesity reviews 2012 International Association for the Study of Obesity
Records excluded on
title/abstract (n = 6463)
Full-text articles
excluded (n = 1455)
Turkey
Brazil
Italy
Finland
Spain
Hong Kong
Italy
Italy
Italy
Germany
Germany
Germany
Greece
Spain
United States
and Italy
Sweden
Denmark
Germany
UK
Korea
United States
UK
Spain
Italy
India
Italy
Iran
Saudi Arabia
Germany
Turkey
ESHRE/ASRM
NIH
ESHRE/ASRM
ESHRE/ASRM
ESHRE/ASRM
ESHRE/ASRM
ESHRE/ASRM
NIH
NIH
ESHRE/ASRM
ESHRE/ASRM
ESHRE/ASRM
NIH
NIH
ESHRE/ASRM
NIH
ESHRE/ASRM
NIH
NIH
ESHRE/ASRM
NIH
ESHRE/ASRM
ESHRE/ASRM
ESHRE/ASRM
ESHRE/ASRM
ESHRE/ASRM
NIH
ESHRE/ASRM
NIH
ESHRE/ASRM
PCOS definition
31.0 2.0
29.0 1.0
28.4 8.4
30.2 6.4
26.4 1.1
27.3 1.1
28.2 7.0
28.0 6.9
25.0 4.9
26.0 6.0
22.0 4.4
27.5 4.1
24.2 5.1
30.0 1.4
29.4 2.3
24.8 5.3
20.8 5.9
24.8 5.6
35.9 5.0
28.9 0.6
25.5 3.9
26.7 3.6
26.0 5.0
29.0 5.0
NA
28.0 6.3
24.0 1.0
27.4 1.2
31.4 5.8
32.6 6.7
Range: 1534
Range: 1933
Range: 1933
22.5 5.3
23.2 6.9
26.88 2.21
24.73 2.91
25.6 5.6
Participants (n)
Age (mean SD
or otherwise stated)
Testosterone
Hirsutism
Hirsutism, testosterone
Hirsutism
IFG/IGT
Diabetes, IFG/IGT
Testosterone
IFG/IGT
Testosterone
SHBG, free T
Outcome measures
C, cholesterol; ESHRE/ASRM, European Society for Human Reproductive and Embryology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine; FAI, free androgen index; free T, free testosterone; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR,
homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance index; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NA, not applicable; NIH, National Institutes of Health; ob, obese; owt, overweight;
PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; SD, standard deviation; SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin.
Country
Author (year)
obesity reviews
obesity reviews
Subgroup analyses
Overweight women (BMI 2529.9 or BMI 2324.9 for
Asian population) compared to normal weight women
with polycystic ovary syndrome
Overweight women with PCOS had lower SHBG and
HDL-cholesterol, and higher FAI, fasting insulin, HOMAIR, fasting glucose and triglyceride (Table 4). Being overweight had no significant effect of total testosterone,
hirsutism, total-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol in women
with PCOS. No studies comparing overweight women
to normal weight women reported 2-h OGTT insulin
or glucose. Significant heterogeneity was seen in studies
reporting hirsutism, HOMA-IR, but not in studies reporting SHBG, total testosterone, fasting insulin, fasting
glucose and all lipid parameters.
According to the only study reporting the prevalence of
IFG/IGT of overweight and normal weight women with
PCOS (53), those who were overweight had higher RR for
IFG/IGT compared to those with normal weight (Table 4).
No study comparing overweight to normal weight women
with PCOS reported the prevalence of type 2 diabetes.
Obese women (BMI 30 or BMI 25 for Asian)
compared to normal weight women with polycystic
ovary syndrome
Obese women with PCOS had lower SHBG and HDLcholesterol, and higher total testosterone, FAI, fasting
insulin, HOMA-IR, fasting glucose, total-cholesterol, LDLcholesterol and triglyceride compared to normal weight
women (Table 4). Obesity had no significant effect on
hirsutism. No studies comparing obese to normal weight
women with PCOS reported 2-h OGTT insulin or glucose.
There was significant heterogeneity in the studies reporting
SHBG, hirsutism, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HDLcholesterol and triglyceride, but no heterogeneity was seen
obesity reviews
Author (year)
Selection
Comparability
Exposure
Total
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
6
7
7
5
6
6
6
5
6
5
5
6
6
7
7
7
7
5
7
Selection
(1) Is the definition of overweight/obesity adequate? (a) yes, with independent validation*, (b) yes,
e.g. record linkage or based on self-reports, (c) no description.
(2) Representativeness of the cases: (a) consecutive or obviously representative series of cases*,
(b) potential for selection biases or not stated.
(3) Selection of normal weight controls: (a) same source as cases*, (b) hospital controls, (c) no
description.
(4) Definition of normal weight controls: (a) not overweight or obese by WHO criteria*, (b) no
description of source.
Comparability
(1) Comparability of cases and controls on basis of design or analysis: (a) study controls for age*,
(b) study controls for any additional factor*
Exposure
(1) Ascertainment of metabolic, reproductive and psychological outcomes: (a) secure record (e.g.
surgical records) or independently measured*, (b) structured interview blinded to case/control
status*, (c) interview not blinded to case/control status, (d) written self-report or medical record only,
(e) no description.
(2) Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls: (a) yes*, (b) no.
(3) Non-response rate: (a) same rate for both groups*, (b) non-respondents described, (c) rate
difference and no designation.
*=1 point awarded.
obesity reviews
101
Table 3 Results of meta-analyses for studies comparing overweight and obese (BMI 25) to normal weight (BMI < 25) women with PCOS
Analysis
Studies
Participants
c2 (P value)
I2 (%)
12
16
5
5
9
6
8
2
1
2
1
7
4
5
7
988
1,304
550
325
800
700
633
364
184
396
102
567
281
384
567
11.89 (P = 0.37)
140.60 (P < 0.001)
11.97 (P = 0.02)
5.70 (P = 0.13)
20.40 (P = 0.09)
46.10 (P < 0.001)
12.89 (P = 0.07)
4.80 (P = 0.03)
NA
11.06 (P < 0.001)
NA
19.08 (P = 0.004)
5.53 (P = 0.14)
16.29 (P = 0.003)
35.72 (P < 0.001)
8
89
67
47
61
89
46
79
NA
91
NA
69
46
75
83
BMI, body mass index; C, cholesterol; CI, confidence interval; FAI, free androgen index; FG, FerrimanGallwey; HDL, high-density lipoprotein;
HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance index; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; LDL, low-density
lipoprotein; NA, not applicable; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; RR, risk ratio; SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin.
Discussion
Principal findings
We report here that being overweight or obese was associated with significantly worse reproductive and metabolic
features of PCOS. We additionally report that being obese
was significantly associated with worse metabolic and
reproductive outcomes measured, except for hirsutism,
when compared to normal weight women with PCOS.
In contrast, women who were overweight but not obese
only had no differences in total testosterone, hirsutism,
total-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol compared to normal
weight women, and no differences in SHBG, total testosterone and fasting lipids compared to obese women. Central
obesity was associated with higher fasting insulin. There
were no data on psychological parameters and limited data
on prevalence of IFG, IGT and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Interpretation of findings
Overweight and obesity on sex
hormone-binding globulin
BMI has previously shown to be negatively associated with
SHBG in women with and without PCOS (27,54,55) with
this relationship likely to be mediated by insulin. SHBG
and insulin were inversely related in women with and
without PCOS, as insulin inhibits hepatic SHBG production (56). Decreased SHBG contributes to hyperandrogenism by increasing bioavailable androgens delivered to
target organs (57,58) and is therefore a negative reproductive consequence of being overweight or obese. From the
current analysis, it is possible that the effect of adiposity on
SHBG predominantly occurs in overweight women with
obesity reviews
Table 4 Results of meta-analyses for studies comparing obese (BMI 30), overweight (BMI 2529.9) and normal weight (BMI < 25) women with
PCOS
Analysis
Studies
Participants
c2 (P value)
I2 (%)
1.19 (P = 0.28)
12.78 (P < 0.001)
3.75 (P = 0.05)
16
92
73
0.59 (P = 0.90)
5.27 (P = 0.15)
2.17 (P = 0.57)
0
43
0
2
2
2
252
395
317
4
4
4
299
457
386
FAI
1
1
1
210
336
266
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3
3
3
262
407
335
9.93 (P = 0.007)
11.14 (P=0.004)
0.24 (P = 0.89)
80
82
0
2
2
2
79
109
102
2.43 (P = 0.12)
4.51 (P = 0.03)
0.25 (P = 0.62)
59
78
0
HOMA-IR
3
3
3
379
536
429
7.69 (P = 0.02)
66.34 (P < 0.001)
23.95 (P < 0.001)
74
97
92
2
2
2
79
109
102
0.26 (P = 0.61)
0.01 (P = 0.91)
0.32 (P = 0.57)
0
0
0
IFG/IGT (n)
1
1
1
139
174
75
3
4
3
145
365
220
2.70 (P = 0.26)
5.46 (P = 0.14)
1.13 (P = 0.57)
26
45
0
3
4
3
145
365
220
2.77 (P = 0.25)
3.40 (P = 0.33)
2.76 (P = 0.25)
28
12
28
4
4
4
277
365
332
5.72 (P = 0.13)
23.45 (P < 0.001)
34.68 (P < 0.001)
48
87
91
4
4
4
277
365
332
5.70 (P = 0.13)
19.29 (P < 0.001)
37.31 (P < 0.001)
47
84
92
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BMI, body mass index; C, cholesterol; CI, confidence interval; FAI, free androgen index; FG, FerrimanGallwey; HDL, high-density lipoprotein;
HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance index; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; LDL, low-density
lipoprotein; NA, not applicable; ob, obese; owt, overweight; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; RR, risk ratio; SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin.
obesity reviews
103
obesity reviews
(104), associated with increased FAI (102) and free testosterone (105) and dyslipidaemia (40,109,110), we are
unable to confirm these findings because there are no
available data for these outcomes. While there are many
mechanisms by which central adiposity could lead to hyperinsulinaemia and hyperandrogenism, high levels of insulin
and androgens could in turn promote central body fat
distribution (111,112). We also reported a lack of data for
all other outcomes, indicating the literature is limited with
regard to the effect of central obesity on reproductive,
metabolic and psychological outcomes in PCOS.
Conclusion
This systematic review reports an evaluation of the metabolic and reproductive effects of overweight, obesity and
central obesity in women with PCOS. We reported that
being overweight adversely affects many aspects of PCOS,
while being obese further worsens these outcomes. Further
studies are required to describe the effect of central obesity
on various outcomes of PCOS, and the effect of excess
weight on the psychological health of women with PCOS.
Research on the risks of metabolic, reproductive and psychological morbidities of PCOS across a wide range of
BMIs in women with PCOS is needed to identify the highest
2012 The Authors
obesity reviews 2012 International Association for the Study of Obesity
obesity reviews
risk groups to target strategies for the prevention and treatment of adiposity-associated morbidities.
References
1. Ruesten A, Steffen A, Floegel A et al. Trend in obesity prevalence in European adult cohort populations during follow-up since
1996 and their predictions to 2015. Plos ONE 2011; 6: e27455.
2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and
trends in obesity among US adults, 19992008. J Am Med Assoc
2010; 303: 235241.
3. Cameron AJ, Welborn TA, Zimmet PZ et al. Overweight and
obesity in Australia: the 19992000 Australian Diabetes, Obesity
and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Med J Aust 2003; 178: 427432.
4. Rich-Edwards JW, Goldman MB, Willett WC et al. Adolescent
body mass index and infertility caused by ovulatory disorder. Am
J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 171177.
5. Zawadzki JK, Dunaif A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary
syndrome; towards a rational approach. In: Dunaif A, Givens JR,
Haseltine F (eds). Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Blackwell Scientific:
Boston, MA, 1992, pp. 377384.
6. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Kouli CR, Bergiele AT et al. A survey
of the polycystic ovary syndrome in the Greek island of Lesbos:
hormonal and metabolic profile. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;
84: 40064011.
7. Knochenhauer ES, Key TJ, Kahsar-Miller M, Waggoner W,
Boots LR, Azziz R. Prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in
unselected black and white women of the southeastern United
States: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83:
30783082.
8. Asuncion M, Calvo RM, San Millan JL, Sancho J, Avila S,
Escobar-Morreale HF. A prospective study of the prevalence of the
polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected Caucasian women from
Spain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85: 24342438.
9. Azziz R, Woods KS, Reyna R, Key TJ, Knochenhauer ES, Yildiz
BO. The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syndrome
in an unselected population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89:
27452749.
10. March WA, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Phillips DI, Norman RJ,
Davies MJ. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a
community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria.
Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 544551.
11. Mehrabian F, Khani B, Kelishadi R, Ghanbari E. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in Iranian women based on
different diagnostic criteria. Endokrynol Pol 2011; 62: 238242.
12. Hudecova M, Holte J, Olovsson M, Larsson A, Berne C,
Sundstrom-Poromaa I. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in
women with a previous diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome:
long-term follow-up. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 12711274.
13. Moran LJ, Misso ML, Wild RA, Norman RJ. Impaired
glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome in
polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 347363.
14. Legro RS, Kunselman AR, Dodson WC, Dunaif A. Prevalence
and predictors of risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired
glucose tolerance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective,
controlled study in 254 affected women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1999; 84: 165169.
105
33. Himelein MJ, Thatcher SS. Depression and body image among
women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Health Psychol 2006;
11: 613625.
34. Barry JA, Kuczmierczyk AR, Hardiman PJ. Anxiety and
depression in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 24422451.
35. Weiner CL, Primeau M, Ehrmann DA. Androgens and mood
dysfunction in women: comparison of women with polycystic
ovarian syndrome to healthy controls. Psychosom Med 2004; 66:
356362.
36. Rasgon NL, Rao RC, Hwang S et al. Depression in women
with polycystic ovary syndrome: clinical and biochemical correlates. J Affect Disord 2003; 74: 299304.
37. Willett WC, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ et al. Weight, weight
change, and coronary heart disease in women. Risk within the
normal weight range. JAMA 1995; 273: 461465.
38. Rudra CB, Sorensen TK, Leisenring WM, Dashow E, Williams
MA. Weight characteristics and height in relation to risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165: 302308.
39. Campbell PJ, Gerich JE. Impact of obesity on insulin action in
volunteers with normal glucose tolerance: demonstration of a
threshold for the adverse effect of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1990; 70: 11141118.
40. Pasquali R, Casimirri F, Venturoli S et al. Body fat distribution
has weight-independent effects on clinical, hormonal, and metabolic features of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolism 1994; 43: 706713.
41. Pasquali R, Casimirri F, Cantobelli S et al. Insulin and androgen relationships with abdominal body fat distribution in women
with and without hyperandrogenism. Horm Res 1993; 39: 179
187.
42. Yucel A, Noyan V, Sagsoz N. The association of serum androgens and insulin resistance with fat distribution in polycystic ovary
syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 126: 81
86.
43. Kalra P, Bansal B, Nag P et al. Abdominal fat distribution and
insulin resistance in Indian women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Fertil Steril 2009; 91 (4 Suppl.): 14371440.
44. Bernasconi D, Del Monte P, Meozzi M et al. The impact of
obesity on hormonal parameters in hirsute and nonhirsute women.
Metabolism 1996; 45: 7275.
45. Broekmans FJ, Knauff EAH, Valkenburg O, Laven JS, Eijkemans MJ, Fauser BCJM. PCOS according to the Rotterdam consensus criteria: change in prevalence among WHO-II anovulation
and association with metabolic factors. BJOG 2006; 113: 1210
1217.
46. World Health Organisation, International Association for
the Study of Obesity, International Obesity TaskForce. The
Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment.
Melbourne: Health Communications, Australia Pty Ltd, 2000.
47. Barlow SE. Expert committee recommendations regarding the
prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent
overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics 2007; 120
(Suppl. 4): S164S192.
48. World Health Organisation. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Report of a
WHO Consultation, 1999.
49. Wells GA, Shea B, OConnell D et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa
Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies
in meta-analyses. [WWW document]. URL http://www.ohri.ca/
programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed September
2010).
50. Cupisti S, Dittrich R, Binder H, Beckmann MW, Mueller A.
Evaluation of biochemical hyperandrogenemia and body mass
obesity reviews
obesity reviews
107
86. Weyer C, Tataranni PA, Bogardus C, Pratley RE. Insulin resistance and insulin secretory dysfunction are independent predictors
of worsening of glucose tolerance during each stage of type 2
diabetes development. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 8994.
87. Lundgren H, Bengtsson C, Blohme G, Lapidus L, Waldenstrom J. Fasting serum insulin concentration and early insulin
response as risk determinants for developing diabetes. Diabet Med
1990; 7: 407413.
88. Haffner SM, Stern MP, Mitchell BD, Hazuda HP, Patterson
JK. Incidence of type II diabetes in Mexican Americans predicted
by fasting insulin and glucose levels, obesity, and body-fat distribution. Diabetes 1990; 39: 283288.
89. Lillioja S, Mott DM, Spraul M et al. Insulin resistance and
insulin secretory dysfunction as precursors of non-insulindependent diabetes mellitus. Prospective studies of Pima Indians.
N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 19881992.
90. Wild RA, Rizzo M, Clifton S, Carmina E. Lipid levels in
polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 10731079.
91. Rosenzweig JL, Ferrannini E, Grundy SM et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in patients at
metabolic risk: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 36713689.
92. Legro RS, Kunselman AR, Dunaif A. Prevalence and predictors of dyslipidemia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Am J Med 2001; 111: 607613.
93. Demirel F, Bideci A, Cinaz P et al. Serum leptin, oxidized low
density lipoprotein and plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine levels
and their relationship with dyslipidaemia in adolescent girls with
polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007; 67: 129
134.
94. Erel CT, Senturk LM, Kaleli S, Gezer A, Baysal B, Tasan E. Is
serum leptin level regulated by thyroid functions, lipid metabolism
and insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome? Gynecol
Endocrinol 2003; 17: 223229.
95. Ashton WD, Nanchahal K, Wood DA. Body mass index and
metabolic risk factors for coronary heart disease in women. Eur
Heart J 2001; 22: 4655.
96. Robins SJ, Lyass A, Zachariah JP, Massaro JM, Vasan RS.
Insulin resistance and the relationship of a dyslipidemia to coronary heart disease: the Framingham Heart Study. Arterioscler
Thromb Vasc Biol 2011; 31: 12081214.
97. Robinson S, Henderson AD, Gelding SV et al. Dyslipidaemia
is associated with insulin resistance in women with polycystic
ovaries. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1996; 44: 277284.
98. Slowinska-Srzednicka J, Zgliczynski S, Wierzbicki M et al.
The role of hyperinsulinemia in the development of lipid disturbances in nonobese and obese women with the polycystic ovary
syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest 1991; 14: 569575.
99. Castelo-Branco C, Steinvarcel F, Osorio A, Ros C, Balasch J.
Atherogenic metabolic profile in PCOS patients: role of obesity
and hyperandrogenism. Gynecol Endocrinol 2010; 26: 736
742.
100. Essah PA, Nestler JE, Carmina E. Differences in dyslipidemia
between American and Italian women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest 2008; 31: 3541.
101. Carmina E, Bucchieri S, Mansueto P, Rini G, Ferin M, Lobo
RA. Circulating levels of adipose products and differences in fat
distribution in the ovulatory and anovulatory phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2009; 91 (4 Suppl.): 1332
1335.
102. Cosar E, Ucok K, Akgun L et al. Body fat composition and
distribution in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol
Endocrinol 2008; 24: 428432.
obesity reviews
obesity reviews
109
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the
online version of this article:
Figure S1. Funnel plot for studies on SHBG.
Figure S2. Funnel plot for studies on testosterone.
Table S1. MeSH terms.
Table S2. Description of included studies.